Progressive vertebral deformities despite unchanged bone mineral density in patients with sarcoidosis: a 4-year follow-up study

Osteoporotic bone fracture risk assessment in Latvian patients with newly diagnosed sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Increased calcitriol synthesis in sarcoid granulomas with subsequent hypercalcaemia and hypercalciuria can affect bone metabolism in patients with sarcoidosis. Multiple factors can increase the fracture risk in patients with sarcoidosis. This study aimed to evaluate a 10-year osteoporotic and a 10-year hip fracture risk and to analyse factors affecting fracture risk for patients with newly diagnosed sarcoidosis compared to an age- and gender-matched control group from a real-world setting.

METHODS

The cross-sectional study included 171 patients with a histologically verified diagnosis of sarcoidosis who were hospitalised due to suspected sarcoidosis within two years and an age- and gender-matched control group of 178 hospitalised individuals. QFracture algorithm questions were asked during interviews.

RESULTS

A cohort of 349 subjects was analysed. The median age in the patient group was 40 years (IQR:20), and 60.2% were female. 21.6% of patients with sarcoidosis had at least one comorbidity that could potentially influence the osteoporotic fracture risk. Both the median 10-year osteoporotic fracture risk (0.9% (IQR:2) vs 1.3% (IQR:2.3), p=0.005; U=12394) and a 10-year hip fracture risk (0.1% (IQR:0.3) vs 0.2% (IQR:0.5), p=0.003; U=12368.5) was lower in patients with sarcoidosis compared to control group subjects. As compared to the control group, individuals with sarcoidosis exhibited a lower frequency of both osteoporotic (2.4% vs 11.2%, OR=0.189 (95% CI:0.063-0.566), p=0.003) and low-energy trauma fractures (2.9% vs 11.8%, OR=0.225 (95% CI:0.083-0.612), p=0.003) in personal medical history.

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first study to investigate osteoporotic fracture risk and related factors in Latvian patients with newly diagnosed sarcoidosis. Our data show a lower risk of a 10-year osteoporotic and a 10-year hip fracture risk in patients with sarcoidosis compared to age- and gender-matched control group subjects from a real-world setting.

Osteoporosis and major fragility fractures (MOF) in sarcoidosis patients: association with disease severity

BACKGROUND

The reports on bone mineral loss or major osteoporosis fracture (MOF) in sarcoidosis are scarce and have conflicting outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of MOF in sarcoidosis patients.

METHODS

In a single-center cohort of 382 patients with sarcoidosis (55.8 ± 11.6 years) we evaluated bone mineral density at lumbar spine, at femoral neck and at total hip and the presence of MOF. Lung function measurements including diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were assessed. Chest X-rays were performed and radiological staging was done by Scadding score.

RESULTS

Ninety patients (23.6%) with sarcoidosis have history of a MOF. BMD T-scores were lower in sarcoidosis with MOF with respect to those without MOF, but the difference was statistically significant only for BMD at femoral neck (p < 0.05). Moreover, BMD values at total hip was positively correlated with DLCO (%) (p < 0.001). Prevalence of MOF was higher in patients with sarcoidosis with lung parenchymal involvement (radiological stages 2-4) than in patients with sarcoidosis in chest X-ray stages 0 and 1 (28.3 vs 19.2% respectively, p < 0.05). Moreover, multiple regression analyses showed that X-ray Scadding score was positively associated with MOF.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that MOF represent a common and important complication in patients with moderate/severe sarcoidosis. The chest X-ray evaluation and the pulmonary function test could allow to define the risk of MOF in sarcoidosis patients.

Bone fragility and sarcoidosis: An underestimated relationship

INTRODUCTION

Sarcoidosis is a chronic multisystem inflammatory disease which may affect any organ. Also bone can be involved both directly and indirectly. Data on BMD values and fragility fractures in sarcoidosis patients are few and heterogeneous. This study aimed to characterized the presence of fracture and the relative risk factors in patients with sarcoidosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single center cross-sectional study we evaluated 252 sarcoidosis patients (54.7 ± 12.1 years) compared to sex-and age matched healthy controls. We measured BMD at lumbar spine, at femoral neck and at total hip. Moreover, the presence of fragility fractures was collected during osteoporosis visit and all radiological images were examined for the presence of any vertebral fracture according to Genant's method's. Lung function measurements, including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were assessed.

