Quantitative ultrasound and radiographic absorptiometry are associated with vertebral deformity in Japanese Women: the Hizen-Oshima study

Heel bone mass of a young South Indian population with a Nigerian population residing in a South Indian suburban neighborhood: a comparative study

This cross-sectional cohort emphasized the impact of heel bone mass in the South Indian population and its comparison with Nigerian ethnicity, residing in South India. Peak bone mass, however, evidenced a significant decrease of around 30% compared to that of Nigerian ethnicity.

INTRODUCTION

In the South Indian population, the local folks do not seem to be well informed about the relative association of bone mass with osteoporosis. Hence, there is an acute necessity to assess the same with respect to the ethnic population, presumed to have possessed high bone mass, i.e., the Nigerian population.

METHODS

The calcaneus of the right foot was measured with a quantitative ultrasound device (Sahara, Hologic Inc., USA) for a total population of 734, out of which 314 were Indian males, 348 Indian females, 41 Nigerian males, and 30 Nigerian females, whose ages ranged from 18 to 35 years.

RESULTS

The peak bone mass in Indian males and females is 0.507 ± 0.1 and 0.479 ± 0.1 g cm(-2), respectively, and it is 0.714 ± 0.2 and 0.682 ± 0.2 g cm(-2) with regard to Nigerian male and female populations, respectively. Indian males and females who were within the age group of 26-30 and ≤ 20 years, respectively, represented high bone mass, and the same was the situation with respect to Nigerian counterparts who were within the age group of 21-25 years. Indian and Nigerian non-vegetarian population of both the genders demonstrated a high significance value of p < 0.000001, deciphered by means of unpaired t test.

CONCLUSION

Peak bone strength was dominant in the Nigerian population compared to that of Indians. The Indian population is approximately lagging by 28-30% with respect to peak bone mass behind their Nigerian equivalents. Indian non-vegetarian male and female populations lagged by 6.15% and 6.16% behind the Indian vegetarian male and female populations, respectively.

A population-based study examining calcaneus quantitative ultrasound and its optimal cut-points to discriminate osteoporotic fractures among 9352 Chinese women and men

CONTEXT

No generally accepted thresholds for quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters to screen individuals at high risk of osteoporotic fractures have been defined.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to define appropriate cutoff points for osteoporotic fractures of calcaneus ultrasound according to participants' prevalent osteoporotic fractures.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This was a cross-sectional, population-based study conducted in Shanghai, China.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 9352 Chinese women and men aged 40 and older were studied.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We measured calcaneus QUS (Achilles Express, GE Lunar) values and their relationships with osteoporotic fractures.

RESULTS

A prevalence of 14.9 and 12.2% of osteoporotic fractures was found in the women and men (P<0.001), respectively. Subjects with osteoporotic fractures had significantly lower QUS values than those without (P<0.001). One sd decline in the stiffness index (SI)-derived T-score was associated with a high risk of nonvertebral fracture [odds ratio (OR)=1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39-1.62; P<0.001], clinical vertebral fracture (OR=1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.90; P<0.01), and multi-fractures (OR=1.98; 95% CI, 1.63-2.40; P<0.001). The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that QUS could differentiate osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women and men, but not in premenopausal women. The optimal cutoff points for the SI-derived T-score to detect a high risk of nonvertebral fractures, clinical vertebral fractures, and multi-fractures were -1.25, -1.55, and -1.80 in postmenopausal women, respectively, and -1.30, -1.90, and -2.00 in males, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

As a screening tool, the SI-derived T-score obtained from the Achilles QUS device for a postmenopausal woman or man that is less than -1.25 and -1.30, respectively, may indicate an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures and should be further evaluated by central DXA.