1
|
Fahridin S, Agarwal N, Bracken K, Law S, Morton RL. The use of linked administrative data in Australian randomised controlled trials: A scoping review. Clin Trials 2024; 21:516-525. [PMID: 38305216 PMCID: PMC11304639 DOI: 10.1177/17407745231225618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS The demand for simplified data collection within trials to increase efficiency and reduce costs has led to broader interest in repurposing routinely collected administrative data for use in clinical trials research. The aim of this scoping review is to describe how and why administrative data have been used in Australian randomised controlled trial conduct and analyses, specifically the advantages and limitations of their use as well as barriers and enablers to accessing administrative data for use alongside randomised controlled trials. METHODS Databases were searched to November 2022. Randomised controlled trials were included if they accessed one or more Australian administrative data sets, where some or all trial participants were enrolled in Australia, and where the article was published between January 2000 and November 2022. Titles and abstracts were independently screened by two reviewers, and the full texts of selected studies were assessed against the eligibility criteria by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted from included articles by two reviewers using a data extraction tool. RESULTS Forty-one articles from 36 randomised controlled trials were included. Trial characteristics, including the sample size, disease area, population, and intervention, were varied; however, randomised controlled trials most commonly linked to government reimbursed claims data sets, hospital admissions data sets and birth/death registries, and the most common reason for linkage was to ascertain disease outcomes or survival status, and to track health service use. The majority of randomised controlled trials were able to achieve linkage in over 90% of trial participants; however, consent and participant withdrawals were common limitations to participant linkage. Reported advantages were the reliability and accuracy of the data, the ease of long term follow-up, and the use of established data linkage units. Common reported limitations were locating participants who had moved outside the jurisdictional area, missing data where consent was not provided, and unavailability of certain healthcare data. CONCLUSIONS As linked administrative data are not intended for research purposes, detailed knowledge of the data sets is required by researchers, and the time delay in receiving the data is viewed as a barrier to its use. The lack of access to primary care data sets is viewed as a barrier to administrative data use; however, work to expand the number of healthcare data sets that can be linked has made it easier for researchers to access and use these data, which may have implications on how randomised controlled trials will be run in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma Fahridin
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Neeru Agarwal
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Karen Bracken
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephen Law
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Toro G, Braile A, Liguori S, Moretti A, Landi G, Cecere AB, Conza G, De Cicco A, Tarantino U, Iolascon G. The role of the fracture liaison service in the prevention of atypical femoral fractures. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2023; 15:1759720X231212747. [PMID: 38035253 PMCID: PMC10685792 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x231212747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteoporosis and fragility fractures (FFs) are considered critical health problems by the World Health Organization (WHO) because of high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. The occurrence of a FF raises the risk of a subsequent fracture (refracture). The hip is the most common site of fragility refracture, and its onset is associated with a further increase in patient's morbidity, mortality, and socioeconomic burden. Therefore, the prevention of refracture is essential. In this context, fracture liaison service (FLS) demonstrated to be able to reduce FF risk and also improve patients' adherence to anti-osteoporotic treatments, particularly for bisphosphonates (BPs). However, long-term and high adherence to BPs may lead to atypical femoral fractures (AFFs). These latter are tensile side stress fractures of the femur, with high rates of complications, including delayed and non-healing. An effective FLS should be able to prevent both FF and AFF. A comprehensive and interdisciplinary approach, through the involvement and education of a dedicated team of healthcare professionals (i.e. orthopedic, geriatrician, primary care physician, rehabilitation team, and bone nurse) for evaluating both FF and AFF risks might be useful to improve the standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Toro
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via L. De Crecchio 4, Naples 80138, Italy
| | - Adriano Braile
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- Unit of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
| | - Sara Liguori
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Antimo Moretti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Landi
- Unit of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Santa Maria della Speranza Hospital, Battipaglia, Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Conza
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Annalisa De Cicco
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- Unit of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli, Italy
| | - Umberto Tarantino
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Iolascon
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang M, Seibel MJ. Approach to the Patient With Bone Fracture: Making the First Fracture the Last. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2023; 108:3345-3352. [PMID: 37290052 PMCID: PMC10655538 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The global burden of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures will increase significantly as we enter a rapidly aging population. Osteoporotic fractures lead to increased morbidity, mortality, and risk of subsequent fractures if left untreated. However, studies have shown that the majority of patients who suffer an osteoporotic fracture are not investigated or treated for osteoporosis, leading to an inexcusable "osteoporosis care gap." Systematic and coordinated models of care in secondary fracture prevention known as fracture liaison services (FLS) have been established to streamline and improve the care of patients with osteoporotic fractures, and employ core principles of identification, investigation, and initiation of treatment. Our approach to the multifaceted care of secondary fracture prevention at a hospital-based FLS is illustrated through several case vignettes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mawson Wang
- The University of Sydney, Bone Research Program, ANZAC Research Institute, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia
| | - Markus J Seibel
- The University of Sydney, Bone Research Program, ANZAC Research Institute, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cianferotti L, Porcu G, Ronco R, Adami G, Alvaro R, Bogini R, Caputi AP, Frediani B, Gatti D, Gonnelli S, Iolascon G, Lenzi A, Leone S, Michieli R, Migliaccio S, Nicoletti T, Paoletta M, Pennini A, Piccirilli E, Rossini M, Tarantino U, Brandi ML, Corrao G, Biffi A. The integrated structure of care: evidence for the efficacy of models of clinical governance in the prevention of fragility fractures after recent sentinel fracture after the age of 50 years. Arch Osteoporos 2023; 18:109. [PMID: 37603196 PMCID: PMC10442313 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-023-01316-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
Randomized clinical trials and observational studies on the implementation of clinical governance models, in patients who had experienced a fragility fracture, were examined. Literature was systematically reviewed and summarized by a panel of experts who formulated recommendations for the Italian guideline. PURPOSE After experiencing a fracture, several strategies may be adopted to reduce the risk of recurrent fragility fractures and associated morbidity and mortality. Clinical governance models, such as the fracture liaison service (FLS), have been introduced for the identification, treatment, and monitoring of patients with secondary fragility fractures. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the association between multidisciplinary care systems and several outcomes in patients with a fragility fracture in the context of the development of the Italian Guidelines. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were investigated up to December 2020 to update the search of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies that analyzed clinical governance models in patients who had experienced a fragility fracture were eligible. Three authors independently extracted data and appraised the risk of bias in the included studies. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Effect sizes were pooled in a meta-analysis using random-effects models. Primary outcomes were bone mineral density values, antiosteoporotic therapy initiation, adherence to antiosteoporotic medications, subsequent fracture, and mortality risk, while secondary outcomes were quality of life and physical performance. RESULTS Fifteen RCTs and 62 observational studies, ranging from very low to low quality for bone mineral density values, antiosteoporotic initiation, adherence to antiosteoporotic medications, subsequent fracture, mortality, met our inclusion criteria. The implementation of clinical governance models compared to their pre-implementation or standard care/non-attenders significantly improved BMD testing rate, and increased the number of patients who initiated antiosteoporotic therapy and enhanced their adherence to the medications. Moreover, the treatment by clinical governance model respect to standard care/non-attenders significantly reduced the risk of subsequent fracture and mortality. The integrated structure of care enhanced the quality of life and physical function among patients with fragility fractures. CONCLUSIONS Based on our findings, clinicians should promote the management of patients experiencing a fragility fracture through structured and integrated models of care. The task force has formulated appropriate recommendations on the implementation of multidisciplinary care systems in patients with, or at risk of, fragility fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Cianferotti
- Italian Bone Disease Research Foundation (FIRMO), Florence, Italy
| | - G Porcu
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
| | - R Ronco
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
| | - G Adami
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - R Alvaro
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - R Bogini
- Local Health Unit (USL) Umbria, Perugia, Italy
| | - A P Caputi
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Messina, Sicily, Italy
| | - B Frediani
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - D Gatti
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - S Gonnelli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Policlinico Le Scotte, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - G Iolascon
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - A Lenzi
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, Rome, Italy
| | - S Leone
- AMICI Onlus, Associazione nazionale per le Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche dell'Intestino, Milan, Italy
| | - R Michieli
- Italian Society of General Medicine and Primary Care (SIMG), Florence, Italy
| | - S Migliaccio
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Foro Italico University, Rome, Italy
| | - T Nicoletti
- CnAMC, Coordinamento nazionale delle Associazioni dei Malati Cronici e rari di Cittadinanzattiva, Rome, Italy
| | - M Paoletta
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - A Pennini
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - E Piccirilli
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, "Policlinico Tor Vergata" Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - M Rossini
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - U Tarantino
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, "Policlinico Tor Vergata" Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - M L Brandi
- Italian Bone Disease Research Foundation (FIRMO), Florence, Italy
| | - G Corrao
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - A Biffi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bennett MJ, Center JR, Perry L. Exploring barriers and opportunities to improve osteoporosis care across the acute-to-primary care interface: a qualitative study. Osteoporos Int 2023:10.1007/s00198-023-06748-0. [PMID: 37093239 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06748-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
This qualitative study interviewed general practitioners, patients, and FLS clinicians and identified key challenges facing stakeholders seeking to improve post-fracture osteoporosis care. Local policies and care pathways as an initial strategy may address information and service delivery issues across the acute-primary care divide. INTRODUCTION Fracture liaison services (FLS) can be effective for secondary fracture prevention, but long-term adherence to therapies remains suboptimal. Few studies have explored how services manage the transition between tertiary and primary post-fracture care. This study mapped service processes and factors influencing integration of post-clinic care, identifying barriers, supports, and opportunities for seamless healthcare. METHODS Qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews with FLS stakeholders at two metropolitan hospitals in New South Wales (NSW) and surrounding general practices. RESULTS Seven FLS clinicians, 11 general practitioners (GPs), and seven patients were interviewed. Six key themes emerged on the transition of patient care from tertiary to primary care (PC). Interprofessional communication issues and role ambiguity posed threats to seamless care. Delayed, absent, inaccessible, or poor-quality communication frustrated GPs, while FLS clinicians lacked confidence in existing communication systems and desired bidirectional communication with PC. GPs were confident managing osteoporosis, but FLS clinicians had limited confidence that patients would discuss osteoporosis with their GP and that GPs would action recommendations. Effective PC follow-up required a positive GP-patient relationship and that patients perceived a need to engage with PC. Patient understanding of osteoporosis (influenced by patient education, knowledge, beliefs, and health behaviours) affected PC attendance. Limited public awareness of osteoporosis and healthcare policy deficits contributed to care gaps. CONCLUSION Key challenges were identified facing stakeholders seeking to improving post-clinic osteoporosis care. Development and implementation of local, integrated acute-community policies and care pathways as an initial intervention may address information and service delivery issues across the acute-PC divide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Bennett
- The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, NSW, Darlinghurst, Australia.
- St George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, Australia.
