Urinary disturbance after therapy for cervical cancer: urodynamic evaluation and beta2-agonist medication

Lower urinary tract dysfunction in pelvic gynecologic cancer: the role of urodynamics

The exact incidence of lower urinary tract dysfunction is not known and its pathogenesis is not completely understood. Advances in urodynamic assessment and widespread availability of a standardized technique have facilitated its exploration prior to and subsequent to the surgical management of patients with gynecologic pelvic cancer. We performed a PubMed and Medline literature search using the following keywords: bladder dysfunction, urinary dysfunction, and urodynamics and all these terms in combination with radical hysterectomy in order to analyze the role of urodynamics in patients with pelvic gynecologic cancer in the preoperative as well as in the early and late postoperative settings.

Lower urinary tract dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current role of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) in reducing the incidence of postoperative lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) and in improving quality of life.

METHODS

A detailed online search was performed using the following keywords: nerve sparing, radical hysterectomy, cervical cancer, and all these terms in combination with urinary dysfunction or bladder dysfunction in order to analyze the effect of NSRH on urinary functional outcomes. Articles retrieved were analyzed and assigned a level of evidence (LE) according to the criteria of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine in Oxford, UK.

RESULTS

Our review highlights the heterogeneity of conducting and reporting studies in the literature. Autonomic pelvic nerve injuries during the procedure are thought to be the major cause of LUTD. The amount of LUTD depends upon the extent and type of nerve injury. Anatomically based surgical techniques are developed to avoid nerve injury without compromising oncological control. All studies comparing NSRH to standard RH yielded promising results with respect to postoperative LUTD. A recent meta-analysis showed similar cancer control rates between the two techniques. However, controversies remain about the ideal surgical approach for nerve sparing and there is no consensus as to the level and landmarks of dissection to preserve the maximal amount of nerves without compromising oncological outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence suggests that NSRH is safe and associated with lower incidence of LUTD. However, there is no standardized technique for NSRH and controversies remain about its oncological safety. Long-term oncological data from multicenter surgical trials are needed as well as a universally accepted standard to report studies on NSRH.

Urological complications after treatment of cervical cancer

Several urological complications can occur after treatment of cervical cancer. Stage IB and IIA cervical tumours are mainly treated by radical hysterectomy; advanced-stage tumours are treated by chemoradiotherapy. In the past two decades, a decrease in complications has been seen due to improvements in therapy, although the exact incidence of lower urinary tract dysfunction is unknown. The main urological complications after radical surgery are hypocontractility of the bladder, detrusor overactivity, incontinence, low-compliance bladder, fistula and hydronephrosis. As a result of improved neuroanatomical knowledge, and consequently nerve-sparing surgery, bladder morbidity has been decreasing. Late radiation-induced urological complications include haemorrhagic cystitis, ureteric stenosis, low-compliance bladder and fistulas. Owing to technological improvements, such as dose reduction and decreased radiation fields, a decrease in radiation morbidity has been observed since 1990.

Neurourological changes before and after radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

The severity of bladder dysfunction in patients receiving radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer has been related to the delicacy and the degree of radicality of the hysterectomy. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of modified radical hysterectomy on the storage and evacuation of the lower urinary tract.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 18 patients underwent radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer with FIGO stages Ia, Ib and IIa. These patients participated in a pudendal motor nerve conduction study and a urodynamic study, including urethral pressure profile (UPP), cystometry (CMG) and uroflowmetry (UFR). These were carried out at preoperative baseline and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months following surgery. We used generalized linear models to evaluate, over time, the relationship between the different parameters marked in these profiles.

RESULTS

The average pudendal nerve motor latency was prolonged at 2 and 6 weeks after surgery but recovered to baseline at 3 months postsurgery. Maximal urethral closing pressure revealed a tendency to decrease, and the CMG showed a significant increase in maximum intravesical filling pressure and a marked decrease in compliance throughout the investigative course. Increased residual urine volume and decreased uroflow rates were detected in a series of UFR. However, these values headed for baseline at 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Transient neurological changes in the majority of our patients suggested that both somatic and autonomic demyelination with or without denervation might be responsible for the temporal changes in vesicourethral function after radical hysterectomy and recovery to baseline condition within 6 months.

Urodynamic findings 3 months after radiotherapy in patients treated with conformal external beam radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on urodynamic function 3 months after RT in patients with prostate cancer undergoing definitive external beam RT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were accrued into a single-arm prospective study. Sixteen of the patients completed a scheduled multichannel video-urodynamic study at baseline and again 3 months after RT; the urodynamic variables were then compared to assess the nature and extent of urodynamic change caused by RT. Correlations were assessed between these quantitative changes and those in self-assessed qualitative urinary function measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Quality of Life assessment index (QoL) and urinary functional enquiry.

