Association between method of pelvic organ prolapse repair involving the vaginal apex and re-operation: a population-based, retrospective cohort study

Review of Vaginal Approaches to Apical Prolapse Repair

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent literature and provide up-to-date knowledge on new and important findings in vaginal approaches to apical prolapse surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Overall prolapse recurrence rates following transvaginal apical prolapse repair range from 13.7 to 70.3% in medium- to long-term follow-up, while reoperation rates for prolapse recurrence are lower, ranging from 1 to 35%. Subjective prolapse symptoms remain improved despite increasing anatomic failure rates over time. The majority of studies demonstrated improvement in prolapse-related symptoms and quality of life in over 80% of patients 2-3 years after transvaginal repair, with similar outcomes with and without uterine preservation. Contemporary studies continue to demonstrate the safety of transvaginal native tissue repair with most adverse events occurring within the first 2 years. Transvaginal apical prolapse repair is safe and effective. It is associated with long-term improvement in prolapse-related symptoms and quality of life despite increasing rates of prolapse recurrence over time. Subjective outcomes do not correlate with anatomic outcomes.

Visualization of implanted mesh in the pelvic reconstructive surgery using an X-ray-detectable thread

PURPOSE

Visualization of the implanted mesh after a pelvic floor repair surgery is important for evaluating mesh-related complications. We made an X-ray-detectable mesh and studied the histocompatibility and toxicity of it.

METHODS

A thin barium sulfate thread was weaved on a traditional polypropylene mesh to make it X-ray detectable. The cytotoxicity of the mesh was tested by the MTT assay on L929 cell line. The histocompatibility and toxicity of mesh were evaluated in rabbits. Meshes were first implanted intraperitoneally. On postoperative day 7, bloods were tested to estimate the acute toxicity of meshes. After 6 months, rabbits were sacrificed and local inflammatory reaction and tissue regeneration at implantation sites were estimated by the HE stain and Masson stain. In addition, CT scans were performed after surgeries to display the location and shape of implanted meshes.

RESULTS

Compared to the polypropylene mesh group, no significant difference was observed in the X-ray-detectable mesh group on both in vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo acute and chronic toxicity. The amounts of extra cellular matrix between two groups did not differ. Through CT scan and 3D remodeling, the barium sulfate thread clearly revealed the position and shape of the X-ray-detectable mesh, whereas the traditional mesh was invisible under CT scan.

CONCLUSION

Adding a thin barium sulfate thread on the polypropylene mesh does not change its histocompatibility or toxicity in rabbit model. The barium sulfate thread can effectively show the location and shape of implanted mesh under CT scan.

Complications of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in the 2015 Finnish Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery Survey Study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the major complications of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in Finland.

METHODS

The Finnish Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery Survey 2015 study is a prospective cohort of POP surgeries performed in Finland in 2015. Perioperative, postoperative, and late complications during 1 year of follow-up were compared among native tissue repair, transvaginal mesh, and abdominal mesh surgery. Major complications were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo grading system. Predictive factors for major complications were studied with logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Within 1 year after POP surgery, 396 (11.2%) of 3,515 women had at least one complication: 10.9% after native tissue, 11.7% after transvaginal mesh, and 13.5% after abdominal mesh repair. The majority of complications occurred within 2 months after surgery and postoperative infection (4.3%) and bleeding or hematoma (2.6%) were the most frequent. The incidence of organ injuries was low. Mesh-augmented surgery was associated with significantly higher rates of bladder and bowel injuries than native tissue surgery. Complication-related reoperations occurred significantly more often after abdominal mesh repair than native tissue surgery (5.2% vs 1.8%, P=.001). Mesh-related complications were diagnosed more often after transvaginal mesh repair. The overall rate of major complications (Clavien-Dindo grades III-V) was 3.3%. Abdominal mesh surgery was associated with the highest rate of major adverse events (8.8% vs native tissue repair 2.6% and transvaginal mesh 4.9%). The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade IV or V complications was rare (less than 0.6%). Mesh surgery (transvaginal mesh adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.23, 95% CI 1.31-3.80, and abdominal mesh aOR 3.02, 95% CI 1.67-5.46), longer operating time (aOR 2.84, 95% CI 1.78-4.53), prior POP surgery (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.00-2.81) and difficult surgery (aOR 2.75, 95% CI 1.63-4.62) were associated with an increased risk for occurrence of major complications.

CONCLUSION

Serious adverse events were rare regardless of the operative approach. However, mesh-augmented surgery was associated with higher risk for major complications.

Revisiting current treatment options for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a contemporary literature review

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affect many women in their lifetime. In this review, we describe and evaluate the latest treatment options for SUI and POP, including the controversy around transvaginal mesh (TVM) use. Growing evidence supports the utilization of pelvic floor muscle training as first-line treatment for both SUI and POP. Vaginal pessaries continue to be an effective and reversible option to manage SUI and POP symptoms. The midurethral sling remains the gold standard for surgical treatment of SUI, although patients and clinicians should acknowledge the potentially serious complications of TVM. Burch urethropexy and pubovaginal sling offer good SUI cure and may be preferred in women wishing to avoid mesh implants; however, their operative morbidities and more challenging surgical approach may limit their use. Site-specific cystocele or rectocele repairs may be indicated for isolated anterior or posterior vaginal compartment prolapse; however, in women with more severe POP, evidence supports using a vaginal native-tissue repair involving apical suspension as the primary surgical technique. Although abdominal and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexies are both effective in treating POP, their failure and mesh complication rates increase with time. There is insufficient evidence to support the widespread use of uterine-preserving surgical POP repairs at present due to the lack of long-term data. Routine TVM use is not recommended in POP surgeries and should only be considered on a case-by-case basis by trained surgeons, primarily in women with multiple risk factors for POP recurrence. In general, clinicians should individualize SUI and POP treatment options for women based on their symptoms, comorbidities, and risk factors for mesh-related complications.