1
|
Mou T, Shinnick J, DeAndrade S, Roselli N, Andebrhan S, Akanbi T, Ackenbom M, Carter-Brooks C, Beestrum M, Cichowski S, Brown O. Disparities Research for Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Systematic Review and Critique of Literature. UROGYNECOLOGY (PHILADELPHIA, PA.) 2024; 30:758-764. [PMID: 38465998 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Understanding the status of pelvic floor disorder (PFD) disparities research will allow the opportunity to advance future pelvic floor equity efforts. OBJECTIVES The aims of the study were to (1) characterize the landscape of PFD disparities literature using the 3 phases of disparities research framework, (2) describe the characteristics of PFD disparities studies, and (3) identify critical knowledge gaps. STUDY DESIGN We performed a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications addressing disparities in PFDs among U.S. populations from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, or the Cochrane Database indexed between 1997 and 2022. Using the triphasic framework for advancing health disparities research by Kilbourne et al ( Am J Public Health . 2006;96(12):2113-21), we categorized the included studies into the detecting phase (identifies and measures disparities in historically marginalized populations), understanding phase (establishes disparity determinants), or reducing phase (conducts interventions to alleviate inequities). All screening, coding, and quality reviews were independently performed by at least 2 authors. We used descriptive analysis and the χ 2 test for comparisons. RESULTS The initial search identified 10,178 studies, of which 123 were included. Of the included studies, 98 (79.7%), 22 (17.9%), and 3 (2.4%) studies were detecting, understanding, and reducing phase research, respectively. The most common disparity category investigated was race and ethnicity (104 studies), and one third of these studies attributed drivers of racial and ethnic differences to structural influences. Publications of detecting phase studies outpaced the growth of understanding and reducing phase research. CONCLUSIONS Most PFD disparities research focused on identifying historically marginalized populations with inadequate progression to understanding and reducing phases. We recommend progressing PFD disparities research beyond the detecting phase to advance health equity in PFD care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung Mou
- From the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Julia Shinnick
- Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - Samantha DeAndrade
- Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Harbor UCLA, Torrance, CA
| | - Nicole Roselli
- Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Bellevue Hospital/NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Sarah Andebrhan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Tracey Akanbi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Mary Ackenbom
- Magee-Women's Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Molly Beestrum
- Research and Information Services, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Sara Cichowski
- Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Oluwateniola Brown
- Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alagh A, Ramm O, Lyon LL, Ritterman Weintraub ML, Shatkin-Margolis A. Implication of Neighborhood Deprivation Index on Pelvic Organ Prolapse Management. UROGYNECOLOGY (PHILADELPHIA, PA.) 2024:02273501-990000000-00183. [PMID: 38465980 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Differences in the rate of diagnosis of POP have been described based on race and ethnicity; however, there are few data available on the management and treatment patterns of POP based on multiple factors of socioeconomic status and deprivation. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to investigate the association between pelvic organ prolapse (POP) management and the Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI), a standardized multidimensional measure of socioeconomic status. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included female members of a large integrated health care delivery system who were 18 years or older and had ≥4 years of continuous health care membership from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. Demographic, POP diagnosis, urogynecology consultation, and surgical treatment of POP were obtained from the electronic medical record. Neighborhood Deprivation Index data were extrapolated via zip code and were reported in quartiles, with higher quartiles reflecting greater deprivation. Descriptive, bivariate, and logistic regression analyses were conducted by NDI. RESULTS Of 1,087,567 patients identified, 34,890 (3.2%) had a POP diagnosis. Q1, the least deprived group, had the highest prevalence of POP (26.3%). Most patients with POP identified as White (57.3%) and represented approximately a third of Q1. Black patients had the lowest rate of POP (5.8%) and comprised almost half of Q4, the most deprived quartile. A total of 13,730 patients (39.4%) had a urogynecology consultation, with rates ranging from 23.6% to 26.4% (P < 0.01). Less than half (12.8%) of patients with POP underwent surgical treatment, and the relative frequencies of procedure types were similar across NDI quartiles except for obliterative procedures (P = 0.01). When controlling for age, no clinically significant difference was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS Differences in urogynecology consultation, surgical treatment, and surgical procedure type performed for prolapse across NDI quartiles were not found to be clinically significant. Our findings suggest that equitable evaluation and treatment of prolapse can occur through a membership-based integrated health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Alagh