RESULTS

Bone Mineral Density T-scores were lower in patients affected by sarcoidosis with respect to those obtained in healthy controls, but the difference was statistically significant only for BMD-LS (p < 0.01) and BMD-TH (p < 0.05). Moreover, BMD values at all skeletal sites were significantly associated with DLCO (%) (p < 0.05). The prevalence of fragility fracture was higher in patients with sarcoidosis than in healthy controls (30.6 vs. 12.3%). The patients with ≥3 vertebral fracture had lower values of FVC (%), FEV1 (%), and DLCO (%). Multiple regression analyses showed that BMI was positively associated with fragility fracture, while BMD-TH, DLCO(%) and therapy use was negatively associated.

CONCLUSIONS

Vertebral fractures represent a frequent complication in patients with sarcoidosis. Furthermore, the number of vertebral fractures was linked with a worsening in pulmonary functional tests. Therefore, the degree of severity of the sarcoidosis disease appears to be the main determinant of bone fragility.

Fracture of the Dens Axis Due to Spinal Manifestation of Sarcoidosis: Treatment Option and Review of the Literature

STUDY DESIGN

Case report and literature review.

OBJECTIVE

We present a case of a pathologic unstable fracture of the odontoid process due to vertebral osseous sarcoidosis. The surgical management of this unreported pathology is described and a review of the literature is given.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Sarcoidosis is a chronic inflammatory systemic disease of unknown etiology, characterized by multiorgan noncaseating granulomatous infiltrations. It affects primarily the lungs, lymphatic system, eyes, skin, heart, and nervous system. Osseous sarcoidosis is usually clinically asymptomatic and therefore frequently under-diagnosed. When it does affect the skull or vertebral column, specific surgical therapy is only necessary in cases with nonmanageable pain or where structural integrity is threatened.

METHODS

Our patient underwent a so-called semiconservative approach, consisting of a minimally invasive transoral-transpharyngeal approach, surgical debridement of the lytic bony lesion, transplantation of cancellous homologous bone, and carbon chest halo-immobilization. Halo-immobilization was left for 8 weeks, followed by a further 6 weeks with a hard cervical collar.

RESULTS

Routine computed tomography scans 3 days, 6, 12, 18 weeks, and 1 year after surgery showed good filling of the original defect with cancellous bone, correct alignment of the upper cervical spine, and progressive fracture consolidation and stability. Surgical site infection (SSI) was not observed. The patient had no neurological postoperative deficits. After initial dysphagia, swallowing was not permanently impaired.

CONCLUSION

Sarcoidosis-induced odontoid fractures can be managed successfully using a semiconservative approach, consisting of transoral-transmucosal, minimally invasive surgical procedure for debridement of the lesion and transplantation of cancellous bone with additional halo-immobilization. Permanent fusion of C1-2 with loss of the cervical range of motion is avoided. Despite performing bone surgery in a potentially markedly contaminated site, bacterial infection was not an issue, possibly supported by the temporary discontinuation of immunosuppressive agents and the prudent use of antibiotics.Level of Evidence: 4.

Sarcoidosis and calcium homeostasis disturbances-Do we know where we stand?

The majority of cases involving hypercalcemia in the setting of sarcoidosis are explained by the overproduction of calcitriol by activated macrophages. Vitamin D takes part in the regulation of granuloma formation. However, using vitamin D metabolites to assess the activity of the disease is still problematic, and its usefulness is disputable. In some cases, though, a calcium metabolism disorder could be a valuable tool (i.e. as a marker of extrathoracic sarcoidosis). Although sarcoidosis does not cause a decrease in bone mineral density, increased incidence of vertebral deformities is noted. Despite increasing knowledge about calcium homeostasis disorders in patients with sarcoidosis, there is still a need for clear guidelines regarding calcium and vitamin D supplementation in these patients.

Repeating Vertebral Fracture Assessment: 2019 ISCD Official Position

Vertebral fracture (VF) is the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. VFs are associated with a decline in quality of life and high morbidity and mortality. The presence of a VF is a significant risk factor for developing another fracture; however, most VFs are not clinically recognized and diagnosed. Vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is a low cost, low radiation, convenient, and reliable method to identify VFs. The finding of a previously unrecognized VF may change the assessment of fracture risk, diagnostic classification, and treatment strategies. Vertebral fracture assessment or radiographic lateral spine imaging should be repeated in patients with continued high risk for fracture (e.g., historical height loss >4 cm [>1.5 inches], self-reported but undocumented vertebral fracture, or glucocorticoid therapy equivalent to ≥5 mg of prednisone or equivalent per day for greater than or equal to 3 months).