- Prince of Wales Hospital & Community Health Services, NSW, Randwick, Australia.
| | - Jacqueline R Center
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, St Vincent's Healthcare Clinical Campus, UNSW, Sydney, Australia
- The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, NSW, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | - Lin Perry
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Ultimo, Australia
- Prince of Wales Hospital & Community Health Services, NSW, Randwick, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Corrao G, Biffi A, Porcu G, Ronco R, Adami G, Alvaro R, Bogini R, Caputi AP, Cianferotti L, Frediani B, Gatti D, Gonnelli S, Iolascon G, Lenzi A, Leone S, Michieli R, Migliaccio S, Nicoletti T, Paoletta M, Pennini A, Piccirilli E, Rossini M, Tarantino U, Brandi ML. Executive summary: Italian guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and care continuity of fragility fractures 2021. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1137671. [PMID: 37143730 PMCID: PMC10151776 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1137671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Fragility fractures are a major public health concern owing to their worrying and growing burden and their onerous burden upon health systems. There is now a substantial body of evidence that individuals who have already suffered a fragility fracture are at a greater risk for further fractures, thus suggesting the potential for secondary prevention in this field. Purpose This guideline aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for recognizing, stratifying the risk, treating, and managing patients with fragility fracture. This is a summary version of the full Italian guideline. Methods The Italian Fragility Fracture Team appointed by the Italian National Health Institute was employed from January 2020 to February 2021 to (i) identify previously published systematic reviews and guidelines on the field, (ii) formulate relevant clinical questions, (iii) systematically review literature and summarize evidence, (iv) draft the Evidence to Decision Framework, and (v) formulate recommendations. Results Overall, 351 original papers were included in our systematic review to answer six clinical questions. Recommendations were categorized into issues concerning (i) frailty recognition as the cause of bone fracture, (ii) (re)fracture risk assessment, for prioritizing interventions, and (iii) treatment and management of patients experiencing fragility fractures. Six recommendations were overall developed, of which one, four, and one were of high, moderate, and low quality, respectively. Conclusions The current guidelines provide guidance to support individualized management of patients experiencing non-traumatic bone fracture to benefit from secondary prevention of (re)fracture. Although our recommendations are based on the best available evidence, questionable quality evidence is still available for some relevant clinical questions, so future research has the potential to reduce uncertainty about the effects of intervention and the reasons for doing so at a reasonable cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Corrao
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Giovanni Corrao, ; Maria Luisa Brandi,
| | - Annalisa Biffi
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Gloria Porcu
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Ronco
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Rosaria Alvaro
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Luisella Cianferotti
- Italian Bone Disease Research Foundation, Fondazione Italiana Ricerca sulle Malattie dell’Osso (FIRMO), Florence, Italy
| | - Bruno Frediani
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Davide Gatti
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Gonnelli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Policlinico Le Scotte, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Giovanni Iolascon
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Lenzi
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Leone
- AMICI Onlus, Associazione Nazionale per le Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche dell’Intestino, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Michieli
- Italian Society of General Medicine and Primary Care Società Italiana di Medicina Generale e delle cure primarie (SIMG), Florence, Italy
| | - Silvia Migliaccio
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Foro Italico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Nicoletti
- CnAMC, Coordinamento nazionale delle Associazioni dei Malati Cronici e rari di Cittadinanzattiva, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Paoletta
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Annalisa Pennini
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Piccirilli
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, “Policlinico Tor Vergata” Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Umberto Tarantino
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, “Policlinico Tor Vergata” Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Brandi
- Italian Bone Disease Research Foundation, Fondazione Italiana Ricerca sulle Malattie dell’Osso (FIRMO), Florence, Italy
- *Correspondence: Giovanni Corrao, ; Maria Luisa Brandi,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Non-Adherence to Anti-Osteoporosis Medication: Factors Influencing and Strategies to Overcome It. A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2022; 12:jcm12010014. [PMID: 36614816 PMCID: PMC9821321 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the reasons for inadequate adherence to osteoporosis therapy and to describe the strategies for improving adherence to and persistence with regular medications, we conducted a review of the literature. The primary outcome of the study was the determination of the factors adverse to the onset and maintenance of anti-osteoporosis therapies. Secondly, we focused on studies whose efforts led to finding different strategies to improve adherence and persistence. We identified a total of 26 articles. The most recurrent and significant factors identified were aging, polypharmacy, and smoking habits. Different strategies to guide patients in their osteoporosis care have been identified, such as monitoring and follow-up via telephone calls, email, and promotional meetings, and proactive care interventions such as medication monitoring, post-fracture care programs, and decision aids. Changes in the drugs regimen and dispensation are strategies tried to lead to better adherence and persistence, but also improved satisfaction of patients undergoing anti-osteoporosis treatment. Patient involvement is an important factor to increase medication persistence while using a flexible drugs regimen.
Collapse
|
8
|
Paskins Z, Babatunde O, Sturrock A, Toh LS, Horne R, Maidment I. Supporting patients to get the best from their osteoporosis treatment: a rapid realist review of what works, for whom, and in what circumstance. Osteoporos Int 2022; 33:2245-2257. [PMID: 35688897 PMCID: PMC9568441 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06453-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Systematic reviews that examine effectiveness of interventions to improve medicines optimisation do not explain how or why they work. This realist review identified that interventions which effectively optimise medicines use in osteoporosis include opportunities to address patients' perceptions of illness and treatment and/or support primary care clinician decision making. INTRODUCTION In people with osteoporosis, adherence to medicines is poorer than other diseases and patients report follow-up is lacking, and multiple unmet information needs. We conducted a rapid realist review to understand what contextual conditions and mechanisms enable interventions to support osteoporosis medication optimisation. METHODS A primary search identified observational or interventional studies which aimed to improve medicines adherence or optimisation; a supplementary second search identified research of any design to gain additional insights on emerging findings. Extracted data was interrogated for patterns of context-mechanism-outcome configurations, further discussed in team meetings, informed by background literature and the Practicalities and Perception Approach as an underpinning conceptual framework. RESULTS We identified 5 contextual timepoints for the person with osteoporosis (identifying a problem; starting medicine; continuing medicine) and the practitioner and healthcare system (making a diagnosis and giving a treatment recommendation; reviewing medicine). Interventions which support patient-informed decision making appear to influence long-term commitment to treatment. Supporting patients' practical ability to adhere (e.g. by lowering treatment burden and issuing reminders) only appears to be helpful, when combined with other approaches to address patient beliefs and concerns. However, few studies explicitly addressed patients' perceptions of illness and treatment. Supporting primary care clinician decision making and integration of primary and secondary care services also appears to be important, in improving rates of treatment initiation and adherence. CONCLUSIONS We identified a need for further research to identify a sustainable, integrated, patient-centred, and cost- and clinically effective model of long-term care for people with osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Paskins
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
- Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK.
| | - O Babatunde
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - A Sturrock
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - L S Toh
- Division of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - R Horne
- Centre for Behavioural Medicine, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - I Maidment
- Clinical Pharmacy, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sanders E, Dobransky J, Cheaitani L, Harris N, Liew A, Papp S, Grammatopoulos G. Preventing hip fractures with multidisciplinary teams: a Canadian perspective. Can J Surg 2021; 64:E310-E316. [PMID: 34038059 PMCID: PMC8327994 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.014219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Fragility fractures (FFs) are low-energy trauma fractures that occur at or below standing height. Among FFs, hip fractures are associated with the greatest morbidity, mortality and cost to Canadian health care systems. This review highlights the current state of medical care for hip fractures in Canada, with specific focus on the role of the multidisciplinary team. Gaps in care exist, as FFs represent a unique challenge requiring both acute and chronic management. Furthermore, there is a lack of ownership of FFs by a medical specialty. These gaps can be addressed through the use of multidisciplinary teams, which have been shown to be efficacious and cost-effective. This model of care also addresses numerous patient-identified barriers to treatment, including inadequate patient counselling. However, there is still room for improvement in both the identification of patients at risk for hip fracture and patient adherence to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan Sanders
- From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Sanders); the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. (Dobransky, Liew, Papp, Harris, Grammatopoulos); and the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Cheaitani)
| | - Johanna Dobransky
- From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Sanders); the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. (Dobransky, Liew, Papp, Harris, Grammatopoulos); and the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Cheaitani)
| | - Lara Cheaitani
- From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Sanders); the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. (Dobransky, Liew, Papp, Harris, Grammatopoulos); and the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Cheaitani)
| | - Nicole Harris
- From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Sanders); the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. (Dobransky, Liew, Papp, Harris, Grammatopoulos); and the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Cheaitani)
| | - Allan Liew
- From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Sanders); the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. (Dobransky, Liew, Papp, Harris, Grammatopoulos); and the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Cheaitani)
| | - Steven Papp
- From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Sanders); the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. (Dobransky, Liew, Papp, Harris, Grammatopoulos); and the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Cheaitani)
| | - George Grammatopoulos
- From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Sanders); the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. (Dobransky, Liew, Papp, Harris, Grammatopoulos); and the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. (Cheaitani)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Delbar A, Pflimlin A, Delabrière I, Ternynck C, Chantelot C, Puisieux F, Cortet B, Paccou J. Persistence with osteoporosis treatment in patients from the Lille University Hospital Fracture Liaison Service. Bone 2021; 144:115838. [PMID: 33385615 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION A Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) was set up at Lille University Hospital in 2016. The purpose of this study was to assess persistence with osteoporosis treatment in patients from the FLS over a period of 1 year, and to determine predictors of discontinuation. METHODS The study population comprised adults of both genders, aged 50 or over, admitted to Lille University Hospital between January 2016 and January 2019 for a low-trauma fracture and managed in our FLS. Outcomes included (1) persistence rate at 1 year after treatment initiation, (2) persistence rate at 2 years after treatment initiation, (3) persistence rate at 1 and 2 years after treatment initiation according to type of treatment, (4) predictors of non-persistence, and (5) reasons for discontinuing treatment over 1 year after initiation. Persistence was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS In all, 1224 patients (≥50 years old) with a recent history of low-trauma fracture (≤12 months) were identified. Of these, 380 patients - 79.2% female; mean (SD) age 76 (11) years - were seen at the FLS. In those 380 patients, 410 fractures were found and 360 of them (87.8%) were major fractures, breaking down as follows: vertebra (44%), hip (19%), proximal humerus (10%), and pelvis (8%). Osteoporosis treatment was prescribed for 367 (96.6%) patients and 275 of them began the prescribed treatment. The following anti-osteoporosis drugs were prescribed: zoledronic acid (n=150, 54.5%), teriparatide (n=63, 22.9%), and denosumab (n=39, 14.2%). Oral bisphosphonates were prescribed for a few patients (n=23, 8.4%). Persistence with osteoporosis medication (any class) was estimated at 84.1% (95% CI: 79.1% to 88.1%) at 12-month follow-up, and dropped to 70.3% (95% CI: 63.7% to 75.9%) at 24 months. When drug-specific analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, persistence rates at 12 and 24 months were found to be higher with denosumab than with any other treatment. Independent predictors of non-persistence at 12 months were 'follow-up performed by a general practitioner (GP)' - Odds Ratio (OR) for GP vs. FLS = 3.68; 95% CI, 1.52 to 8.90, p=0.004 - and 'treatment with zoledronic acid' - OR for zoledronic acid vs. denosumab = 3.39; 95% CI, 1.21 to 9.50, p=0.019; OR for zoledronic acid vs. teriparatide = 8.86; 95% CI, 1.15 to 68.10, p=0.035. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence of the success of our FLS in terms of long-term persistence with osteoporosis treatments. However, osteoporosis treatment initiation still needs to be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Delbar
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, Department of Rheumatology, 59000 Lille, France.
| | - Arnaud Pflimlin
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, Department of Rheumatology, 59000 Lille, France.
| | | | - Camille Ternynck
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
| | | | - François Puisieux
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, Department of Gerontology, 59000 Lille, France.
| | - Bernard Cortet
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, MABlab ULR 4490, Department of Rheumatology, 59000 Lille, France.
| | - Julien Paccou
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, MABlab ULR 4490, Department of Rheumatology, 59000 Lille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Giusti A, Bianchi G, Barone A, Black DM. A novel effervescent formulation of oral weekly alendronate (70 mg) improves persistence compared to alendronate tablets in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis. Aging Clin Exp Res 2021; 33:2529-2537. [PMID: 33449337 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01777-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A novel effervescent buffered solution of 70 mg alendronate (ALN-EX) was developed to improve upper gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability over alendronate tablets (ALN-T). Whether a better GI tolerability can improve persistence remains to be determined. AIM This study evaluated persistence and reasons for discontinuation in patients treated with ALN-EX compared to a historical cohort on ALN-T. METHODS Post-menopausal women (PMW) from a standardized clinical database with BMD T-score < -2.5, or between -2 and -2.5 and at least one vertebral fracture, starting ALN-EX between July 2015 and June 2016 were included. A historical cohort comprised of randomly selected and age-matched PMW on ALN-T was used as a control. Persistence at 6 and 12 months and reasons for discontinuation (e.g. adverse events; AE) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS A total of 144 PMW on ALN-EX and 216 PMW on ALN-T were analysed. Persistence at 6 and 12 months was 91% and 81% in the ALN-EX group vs. 75% and 69% in the ALN-T group, this difference attaining statistical significance at both 6- (p < 0.001) and 12 months (p = 0.009). A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving ALN-T discontinued treatment due to GI AEs (4% ALN-EX vs. 11% ALN-T; p = 0.027), or patient's decision to discontinue (6% ALN-EX vs. 13% ALN-T; p = 0.016). The adjusted odds ratio of persisting on ALN-EX treatment at 12 months was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.21-3.41, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION Our findings demonstrate that ALN-EX can provide greater persistence and improved tolerability compared to ALN-T, allowing it to be a viable alternative option in the management of osteoporosis.