- From the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Oakland, Kaiser Permanente East Bay-University of California San Francisco Urogynecology Fellowship Training Program
| | - Olga Ramm
- Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California San Francisco, Kaiser Permanente East Bay-University of California San Francisco Urogynecology Fellowship Training Program
| | - Liisa L Lyon
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | | | - Abigail Shatkin-Margolis
- Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California San Francisco, Kaiser Permanente East Bay-University of California San Francisco Urogynecology Fellowship Training Program
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
St Martin B, Markowitz MA, Myers ER, Lundsberg LS, Ringel N. Estimated National Cost of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 143:419-427. [PMID: 38128098 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the national cost of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in the United States. METHODS In this cross-sectional, population-based study, we used the 2016-2018 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Samples and National Ambulatory Surgery Samples to identify patients undergoing POP surgery using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes, ICD-10 procedural codes, and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Cost-to-charge ratios and weighted estimates were used to calculate nationwide costs. Descriptive analysis was used to identify the sociodemographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics of the population undergoing POP surgery. RESULTS Between 2016 and 2018, there were 140,762 POP surgical cases annually with an annual national cost estimated at $1.523 billion per year. The median cost per procedure increased slightly from $8,837 in 2016 to $8,958 in 2018. Overall, 82.5% of the total surgeries and 78% of the total national costs associated with POP surgery came from the ambulatory setting over this time period. Of these surgeries, 44.7% included an apical repair, and 42.3% included a concomitant hysterectomy. The average age of the population was 62 years, and 20% of the total population receiving prolapse surgery were younger than age 50 years. CONCLUSION The annual national cost associated with surgical correction of POP is substantial, and the majority of cases occur in an ambulatory setting. These findings will contribute to enhancing cost-effectiveness analyses and decision-making processes for both health care professionals and policymakers as the national population continues to age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brad St Martin
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pfeuti CK, Madsen A, Habermann E, Glasgow A, Occhino JA. Postoperative Complications After Sling Operations for Incontinence: Is Race a Factor? UROGYNECOLOGY (PHILADELPHIA, PA.) 2024; 30:197-204. [PMID: 38484232 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Racial and ethnic disparities exist in urogynecologic surgery; however, literature identifying specific disparities after sling operations for stress incontinence are limited. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate racial and ethnic disparities in surgical complications within 30 days of midurethral sling operations. STUDY DESIGN This retrospective cohort study identified women who underwent an isolated midurethral sling operation between 2014 and 2021 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Women were stratified by racial and ethnic category to assess the primary outcome, 30-day surgical complications, and the secondary outcome, comparison of urinary tract infections (UTIs). RESULTS There were 20,066 patients included. Mean age and body mass index were 53.9 years and 30.8, respectively. More Black or African American women had diabetes and hypertension, and more American Indian or Alaska Native women used tobacco. The only difference in 30-day complications was stroke/cerebrovascular accident, which occurred in only 1 Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander patient (0.1%, P < 0.0001). The most frequent complication was UTI (3.3%). Black or African American women were significantly less likely to have a diagnosis of UTI than non-Hispanic White (P = 0.04), Hispanic White (P = 0.03), and American Indian or Alaska Native women (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Surgical complications within 30 days of sling operations are rare. No clinically significant racial and ethnic differences in serious complications were observed. Urinary tract infection diagnoses were lower among Black or African American women than in non-Hispanic White, Hispanic White, and American Indian or Alaska Native women despite a greater comorbidity burden. No known biologic reason exists to explain lower UTI rates in this population; therefore, this finding may represent a disparity in diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Annetta Madsen
