Effect of investigative laparoscopy on bladder pain syndrome: a prospective cohort trial

Impact of chronic pelvic pain and painful bladder syndrome on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index on women with deep endometriosis: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Painful bladder syndrome (PBS) is frequently associated with deep endometriosis (DE), and both conditions cause chronic pelvic pain (CPP), which often impairs sleep quality. This study was aimed at analyzing the impact of CPP plus PBS in women with DE on the global sleep quality index using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and subsequently examine each sleep dimension.

METHODS

One hundred and forty women with DE were included and answered the PSQI and the O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptoms and Problem Index questionnaires with or without CPP. Women were categorized into good or poor sleepers using the PSQI cutoff; subsequently, a linear regression model was used to analyze the PSQI score and a logistic regression model for each questionnaire's sleep component.

RESULTS

Only 13% of women with DE had a good sleep. Approximately 20% of those with DE but no/mild pain were good sleepers; 138 women with DE (88.5%), 94% with PBS, and 90.5% with moderate/severe pain were poor sleepers. For PSQI components, CPP worsened the subjective sleep quality by more than threefold (p = 0.019), increased sleep disturbances by nearly sixfold (p = 0.03), and decreased the sleep duration by practically sevenfold (p = 0.019). Furthermore, PBS increased sleep disturbances by nearly fivefold (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of PBS to CPP in women with DE is devastating for overall sleep quality, probably because it impacts some sleep dimensions unaffected by CPP and amplifies the problem in those already affected by pain.

Peripheral, Central, and Cross Sensitization in Endometriosis-Associated Pain and Comorbid Pain Syndromes

Endometriosis-associated pain and the mechanisms responsible for its initiation and persistence are complex and difficult to treat. Endometriosis-associated pain is experienced as dysmenorrhea, cyclical pain related to organ function including dysuria, dyschezia and dyspareunia, and persistent pelvic pain. Pain symptomatology correlates poorly with the extent of macroscopic disease. In addition to the local effects of disease, endometriosis-associated pain develops as a product of peripheral sensitization, central sensitization and cross sensitization. Endometriosis-associated pain is further contributed to by comorbid pain conditions, such as bladder pain syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, abdomino-pelvic myalgia and vulvodynia. This article will review endometriosis-associated pain, its mechanisms, and its comorbid pain syndromes with a view to aiding the clinician in navigating the literature and terminology of pain and pain syndromes. Limitations of our current understanding of endometriosis-associated pain will be acknowledged. Where possible, commonalities in pain mechanisms between endometriosis-associated pain and comorbid pain syndromes will be highlighted.

Optimising the management of bladder pain syndrome

Objective:

Clinicians have shown variable practice in the diagnosis and management of bladder pain syndrome (BPS). This study assessed pain localisation sites, common co-morbidities, investigations and treatment patterns in clinical practice.

Patients and methods:

We performed a retrospective analysis of 412 patients attending our pelvic pain clinic between 2004 and 2016. Frequency counts were used to summarise findings.

Results:

Pain in women ( N=388) was localised to the lower abdomen (92.0%), lower back (71.1%) and vagina (60.8%). Men ( N=24) typically presented with testicular pain with painful ejaculation (70.8%). Nearly all (95.4%) patients reported sexual dysfunction. Visceral neuropathic pain and autoimmune co-morbidities, such as irritable bowel syndrome, chronic headaches or migraines and skin lesions, were more prevalent in our cohort than in the general population. All patients had urine culture and sensitivities and flexible cystoscopy. Laparoscopy, urodynamic studies and bladder biopsies were mostly normal, but were essential in excluding other pathologies. Good pain control was achieved on amitriptyline (83.0%). Hydro-distension and benign bladder ulcer cauterisation provided temporary symptomatic relief.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates that patient expectation management and education is essential in BPS, with most achieving good pain control with conservative measures and amitriptyline. Those receiving intravesical treatments will most likely require subsequent revisions.

Level of evidence:

Not applicable for this single-centre audit.