Bone Mineral Loss and Fracture in Sarcoidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives

This meta-analysis aims to investigate the possibility of bone mineral loss and fracture in sarcoidosis.

Materials and methods

A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed from inception through August 2017. The inclusion criterion was observational studies evaluating the association between sarcoidosis and bone mineral density (BMD) or fracture. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of fracture, standardized mean difference (SMD) of volumetric BMD and areal BMD, and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis to compare risk between sarcoidosis and controls. The between-study heterogeneity of effect-size was quantified using the Q statistic and I2.

Results

Data were extracted from 10 studies involving a total of 6,448 sarcoidosis patients and 77,857 controls. The pooled result demonstrated no significant increased risk of fracture in sarcoidosis patients compared with controls (OR=1.68; 95% CI: 0.85-3.31, p value=0.14, I2=72%). There were no differences between the patients and controls in areal BMD (SMD= 0.21 g/cm2; 95% CI: -0.12-0.54, p value= 0.22, I2=0%) or volumetric BMD (SMD= 0.04 mg/cm3; 95% CI: -0.51-0.58, p value=0.89, I2=83%).

Conclusion

Our study has not shown an increased risk of fracture or bone mineral loss in sarcoidosis. However, based on the currently available studies with heterogeneity in between, the conclusion for the osteoporosis screening and fracture risk assessment of patients with sarcoidosis cannot be drawn until more studies are available.

Current concepts regarding calcium metabolism and bone health in sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Vitamin D supplementation is widespread used in the general population. In sarcoidosis, up to 50% of patients, especially postmenopausal women and those taking corticosteroids, show evidence of increased bone fragility. The purpose of this review is to provide an evidence-based rationale on how to treat sarcoidosis patients with bone health issues.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence from observational studies show that decreased 25-hydroxy vitamin D is common in sarcoidosis. However, the great majority of sarcoidosis patents have normal or often elevated levels of 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D (calcitriol), a marker associated with disease activity. High calcitriol levels may often be associated with hypercalcemia and hypercalcuria. The few interventional randomized controlled studies in the field, suggest that vitamin D supplementation may not be well tolerated because of hypercalcemia, moreover without substantial benefit on bone health and risk for fractures in these patients.

SUMMARY

Vitamin D supplementation may be withheld in sarcoidosis patients with bone fragility, unless calcitriol levels are below normal limits. A treating scheme is proposed.

Use of systemic glucocorticoids and the risk of major osteoporotic fractures in patients with sarcoidosis

This study revealed the risk of major osteoporotic fracture in patients with sarcoidosis exposed to glucocorticoids. Current use of glucocorticoids was associated with a risk of fracture, with no difference between patients with and without sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis per se was not associated with an increased fracture risk.

INTRODUCTION

Sarcoidosis is a multi-organ, chronic inflammatory, granulomatous disorder that most frequently affects the lungs, lymph nodes, skin, eyes, and liver, but may occur in any organ, including the bones. While oral glucocorticoids (GCs) are commonly used as initial treatment, little is known about the risk of major osteoporotic fractures in patients with sarcoidosis exposed to GCs.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted using the Danish National Hospital Discharge Registry (NHDR) between January 1995 and December 2011. Conditional logistics regression models were used to derive adjusted odds ratios (OR) of major osteoporotic fractures in subjects with and without sarcoidosis stratified by average daily and cumulative dose exposures.

RESULTS

A total of 376,858 subjects with a major osteoporotic fracture and the same number of subjects without this event were identified (mean age 64.2 ± 19.5 years, 69% female). In patients with sarcoidosis (n = 124), current use of GC was associated with an increased risk of major osteoporotic fracture (adjusted (adj.) OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.17-2.58), which dropped to baseline levels after discontinuation. In subjects without sarcoidosis, this risk was comparable (adj. OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.32-1.40). In sarcoidosis patients, cumulative dose 1.0-4.9 g and >10 g prednisolone equivalents were associated with increased risk of major osteoporotic fracture (adj. OR 2.75; 95% CI 1.06-7.14 and 2.22; 95% CI 1.17-4.22, respectively), whereas a cumulative dose of <1.0 g and 5.0-9.9 g was not associated with major osteoporotic fracture risk.