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Amy Glasgow
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, Rochester, MN
| | - John A Occhino
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carter-Brooks CM, Brown OE, Ackenbom MF. Pelvic Floor Disorders in Black Women: Prevalence, Clinical Care, and a Strategic Agenda to Prioritize Care. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2024; 51:157-179. [PMID: 38267125 PMCID: PMC11093648 DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2023.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Pelvic floor disorders are a group of common conditions affecting women of all racial and ethnic groups. These disorders are undertreated in all women, but this is especially magnified in Black people who have been historically marginalized in the United States. This article seeks to highlight the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in Black women, evaluate the clinical care they receive, examine barriers they face to equitable care, and present a strategic agenda to prioritize the care of Black women with pelvic floor disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charelle M Carter-Brooks
- The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2150 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 6A- 416, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
| | - Oluwateniola E Brown
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 250 East Superior Avenue Suite 05-2113, Chicago, IL 60601, USA
| | - Mary F Ackenbom
- Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, 3240 Craft Place, Suite 226, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Downing P, Dong SM, Ardizzone MA, Lynch CD, Hickman LC. Association of Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status With Prolapse Management Decision. UROGYNECOLOGY (PHILADELPHIA, PA.) 2024; 30:345-351. [PMID: 38484252 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE This study identifies how neighborhood-level socioeconomic status (SES) may affect patients' treatment decisions for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the association of neighborhood-level SES with the decision of surgical versus conservative POP management. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study of patients newly diagnosed with POP at a tertiary medical center between 2015 and 2021. Patients lost to follow-up or poor surgical candidates were excluded. Patient characteristics, demographics, and treatment selection were abstracted from the electronic health record. Conservative management was defined as expectant, pessary, and/or pelvic floor physical therapy. Five-digit zip codes were linked to the Area Deprivation Index and used as a surrogate for neighborhood-level SES. Area Deprivation Indices were dichotomized at or below the sample median (less disadvantaged area) and above the sample median (more disadvantaged area). Logistic regression models estimated the odds of choosing surgical versus conservative management as a function of the Area Deprivation Index. RESULTS A total of 459 patients met the eligibility criteria (non-Hispanic White, 88.2%). The median age was 63 years (interquartile range, 52-70 years), and the majority had stage 2 POP (65.7%). Of all patients, 59.3% had Medicare/Medicaid, 39.9% were privately insured, and 0.9% were uninsured. Furthermore, 74.7% selected surgical management, and 25.3% chose conservative management. Increasing age and higher Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System stage were significantly associated with selecting surgery (P = 0.01). Women residing in a more disadvantaged area had a 67% increased odds of choosing surgical over conservative management (adjusted odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.64) after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System stage. CONCLUSIONS Residing in a more disadvantaged zip code was associated with 67% increased odds of choosing surgical versus conservative POP management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Perrin Downing
- From the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Shirley M Dong
- From the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Courtney D Lynch
- Obstetrics and Gynecology and Epidemiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Lisa C Hickman
- From the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Disparities in Benign Gynecologic Surgical Care. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2023; 66:124-131. [PMID: 36657049 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
A person's health is not only affected by their disease states, but also the quality of care and posttreatment sequelae. Research shows that disparities exist in benign gynecologic surgery access to care, techniques, and perioperative outcomes. Surgical education, pathways that emphasize minimally invasive approaches, and patient-centered care that recognizes historical influences on patient perspectives are critical to dampening these disparities.