Collapse
|
12
|
Persistence with oral bisphosphonates and denosumab among older adults in primary care in Ireland. Arch Osteoporos 2021; 16:71. [PMID: 33864529 PMCID: PMC8053179 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-00932-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Gaps in pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis can reduce effectiveness. Among older adults, we found about half of new users of oral bisphosphonate and denosumab persisted with their treatment at 2 years, with few switching to alternative therapy. Persistence is suboptimal and warrants evaluation of interventions to improve this. PURPOSE Gaps in pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis can reduce effectiveness. This study aimed to estimate persistence rates for oral bisphosphonates and denosumab in older primary care patients and identify factors associated with discontinuation. METHODS Older patients newly prescribed oral bisphosphonates or denosumab during 2012-2017 were identified from 44 general practices (GP) in Ireland. Persistence without a coverage gap of >90 days was calculated for both medications from therapy initiation. Factors associated with time to discontinuation were explored using Cox regression analysis. Exposures included age group, osteoporosis diagnosis, fracture history, calcium/vitamin D prescription, number of other medications, health cover, dosing frequency (bisphosphonates) and previous bone-health medication (denosumab). RESULTS Of 41,901 patients, n=1569 were newly initiated on oral bisphosphonates and n=1615 on denosumab. Two-year persistence was 49.4% for oral bisphosphonates and 53.8% for denosumab and <10% were switched to other medication. Having state-funded health cover was associated with a lower hazard of discontinuation for both oral bisphosphonates (HR=0.49, 95% CI=0.36-0.66, p<0.01) and denosumab (HR=0.71, 95% CI=0.57-0.89, p<0.01). Older age group, number of medications and calcium/vitamin D prescription were also associated with better bisphosphonate persistence, while having osteoporosis diagnosed was associated with better denosumab persistence. CONCLUSION Persistence for osteoporosis medications is suboptimal. Of concern, few patients are switched to other bone-health treatments when denosumab is stopped which could increase fracture risk. Free access to GP services and medications may have resulted in better medication persistence in this cohort. Future research should explore prescribing choices in primary care osteoporosis management and evaluate cost-effectiveness of interventions for improving persistence.
Collapse
|
13
|
Cha YH, Ha YC, Park KS, Yoo JI. What is the Role of Coordinators in the Secondary Fracture Prevention Program? J Bone Metab 2020; 27:187-199. [PMID: 32911583 PMCID: PMC7571241 DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2020.27.3.187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study is to search for reports on the clinical effectiveness of FLS being implemented worldwide through the systematic review, analyze the roles of coordinators in each study, and provide basic data for the development of future coordinator education programs. Methods A systematic search of the literature using the Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Library was conducted for using the following keywords: ‘osteoporosis’ AND ‘fractures’ AND ’secondary prevention’. Finally, 65 studies are included in this study. Results At the coordinator-based fracture liaison service (FLS) center, the coordinator (often a nurse) acts as a central player in the establishing of patient connections, orthopedic surgeons, radiologists, and attending physicians. Coordinators help bridge the nursing gap by supporting identification, investigation, initiation of treatment, and patient follow-up. Medics has opened the way to effectively manage patients at high risk of developing another fracture. In addition, nurses are in a unique and important role as nurses responsible for enhancing their daily lives by building relationships with patients and families. Conclusions The coordinator in the FLS program plays an important role in the multidisciplinary management of vulnerable fractures, as well as in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis and in maintaining continuity of treatment. In the future, the broader role of coordinators should be systematically organized and developed into accredited educational programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Han Cha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Yong-Chan Ha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki-Soo Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea
| | - Jun-Il Yoo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cornelissen D, de Kunder S, Si L, Reginster JY, Evers S, Boonen A, Hiligsmann M. Interventions to improve adherence to anti-osteoporosis medications: an updated systematic review. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:1645-1669. [PMID: 32358684 PMCID: PMC7423788 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05378-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
An earlier systematic review on interventions to improve adherence and persistence was updated. Fifteen studies investigating the effectiveness of patient education, drug regimen, monitoring and supervision, and interdisciplinary collaboration as a single or multi-component intervention were appraised. Multicomponent interventions with active patient involvement were more effective. INTRODUCTION This study was conducted to update a systematic literature review on interventions to improve adherence to anti-osteoporosis medications. METHODS A systematic literature review was carried out in Medline (using PubMed), Embase (using Ovid), Cochrane Library, Current Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov , NHS Centre for Review and Dissemination, CINHAL, and PsycINFO to search for original studies that assessed interventions to improve adherence (comprising initiation, implementation, and discontinuation) and persistence to anti-osteoporosis medications among patients with osteoporosis, published between July 2012 and December 2018. Quality of included studies was assessed. RESULTS Of 585 studies initially identified, 15 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria of which 12 were randomized controlled trials. Interventions were classified as (1) patient education (n = 9), (2) drug regimen (n = 3), (3) monitoring and supervision (n = 2), and (4) interdisciplinary collaboration (n = 1). In most subtypes of interventions, mixed results on adherence (and persistence) were found. Multicomponent interventions based on patient education and counseling were the most effective interventions when aiming to increase adherence and/or persistence to osteoporosis medications. CONCLUSION This updated review suggests that patient education, monitoring and supervision, change in drug regimen, and interdisciplinary collaboration have mixed results on medication adherence and persistence, with more positive effects for multicomponent interventions with active patient involvement. Compared with the previous review, a shift towards more patient involvement, counseling and shared decision-making, was seen, suggesting that individualized solutions, based on collaboration between the patient and the healthcare provider, are needed to improve adherence and persistence to osteoporosis medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Cornelissen
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Room 0.038, 6200, Maastricht, MD, Netherlands.
| | - S de Kunder
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Center for Family Medicine, Geriatric Care and Public Health, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - L Si
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia
| | - J-Y Reginster
- WHO Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of Musculoskeletal Health and Ageing, Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - S Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Room 0.038, 6200, Maastricht, MD, Netherlands
- Centre for economic evaluation, Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - A Boonen
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Room 0.038, 6200, Maastricht, MD, Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - M Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Room 0.038, 6200, Maastricht, MD, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Patients discharged from a fracture liaison service still require follow-up and bone health advice. Arch Osteoporos 2020; 15:118. [PMID: 32728971 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-020-00787-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Fracture liaison services (FLSs) were established to address the well-recognised gap in bone health management after a fragility fracture. However, it is unclear what happens to patients after discharge from an FLS. Our study suggests FLSs should include a patient bone health education session and a follow-up telephone call 12-18 months post-discharge to optimise management, in particular, to assess therapy adherence and to reinforce bone health advice. PURPOSE While fracture liaison services (FLSs) have improved bone health management following fragility fracture, it is unclear what happens to patients following discharge from these services. We sought to determine patient self-reported medication adherence and the need for bone-specific health advice ≥ 12 months following discharge from one of the first FLSs in Australia. METHODS Patients were contacted by telephone ≥ 12 months following discharge from the Coffs Fracture Prevention Clinic (CFPC)/FLS to determine if the patient was still taking prescribed bone protective therapy (BPT). Bone health advice was provided, if appropriate, during the telephone interview. RESULTS Of the 516 consecutive patients seen in CFPC from July 2012-December 2018, 326 (63.2%) were assessed and discharged from the clinic. One hundred and two patients (19.8%) were lost to follow-up/uncontactable. Of 190 patients commenced on BPT at CFPC and who were discharged ≥ 12 months prior, 141 (74.2%) self-reported adherence with BPT. Bone health advice was required during the telephone call in 60/190 (31.6%) of these patients. Of the 141 adherent patients, 40 (28.4%) had attended a bone health education session, compared to 4/49 (8.2%) patients in the non-adherent group (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION At 19 months following discharge from our FLS, self-reported adherence with treatment was 74%. One bone health education session at baseline was associated with increased treatment adherence. At time of telephone contact, one third of patients required further advice to optimise bone health.
Collapse
|
16
|
Javaid MK, Sami A, Lems W, Mitchell P, Thomas T, Singer A, Speerin R, Fujita M, Pierroz DD, Akesson K, Halbout P, Ferrari S, Cooper C. A patient-level key performance indicator set to measure the effectiveness of fracture liaison services and guide quality improvement: a position paper of the IOF Capture the Fracture Working Group, National Osteoporosis Foundation and Fragility Fracture Network. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:1193-1204. [PMID: 32266437 PMCID: PMC7280347 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05377-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) Capture the Fracture® Campaign with the Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) and National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) has developed eleven patient-level key performance indicators (KPIs) for fracture liaison services (FLSs) to guide quality improvement. INTRODUCTION Fracture Liaison Services (FLSs) are recommended worldwide to reduce fracture risk after a sentinel fracture. Given not every FLS is automatically effective, the IOF Capture the Fracture working group has developed and implemented the Best Practice Framework to assess the organisational components of an FLS. We have now developed a complimentary KPI set that extends this assessment of performance to the patient level. METHODS The Capture the Fracture working group in collaboration with the Fragility Fracture Network Secondary Fragility Fracture Special Interest Group and National Osteoporosis Foundation adapted existing metrics from the UK-based Fracture Liaison Service Database Audit to develop a patient-level KPI set for FLSs. RESULTS Eleven KPIs were selected. The proportion of patients: with non-spinal fractures; with spine fractures (detected clinically and radiologically); assessed for fracture risk within 12 weeks of sentinel fracture; having DXA assessment within 12 weeks of sentinel fracture; having falls risk assessment; recommended anti-osteoporosis medication; commenced of strength and balance exercise intervention within 16 weeks of sentinel fracture; monitored within 16 weeks of sentinel fracture; started anti-osteoporosis medication within 16 weeks of sentinel fracture; prescribed anti-osteoporosis medication 52 weeks after sentinel fracture. The final KPI measures data completeness for each of the other KPIs. For these indicators, levels of achievement were set at the < 50%, 50-80% and > 80% levels except for treatment recommendation where a level of 50% was used. CONCLUSION This KPI set compliments the existing Best Practice Framework to support FLSs to examine their own performance using patient-level data. By using this KPI set for local quality improvement cycles, FLSs will be able to efficiently realise the full potential of secondary fracture prevention and improved clinical outcomes for their local populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M K Javaid
- The Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX4 7LD, UK.
| | - A Sami
- The Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX4 7LD, UK
| | - W Lems
- VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Mitchell
- The Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX4 7LD, UK
- School of Medicine, Sydney Campus, The University of Notre Dame Australia, 140 Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - T Thomas
- Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Nord, CHU de Saint-Etienne, and INSERM U1059, University of Lyon, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - A Singer
- Department of Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - R Speerin
- Fragility Fracture Network, Zürich, Switzerland
- Musculoskeletal Network, NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation, Chatswood, Australia
| | - M Fujita
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - D D Pierroz
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - K Akesson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - P Halbout
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - S Ferrari
- Division of Bone Disease, Department of Internal Medicine Specialties, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - C Cooper
- The Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX4 7LD, UK
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Beaupre LA, Moradi F, Khong H, Smith C, Evens L, Hanson HM, Juby AG, Kivi P, Majumdar SR. Implementation of an in-patient hip fracture liaison services to improve initiation of osteoporosis medication use within 1-year of hip fracture: a population-based time series analysis using the RE-AIM framework. Arch Osteoporos 2020; 15:83. [PMID: 32488730 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-020-00751-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED A hip fracture liaison service that was implemented in 2 hospitals in Alberta, Canada, co-managed by a nurse and physician, was effective for improving initiation of osteoporosis medication following hip fracture. PURPOSE To examine implementation of an in-patient hip fracture liaison service (H-FLS) to improve osteoporosis medication use after hip fracture using the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance). METHODS Using population-based administrative data from 7 quarters before and up to 7 quarters after H-FLS implementation, we examined new starts, continued use, and overall use (new starts + continued use) of osteoporosis medication after hip fracture. A total of 1427 patients 50 years and older that underwent hip fracture surgery at 1 of 2 tertiary hospitals in a Canadian province and survived to 12 months post-fracture were included. We also compared treatment initiation rates by sex and hospital. RESULTS Of the 1427 patients, 1002 (70.2%) were female (mean age = 79.3 ± 11.9 years) and 425 (29.8%) were male (mean age = 73.8 ± 13.8 years). Based on pre-fracture residence within the health zone, 1101 (69%) were considered eligible (Reach). New starts of osteoporosis medication increased from 24.7% pre- to 43.9% post-implementation of the H-FLS (p < 0.001) (effectiveness). The proportion of patients prescribed osteoporosis medication prior to a hip fracture remained consistent (15.1% pre-; 14.7% post-implementation; p = 0.88) with a resultant improvement in overall medication use from 39.8% pre- to 58.6% post-implementation (p < 0.001). Both sites significantly improved medication initiation (site 1: 27.9% pre- to 40.3% post-implementation; site 2: 19.6% pre- to 50.0% post-implementation; p < 0.001 for both) (adoption). Medication initiation in females improved from 26.0% pre- to 43.4% post-implementation while initiation in males improved from 21.7% pre- to 45.1% post-implementation (p < 0.001[females]; p = 0.001[males]) (implementation). Post-implementation, elevated initiation rates were retained over the 7 quarters (p = 0.81) (maintenance). CONCLUSIONS An H-FLS based in two tertiary hospital sites significantly improved use of osteoporosis medications after hip fracture in both males and females.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L A Beaupre
- University of Alberta (Physical Therapy), 2-50 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G4, Canada.
