Sacrocolpopexy experience with a novel robotic surgical platform

Initial Experience With Senhance-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Cystectomy Using the Double Bipolar Method With 3 mm Bipolar Instruments

The Senhance robotic system (Asensus Surgical, Durham, NC, USA) is an innovative platform for minimally invasive surgery. It enables surgeons to perform precise and cost-effective procedures using reusable instruments and has advanced features such as haptic feedback and eye-tracking camera control. Herein, we present the first application of the "double bipolar method" (DBM) in a Senhance-assisted laparoscopic partial cystectomy utilizing 3 mm Maryland bipolar instruments. The DBM technique allows for the simultaneous use of bipolar instruments in both hands, thereby providing exceptional control in tissue dissection and coagulation, which are critical for delicate urologic procedures such as partial cystectomy. We present a case of a 62-year-old female patient who had a 2 cm tumor located at the bladder's dome. Following comprehensive preoperative imaging and cystoscopic evaluation, the tumor was deemed suitable for resection using the Senhance system. The DBM technique enabled the precise and bloodless resection of the bladder wall. Intraoperative evaluation confirmed the complete removal of the tumor and the successful closure of the bladder defect using a barbed suture. The patient had an uncomplicated recovery and was discharged on the eighth postoperative day. The combination of Senhance's advanced features and the DBM technique with 3 mm instruments offers a significant advantage in urologic surgery, providing enhanced precision, cost-efficiency, and improved cosmetic outcomes. The DBM technique in conjunction with the Senhance system represents a promising approach for bladder-sparing surgeries, with the potential for widespread adoption in clinical practice.

Evaluation of Clinical Research on Novel Multiport Robotic Platforms for Urological Surgery According to the IDEAL Framework: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background and objective

Several novel multiport robotic systems have been developed and introduced in clinical practice after regulatory approval. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the evolution status of novel robotic platforms approved for clinical use in urological surgery according to the IDEAL framework.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted using the Medline and Scopus databases according to the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (CRD42024503227). Comparative or noncomparative studies reporting on any urological procedures performed with novel robotic platforms (Hugo RAS; Versius, KangDuo, Senhance, REVO-I, Avatera, Hinotori, Dexter, or Toumai) were selected and included in the analysis.

Key findings and limitations

Seventy-four eligible studies were included, of which 67 (90.5%) were noncomparative surgical series representing developmental or explorative studies according to the IDEAL criteria. Only one randomised controlled trial (comparing KangDuo vs da Vinci robot-assisted partial nephrectomy) was included. The trial showed comparable perioperative outcomes between the two robotic systems. Four studies assessed clinical outcomes for patients undergoing urological procedures using a REVO-I (1 study), Senhance (2 studies), or Hinotori (1 study) system in comparison to the same procedures performed using a da Vinci system. All studies revealed outcomes comparable to those with the da Vinci system. Limitations include the small sample size in all studies, and assessment of first-generation novel platforms versus the fourth-generation multiarm da Vinci system in most of the comparative studies.

Conclusions and clinical implications

A few poor-quality studies have compared the use of novel robotic platforms to da Vinci systems in urological surgery and demonstrated comparable results. Most studies can be classified as developmental or explorative, representing the initial steps of clinical research. Large multicentre series are needed to understand whether these novel robots could offer advantages beyond cost reductions over the da Vinci systems.

Patient summary

We reviewed research on new robotic systems for surgery in urology. Several studies have shown the feasibility and safety of these new robots during the most common procedures. Very few studies have assessed clinical outcomes with the new robots in comparison to the reference standard, which is a fourth-generation da Vinci robot. Large multicentre studies are needed to understand whether the new robots could offer advantages other than cost savings over the da Vinci robot.