CONCLUSION

Both in subjects with and without sarcoidosis, current expose to GC is associated with increased risk of major osteoporotic fractures, with no between-group difference. Sarcoidosis per se was not associated with increased fracture risk. Having sarcoidosis per se, i.e., if not treated with GC, is not a risk factor for fracture, and such patients may only need risk assessment when they commence GC therapy.

Risk of fragility fracture among patients with sarcoidosis: a population-based study 1976-2013

Incidence of fragility fracture of a population-based cohort of 345 patients with sarcoidosis was compared with age and sex-matched comparators. The incidence of fragility fracture was higher among patients with sarcoidosis with hazard ratio (HR) of 2.18.

INTRODUCTION

Several chronic inflammatory disorders increase the risk of fragility fracture. However, little is known about the risk of fragility fracture in patients with sarcoidosis.

METHODS

This study was conducted using a previously identified population-based cohort of 345 patients with incident sarcoidosis from Olmsted County, Minnesota. Diagnosis of sarcoidosis required physician diagnosis supported by biopsy showing non-caseating granuloma, radiographic evidence of intrathoracic sarcoidosis, and compatible clinical presentations without evidence of other granulomatous diseases. Sex and age-matched subjects randomly selected from the same underlying population were used as comparators. Medical records of cases and comparators were reviewed for baseline characteristics and incident fragility fracture.

RESULTS

Fragility fractures were observed in 34 patients with sarcoidosis, corresponding to a cumulative incidence of 5.6% at 10 years, while 18 fragility fractures were observed among comparators for a cumulative incidence of 2.4% at 10 years. The HR of fragility fractures among cases compared with comparators was 2.18 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-3.88). The risk of fragility fracture by site was significantly higher among patients with sarcoidosis, and was due to a higher rate of distal forearm fracture (HR 3.58; 95% CI 1.53-8.40). Statistically non-significant increased risk was also observed in proximal femur (HR 1.66; 95% CI 0.45-6.06) and proximal humerus (HR 3.27; 95% CI 0.66-16.21). Risk of vertebral fracture was not increased (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.32-3.11).

CONCLUSION

Patients with sarcoidosis have an increased risk of fragility fracture which is primarily driven by the higher incidence of distal forearm fracture.

Risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in patients with sarcoidosis: a population-based cohort

In this retrospective cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), patients with sarcoidosis have an increased risk of clinical vertebral fractures and when on recent treatment with oral glucocorticoids, also an increased risk of any fractures and osteoporotic fractures.

INTRODUCTION

Sarcoidosis is a chronic inflammatory disease, in which fragility fractures have been reported despite normal BMD. The aim of this study was to assess whether patients with sarcoidosis have an increased risk of clinical fractures compared to the general population.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the CPRD. All patients with a CPRD code for sarcoidosis between January 1987 and September 2012 were included. Cox proportional hazards models were used to derive adjusted relative risks (RRs) of fractures in all sarcoidosis patients compared to matched controls, and within the sarcoidosis group according to use and dose of systemic glucocorticoids.

RESULTS

Five thousand seven hundred twenty-two sarcoidosis patients (mean age 48.0 years, 51 % females, mean follow-up 6.7 years) were identified. Compared to 28,704 matched controls, the risk of any fracture was not different in patients with sarcoidosis. However, the risk of clinical vertebral fractures was significantly increased (adj RR 1.77; 95 % CI 1.06-2.96) and the risk of non-vertebral fractures was decreased although marginally significant (adj RR 0.87; 95 % CI 0.77-0.99). Compared to sarcoidosis patients not taking glucocorticoids, recent use of systemic glucocorticoids was associated with an increased risk of any fracture (adj RR 1.50; 95 % CI 1.20-1.89) and of an osteoporotic fracture (adj RR 1.47; 95 % CI 1.07-2.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with sarcoidosis have an increased risk of clinical vertebral fractures, and when using glucocorticoid therapy, an increased risk of any fractures and osteoporotic fractures. In contrast, the risk of non-vertebral fractures maybe decreased. Further investigation is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms of these contrasting effects on fracture risk.

Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures as Part of Systemic Disease

Our understanding of the genetic control of skeletogenesis and bone remodeling is expanding, and normally, bone resorption and bone formation are well balanced through regulation by hormones, growth factors, and cytokines. Osteoporosis is considered a systemic disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue. Consequent increased bone fragility results in higher fracture risk. The most common osteoporotic fractures are located in the spine, and they form a significant health issue. A large variety of systemic diseases are associated with risk of osteoporotic vertebral fractures, illustrating its multifactorial etiology. Prevalences of these conditions vary from common to extremely rare, and incidence peaks differ according to etiology. This review appreciates different aspects of osteoporotic vertebral fractures as part of systemic disease, including genetic, immunologic, inflammatory, metabolic, and endocrine pathways. It seems impossible to be all-comprehensive on this topic; nevertheless, we hope to provide a reasonably thorough overview. Plenty remains to be elucidated in this field, identifying even more associated diseases and further exposing pathophysiological mechanisms underlying osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Morbidity and mortality in sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic sarcoidosis is a complex disease with numerous comorbid conditions and can be fatal in some cases. Recognizing causes of morbidity and mortality is important to effectively select treatments, manage symptoms and improve outcomes. The purpose of this review is to examine emerging knowledge on morbidity and mortality in sarcoidosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Approximately 1-5% of patients with sarcoidosis die from complications of sarcoidosis. Recent population studies indicate that mortality may be increasing over the past decade. The reasons behind these trends are unclear, but could include increasing incidence, detection rates, severity of disease or age of the population. Morbidity of sarcoidosis is reflected by a trend of increased hospitalizations over recent years and increased use of healthcare resources. Morbidity can be caused by organ damage from granulomatous inflammation, treatment complications and psychosocial effects of the disease. Recent studies are focused on morbidity related to cardiopulmonary complications, bone health and ageing within the sarcoidosis population. Last, sarcoidosis is associated with autoimmune diseases, pulmonary embolism and malignancy; however, the underlying mechanisms linking diseases continue to be debated.

SUMMARY

Morbidity in sarcoidosis is significant and multifactorial. Mortality is infrequent, but may be increasing over the years.

Bone density is normal and does not change over 2 years in sarcoidosis

SUMMARY

Small studies have previously suggested that sarcoidosis may be associated with low bone mineral density. In this observational study of 64 patients with sarcoidosis, bone mineral density was within the normal range at baseline, and there was no evidence of accelerated bone loss over 1-2 years.

INTRODUCTION

Several small studies have suggested that sarcoidosis may be associated with low bone mineral density (BMD).

METHODS

We undertook a cross-sectional study of BMD in 64 patients with sarcoidosis. Of these, 27 with 25-hydroxyvitamin D<50 nmol/L entered a 1-year intervention study of vitamin D supplements, and 37 entered a 2-year longitudinal study of BMD, with the primary endpoint of the change in lumbar spine BMD.

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 58 years, 68% were female, and 8% were currently using oral glucocorticoids. At baseline, BMD for the entire cohort was greater than the expected values for the population at the lumbar spine (mean Z-score 0.7, P<0.001) and total body (0.5, P<0.001) and similar to expected values at the femoral neck (0.2, P=0.14) and total hip (0.2, P=0.14). BMD did not change at any of these four sites (P>0.19) over 2 years in the longitudinal study. In the intervention study, vitamin D supplements had no effect on BMD, and therefore we pooled the data from all participants. BMD did not change over 1 year at the spine, total hip, or femoral neck (P>0.3), but decreased by 0.7% (95% confidence interval 0.3-1.1) at the total body (P=0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

BMD was normal at baseline, and there was no consistent evidence of accelerated bone loss over 1-2 years, regardless of baseline vitamin D status. Patients with sarcoidosis not using oral glucocorticoids do not need routine monitoring of BMD.

Bone fragility in sarcoidosis and relationships with calcium metabolism disorders: a cross sectional study on 142 patients

Introduction

The prevention of fragility fractures in patients with sarcoidosis is a serious concern and the potential risk of hypercalcemia limits vitamin D and calcium supplementation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for low bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures in sarcoidosis. In particular, we aimed to determine the link among bone fragility and calcium and vitamin D metabolism in this population.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional analysis on 142 consecutive patients with histologically proven sarcoidosis. BMD and prevalence of vertebral fractures on X-rays were assessed and the association with potential risk factors was studied by regression analysis.

Results

Fragility fractures occurred in 23.5% of patients, despite a normal mean BMD in the study population. In a multivariate analysis, low dietary calcium, fracture, age, gender and menopause were associated with increased risk of low BMD. Low dietary calcium, high current corticosteroid dose and low creatinine clearance were associated with increased risk of fracture. Serum 25(OH)D between 10 and 20 ng/ml was significantly associated with higher BMD. Conversely, values greater than 20 ng/ml were associated with increased risk of fracture. Serum 25(OH)D level was inversely correlated with disease activity. Of note, vitamin D supplements increased serum 25(OH)D in a dose-dependent manner but had no effect on serum calcium level.