| | - F Moradi
- Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - H Khong
- Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - C Smith
- Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - L Evens
- Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - H M Hanson
- Seniors Health Strategic Clinical Network™, Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary (Medicine), Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - A G Juby
- University of Alberta (Geriatric Medicine), Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - P Kivi
- University of Alberta (Family Medicine), Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - S R Majumdar
- University of Alberta (Medicine), Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mugnier B, Daumas A, Doddoli S, Belmeliani S, Couderc AL, Mizzi B, Lévêque P, Villani P. Adherence to fracture liaison service programs in patients over 70: the hidden part of the iceberg. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:765-774. [PMID: 31927612 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05290-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Significant dropout rates have been observed throughout Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) programs, especially for elderly patients. In an FLS program set up specifically for patients over 70, the non-initiation of osteoporosis treatment was the only factor associated with poor adherence to the program. Neither age nor frailty factors affected adherence. INTRODUCTION FLS programs are considered the most effective interventions for secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures. Our objective was to identify risk factors for non-adherence to an FLS program set up specifically for patients over 70. METHODS Our multifaceted, intensive program included five appointments over a 2-year period. One hundred sixty-seven patients (mean age 83.5 years) who presented with a recent fragility fracture were enrolled. Multivariable analysis was conducted to determine whether the demographic, clinical, frailty, and osteoporotic risk factors of the patients influenced their adherence to the program. RESULTS About half of the patients did not attend the follow-up visits. According to the regression analysis, non-initiation of osteoporosis treatment was associated with poor adherence to the program (aHR 3.66). Demographic, clinical, dwelling, frailty factors, osteoporotic risk factors, fracture type, or densitometric scores were not associated with adherence. The first self-reported reason for withdrawal was the difficulty of attending several follow-up visits, and the second was the feeling of not being concerned. CONCLUSION We observed that non-initiation of osteoporosis treatment was the only factor correlated with non-adherence to an FLS program. Thus, neither age nor frailty factors should result in patients not being included in FLS. Beyond the necessity of the osteoporosis treatment, good patient understanding of the relevance of all the interventions included in the program is the key.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Mugnier
- APHM, Hôpital Sainte Marguerite, Service de Médecine Interne Gériatrie et Thérapeutique, 270 Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.
| | - A Daumas
- APHM, Hôpital La Timone, Service de Médecine Interne Gériatrie et Thérapeutique, 264 rue Saint Pierre, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - S Doddoli
- APHM, Hôpital Sainte Marguerite, Service de Médecine Interne Gériatrie et Thérapeutique, 270 Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - S Belmeliani
- APHM, Hôpital Sainte Marguerite, Service de Médecine Interne Gériatrie et Thérapeutique, 270 Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - A-L Couderc
- APHM, Hôpital Sainte Marguerite, Service de Médecine Interne Gériatrie et Thérapeutique, 270 Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - B Mizzi
- APHM, Hôpital Sainte Marguerite, Service de Médecine Interne Gériatrie et Thérapeutique, 270 Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - P Lévêque
- APHM, Hôpital Sainte Marguerite, Service de Médecine Interne Gériatrie et Thérapeutique, 270 Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - P Villani
- APHM, Hôpital Sainte Marguerite, Service de Médecine Interne Gériatrie et Thérapeutique, 270 Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
- APHM, Hôpital La Timone, Service de Médecine Interne Gériatrie et Thérapeutique, 264 rue Saint Pierre, 13005, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kelly A, Crimston-Smith L, Tong A, Bartlett SJ, Bekker CL, Christensen R, De Vera MA, de Wit M, Evans V, Gill M, March L, Manera K, Nieuwlaat R, Salmasi S, Scholte-Voshaar M, Singh JA, Sumpton D, Toupin-April K, Tugwell P, van den Bemt B, Verstappen S, Tymms K. Scope of Outcomes in Trials and Observational Studies of Interventions Targeting Medication Adherence in Rheumatic Conditions: A Systematic Review. J Rheumatol 2019; 47:1565-1574. [PMID: 31839595 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.190726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Nonadherence to medications is common in rheumatic conditions and associated with increased morbidity. Heterogeneous outcome reporting by researchers compromises the synthesis of evidence of interventions targeting adherence. We aimed to assess the scope of outcomes in interventional studies of medication adherence. METHODS We searched electronic databases to February 2019 for published randomized controlled trials and observational studies of interventions with the primary outcome of medication adherence including adults with any rheumatic condition, written in English. We extracted and analyzed all outcome domains and adherence measures with prespecified extraction and analysis protocols. RESULTS Overall, 53 studies reported 71 outcome domains classified into adherence (1 domain), health outcomes (38 domains), and adherence-related factors (e.g., medication knowledge; 32 domains). We subdivided adherence into 3 phases: initiation (n = 13 studies, 25%), implementation (n = 32, 60%), persistence (n = 27, 51%), and phase unclear (n = 20, 38%). Thirty-seven different instruments reported adherence in 115 unique ways (this includes different adherence definitions and calculations, metric, and method of aggregation). Forty-one studies (77%) reported health outcomes. The most frequently reported were medication adverse events (n = 24, 45%), disease activity (n = 11, 21%), bone turnover markers/physical function/quality of life (each n = 10, 19%). Thirty-three studies (62%) reported adherence-related factors. The most frequently reported were medication beliefs (n = 8, 15%), illness perception/medication satisfaction/satisfaction with medication information (each n = 5, 9%), condition knowledge/medication knowledge/trust in doctor (each n = 3, 6%). CONCLUSION The outcome domains and adherence measures in interventional studies targeting adherence are heterogeneous. Consensus on relevant outcomes will improve the comparison of different strategies to support medication adherence in rheumatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayano Kelly
- A. Kelly, Clinical Associate Lecturer, Australian National University, MBBS, FRACP, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, and Canberra Rheumatology, Canberra, and Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia;
| | - Luke Crimston-Smith
- L. Crimston-Smith, BN, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, and Canberra Rheumatology, Canberra, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- A. Tong, PhD, Professor, K. Manera, MIPH, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, and Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Susan J Bartlett
- S.J. Bartlett, PhD, Professor, Department of Medicine, McGill University and Research Institute, McGill University Health Centres, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Charlotte L Bekker
- C.L. Bekker, PhD, Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Robin Christensen
- R. Christensen, PhD, Professor of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, the Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, and Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mary A De Vera
- M.A. De Vera, PhD, Assistant Professor, Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Maarten de Wit
- M. de Wit, PhD, OMERACT Patient Research Partner, the Netherlands
| | - Vicki Evans
- V. Evans, PhD, Clear Vision Consulting, Canberra, and OMERACT Patient Research Partner, and Discipline of Optometry, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
| | - Michael Gill
- M. Gill, BA, Dragon Claw, Sydney, Australia, and OMERACT Patient Research Partner
| | - Lyn March
- L. March, PhD, Professor, Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, and Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, and Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Karine Manera
- A. Tong, PhD, Professor, K. Manera, MIPH, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, and Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Robby Nieuwlaat
- R. Nieuwlaat, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shahrzad Salmasi
- S. Salmasi, MSc, Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Marieke Scholte-Voshaar
- M. Scholte-Voshaar, MSc, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands and OMERACT Patient Research Partner
| | - Jasvinder A Singh
- J.A. Singh, Professor, MD, Medicine Service, VA Medical Center, and Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama, and Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Daniel Sumpton
- D. Sumpton, MBBS, FRACP, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, and Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, and Department of Rheumatology, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Karine Toupin-April
- K. Toupin-April, PhD, Associate Scientist, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, and Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics and School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Tugwell
- P. Tugwell, MD, Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bart van den Bemt
- B. van den Bemt, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, and Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Verstappen
- S. Verstappen, PhD, Reader, Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Kathleen Tymms
- K. Tymms, MBBS, FRACP, Associate Professor, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, and Canberra Rheumatology, and Department of Rheumatology, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kwok TSH, Gakhal N, Ruban TN. The Evaluation of an Osteoporosis Clinic in a Community Hospital Setting: a Retrospective Chart Review and Telephone Survey. Can Geriatr J 2019; 22:143-147. [PMID: 31565110 PMCID: PMC6715410 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.22.359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients who have suffered fragility fractures are at an increased risk for subsequent fractures. The Osteoporosis (OP) Clinic at Markham Stouffville Hospital (MSH) was set up in July 2015 to screen, diagnose, and treat patients with fragility fractures. The goal of this study was to identify differences in OP screening and treatment initiation between patients seen in the OP clinic versus usual care. Methods A retrospective cohort study and telephone interview was conducted on 40 patients who had sustained a hip fragility fracture between September 2015 and July 2016. 20 of those patients were referred to the OP clinic, while the remaining patients received usual care. Results At the end of the intervention, 16/20 patients in the OP clinic group were appropriately placed on a bisphosphonate/RANKL inhibitor versus only 6/20 patients in the usual care group (p < .01). Conclusions A significant care gap exists in secondary fracture prevention between the osteoporosis clinic and usual care groups. Better screening and subsequent intervention are needed for patients with fragility fractures. This study highlights the efficacy of an outpatient OP clinic in a community hospital setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy S H Kwok
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Natasha Gakhal
- Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thanu N Ruban
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Markham Stouffville Hospital, Markham, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Senay A, Fernandes JC, Delisle J, Morin SN, Perreault S. Persistence and compliance to osteoporosis therapy in a fracture liaison service: a prospective cohort study. Arch Osteoporos 2019; 14:87. [PMID: 31375983 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-019-0633-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Persistence and compliance to osteoporosis medications aiming to prevent fragility fractures are essential for fracture prevention, but are suboptimal in the population. A Fracture Liaison Service with a systematic follow-up led to ongoing therapy and optimal drug compliance for more than half of treated patients over 2 years. PURPOSE Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) have the potential to improve persistence and compliance to osteoporosis therapy. We aimed to assess patterns of drug use in a high-level intervention FLS. METHODS Women and men (> 40 years) with a fragility fracture were recruited in a FLS, where osteoporosis therapy was prescribed if appropriate. Based on claims data, patients who filled their prescription in the 3-month period following baseline were selected. The 1- and 2-year persistence rates were measured using survival analysis. In non-persistent subjects, 1-year treatment re-initiation was measured. The 1- and 2-year compliance levels were measured, using the proportion of days covered (PDC > 80% = compliant). Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of non-persistence/compliance. RESULTS Out of 332 subjects with complete drug insurance coverage, 297 (89.5%) were prescribed osteoporosis therapy by the FLS, and 275 (92.6%) were dispensed. Two hundred sixty participants (86.9% female; mean age 65.6 years) were selected for having filled a prescription inside 3 months after baseline. The 1- and 2-year persistence rates were 66.4% and 55.6%, respectively. Treatment re-initiation was observed in 56% of non-persistent patients. PDC was > 80% in 64.2% for 1 year and 62.5% for 2 years. Older and younger age, smoking, higher spine bone mineral density, lower major FRAX risk, and missing follow-up visits were predictors of non-persistence and/or non-compliance. CONCLUSIONS After 2 years in a high-level intervention FLS, more than half the treated participants were persistent and compliant to treatment. Comparative effectiveness studies must be undertaken to determine whether this intervention is an improvement over usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andréa Senay
