A laparoscopic technique for excision of retropubic midurethral sling arms eroding into the bladder

Should endoscopic laser excision be offered as the first-line management for patients with eroded mesh? Outcomes of a systematic review of literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mesh erosions following previous synthetic sling/mesh surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) have become increasingly common. This systematic review provides evidence for the role of laser excision as a first-line management in patients with eroded mesh.

RECENT FINDINGS

Fourteen articles (173 patients) were included for the final review. Among these, 138 patients (79.8%) were submitted to trans-urethral laser excision of eroded urethral/bladder mesh over a median time to presentation of 36.6 months. Over a median follow-up of 23.6 months, 88 (63.7%) reported a complete resolution, 32 (23.2%) reported persistence or recurrence of SUI and 17 (12.3%) presented with recurrent mesh erosion. The success rate after a single endoscopic procedure was 66.5, vs. 93.5% after additional endoscopic procedures, with only 9 (6.6%) requiring open surgical excision. Overall, there were seven (5.1%) postoperative complications including two urethrovaginal fistulas, two UTIs and haematuria each, and one case of urethral diverticulum.

SUMMARY

Laser excision of eroded mid-urethral slings into either the bladder or urethra is a challenging complication of minimally invasive incontinence surgery. Laser excision was able to achieve a good success rate with single or staged endoscopic procedure with a low risk of complication. It represents a valid first treatment option, although patients should be managed in mesh referral centres in collaboration with uro-gynaecology teams.

Laparoscopic removal of intravesically inserted transobturator tape

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this video is to provide a step-by-step description of our approach to the surgical management of intravesically localized transobturator tape after previous failure of repeated cystoscopic tape resection.

METHODS

This video presents a patient with tape erosion to the urinary bladder after repeated cystoscopic tape resection, recurrent stone formation, and repeated lithotripsy, with recurrent urinary tract infections and overactive bladder (OAB) with urgency incontinence.

RESULTS

During the laparoscopy procedure tape was identified in the left obturator muscle, cut near the obturator muscle, and dissected up to the bladder wall. Afterward, a vertical 2-cm incision was made in the bladder wall, the stone was removed, and the rest of the tape was dissected from the bladder wall. A two-layer suture of the bladder wall was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful. In follow-up visits 3 and 6 months after surgery the patient was continent with no symptoms of OAB.

CONCLUSIONS

Cystoscopic resection of protruded mesh is inadequate in many cases. In such cases the mesh should be removed from the urinary bladder wall completely. Laparoscopy allows minimally invasive complete removal of the tape, combining resection of the extravesical and intravesical parts of the tape.

Delayed presentation of mons pubis abscess formation following MUS-case report and surgical video

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has relatively low complication rates. However, although rare, complications such as bladder wall, prepubic and thigh abscess occur. We present an unusual case of MUS vaginal mesh exposure followed by mons pubis abscess formation occurring 18 years postoperatively because of inadvertent prepubic insertion of the right arm. Our objectives were to raise awareness about such a rare complication and to describe the approach for sling removal.

METHODS

A 75-year-old woman presented with gradual swelling on the mons pubis followed by pain with a past history of MUS insertion. Examination revealed a palpable, tender, non-fluctuant mass, extending about 10-15 cm from mons pubis to the right labia. There was a 2 × 2-cm vaginal mesh exposure. Following imaging, an examination under anaesthesia was performed with vaginal exploration and complete removal of the right arm of the MUS and closure of the vagina.

RESULTS

Six months postoperatively, all surgical sites had healed well, and there was no recurrent SUI or persistent mesh exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Unusual long-term complications of MUS should be considered and recognized. Thorough evaluation is crucial for informed decision-making related to treatment strategies. The vaginal approach to mesh removal is safe and should be practised by experienced surgeons. Patients should be informed regarding the possibility of incontinence after sling removal.