Adjustable slings versus other surgical methods in female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Continence Is Not Affected after Sling Revision with Transvaginal Tape Elongation for Post-Sling Voiding Dysfunction

Voiding dysfunction (VD) after sling operation is not uncommon. Sling revisions by incision/excision are usually effective; however, they may result in recurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We aimed to evaluate continence status after an innovative sling revision procedure that preserves the integrity of the sling. Patients who underwent either a single-incision (AJUST) or a trans-obturator (TVT-O) mid-urethral sling were studied. Transvaginal tape elongation (i.e., sling midline incision and mesh interposition) was performed on patients with post-sling VD. Factors that may affect recurrent SUI were investigated by statistical analyses. Of 119 patients, 90 (75.6%) (45 AJUST and 45 TVT-O) were available for long-term (median 9; 8-10 years) follow-up. A significantly higher rate (17.2% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.014) of VD was noted after AJUST (N = 10) than after TVT-O (N = 2). After sling revision, four (33%) of the 12 cases reported recurrent SUI, which was not significantly different (p = 1.000) from the rate (37%, 29/78) of patients who did not undergo sling revision. Further statistical analyses revealed no significant predisposing factors affecting the recurrence of SUI. Surgical continence did not seem to be affected by having had sling revision with transvaginal tape elongation for post-sling VD.

Establishing urogynecology subspecialty in Armenia: The Armenia project

It is well known that there are many countries in the world where Urogynecology is not an existing subspecialty, and women are not receiving appropriate care for their pelvic floor disorders (PFD). One of these countries is the Republic of Armenia. Given the lack of expertise in the field of Urogynecology in Armenia, we conducted a study on the prevalence of PFDs and the degree of bother among women of all ages across the country, which was published in 2020. This led to the creation of the International Urogynecology Association for Armenia, comprising seven physicians from different countries: five from the USA, one urogynecologist from Lebanon, and one urologist from Russia. We implemented hybrid teaching based on Zoom lectures, case presentations, journal clubs, and live visits of mentors to Armenia on a regular basis to see patients and operate with our five fellows. We introduced our fellows to research and statistics by assigning research topics for different projects. Our fellows presented evidence-based presentations and extensive literature reviews on a regular basis. Our program will continue to grow the next 2-3 years. The success of this project holds significance for governmental, public, and healthcare entities in Armenia and across the world, where this subspecialty is non-existent, in preparing future female pelvic surgeons to care for the growing needs of women with these conditions. Replicating this program in other parts of the world will compound the benefits and successes of Urogynecology care across different societies, cultures, and people around the globe.