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, C. P. 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada.,CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 bl. Gouin ouest, Montréal, Quebec, H4J 1C5, Canada
| | - Julio C Fernandes
- CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 bl. Gouin ouest, Montréal, Quebec, H4J 1C5, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, 2900 bl. Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Quebec, H3T 1J4, Canada.,CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital Jean-Talon, 1385 rue Jean-Talon est, Montréal, Quebec, H2E 1S6, Canada
| | - Josée Delisle
- CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 bl. Gouin ouest, Montréal, Quebec, H4J 1C5, Canada.,CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital Jean-Talon, 1385 rue Jean-Talon est, Montréal, Quebec, H2E 1S6, Canada
| | - Suzanne N Morin
- Department of Medicine, Center for Outcomes and Evaluation, McGill University, 5252 de Maisonneuve ouest, Montréal, Quebec, H4A 3S5, Canada
| | - Sylvie Perreault
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, C. P. 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada. .,Sanofi Aventis endowment Research Chair in Optimal Drug Use, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pepe J, Cipriani C, Cecchetti V, Ferrara C, Della Grotta G, Danese V, Colangelo L, Minisola S. Patients' reasons for adhering to long-term alendronate therapy. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30:1627-1634. [PMID: 31089764 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05010-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED We aimed to determine patients' reasons for continuing alendronate therapy over 5 years by administering a questionnaire. Bone mineral density, fractures, drugs, Charlson comorbidity index, and lifestyle factors were also considered. Education and awareness of the disease appeared highly associated with good alendronate adherence while worsening health status with discontinuation. INTRODUCTION Aim of this study was to investigate patients' reasons for adhering to long-term alendronate therapy (more than 5 years), as data is not available in the current literature regarding the reasons behind long-term adherence. METHODS We studied 204 long-term adherent alendronate users: 65 postmenopausal outpatients still adherent (group C, years on treatment = 8.70 ± 1.31) were compared to 139 age-matched patients who discontinued therapy (group S, years on treatment = 8.64 ± 1.43). We evaluated main biochemical parameters, BMD values, fractures, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). A questionnaire was administered to analyze the reasons for long-term adherence. RESULTS There were no significant differences between groups concerning baseline DXA values, number of fractures, and CCI. A higher education level was observed in group C (C 54% vs S 35% of patients, p = 0.001). At the time of interview, there was a significantly higher number of patients with a CCI of two in group S compared to the beginning of treatment (56% vs 43%, p = 0.04), together with a higher number of patients taking more than 3 drugs (22% vs 11%, p = 0.01) compared to basal evaluation. Forty-seven percent of patients reported new diseases during the treatment as the main reason for stopping alendronate. A multivariate, stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that awareness of the disease was highly associated with adherence (OR = 0.20; 95% CI 0.045-0.93, p = 0.04) followed by higher education (OR = 0.526, 95% CI 0.345-0.801, p = 0.003). Worsening of CCI was associated with discontinuation (OR = 2.75, 95% CI 1.033-7.324, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Education and disease awareness are associated with long-term alendronate adherence while competing health problems negatively impact adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Pepe
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
| | - C Cipriani
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - V Cecchetti
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - C Ferrara
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - G Della Grotta
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - V Danese
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - L Colangelo
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - S Minisola
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Senay A, Perreault S, Delisle J, Morin SN, Raynauld JP, Banica A, Troyanov Y, Beaumont P, Jodoin A, Laflamme GY, Leduc S, Mac-Thiong JM, Nguyen H, Ranger P, Rouleau DM, Fernandes JC. Rationale, study design, and descriptive data of the Lucky Bone™ Fracture Liaison Service. Arch Osteoporos 2019; 14:19. [PMID: 30756193 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-019-0571-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The study design of a multidisciplinary Fracture Liaison Service (2-year follow-up) aiming to optimize fragility fracture management in an outpatient setting is presented. Patient characteristics, investigation, and treatment initiation data at baseline were recorded. Results corroborate the care gap in osteoporosis management, reinforcing the need for secondary fracture prevention programs. PURPOSE This paper describes the study design, implementation, and baseline characteristics of a multidisciplinary Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) in Quebec (Canada). METHODS A FLS was implemented as a prospective cohort study. After identification, fracture risk was assessed and patients were started on treatment or referred, according to guidelines and risk assessment. Thereafter, patients were systematically followed over 2 years. Clinical data (fractures, bone density, blood testing (bone turnover markers), quality of life, physical disability) as well as administrative data (pharmacological, health services, hospitalization) was collected. Baseline descriptive data was analyzed and presented. RESULTS Of 542 recruited participants, 532 underwent baseline assessment (85.7% female, mean age 63.4 years). Overall, 29.7% of participants either withdrew from the study or were lost to follow-up. Almost 27% were referred to a specialist, while > 70% received anti-osteoporosis medication prescriptions through the FLS at baseline. Mean femoral T-score was - 1.6 ± 1.0 and vertebral T-score was - 1.7 ± 1.4. Nearly 19% of subjects reported being under anti-osteoporosis medication at the time of incident fracture. Thirty-three percent of participants reported a prior fracture history, of which 29.7% reported being given anti-osteoporosis therapy. Most fracture sites were to the wrist and ankle, while < 19% were hip/femur or vertebral fractures. CONCLUSIONS These results highlight the important care gap in fragility fracture management and reinforce the need for secondary fracture prevention programs. This prospective study will allow the evaluation of key performance indicators for outpatient clinic-based FLS, such as medication usage, by combining prospective clinical and administrative data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andréa Senay
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, 2900 bl. Edouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada.,CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 bl. Gouin ouest, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada
| | - Sylvie Perreault
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, 2900 bl. Edouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada.,Sanofi Aventis endowment Research Chair in Optimal Drug Use, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Josée Delisle
- CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 bl. Gouin ouest, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada.,CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital Jean-Talon, 1385 rue Jean-Talon est, Montreal, QC, H2E 1S6, Canada
| | - Suzanne N Morin
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar avenue, Room B2.118, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Jean-Pierre Raynauld
- Institut de rhumatologie de Montréal, 1551 rue Ontario est, Montreal, QC, H2L 1S6, Canada
| | - Andreea Banica
- CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 bl. Gouin ouest, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada.,CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital Jean-Talon, 1385 rue Jean-Talon est, Montreal, QC, H2E 1S6, Canada
| | - Yves Troyanov
- CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 bl. Gouin ouest, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada
| | - Pierre Beaumont
- CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 bl. Gouin ouest, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada
| | - Alain Jodoin
- CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 bl. Gouin ouest, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada
| | - G Yves Laflamme
- CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 bl. Gouin ouest, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada.,CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital Jean-Talon, 1385 rue Jean-Talon est, Montreal, QC, H2E 1S6, Canada
| | - Stéphane Leduc
- CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 bl. Gouin ouest, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada.,CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital Jean-Talon, 1385 rue Jean-Talon est, Montreal, QC, H2E 1S6, Canada
| | - Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
- CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 bl. Gouin ouest, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada
| | - Hai Nguyen
- CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital Jean-Talon, 1385 rue Jean-Talon est, Montreal, QC, H2E 1S6, Canada
| | - Pierre Ranger
- CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 bl. Gouin ouest, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada.,CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital Jean-Talon, 1385 rue Jean-Talon est, Montreal, QC, H2E 1S6, Canada
| | - Dominique M Rouleau
- CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 bl. Gouin ouest, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada
| | - Julio C Fernandes
- CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 bl. Gouin ouest, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada. .,CIUSSS Nord de l'Ile de Montréal, Hôpital Jean-Talon, 1385 rue Jean-Talon est, Montreal, QC, H2E 1S6, Canada. .,Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, 2900 bl. Edouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada. .,Chaire de recherche en orthopédie de l'UdeM au CIUSS NIM, 5400 boul. Gouin ouest, Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
McAlister FA, Ye C, Beaupre LA, Rowe BH, Johnson JA, Bellerose D, Hassan I, Majumdar SR. Adherence to osteoporosis therapy after an upper extremity fracture: a pre-specified substudy of the C-STOP randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30:127-134. [PMID: 30232538 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4702-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Despite their proven efficacy for secondary fracture prevention, long-term adherence with oral bisphosphonates is poor. INTRODUCTION To compare the effectiveness of two interventions on long-term oral bisphosphonate adherence after an upper extremity fragility fracture. METHODS Community-dwelling participants 50 years or older with upper extremity fragility fractures not previously treated with bisphosphonates were randomized to either a multi-faceted patient and physician educational intervention (the active control arm) vs. a nurse-led case manager (the study arm). Primary outcome was adherence (taking > 80% of prescribed doses) with prescribed oral bisphosphonates at 12 months postfracture between groups; secondary outcomes included rates of primary non-adherence and 24-month adherence. We also compared quality of life between adherent and non-adherent patients. RESULTS By 12 months, adherence with the initially prescribed bisphosphonate was similar (p = 0.96) in both groups: 38/48 (79.2%) in the educational intervention group vs. 66/83 (79.5%) in the case manager arm. By 24 months, adherence rates were 67% (32/48) in the educational intervention group vs. 53% (43/81) in case managed patients (p = 0.13). Primary non-adherence was 6% (11 patients) in the educational intervention group and 12% (21 patients) in the case managed group (p = 0.07). Prior family history of osteoporosis (aOR 2.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 4.4) and being satisfied with current medical care (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.8) were associated with better adherence while lower income (aOR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.6, for patients with income < $30,000 per annum) was associated with poorer rates of adherence. There were no differences in health-related quality of life scores at baseline or during follow-up between patients who were adherent and those who were not. CONCLUSION While both interventions achieved higher oral bisphosphonate adherence compared to previously reported adherence rates in the general population, primary non-adherence and long-term adherence to bisphosphonates were similar in both arms. Adherence was influenced by family history of osteoporosis, satisfaction with current medical care, and income. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT01401556.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F A McAlister
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
- Clinical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, 11350 83 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G3, Canada.
