Ordnungswidrigkeiten bei Leichenschau und Ausstellen der Todesbescheinigung

[Preliminary and Final Postmortem Examination and Death Certificate in the Emergency Medical Services in Germany: Heterogeneous Process Flows and Inadequate Standards]

BACKGROUND

Inconsistent regulations and laws can lead to misunderstandings and incorrect procedures. In this study we would like to evaluate the heterogeneity of the different processes of postmortem examination and death certification in the German emergency medical services.

METHODS

An e-mail with a survey link was sent to 212 medical directors of emergency services. The questions were answered online.

RESULTS

The response rate was 47%. Regulated procedures were evident in 58% of the cases. Issue of provisional death certificate comprised 64%, postmortem examination 45%; 19.4% of emergency physicians were required to do the final post-mortem. In 41% of the cases, the application protocol was considered sufficient as a form of documentation. 45% of the participants evaluated the respective legal regulation as sufficient. Questions and concerns arose, especially when medical directors of EMS believed that the state-specific regulations were not sufficient (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results show that the obligatory post-mortem examination in Germany is heterogeneous in its processing procedures. More than half of the participants rate the existing legal regulations as inadequate. As a result, it is not uncommon for queries and complaints to arise, but above all for uncertainties to arise in everyday practice. Our results suggest that uniform legislation and clearly defined processes are desirable.

[COVID-19- and influenza-associated deaths in Munich as of March 2020-a standardized analysis of death certificates]

INTRODUCTION

In light of the current COVID-19 pandemic, the idea arose to conduct a study to comparatively evaluate deaths from two respiratory transmissible infectious diseases (pandemic COVID-19 and seasonal influenza) by means of death certificates received by the health department.

METHODS

Death certificates of all deaths in Munich in the death period from 1 March-31 December 2020 were analyzed. The predefined inclusion criteria were the indication of "Corona, COVID-19, SARS-CoV‑2, Influenza (A/B)" on the death certificates. Standardized data entry was performed. The collected data were analyzed descriptively in aggregated form.

RESULTS

A total of 12,441 persons died during the study period, 1029 (8.3%) from confirmed COVID-19 and 22 (0.1%) from influenza. The two collectives matched well in the parameters studied. The mean age at death was approximately 80 years and the most common site of death was in hospital. Infectious disease was the cause of death in more than 90% of cases. The most common causes of death were acute respiratory distress syndrome/respiratory failure and multiorgan failure. An average of two previous illnesses were reported, most commonly diseases of the circulatory system and nervous system. There was no influenza death in the second pandemic wave.

DISCUSSION

In this study, COVID-19- and influenza-associated deaths were compared for the first time. The deaths of both collectives matched well in the parameters studied, but still require verification in a larger study given the small numbers of influenza cases. An English full-text version of this article is available at SpringerLink as Supplementary Information.

Das Projekt rechtsmedizinische Leichenschau in Frankfurt am Main – Erste Leichenschau vs. Sektionsergebnisse

Hintergrund

In Frankfurt am Main (~750.000 Einwohner) wird die erste Leichenschau im Auftrag der Polizei tagsüber durch einen dafür eingerichteten rechtsmedizinischen Dienst vorgenommen. Nachts und am Wochenende führen diese Tätigkeit Ärzte des ärztlichen Bereitschaftsdienstes (ÄBD) der kassenärztlichen Vereinigung durch.

Material und Methoden

Für das Jahr 2019 wurden die im Rahmen dieser ersten Leichenschauen ausgestellten Leichenschauscheine hinsichtlich der attestierten Todesart ausgewertet und die Ergebnisse mit denen einer ggf. im Nachgang durchgeführten Sektion, inklusive Zusatzuntersuchungen, verglichen. Von den Ärzten des ÄBD konnten 461 Leichenschauen in die Auswertung eingeschlossen werden, davon erfolgte in 76 Fällen eine Obduktion. Im Nachgang der 364 rechtsmedizinischen Leichenschauen wurden 78 Obduktionen durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse

Veränderungen in der Todesart nach Sektion ergaben sich für die Leichenschauen des ÄBD in 57, bei den rechtsmedizinischen Leichenschauen in 49 Fällen, wobei insbesondere eine bei Leichenschau attestierte ungeklärte Todesart in einen natürlichen Tod spezifiziert werden konnte. Nach der Obduktion fanden sich bei den rechtsmedizinischen Leichenschauen 8 Fälle, bei denen des ÄBD 19 Fälle eines nichtnatürlichen (statt weiterhin ungeklärten) Todes. Bei den rechtsmedizinisch beschauten Fällen änderte sich zudem nach der Sektion in einem Fall die Todesart von natürlich zu nichtnatürlich, bei denen des ÄBD kam es in einem Fall zu einer Änderung von nichtnatürlich zu natürlich.