Collapse
|
8
|
Mou T, Nelson L, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Brown O. Opportunities to Advance Postpartum Pelvic Floor Care With a Health Equity-based Conceptual Framework. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2023; 66:86-94. [PMID: 36657047 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
An essential part of postpartum care includes the evaluation and treatment of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). Postpartum PFDs are common and occur in over 40% of postpartum women. Despite significant advancements in urogynecology to understand postpartum PFDs and their treatments, there has been a lack of attention to addressing equity in postpartum pelvic floor care. In this article, we address the current scientific understanding of postpartum PFDs while adapting a health equity-based conceptual framework to highlight areas of opportunity in optimizing postpartum pelvic floor care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung Mou
- Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Christina Lewicky-Gaupp
- Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Oluwateniola Brown
- Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Diversity in Pelvic Floor Disorders Research: A Matter of Equity and Inclusion. UROGYNECOLOGY (HAGERSTOWN, MD.) 2023; 29:1-4. [PMID: 36548100 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
10
|
Gurayah AA, Mason MM, Grewal MR, Nackeeran S, Martin LE, Wallace SL, Amin K, Syan R. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in cost and postoperative complications following sacrocolpopexy in a US National Inpatient Database. World J Urol 2023; 41:189-196. [PMID: 36515723 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04226-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to determine the association between socioeconomic factors, procedural costs, and postoperative complications among patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy. METHODS The 2016-2017 US National Inpatient Sample from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was used to identify females > 18 years of age with an ICD10 diagnosis code of apical prolapse who received open or laparoscopic/robotic sacrocolpopexy. We analyzed relationships between socioeconomic factors, procedural costs, and postoperative complications in these patients. Multivariate logistic and linear regressions were used to identify variables associated with increased complications and costs, respectively. RESULTS We identified 4439 women who underwent sacrocolpopexy, of which 10.7% had complications. 34.6% of whites, 29.1% of Blacks, 29% of Hispanics, and 34% of Others underwent a laparoscopic/robotic procedure. Hispanic patients had the highest median charge associated with surgical admission for sacrocolpopexy at $51,768, followed by Other ($44,522), White ($43,471), and Black ($40,634) patients. Procedure being within an urban teaching hospital (+ $2602), laparoscopic/robotic (+ $6790), or in the West (+ $9729) were associated with a significantly higher median cost of surgical management. CONCLUSIONS In women undergoing sacrocolpopexy, the protective factors against postoperative complications included private insurance status, a laparoscopic approach, and concurrent hysterectomy. Procedures held within an urban teaching hospital, conducted laparoscopically/robotically or in the West are associated with significantly higher costs of surgical management. Hispanic patients observe significantly higher procedure charges and costs, possibly resulting from the large number of this ethnic group living in the Western United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron A Gurayah
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Matthew M Mason
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Meghan R Grewal
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Sirpi Nackeeran
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Laura E Martin
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Shannon L Wallace
- Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Disorders, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Katherine Amin
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Raveen Syan
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
International urogynecology consultation chapter 1 committee 2: Epidemiology of pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence, incidence, natural history, and service needs. Int Urogynecol J 2022; 33:173-187. [PMID: 34977950 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-05018-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS This narrative review describes the existing epidemiologic literature and identifies gaps regarding pelvic organ prolapse (POP) prevalence, incidence, natural history, and current and future service needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS A PubMed search identified relevant citations published in 2000 or later. Pre-specified criteria were used to screen titles, abstracts, and manuscripts, including reference sections. Study findings were summarized to define what is known, identify gaps in current knowledge, and suggest priority areas for future research. RESULTS The reported prevalence of POP varies widely (1-65%) based on whether its presence is ascertained by symptoms (1-31%), pelvic examination (10-50%), or both (20-65%). Most existing population-based surveys do not include physical examination data. White women from higher income countries are overrepresented in the existing literature. Incidence and natural history data are limited and consist mainly of cohorts that follow women after pregnancy or menopause. Given global increases in aging populations in well-resourced countries, the need for POP treatment is anticipated to increase in the coming decades. In lower and middle income countries (LMICs) where demographic trends are different, there is a dearth of information about anticipated POP service needs. CONCLUSION Future POP incidence, prevalence, and natural history studies should include non-white women from LMICs and should combine pelvic examination data with validated patient-reported outcome measures when feasible. Anticipated future service needs differ globally, with a greater demand for POP treatment services in well-resourced settings where aging populations are prevalent.
Collapse
|