| | - C Ye
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - L A Beaupre
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - B H Rowe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - J A Johnson
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - D Bellerose
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - I Hassan
- EPICORE Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - S R Majumdar
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yeam CT, Chia S, Tan HCC, Kwan YH, Fong W, Seng JJB. A systematic review of factors affecting medication adherence among patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29:2623-2637. [PMID: 30417253 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4759-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this review was to identify factors that influence patients' adherence to anti-osteoporotic therapy. Factors identified that were associated with poorer medication adherence included polypharmacy, older age, and misconceptions about osteoporosis. Physicians need to be aware of these factors so as to optimize therapeutic outcomes for patients. INTRODUCTION To identify factors that influence patients' adherence to anti-osteoporotic therapy. METHODS A systematic review of literature was performed for articles published up till January 2018 using PubMed®, PsychINFO®, Embase®, and CINAHL®. Peer-reviewed articles which examined factors associated with anti-osteoporotic medication adherence were included. Classes of anti-osteoporotic therapy included bisphosphonates, parathyroid hormone-related analogue, denosumab, selective estrogen receptor modulators, estrogen/progestin therapy, calcitonin, and strontium ranelate. Meta-analyses, case reports/series, and other systematic reviews were excluded. Identified factors were classified using the World Health Organization's five dimensions of medication adherence (condition, patient, therapy, health-system, and socio-economic domains). RESULTS Of 2404 articles reviewed, 124 relevant articles were identified. The prevalence of medication adherence ranged from 12.9 to 95.4%. Twenty-four factors with 139 sub-factors were identified. Bisphosphonates were the most well-studied class of medication (n = 59, 48%). Condition-related factors that were associated with poorer medication adherence included polypharmacy, and history of falls was associated with higher medication adherence. Patient-related factors which were associated with poorer medication adherence included older age and misconceptions about osteoporosis while therapy-related factors included higher dosing frequency and medication side effects. Health system-based factors associated with poorer medication adherence included care under different medical specialties and lack of patient education. Socio-economic-related factors associated with poorer medication adherence included current smoker and lack of medical insurance coverage. CONCLUSION This review identified factors associated with poor medication adherence among osteoporotic patients. To optimize therapeutic outcomes for patients, clinicians need to be aware of the complexity of factors affecting medication adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C T Yeam
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - S Chia
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - H C C Tan
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Y H Kwan
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - W Fong
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - J J B Seng
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Majumdar SR, McAlister FA, Johnson JA, Rowe BH, Bellerose D, Hassan I, Lier DA, Li S, Maksymowych WP, Menon M, Russell AS, Wirzba B, Beaupre LA. Comparing Strategies Targeting Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures After an Upper Extremity Fracture (C-STOP Trial): A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Miner Res 2018; 33:2114-2121. [PMID: 30040140 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2018] [Revised: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
We compared osteoporosis care after upper extremity fragility fracture using a low-intensity Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) versus a high-intensity FLS in a pragmatic patient-level parallel-arm comparative effectiveness trial undertaken at a Canadian academic hospital. A low-intensity FLS (active-control) that identified patients and notified primary care providers was compared to a high-intensity FLS (case manager) where a specially-trained nurse identified patients, investigated bone health, and initiated appropriate treatment. A total of 361 community-dwelling participants 50 years or older with upper extremity fractures who were not on bisphosphonate treatment were included; 350 (97%) participants completed 6-month follow-up undertaken by assessors blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome was difference in bisphosphonate treatment between groups 6 months postfracture; secondary outcomes included differences in bone mineral density (BMD) testing and a predefined composite measure termed "appropriate care" (taking or making an informed decision to decline medication for those with low BMD; not taking bisphosphonate treatment for those with normal BMD). Absolute differences (%), relative risks (RR with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]), number-needed-to-treat (NNT), and direct costs were compared. A total of 181 participants were randomized to active-control and 180 to case-manager using computer-generated randomization; the groups were similar on study entry. At 6 months, 51 (28%) active-control versus 86 (48%) case-manager participants started bisphosphonate treatment (20% absolute difference; RR 1.70; 95% CI, 1.28 to 2.24; p < 0.0001; NNT = 5). Of active-controls, 108 (62%) underwent BMD testing compared to 128 (73%) case-managed patients (11% absolute difference; RR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.36; p = 0.03). Appropriate care was received by 76 (44%) active-controls and 133 (76%) case-managed participants (32% absolute difference; RR 1.73; 95% CI, 1.43 to 2.09; p < 0.0001). The direct cost per participant was $18 Canadian (CDN) for the active-control intervention compared to $66 CDN for the case-manager intervention. In summary, case-management led to substantially greater improvements in bisphosphonate treatment and appropriate care within 6 months of fracture than the active control. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumit R Majumdar
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Jeffrey A Johnson
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Brian H Rowe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Debbie Bellerose
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Imran Hassan
- EPICORE Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Douglas A Lier
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Stephanie Li
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Matthew Menon
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Brian Wirzba
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Lauren A Beaupre
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jaleel A, Saag KG, Danila MI. Improving drug adherence in osteoporosis: an update on more recent studies. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2018; 10:141-149. [PMID: 30023009 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x18785539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Similar to other chronic diseases such as diabetes and hypertension, osteoporosis has struggled with suboptimal medication adherence, resulting in an increased risk of fractures and all-cause mortality. The goal of this narrative review was to summarize interventions to improve medication adherence in osteoporosis. Because past reviews of this topic covered published literature through 2013, we conducted our literature search to include the period between January 2012 and November 2017. We identified 10 studies evaluating healthcare system and patient interventions aimed at improving osteoporosis treatment adherence, including three fracture liaison service (FLS) programs, one pharmacist-delivered counseling program, and six patient-directed interventions consisting of three coaching or counseling programs and three interventions using reminder prompts. Four out of the six patient-directed interventions did not lead to significant improvements in outcomes, suggesting that patient-directed interventions may have limited success in this setting. The healthcare system interventions that evaluated FLS programs and pharmacist-directed tailored counseling were effective at improving medication adherence; however, the studies were not randomized, they were costly, resource intensive and effective in countries with more centralized healthcare, possibly limiting their generalizability. In conclusion, while healthcare system interventions such as FLS, and pharmacist-delivered counseling appeared to be successful in improving osteoporosis medication adherence in some settings, behavioral interventions including patient counseling and reminder prompts for medication utilization were not, perhaps due to patient perceptions regarding osteoporosis consequences and need for treatment. Thus, these patient attributes may define patients 'at high risk' for poor adherence and developing intervention approaches to enhance patient knowledge and understanding of osteoporosis and its consequences may improve the perception of the need for treatment, optimize osteoporosis care and thereby improve overall outcomes of patients with osteoporosis. We hope that the knowledge gained through our review will help inform the design of further programs aimed at optimizing osteoporosis care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kenneth G Saag
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Maria I Danila
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower, Room 838510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294-3408, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wu CH, Chen CH, Chen PH, Yang JJ, Chang PC, Huang TC, Bagga S, Sharma Y, Lin RM, Chan DC. Identifying characteristics of an effective fracture liaison service: systematic literature review. Osteoporos Int 2018. [PMID: 29525971 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4370-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Fracture liaison services (FLS) have been demonstrated to improve outcomes following osteoporotic fracture. The aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to determine the characteristics of an FLS that lead to improved patient outcomes. We conducted a SLR, including articles published between 2000 and February 2017, using global (Medline, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library) and local databases. Studies including patients aged ≥ 50 years with osteoporotic fractures enrolled in an FLS were assessed. Information extracted from each article included key person coordinating the FLS (physician, nurse or other healthcare professional), setting (hospital vs community), intensity (single vs multiple), duration (long vs short term), fracture type and gender. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was conducted based on the key person coordinating the FLS. Out of 7236 articles, 57 were considered to be high quality and identified for further analysis. The SLR identified several components which contributed to FLS success, including multidisciplinary involvement, driven by a dedicated case manager, regular assessment and follow-up, multifaceted interventions and patient education. Meta-analytic data confirm the effectiveness of an FLS following an osteoporotic fracture: approximate 27% increase in the likelihood of BMD testing and up to 21% increase in the likelihood of treatment initiation compared with usual care. The balance of evidence indicates that the multifaceted FLS and dedicated coordination are important success factors that contribute to effective FLS interventions which reduce fracture-related morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C-H Wu
- Department of Family Medicine, National Cheng Kung University College of Medicine and Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
- Institute of Gerontology, National Cheng Kung University College of Medicine, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - C-H Chen
- Orthopaedic Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopaedics, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Division of Adult Reconstruction Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopedics, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - P-H Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan
| | - J-J Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Po Jen General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - P-C Chang
- Department of Orthopedics, An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - T-C Huang
- National Taiwan University Hospital Chu-Tung Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - S Bagga
- Complete HEOR Solutions LLC, 1046 Knapp Road, North Wales, PA, 19454, USA
| | - Y Sharma
- Complete HEOR Solutions LLC, 1046 Knapp Road, North Wales, PA, 19454, USA
| | - R-M Lin
- Tainan Municipal An-Nan Hospital-China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - D-C Chan
- National Taiwan University Hospital Chu-Tung Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
- Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
van den Berg P, van Haard PMM, van der Veer E, Geusens PP, van den Bergh JP, Schweitzer DH. A dedicated Fracture Liaison Service telephone program and use of bone turnover markers for evaluating 1-year persistence with oral bisphosphonates. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29:813-824. [PMID: 29260291 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4340-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Telephone call intervention did not improve alendronate persistence in Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) patients in this study. A bone turnover marker cut-off point for alendronate persistence is proposed for individual FLS patients. INTRODUCTION FLS aims to prevent subsequent fractures, which should include improving patients' persistence with prescribed oral bisphosphonates. We studied the influence of telephone calls and the predictive value of changes in bone turnover markers (BTMs) for evaluating persistence with alendronate. METHODS Postmenopausal women with a recent fracture and osteoporosis who started alendronate were randomized to receive three phone calls (PC) (after 1, 4, and 12 months) or no phone calls (no PC). s-CTX and P1NP were measured at baseline and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. As a reference group, 30 postmenopausal osteopenic patients with a recent fracture were analyzed as well. Persistence was assessed using the Dutch National Switch Point Pharmacies-GPs database and cross-referenced with PC, no PC, and BTM changes. Cut-off values of BTMs were calculated based on least significant change (LSC) and also on underrunning median values of the untreated osteopenic postmenopausal reference group with a recent fracture. RESULTS Out of 119 patients, 93 (78%) completed 12 months follow-up (45 PC and 48 no PC). Mean age was 69 years. Persistence was similar in PC and no PC participants. The cut-off value > 29% (< 415 ng/L) as LSC of s-CTX and > 36% (< 53.1 μg/L) as LSC of P1NP was determined optimally showing alendronate persistence after 1 year (being 93 and 88%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In this context, telephone calls did not improve persistence. In around 90% of patients, 1-year alendronate persistence was confirmed by achieving LSC of s-CTX and of P1NP at 12 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P van den Berg
- Department of Orthopedics and Surgery, Fracture Liaison Service, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands.
| | - P M M van Haard
- Department of Medical Laboratories, Association of Clinical Chemistry, Reinier the Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - E van der Veer
- Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Centre, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - P P Geusens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Subdivision Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - J P van den Bergh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Subdivision Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre Noord-Limburg, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - D H Schweitzer
- Department of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Reinier the Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chang YF, Huang CF, Hwang JS, Kuo JF, Lin KM, Huang HC, Bagga S, Kumar A, Chen FP, Wu CH. Fracture liaison services for osteoporosis in the Asia-Pacific region: current unmet needs and systematic literature review. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29:779-792. [PMID: 29285627 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4347-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The analysis aimed to identify the treatment gaps in current fracture liaison services (FLS) and to provide recommendations for best practice establishment of future FLS across the Asia-Pacific region. The findings emphasize the unmet need for the implementation of new programs and provide recommendations for the refinement of existing ones. The study's objectives were to evaluate fracture liaison service (FLS) programs in the Asia-Pacific region and provide recommendations for establishment of future FLS programs. A systematic literature review (SLR) of Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (2000-2017 inclusive) was performed using the following keywords: osteoporosis, fractures, liaison, and service. Inclusion criteria included the following: patients ≥ 50 years with osteoporosis-related fractures; randomized controlled trials or observational studies with control groups (prospective or retrospective), pre-post, cross-sectional and economic evaluation studies. Success of direct or indirect interventions was assessed based on patients' understanding of risk, bone mineral density assessment, calcium intake, osteoporosis treatment, re-fracture rates, adherence, and mortality, in addition to cost-effectiveness. Overall, 5663 unique citations were identified and the SLR identified 159 publications, reporting 37 studies in Asia-Pacific. These studies revealed the unmet need for public health education, adequate funding, and staff resourcing, along with greater cooperation between departments and physicians. These actions can help to overcome therapeutic inertia with sufficient follow-up to ensure adherence to recommendations and compliance with treatment. The findings also emphasize the importance of primary care physicians continuing to prescribe treatment and ensure service remains convenient. These findings highlight the limited evidence supporting FLS across the Asia-Pacific region, emphasizing the unmet need for new programs and/or refinement of existing ones to improve outcomes. With the continued increase in burden of fractures in Asia-Pacific, establishment of new FLS and assessment of existing services are warranted to determine the impact of FLS for healthcare professionals, patients, family/caregivers, and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y -F Chang
- Department of Family Medicine, National Cheng Kung University College of Medicine and Hospital, 138 Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, 70428, Taiwan
| | - C -F Huang
- Department of Family Medicine, National Yang-Ming University Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan
| | - J -S Hwang
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - J -F Kuo
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - K -M Lin
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - H -C Huang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Tainan Municipal Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - S Bagga
- Complete HEOR Solutions LLC, 1046 Knapp Road, North Wales, PA, 19454, USA
| | - A Kumar
- Complete HEOR Solutions LLC, 1046 Knapp Road, North Wales, PA, 19454, USA
| | - F -P Chen
- Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - C -H Wu
- Department of Family Medicine, National Cheng Kung University College of Medicine and Hospital, 138 Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, 70428, Taiwan.
- Institute of Gerontology, National Cheng Kung University College of Medicine, Tainan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to report the evidence of beneficial effects of Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) including data regarding their impact on subsequent fracture, mortality risk and cost-effectiveness. This review also discusses the limitations of these data and the challenges faced during the implementation of FLS. RECENT FINDINGS Recent studies showed the beneficial impact of implementation of FLS on the prevention of subsequent fracture risk, reduced mortality and cost-effectiveness. However, heterogeneity of FLS models and small number of studies limited the conclusion about the impact of FLS on secondary fracture prevention. SUMMARY Patients with osteoporosis-related fractures are at higher risk of subsequent refractures. These subsequent fractures are associated with increased morbidity and premature mortality. However, there is a gap between evidence-based recommendations for postfracture care and actual clinical practice. FLS care is recommended for the management of the prevention of secondary fracture. FLS implementation reduces the risk of subsequent fracture, but the level of evidence is low as the interpretation of data is limited by the number of studies and their heterogeneity. FLS care significantly reduces the postfracture mortality, especially in patients with hip fractures. FLS implementation is cost-effective compared with usual care. Additional studies (with large sample and long-term follow-up) are needed to assess the impact of FLS care on subsequent fracture risk.