RESULTS

There were significant changes detected by the urodynamic study 3 months after RT in bladder volume at capacity (mean decrease 70 mL) and bladder volume at first sensation when supine (mean decrease 85 mL), and a lower postvoid residual volume (mean 50 mL). There was no significant change in the remaining urodynamic variables (including maximum flow rate and voided volume), nor in bladder compliance, bladder instability or bladder outlet obstruction. The self-assessed qualitative urological function measured by the IPSS, QoL and median urinary frequency/24 h showed no significant change after RT.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first quantitative study to prospectively evaluate the effect of RT on urodynamics in patients with prostate cancer. Only a few urodynamic variables changed significantly 3 months after RT, while most, including self-assessed qualitative urinary function, did not. This finding corresponds well with the notion that most patients tolerate RT well and that acute RT-induced urinary symptoms resolve successfully, with the return of lower urinary tract function to baseline levels by 3 months after RT.

Urodynamic changes at 18 months post-therapy in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma

PURPOSE

To quantify the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on urodynamics at 18 months post-therapy, using urodynamic study, in prostate cancer patients undergoing definitive external beam RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 17 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were accrued into a single-arm prospective study. Fifteen of 17 patients completed scheduled multichannel video-urodynamic study at baseline as well as 3 and 18 months after RT. Baseline quantitative urodynamic parameters were compared with those at 18 months post-RT to assess the nature and extent of urodynamic change brought about by RT. These quantitative changes were further correlated to the change in self-assessed qualitative urinary function measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Quality of Life assessment index (QoL), and urinary functional inquiry.

RESULTS

The statistically significant quantitative changes detected by the urodynamic study at 18 months post-RT were decrease in bladder capacity and bladder volume at first sensation in both the supine and upright position, and reduction in bladder volume at desire to void in the supine position. In our cohort, the mean reduction in bladder capacity was 100 mL in the supine position and 54 mL in the upright position. No statistically significant change was observed with regard to pressure, maximum flow rate, voided volume, or postvoid residual volume. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant change in bladder compliance, bladder instability, or bladder outlet obstruction. No statistically significant change in self-assessed qualitative urological function was observed between baseline and 18 months post-RT, measured by the 3 parameters (IPSS, QoL, and urinary frequency over 24 h).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first quantitative study that prospectively evaluated the effect of RT on urodynamics in prostate cancer patients receiving definitive RT. The statistically significant changes at 18 months post-RT were reduction in bladder capacity, reduction in bladder volume at first sensation, and decrease in bladder volume at desire to void. Despite the decrease in these parameters, there was no statistically significant adverse effect of RT on bladder compliance, bladder stability, or bladder outlet flow. This observation corresponded well with no significant change in IPSS, QoL, or urinary frequency over 24 h. Furthermore, these results confirm the notion that most prostate cancer patients generally tolerate RT very well.

Prognostic factors in surgically treated stage ib-iib cervical carcinomas with special emphasis on the importance of tumor volume

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to analyze the importance of tumor volume as a prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in surgically treated stage Ib-IIb cervical carcinoma.

METHODS

One hundred thirteen of one hundred sixty-five patients with histopathological stage Ib-IIb cervical carcinoma (44 Ib1, 24 Ib2, 10 IIa, 35 IIb) treated by radical abdominal hysterectomy between 1989 and 1999, for whom tumor volume could be assessed, were included in this study. Of the 113 patients, 90 (79.6%) received postoperative radiotherapy. Measurement of tumor volume was performed on giant histological sections using a semiautomatic image analyzer. The prognostic significance of tumor volume was analyzed and compared with that of various clinicopathological parameters using uni- and multivariate statistics.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-free survival was 71.4%. Increasing tumor volume was associated with more frequent lymph node metastases and a significant decrease in OS (P = 0.0112). The Median tumor volume was smaller in stage IIa tumors than in stage Ib2 tumors, and histopathological stage did not correlate linearly with lymph node metastases as well as OS. Stage Ib2 tumors were associated with worse overall survival than stage IIa tumors. In univariate analysis, lymph node metastases, histopathological stage, lymph vascular space involvement, tumor volume, parametrial spread, and tumor involvement of resection margins were significant parameters for OS. In multivariate statistical analysis, only lymph node metastases and histopathological staging remained independent prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor volume does not seem to confer additional prognostic information if histopathological stage and lymph node status are known. However, it may provide important prognostic information if lymph node status is not known or histopathological stage cannot be assessed.