Is robotic-assisted sacrocolpo(hystero)pexy safe and effective in women over 65 years of age?

The effect of advanced age on peri- and post-operative complications following pelvic floor repair surgeries

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether advanced age is a risk factor for complications following pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair surgeries using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 260 women who had undergone POP repair surgery at the Soroka University Medical Center (SUMC) between the years 2014-2019 were included. A univariate analysis was conducted to compare the demographical, clinical, obstetrical and operative characteristics of patients by age group (younger or older than 70 years). We performed a similar analysis to assess for the possible association between several variables and post-operative complications. Variables that were found to be associated with post-operative complications (P < 0.2) were included in a multivariate analysis along with advanced age.

RESULTS

During the 12 months follow-up period, more than half of the women had experienced at least one post-operative complication. Minor complications (grades 1-2 according to the Clavian-Dindo classification system) were the most common. One woman had died during the follow-up period, and none had experienced organ failure (grade 4). Hysterectomy, as part of POP surgery, was found to be significantly associated with post-operative complications. Additionally, grandmultiparity (> 5 births) showed a tendency towards an increased risk for post-operative complications, however this reached only borderline significance. We found no association between advanced age and post-operative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

POP repair surgeries are safe for women of all ages. Major complications (grades 3-5) are rare in all age groups. Although advanced age was associated with a higher prevalence of comorbidity and a higher grade of prolapse, no significant difference in the post-operative complications was found between age groups. Concomitant hysterectomy at the time of POP repair surgery is a risk factor for post-operative complications.

Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy for right renal pelvic tumor post sacrocolpopexy with mesh: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma has been increasingly performed as a minimally invasive procedure recently. However, there are concerns regarding its adoption in highly complex cases with dense adhesions.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

An 86-year-old woman presented to our hospital with gross hematuria one year after having undergone robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy using a mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Cystoscopy revealed hematuria from the right ureteral orifice. Computed tomography suggested right hydronephrosis; retrograde pyelography showed a defect in the right renal pelvis with class V urine cytology of the urine from the right kidney. Based on these findings, a right renal pelvic tumor was diagnosed, and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy was performed. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 7 without complications.

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report in which robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy was performed after robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy with a mesh. Dense tissue adhesions are encountered not only between the bladder and the anterior vaginal wall but also around the right ureter in the pelvis. In this case, dense adhesions were confirmed around the right ureter in the pelvis.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy may be considered an option for minimally invasive surgery in cases with a history of pelvic organ prolapse surgery using mesh.

Evaluation of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy videos on YouTube

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality and reliability of videos on YouTube about robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy.

METHODS

YouTube's search function was used to find videos associated with robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. On June 1, 2022, systematic research was performed using the term "robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy". The first 50 videos were included in the study. The quality of the videos was evaluated using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) [a 5-point scale: high quality (4 or 5), acceptable quality (3), low quality (1 or 2)]. The modified DISCERN scale was used to evaluate the reliability of the videos [a 5-point scale: high reliability (5), moderate reliability (3 and 4), low reliability (1 or 2)].

RESULTS

A total of 50 videos associated with robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy were analyzed. The most frequently discussed topics in the videos were the duration of the surgery (72%), the anatomical success rates (70%), the advantages and disadvantages of the procedure compared to the classical methods (68%), and the postoperative complications (60%). The mean GQS of the videos was 3.04 ± 0.75. The mean DISCERN score of the videos was 2.21 ± 1. No appropriate references were cited in any of the videos. There was no video that received a full score (5 points) from DISCERN.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that the level of quality in YouTube videos associated with robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy is at an acceptable and high level, but its reliability is low. Therefore, short and concise videos that contain accurate information and refer to scientific facts should be prepared by urogynecology associations.

Robotic sacrocolpopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: a review of current literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recently, robotic sacrocolpopexy has become the gold standard for treating genital prolapse. Despite this, there is still much interest in this procedure, and many questions remain unanswered. This review focuses on the most critical articles on this issue that have been published in the last 2 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

A summary of 23 articles is provided. There were no differences in total postoperative complications, postoperative stress incontinence, mesh erosion, and the success of the two surgical techniques in long-term investigations. Obesity modestly increases robotic approach difficulty and does not raise the mesh erosion rate or prolapse recurrence rate. Ultra-light and preprepared meshes with alternative fixation techniques can be applied with these procedures. Another emerging trend is alternative robotic approaches and the use of single-port surgery.

SUMMARY

For women with pelvic organ prolapse, especially the elderly and obese, robotic sacrocolpopexy is well tolerated and effective. Despite highly restricted and heterogeneous data, recent investigations have included single incision methods and new mesh/fixation materials. Randomized trials with large sample size and excellent quality are necessary before the practical implementation of new techniques.