Conclusions

Sarcoidosis patients have a high risk of fracture despite not having a lowered BMD suggesting that other independent factors are involved. Current corticosteroid dose, low dietary calcium and serum 25(OH)D levels are associated with bone fragility. In sarcoidosis, calcium and vitamin D supplementation might be warranted, but desirable 25(OH)D serum levels might be lower than those advised for the general population.

Predictors of osteoporosis and vertebral fractures in patients presenting with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive lung disease

Bone mineral density (BMD) alone does not reliably predict osteoporotic fractures. The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) was developed to estimate the risk of fracture in the general population. This study was designed to identify predictors of osteoporosis and vertebral fractures in patients presenting with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We studied 85 patients (mean age = 75 years; 92% men) with moderate to very severe COPD. Osteoporosis and vertebral fractures were diagnosed with dual energy X-ray absorptiometric scan and vertebral X-rays, respectively. Patient characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and results of pulmonary function tests, chest computed tomography scan, blood and urinary biomarkers of bone turnover were recorded, and a FRAX score was calculated by a computer-based algorithm. Osteoporosis, defined as a T score < -2.5, found in 20 patients (24%), was associated with female gender, BMI, dyspnea scale, long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), vital capacity (VC), emphysema score on computed tomography, measurements of serum and urinary biomarkers of bone turnover. Vertebral fractures, diagnosed in 29 patients (35%), were strongly correlated with age, LTOT, VC, and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec, treatment with oral corticosteroid or warfarin, and weakly associated with the presence of osteoporosis. There was no correlation between FRAX score and prevalence of vertebral fractures, suggesting that neither BMD alone nor FRAX score would predict the presence of vertebral fractures in COPD patients. A disease-specific algorithm to predict osteoporotic fractures is needed to improve the management of patients suffering from COPD.

Progression of osteoporosis in patients with COPD: a 3-year follow up study

Currently, our knowledge on the progression of osteoporosis and its determinants is limited in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Bone mineral density generally remains stable in patients with COPD over a period of 3 years. Nevertheless, the progression of vertebral fractures was not assessed, while an increase of vertebral fractures over time may be reasonable. Aims of the current study were to determine the percentage of newly diagnosed osteoporotic patients after a follow up of 3 years and to identify baseline risk factors for the progression of osteoporosis in COPD. Clinically stable COPD outpatients were included. Lung function parameters, body composition measures, six minute walk distance, DXA-scan and X-spine were assessed at baseline and repeated after 3 years. Prevalence of osteoporosis in COPD patients increased from 47% to 61% in 3 years mostly due to an increase of vertebral fractures. Lower baseline T-score at the trochanter independently increased the risk for the development of osteoporosis. Additionally, baseline vitamin D deficiency increased this risk 7.5-fold. In conclusion, the prevalence of osteoporosis increased over a 3-year period in patients with COPD. Baseline risk factors for the development of osteoporosis are osteopenia at the trochanter and vitamin D deficiency.

Primary musculoskeletal sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a well-described clinical entity with several types of presentation among different organ systems. However, primary musculoskeletal manifestation is a rare and seldom-described manifestation. A retrospective review of patients seen at our institution from 1999 to 2009 was performed to identify patients with such presentation. Eleven patients with musculoskeletal sarcoidosis were identified. Seven patients presented with solitary lesions, while 4 presented with multiple foci of disease. Histologically, all lesions revealed granulomatous inflammation consistent with sarcoidosis. Cultures and gram stain were negative in all patients. One patient was found to have evidence of pulmonary sarcoidosis after diagnosis of musculoskeletal sarcoidosis. Eight patients had primarily soft tissue involvement with visible masses, while 3 patients had primarily osseous involvement with no mass. Pain was reported by 9 of 11 patients. On magnetic resonance imaging, all lesions were dark on T1, bright on T2, and poorly marginated. Magnetic resonance imaging was noted to be more accurate in revealing the pathology than radiographic imaging. Four patients underwent complete excision and 1 received a steroid injection. The remaining patients required no further treatment after diagnosis. Musculoskeletal sarcoidosis is rare and can present as single or multiple lesions. Definitive diagnosis is made by biopsy. The decision to operate should be based on symptoms, issues with cosmesis, impending fractures, growth, and/or involvement of neuro-vascular structures. Patients should be evaluated for pulmonary involvement.