Robot-assisted vesicovaginal fistula repair via a transvesical approach

Robotic surgery in gynaecology: Scientific Impact Paper No. 71 (July 2022)

The use of robotic-assisted keyhole surgery in gynaecology has expanded in recent years owing to technical advances. These include 3D viewing leading to improved depth perception, limitation of tremor, potential for greater precision and discrimination of tissues, a shorter learning curve and improved comfort for surgeons compared with conventional keyhole and open abdominal surgery. Robotic-assisted keyhole surgery, compared with conventional keyhole surgery, improves surgical performance without increasing operating time, minimises blood loss and intra- or postoperative complications, while reducing the need to revert to abdominal surgery. Moreover, surgeons using a robot experience fewer skeletomuscular problems of their own in the short and long term than those operating without a robot as an additional tool. This Scientific Impact Paper looks at the use of a robot in different fields of gynaecological surgery. A robot could be considered safe and a more effective surgical tool than conventional keyhole surgery for women who have to undergo complex gynaecology surgery or have associated medical issues such as body-mass index (BMI) at 30 kg/m² or above or lung problems. The introduction of the use of robots in keyhole surgery has resulted in a decrease in the number of traditional open surgeries and the risk of conversion to open surgery after traditional keyhole surgery; both of which should be considered when examining the cost-benefit of using a robot. Limitations of robotic-assisted surgery remain the associated higher costs. In womb cancer surgery there is good evidence that introducing robotics into the service improves outcomes for women and may reduce costs.

Laparoscopic repair of female genitourinary fistulae: 10-year single-center experience

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Laparoscopic repair of different female genitourinary fistulae has been recently reported, including both conventional and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). We present our 10-year single-center experience of the laparoscopic repair of different types of female genitourinary fistulae.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of our records over the last 10 years was performed. Type of fistula, etiology, laparoscopic approach, operative data, postoperative outcome, and follow-up were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, 46 patients with laparoscopic repair of genitourinary fistulae were reported: 25 had vesicovaginal fistulae (VVF), 14 had vesicouterine fistulae (VUF), and 7 had ureterovaginal fistulae (UVF). Thirty-three patients had conventional laparoscopic repair, whereas 7 VVF and 6 VUF had LESS repair. In all patients with VVF and VUF, extravesical repair was carried out by excising the fistulous tract and closing both the bladder and the vagina or the uterus with interposing tissue in-between. In patients with UVF, extravesical ureteric re-implantation was performed. Mean operative time was 176 ± 25 min. Mean blood loss was 105 ± 25 cc. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. None was converted to open surgery. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.2 ± 1.2 days. After a mean follow-up of 6.3 ± 3.1 years, all patients had undergone successful repair, except for one patient with complex VVF.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic repair of VVF, VUF, and UVF is a feasible procedure with a high success rate and low morbidity. LESS repair of VVF and VUF has a comparable success rate to conventional laparoscopy, but with a shorter hospital stay and fewer analgesic requirements.