Diskussion

Die Veränderung bzw. Spezifizierung der Todesart nach der Sektion beider Kollektive verdeutlicht, wie wichtig eine Steigerung der Sektionsrate wäre, und dass auch bei professioneller Durchführung der Leichenschau das Erkennen der Todesart Probleme bereitet.

[COVID-19-associated deaths]

INTRODUCTION

In December 2019, the new infectious coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) first appeared in China. So far, no systematic evaluation of death certificates of COVID-19-associated deaths has been presented.

METHODS

The death certificates of all deaths in Munich during the period from 1 March to 31 July 2020 were analyzed. The previously defined inclusion criteria were the indication of corona, COVID-19 and SARS-CoV‑2 in the death certificates. The variables were entered anonymously according to a developed key. The collected data were evaluated descriptively.

RESULTS

In the period under investigation, a total of 5840 people died in the Munich City area. Of these deaths 332 (5.7%) were COVID-19-associated. In 281 deaths (84.6%) there was a definite COVID-19 and in 51 deaths (15.4%) the suspicion of this disease. The most frequent causes of death were acute respiratory distress syndrome or respiratory insufficiency (59.1%), multiple organ failure (21.4%) and sepsis (10%). An average of 1.8 pre-existing illnesses were reported in the death certificates. Most frequently mentioned were diseases of the circulatory system (54.8%), the nervous system (22.8%) and metabolic diseases (18.9%). The average age at death was 79 years and the most frequent place of death was a hospital (85%). An autopsy was attempted by the doctors who issued the death certificates for 18.1% of the collective, most frequently in the case of unexplained or unnatural causes of death and young age of the deceased. Clinical pathological autopsies were performed on 11% of the collective and judicial autopsies on 1%.

DISCUSSION

This study is the first evaluation of death certificates with respect to the novel infectious COVID-19. Number and essential characteristics of COVID-19-associated deaths in Munich during the so-called first wave could be mapped. The interest of physicians in autopsies was rather low despite the appearance of a new infectious disease.

[Death certificates-an underestimated source of information for statistics, judicature, public health, and science]

The thorough external examination of a corpse and the correct completion of the death certificate are medical duties with far-reaching consequences. Data obtained from the death certificates are the basis for mortality statistics and for scientific research. They can be helpful in uncovering criminal offences or for the surveillance of medical facilities. For many years the deficiencies of external post-mortem examinations and death certificates have been discussed in professional journals.The important task of analysing all death certificates is performed by the local health authorities. This is the only opportunity for quality control and, if necessary, the doctors who issued the death certificate must be asked for corrections. This also improves the quality of the mortality statistics and contributes to the administration of justice.Additionally, important information for routine duties of the public health authorities can be obtained from the death certificates concerning the monitoring of narcotics, the supervision of medical facilities and the adherence to notification requirements for infectious diseases. Furthermore, death certificates contain relevant data for selected medical research projects.The high information content of death certificates is widely unknown and should be used by the health authorities comprehensively and systematically. Enough qualified staff needs to be allocated to further secure the important task of quality control of death certificates.

[Forensic postmortem examination service: challenges and opportunities]

The external examination of a corpse is regulated by federal law and presents physicians and police with a series of challenges. Mostly GPs, but practically every licensed physician, are obliged to complete death certificates, resulting in a very large number of potential physicians, which at the same time means only a small number of cases for each individual. Consequently, this sensitive topic often lacks the experience needed.As already shown in several studies, only very limited possibilities for the correct determination of the cause of death are generally present at the inquest. The legal provisions also represent a certain basic problem, from which further pitfalls can arise.In Munich, the medical association, in cooperation with the Institute of Legal Medicine, organizes a 24‑h service with at least one physician on standby, which ensures quality assurance and/or enhancement of this postmortem service through continuous education and further training as well as monthly meetings. The principles and considerations concerning the practicability of such a system will be discussed in this paper.