Collapse
|
32
|
Tarantino U, Iolascon G, Cianferotti L, Masi L, Marcucci G, Giusti F, Marini F, Parri S, Feola M, Rao C, Piccirilli E, Zanetti EB, Cittadini N, Alvaro R, Moretti A, Calafiore D, Toro G, Gimigliano F, Resmini G, Brandi ML. Clinical guidelines for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: summary statements and recommendations from the Italian Society for Orthopaedics and Traumatology. J Orthop Traumatol 2017; 18:3-36. [PMID: 29058226 PMCID: PMC5688964 DOI: 10.1007/s10195-017-0474-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Italian Society for Orthopaedics and Traumatology conceived this guidance-which is primarily addressed to Italian orthopedic surgeons, but should also prove useful to other bone specialists and to general practitioners-in order to improve the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis and its consequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS Literature reviews by a multidisciplinary team. RESULTS The following topics are covered: the role of instrumental, metabolic, and genetic evaluations in the diagnosis of osteoporosis; appraisal of the risk of fracture and thresholds for intervention; general strategies for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis (primary and secondary prevention); the pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis; the setting and implementation of fracture liaison services for tertiary prevention. Grade A, B, and C recommendations are provided based on the main levels of evidence (1-3). Toolboxes for everyday clinical practice are provided. CONCLUSIONS The first up-to-date Italian guidelines for the primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Tarantino
- Policlinico Tor Vergata Foundation, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Iolascon
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Luisella Cianferotti
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Masi
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Gemma Marcucci
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Giusti
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Marini
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Simone Parri
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Maurizio Feola
- Policlinico Tor Vergata Foundation, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Cecilia Rao
- Policlinico Tor Vergata Foundation, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Piccirilli
- Policlinico Tor Vergata Foundation, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuela Basilici Zanetti
- Nursing Science, Center of Excellence for Culture and Nursing Research-IPASVI, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Noemi Cittadini
- Nursing Science, Center of Excellence for Culture and Nursing Research-IPASVI, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosaria Alvaro
- Nursing Science, Center of Excellence for Culture and Nursing Research-IPASVI, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Antimo Moretti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Dario Calafiore
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Toro
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Gimigliano
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Resmini
- Section of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Centre for the Study of Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease, Treviglio-Caravaggio Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Brandi
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Noordin S, Allana S, Masri BA. Establishing a hospital based fracture liaison service to prevent secondary insufficiency fractures. Int J Surg 2017; 54:328-332. [PMID: 28919380 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Revised: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
In the aging population worldwide, osteoporosis is a relatively common condition and a major cause of long-term morbidity. Initial fragility fractures can lead to subsequent fractures. After a vertebral fracture, the risk of any another fracture increases 200% and that of a subsequent hip fracture increases 300%. For starting a hospital based Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) program, the nucleus is based on a physician champion, a FLS coordinator, and a nurse manager. A Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) is a multidisciplinary system approach to reducing subsequent fracture risk in patients with a recent fragility fracture due to compromised bone health by identifying them at or close to the time when they are treated at the hospital for fracture and providing them with easy access to osteoporosis care. It has been shown that when compared to other models such as referral letters to primary care physicians or endocrinologists, the FLS model results in a higher rate of diagnosis and treatment with less attrition in the posffracture phase. Insufficiency fracture care requires more than surgery to stabilize a fractured bone. The FLS program provides an opportunity to treat osteoporosis from a public health perspective rather than leaving this to the whims of individual physicians. This is achieved by providing a seamless integration of care by health care providers, nursing staff and administration. The FLS can be adapted to any model of care including academic health systems. FLS provides a holistic approach to identify patients as well as to provide evidence-based interventions to prevent subsequent fractures. The long term goal is that internationally FLS will result in in decreased fracture-related morbidity, mortality and overall health care expenditure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahryar Noordin
- Associate Professor, Orthopaedic Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
| | - Salim Allana
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, USA
| | - Bassam A Masri
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vacnouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
van der Zwaard BC, van Hout W, Hugtenburg JG, van der Horst HE, Elders PJM. Adherence and persistence of patients using oral bone sparing drugs in primary care. Fam Pract 2017; 34:525-531. [PMID: 28334908 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmw120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM Studies based on pharmacy medication records have shown suboptimal adherence and persistence of osteoporosis treatment with oral bone sparing drugs (OBSD). Little is known about adherence and persistence of OBSD treatment in primary care. We assessed adherence and persistence of OBSD use of patients in general practices and identified associated factors. METHODS Using electronic medical records, adherence and persistence of newly prescribed treatment with OBSD in patients from 16 general practices was retrospectively assessed. The Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) was calculated as a proxy for adherence (MPR > 75%), persistence rates were estimated using survival analysis. Determinants of adherence and persistence using logistic regression and Cox regression analysis were assessed. RESULTS OBSD treatment was initiated in 957 patients. Seventy-five percent and 45% of the patients persisted OBSD treatment for one and five years, respectively. Being adherent in the first year decreased the risk of long-term non-persistence [hazard ratio (HR) 0.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.57; P < 0.001]. Patients receiving the majority of their prescriptions by a specialist tended to be more non-persistent (HR 1.37; 96%; CI 0.96-1.94; P = 0.08). Adherence was 62.5% in the first year and 60.8% in the overall treatment period. Non-adherence was associated with the specialist being the main prescriber [odds ratio (OR) 3.76; 95% CI 2.43-5.82; P < 0.001] and younger age (<65 years, OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.01-2.08; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION Older age of the patients and the GP prescribing the majority of medication were associated with better adherence and persistence. Good adherence in the first prescription year was associated with better persistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Babette C van der Zwaard
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine,VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wesley van Hout
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine,VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline G Hugtenburg
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine,VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henriëtte E van der Horst
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine,VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petra J M Elders
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine,VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Park CH, Lee YK, Ha YC. Change of Bone Mineral Density Measurement among Patients with Osteoporotic Fractures in Korean Population Using National Claim Database. J Bone Metab 2017; 24:183-186. [PMID: 28955694 PMCID: PMC5613023 DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2017.24.3.183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Revised: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 07/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior osteoporotic fractures are strongly associated with subsequent fractures. To prevent this, the diagnosis of osteoporosis following an osteoporotic fracture is important. The measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) is the first step in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Therefore, this study aimed 1) to evaluate the rate of BMD measurement after osteoporotic fracture in the Korean population, and 2) to determine whether the rate of BMD measurement after osteoporotic fracture changed between 2005 and 2010. METHODS Using the database of the Health Insurance Review Assessment Service (HIRA), we identified patients with osteoporotic fractures (hip, spine, humerus, and wrist fractures) in 2005 and 2010. BMD examinations were evaluated by using procedure codes and medicines, exclusively approved for osteoporosis treatment. RESULTS During the study period, about half of all patients with osteoporotic fractures had BMD measurement. Between 2005 and 2010, the rate of BMD measurement significantly increased from 42.0% (65,556/156,190) to 53.9% (103,785/192,556) (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that about half of all patients with osteoporotic fractures had BMD measurement, and that screening for osteoporosis in patients with osteoporotic fractures increased between 2005 and 2010.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chan Ho Park
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
| | - Young-Kyun Lee
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Yong-Chan Ha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Peper FE, Esteban S, Terrasa SA. [Evaluation of primary adherence to medications in patients with chronic conditions: A retrospective cohort study]. Aten Primaria 2017; 50:96-105. [PMID: 28521859 PMCID: PMC6837084 DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2016] [Revised: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the proportion of members of a private health insurance at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires with primary adherence to, 1) bisphosphonates for secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures, 2) insulin and metformin in type 2 diabetes, and 3) tamoxifen in the context of treatment of breast cancer. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study to determine the proportion of primary treatment adherence during 2012 and 2013. SITE: Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina. PARTICIPANTS Members of the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires private health insurance, who had received a new electronic prescription (alendronate or ibandronate for secondary prevention of fractures following an osteoporotic fracture; insulin and/or metformin for type 2 diabetes; or tamoxifen as a treatment for breast cancer) during the years 2012 and 2013. An analysis was performed on 1,403 new electronic prescriptions, of which 673 were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria. MAIN MEASUREMENTS Primary adherence has been defined as the execution of a first-time treatment after it was agreed with the health care provider. The primary analysis assessed the proportion of primary adherence for the three medications. A bivariate analysis was performed to compare the characteristics and potential predictors of primary adherence. RESULTS Primary adherence for each drug group was, 93% Bisphosphonates, 88% Metformin, 96% Insulin, and 92% Tamoxifen. CONCLUSIONS To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that has evaluated primary adherence in Argentina, and the first for Tamoxifen world wide. The primary adherence documented in our study was somewhat higher than that reported in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Santiago Esteban
- Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Harvey NCW, McCloskey EV, Mitchell PJ, Dawson-Hughes B, Pierroz DD, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R, Cooper C, Kanis JA. Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28:1507-1529. [PMID: 28175979 PMCID: PMC5392413 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3894-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
This narrative review considers the key challenges facing healthcare professionals and policymakers responsible for providing care to populations in relation to bone health. These challenges broadly fall into four distinct themes: (1) case finding and management of individuals at high risk of fracture, (2) public awareness of osteoporosis and fragility fractures, (3) reimbursement and health system policy and (4) epidemiology of fracture in the developing world. Findings from cohort studies, randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, in addition to current clinical guidelines, position papers and national and international audits, are summarised, with the intention of providing a prioritised approach to delivery of optimal bone health for all. Systematic approaches to case-finding individuals who are at high risk of sustaining fragility fractures are described. These include strategies and models of care intended to improve case finding for individuals who have sustained fragility fractures, those undergoing treatment with medicines which have an adverse effect on bone health and people who have diseases, whereby bone loss and, consequently, fragility fractures are a common comorbidity. Approaches to deliver primary fracture prevention in a clinically effective and cost-effective manner are also explored. Public awareness of osteoporosis is low worldwide. If older people are to be more pro-active in the management of their bone health, that needs to change. Effective disease awareness campaigns have been implemented in some countries but need to be undertaken in many more. A major need exists to improve awareness of the risk that osteoporosis poses to individuals who have initiated treatment, with the intention of improving adherence in the long term. A multisector effort is also required to support patients and their clinicians to have meaningful discussions concerning the risk-benefit ratio of osteoporosis treatment. With regard to prioritisation of fragility fracture prevention in national policy, there is much to be done. In the developing world, robust epidemiological estimates of fracture incidence are required to inform policy development. As the aging of the baby boomer generation is upon us, this review provides a comprehensive analysis of how bone health can be improved worldwide for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N C W Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - E V McCloskey
- MRC ARUK Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, Metabolic Bone Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
- Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - P J Mitchell
- Synthesis Medical NZ Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand
- University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - B Dawson-Hughes
- Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - D D Pierroz
- International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), Nyon, Switzerland
| | - J-Y Reginster
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - R Rizzoli