Utility of a 3 mm Bipolar Instrument in Laparoscopic Renal Surgery Using the Senhance Robotic System

We report our initial experience and the utility of 3 mm bipolar forceps in laparoscopic renal surgery using the Senhance robotic system. We performed laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in two patients: an 80-year-old female with a left renal pelvic tumor and an 80-year-old male with a right ureteral tumor. Both surgeries were successfully completed without conversion to conventional laparoscopic surgery or laparotomy. The console times for the procedures were 101 and 108 minutes, with estimated blood losses of 5 and 50 milliliters, respectively. The postoperative courses were uncomplicated, with histopathological examinations confirming high-grade urothelial carcinoma with negative surgical margins in both patients. The 3 mm Maryland bipolar instrument was able to grasp membranes with sufficient gentleness and precision. The relatively narrow diameter of the shaft posed a challenge in terms of shaft strength; however, it did not deflect even when it was used to lift the kidney, indicating sufficient robustness. When utilized in the cutting mode, the incision capacity of the 3 mm Maryland bipolar instrument was higher than that of the 5 mm instrument, which allowed for expedient and precise incision. Since only the tissue held by the forceps was incised, it was possible to perform a safe incision even in areas near blood vessels and other organs. Although the tip of the 3 mm Maryland instrument is more sharply pointed than that of the 5 mm instrument, no tissue damage was observed even when the 3 mm instrument was used for blunt dissection. Our initial results suggest that the 3 mm Maryland bipolar instrument is efficacious for performing laparoscopic renal surgery. The instrument may be suitable for a range of surgical procedures in laparoscopic renal surgery using the Senhance system. Further studies are necessary to establish the role and effectiveness of this instrument in broader clinical applications.

Surgical cost of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparison of two robotic platforms

IMPORTANCE

Robotic assistance in pelvic organ prolapse surgery can improve surgeon ergonomics and instrument dexterity compared with traditional laparoscopy but at increased costs.

OBJECTIVE

To compare total costs for robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSC) between two robotic platforms at an academic medical center.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of Senhance (Ascensus) RSC between 1/1/2019 and 6/30/21 who were matched 2:1 with DaVinci (Intuitive) RSC. Primary outcome was total costs to hospital system; secondarily we evaluated cost sub-categories. Purchase costs of the robotic systems were not included. T-test, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests were used. A multivariable linear regression was performed to model total costs adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

The matched cohort included 75 subjects. The 25 Senhance and 50 DaVinci cases were similar overall, with mean age 60.5 ± 9.7, BMI 27.9 ± 4.7, and parity 2.5 ± 1.0. Majority were white (97.3%) and postmenopausal (86.5%) with predominantly stage III prolapse (64.9%). Senhance cases had longer OR times (Δ = 32.1 min, p = 0.01). There were no differences in concomitant procedures, intraoperative complications, or short-term postoperative complications between platforms (all p > 0.05). On univariable analysis, costs were similar (Senhance $5368.31 ± 1486.89, DaVinci $5741.76 ± 1197.20, p = 0.29). Cost subcategories (medications, supplies, etc.) were also similar (all p > 0.05). On multivariable linear regression, total cost was $908.33 lower for Senhance (p = 0.01) when adjusting for operative time, estimated blood loss, concomitant mid-urethral sling, and use of the GelPoint mini port system.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite longer operating times, total cost of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy was significantly lower when using the Senhance compared to the DaVinci system.

New multiport robotic surgical systems: a comprehensive literature review of clinical outcomes in urology

Over the past 20 years, the field of robotic surgery has largely been dominated by the da Vinci robotic platform. Nevertheless, numerous novel multiport robotic surgical systems have been developed over the past decade, and some have recently been introduced into clinical practice. This nonsystematic review aims to describe novel surgical robotic systems, their individual designs, and their reported uses and clinical outcomes within the field of urologic surgery. Specifically, we performed a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the use of the Senhance robotic system, the CMR-Versius robotic system, and the Hugo RAS in urologic procedures. Systems with fewer published uses are also described, including the Avatera, Hintori, and Dexter. Notable features of each system are compared, with a particular emphasis on factors differentiating each system from the da Vinci robotic system.