- Division of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Institute for Health and Aging, Catholic University of Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Judge A, Javaid MK, Leal J, Hawley S, Drew S, Sheard S, Prieto-Alhambra D, Gooberman-Hill R, Lippett J, Farmer A, Arden N, Gray A, Goldacre M, Delmestri A, Cooper C. Models of care for the delivery of secondary fracture prevention after hip fracture: a health service cost, clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness study within a region of England. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr04280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundProfessional bodies have produced comprehensive guidance about the management of hip fracture. They recommend orthogeriatric services focusing on achieving optimal recovery, and fracture liaison services (FLSs) focusing on secondary fracture prevention. Despite such guidelines being in place, there is significant variation in how services are structured and organised between hospitals.ObjectivesTo establish the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of changes to the delivery of secondary fracture prevention services, and to identify barriers and facilitators to changes.DesignA service evaluation to identify each hospital’s current models of care and changes in service delivery. A qualitative study to identify barriers and facilitators to change. Health economics analysis to establish NHS costs and cost-effectiveness. A natural experimental study to determine clinical effectiveness of changes to a hospital’s model of care.SettingEleven acute hospitals in a region of England.ParticipantsQualitative study – 43 health professionals working in fracture prevention services in secondary care.InterventionsChanges made to secondary fracture prevention services at each hospital between 2003 and 2012.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome is secondary hip fracture. Secondary outcomes include mortality, non-hip fragility fracture and the overall rate of hip fracture.Data sourcesClinical effectiveness/cost-effectiveness analyses – primary hip fracture patients identified from (1) Hospital Episode Statistics (2003–13,n = 33,152); and (2) Clinical Practice Research Datalink (1999–2013,n = 11,243).ResultsService evaluation – there was significant variation in the organisation of secondary fracture prevention services, including staffing levels, type of service model (consultant vs. nurse led) and underlying processes. Qualitative – fracture prevention co-ordinators gave multidisciplinary health professionals capacity to work together, but communication with general practitioners was challenging. The intervention was easily integrated into practice but some participants felt that implementation was undermined by under-resourced services. Making business cases for a service was particularly challenging. Natural experiment – the impact of introducing an orthogeriatrician on 30-day and 1-year mortality was hazard ratio (HR) 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65 to 0.82] and HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.87), respectively. Thirty-day and 1-year mortality were likewise reduced following the introduction or expansion of a FLS: HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.91) and HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.93), respectively. There was no significant impact on time to secondary hip fracture. Health economics – the annual cost in the year of hip fracture was estimated at £10,964 (95% CI £10,767 to £11,161) higher than the previous year. The annual cost associated with all incident hip fractures in the UK among those aged ≥ 50 years (n = 79,243) was estimated at £1215M. At a £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year threshold, the most cost-effective model was introducing an orthogeriatrician.ConclusionIn hip fracture patients, orthogeriatrician and nurse-led FLS models are associated with reductions in mortality rates and are cost-effective, the orthogeriatrician model being the most cost-effective. There was no evidence for a reduction in second hip fracture. Qualitative data suggest that weaknesses lie in treatment adherence/monitoring, a possible reason for the lack of effectiveness on second hip fracture outcome. The effectiveness on non-hip fracture outcomes remains unanswered.Future workReliable estimates of health state utility values for patients with hip and non-hip fractures are required to reduce uncertainty in health economic models. A clinical trial is needed to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a FLS for non-hip fracture patients.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and the NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Judge
- Oxford National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - M Kassim Javaid
- Oxford National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - José Leal
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Samuel Hawley
- Oxford National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Drew
- Oxford National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sally Sheard
- Oxford National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
- Oxford National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- GREMPAL Research Group (IDIAP Jordi Gol) and Musculoskeletal Research Unit (Fundació IMIM-Parc Salut Mar), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Janet Lippett
- Elderly Care Unit, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, UK
| | - Andrew Farmer
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, UK
| | - Nigel Arden
- Oxford National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Alastair Gray
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Goldacre
- Unit of Health Care Epidemiology, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Antonella Delmestri
- Oxford National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- Oxford National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Carbone EJ, Rajpura K, Allen BN, Cheng E, Ulery BD, Lo KWH. Osteotropic nanoscale drug delivery systems based on small molecule bone-targeting moieties. NANOMEDICINE-NANOTECHNOLOGY BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2016; 13:37-47. [PMID: 27562211 DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2015] [Revised: 08/02/2016] [Accepted: 08/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Bone-targeted drug delivery is an active research area because successful clinical applications of this technology can significantly advance the treatment of bone injuries and disorders. Molecules with bone-targeting potential have been actively investigated as promising moieties in targeted drug delivery systems. In general, bone-targeting molecules are characterized by their high affinity for bone and their predisposition to persist in bone tissue for prolonged periods, while maintaining low systemic concentrations. Proteins, such as monoclonal antibodies, have shown promise as bone-targeting molecules; however, they suffer from several limitations including large molecular size, high production cost, and undesirable immune responses. A viable alternative associated with significantly less side effects is the use of small molecule-based targeting moieties. This review provides a summary of recent findings regarding small molecule compounds with bone-targeting capacity, as well as nanoscale targeted drug delivery approaches employing these molecules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica J Carbone
- Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut Health Center, School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA; The Raymond and Beverly Sackler Center for Biomedical, Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA; Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA; UConn Stem Cell Institute, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Komal Rajpura
- Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut Health Center, School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA; The Raymond and Beverly Sackler Center for Biomedical, Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA; Connecticut Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Brittany N Allen
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Emily Cheng
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Bret D Ulery
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Kevin W-H Lo
- Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut Health Center, School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA; The Raymond and Beverly Sackler Center for Biomedical, Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA; Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA; UConn Stem Cell Institute, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, School of Engineering, Storrs, CT, USA; Connecticut Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Naranjo A, Ojeda-Bruno S, Bilbao-Cantarero A, Quevedo-Abeledo JC, Diaz-González BV, Rodríguez-Lozano C. Two-year adherence to treatment and associated factors in a fracture liaison service in Spain. Osteoporos Int 2015; 26:2579-85. [PMID: 26048675 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3185-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2015] [Accepted: 05/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED A fracture liaison service in Spain is able to maintain 73 % of the patients on antiresorptive 2 years after the fracture. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 2-year effectiveness of a program for the secondary prevention of fractures. METHODS Fragility fractures in patients over 50 attending the emergency room in our centre are captured by the recruitment system of a secondary prevention program. The unit is attended by a nurse, coordinated by two rheumatologists and with the collaboration of primary care consisted of a training program and annual meetings. The outcome of the program was analysed 2 years after implementation, including: (1) percentage of attendees/eligible; (2) percentage of attendees who start treatment with antiresorptive; (3) percentage of patients who retain treatment after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months; and (4) factors associated to adherence. RESULTS After 2 years of implementation, the program detected 1674 patients with fracture, of whom 759 finally entered the program (57 % of eligible). After 3 months, 82 % of patients prescribed an antiresorptive started treatment. After a year, 52 % of the patients in the program, 72 % of those of a prescribed treatment, were taking antiresorptives. Adherence at 24 months among those who had prescribed anti-fracture drugs was 73 %. Factors associated with adherence at 12 months were female sex (76 vs 45 %; p = 0.01) and previous treatment with antiresorptive (86 vs 68 %; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS In Spain, a program designed to prevent secondary fragility fractures based on the collaboration between primary care and rheumatology seems effective in terms of recruitment of patients and adherence to treatment in the mid/long-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Naranjo
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Barranco de La Ballena s/n, 35011, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
- Medical and Surgical Sciences Department, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
| | - S Ojeda-Bruno
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Barranco de La Ballena s/n, 35011, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - A Bilbao-Cantarero
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Barranco de La Ballena s/n, 35011, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - J C Quevedo-Abeledo
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Barranco de La Ballena s/n, 35011, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - B V Diaz-González
- Primary Care Service, Gerencia de Atención Primaria de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - C Rodríguez-Lozano
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Barranco de La Ballena s/n, 35011, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Klop C, Welsing PMJ, Elders PJM, Overbeek JA, Souverein PC, Burden AM, van Onzenoort HAW, Leufkens HGM, Bijlsma JWJ, de Vries F. Long-term persistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs after fracture. Osteoporos Int 2015; 26:1831-40. [PMID: 25822104 PMCID: PMC4469296 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3084-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2014] [Accepted: 02/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Long-term persistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs and determinants for discontinuation among fracture patients were examined. Persistence was 75.0 and 45.3 % after 1 and 5 years, respectively. Those aged ≥80 years were at increased risk of early discontinuation. Within 1 year after discontinuation, 24.3 % restarted therapy, yet 47.0 % persisted for 1 year. INTRODUCTION The risk of osteoporotic fracture can effectively be reduced with use of anti-osteoporosis drugs. However, little is known about persistence with these drugs after fracture where subsequent fracture risk is high. The aims were to determine long-term persistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs among fracture patients, including its determinants, and to describe restart and subsequent persistence. METHODS A cohort study was conducted within the Dutch PHARMO Database Network. Patients aged ≥50 years (n = 961) who received anti-osteoporosis drugs within 1 year after fracture, but not in the preceding year, were included (2002-2011). Persistence (defined as the proportion on treatment) and the proportion restarting after discontinuation were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Time-dependent Cox regression was used to identify determinants of non-persistence including age, sex, initial dosage regime, fracture type, comorbidities, and drug use. RESULTS Persistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs was 75.0 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 72.0-77.7) and 45.3 % (95 % CI 40.4-50.0) after 1 and 5 years, respectively. A significant determinant of non-persistence was age ≥80 years (reference 50-59 years: adjusted hazard ratio [adj. HR] 1.65; 95 % CI 1.15-2.38). This effect was not constant over time (≤360 days following initiation: adj. HR 2.07; 95 % CI 1.27-3.37; >360 days: adj. HR 1.08; 95 % CI 0.62-1.88). Within 1 year after discontinuation, 24.3 % (95 % CI 20.1-29.2) restarted therapy, yet 47.0 % persisted for 1 year. CONCLUSIONS This study identified suboptimal persistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs among fracture patients. Major target groups for measures aimed to improve persistence may be those aged >80 years and those restarting therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Klop
- Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - P M J Welsing
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - P J M Elders
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - J A Overbeek
- PHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - P C Souverein
- Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - A M Burden
- Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - H A W van Onzenoort
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - H G M Leufkens
- Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - J W J Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - F de Vries
- Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Miller AN, Lake AF, Emory CL. Establishing a fracture liaison service: an orthopaedic approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97:675-81. [PMID: 25878314 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.n.00957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
➤ Bone health evaluations should be incorporated into care pathways for fragility fractures in all patients who are fifty years of age or older.➤ A fracture liaison service (FLS) is an established and proven method to achieve recommended standards of care for fragility fractures, including intervention for osteoporosis, secondary fracture prevention, and bone health evaluation.➤ The FLS facilitates patient care by automatically including all patients with a fragility fracture within a health-care system to provide them with the intervention that they need and to prevent avoidable fracture-related complications or readmissions.➤ An FLS functions with three key personnel: the FLS coordinator (usually an advanced practice provider), a physician champion (usually an orthopaedic surgeon), and a nurse navigator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna N Miller
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1070. E-mail address for A.N. Miller:
| | - Anne F Lake
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1070. E-mail address for A.N. Miller:
| | - Cynthia L Emory
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1070. E-mail address for A.N. Miller:
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ganda K, Schaffer A, Seibel MJ. Predictors of re-fracture amongst patients managed within a secondary fracture prevention program: a 7-year prospective study. Osteoporos Int 2015; 26:543-51. [PMID: 25189427 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2880-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2014] [Accepted: 08/27/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY This 7-year prospective observational study determined the predictors of re-fracture amongst 234 patients managed within a Secondary Fracture Prevention programme. Poor compliance, multiple co-morbidities, corticosteroid therapy, low hip bone mineral density (BMD) or low body weight were all significantly associated with re-fracture in patients commenced on long-term anti-resorptive therapy. INTRODUCTION Risk factors for osteoporotic fracture amongst treatment-naïve patients are well established. In contrast, predictors of re-fracture in patients optimally managed within a Secondary Fracture Prevention (SFP) programme are ill-defined. METHODS This prospective observational study included 234 subjects with incident osteoporotic fractures managed long-term by the Concord SFP programme. Using Cox proportional hazards models, predictors of re-fracture were analysed separately for patients commenced on specific pharmacotherapy (group 1, N=171) and subjects receiving calcium and/or vitamin D supplements only (group 2, N=63). Relevant anthropometric, clinical and technical data were documented at each visit. Compliance and persistence were analysed as time-varying covariates. RESULTS During a mean follow-up of 5.2 (range 3.5-7.3) years, 20.9% of all subjects re-fractured (26.3% in group 1, 6.3% in group 2). Multivariate predictors of re-fracture in group 1 were significant co-morbidity (HR 2.04 if >3, 95% CI 1.10-3.79, p=0.024), corticosteroid use (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.12-2.73, p=0.013) and total hip BMD (HR 1.36 per 0.1 g/cm2 decrease, 95% CI 1.08-1.70, p=0.008). In contrast, gender, prevalent fractures and lumbar spine BMD were not associated with re-fracture. Amongst patients with complete compliance data, a medication possession ratio of ≤50% (HR 3.36, 95% CI 1.32-8.53, p=0.011) and low body weight (HR 1.04 per 1-kg decrease, 95% CI 1.003-1.08, p=0.032) were significantly associated with re-fracture. CONCLUSIONS Amongst patients managed within a dedicated SFP programme, poor compliance, multiple co-morbidities, corticosteroid therapy, low hip BMD or low body weight are all associated with increased risk of re-fracture. This subgroup of patients therefore require intensive management including strategies to improve compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Ganda
- Bone Research Program, ANZAC Research Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kootala S, Ossipov D, van den Beucken JJJP, Leeuwenburgh S, Hilborn J. Bisphosphonate-functionalized hyaluronic acid showing selective affinity for osteoclasts as a potential treatment for osteoporosis. Biomater Sci 2015. [DOI: 10.1039/c5bm00096c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Bisphosphonate-functionalized hyaluronic can potentially reduce long-term administration of high doses of BPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujit Kootala
- Department of Chemistry
- A Science for Life Laboratory
- Polymer Chemistry Division
- Uppsala University
- Uppsala SE 75121
| | - Dmitri Ossipov
- Department of Chemistry
- A Science for Life Laboratory
- Polymer Chemistry Division
- Uppsala University
- Uppsala SE 75121
| | | | | | - Jöns Hilborn
- Department of Chemistry
- A Science for Life Laboratory
- Polymer Chemistry Division
- Uppsala University
- Uppsala SE 75121
| |
Collapse
|