1
|
Gagnon ME, Talbot D, Tremblay F, Desforges K, Sirois C. Polypharmacy and risk of fractures in older adults: A systematic review. J Evid Based Med 2024; 17:145-171. [PMID: 38517979 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fractures have serious health consequences in older adults. While some medications are individually associated with increased risk of falls and fractures, it is not clear if this holds true for the use of many medications (polypharmacy). We aimed to identify what is known about the association between polypharmacy and the risk of fractures in adults aged ≥65 and to examine the methods used to study this association. METHODS We conducted a systematic review with narrative synthesis of studies published up to October 2023 in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the grey literature. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, then performed data extraction and quality assessment. RESULTS Among the 31 studies included, 11 different definitions of polypharmacy were used and were based on three medication counting methods (concurrent use 15/31, cumulative use over a period 6/31, daily average 3/31, and indeterminate 7/31). Overall, polypharmacy was frequent and associated with higher fracture risk. A dose-response relationship between increasing number of medications and increased risk of fractures was observed. However, only seven studies adjusted for major confounders (age, sex, and chronic disease). The quality of the studies ranged from poor to high. CONCLUSIONS Polypharmacy appears to be a relevant modifiable risk factor for fractures in older individuals that can easily be used to identify those at risk. The diversity of medication calculation methods and definitions of polypharmacy highlights the importance of a detailed methodology to understand and compare results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Eve Gagnon
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Department of Health Sciences, Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR), Rimouski, Québec, Canada
- Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Centre d'excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec, VITAM - Centre de recherche en sante durable, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Denis Talbot
- Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Katherine Desforges
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Pharmacy, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Caroline Sirois
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
- Centre d'excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec, VITAM - Centre de recherche en sante durable, Québec, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Almohaileb FI, Rasheed Z. Comparing the efficacies of bisphosphonates' therapies for osteoporosis persistence and compliance: A Systematic Review. Curr Mol Med 2021; 22:274-284. [PMID: 33855941 DOI: 10.2174/1566524021666210414100227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Osteoporosis is the most prevalent metabolic bone disorder worldwide. This review was undertaken to compare the efficacies of bisphosphonates therapies for patient persistence and compliance for the treatment of osteoporosis. METHODS A systematic review was performed in accordance with the available reporting items. MEDLINE and Cochrane library databases were applied for literature searched up to January 2020. All major studies such as prospective, retrospective and reviews articles that examined patient persistence or compliance to bisphosphonates for osteoporosis were included. RESULTS Literature search found 656 relevant published reports, out of which 87 were included. The 10,712,176 osteoporotic patients were studied for patient persistence and 5,875,718 patients were studied for patient compliances. Analysis of all studied bisphosphonates showed almost similar patterns for patient persistence rates as it was decreased over the time following initial prescription but persistence length was found to be significantly high for alendronate therapy as compared to the other studied bisphosphonates (p<0.001), whereas the length of persistence of all other bisphosphonates (other than alendronate) were almost same (p>0.05). Analysis of patient compliances with etidronate therapy showed the highest percent medication possession ratio (MRP) at 12 months, followed by the MRPs of ibandronate, alendronate, risedronate, and clodronate. CONCLUSIONS This is the first systematic review that shows the comparison of the efficiencies of bisphosphonates for patient persistence and compliance for the treatment of osteoporosis. The data showed that the length of patient persistence was highest for alendronate therapy, whereas patient compliance was highest for etidronate therapy for the treatment of osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal I Almohaileb
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Zafar Rasheed
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Persistence with oral bisphosphonates and denosumab among older adults in primary care in Ireland. Arch Osteoporos 2021; 16:71. [PMID: 33864529 PMCID: PMC8053179 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-00932-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Gaps in pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis can reduce effectiveness. Among older adults, we found about half of new users of oral bisphosphonate and denosumab persisted with their treatment at 2 years, with few switching to alternative therapy. Persistence is suboptimal and warrants evaluation of interventions to improve this. PURPOSE Gaps in pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis can reduce effectiveness. This study aimed to estimate persistence rates for oral bisphosphonates and denosumab in older primary care patients and identify factors associated with discontinuation. METHODS Older patients newly prescribed oral bisphosphonates or denosumab during 2012-2017 were identified from 44 general practices (GP) in Ireland. Persistence without a coverage gap of >90 days was calculated for both medications from therapy initiation. Factors associated with time to discontinuation were explored using Cox regression analysis. Exposures included age group, osteoporosis diagnosis, fracture history, calcium/vitamin D prescription, number of other medications, health cover, dosing frequency (bisphosphonates) and previous bone-health medication (denosumab). RESULTS Of 41,901 patients, n=1569 were newly initiated on oral bisphosphonates and n=1615 on denosumab. Two-year persistence was 49.4% for oral bisphosphonates and 53.8% for denosumab and <10% were switched to other medication. Having state-funded health cover was associated with a lower hazard of discontinuation for both oral bisphosphonates (HR=0.49, 95% CI=0.36-0.66, p<0.01) and denosumab (HR=0.71, 95% CI=0.57-0.89, p<0.01). Older age group, number of medications and calcium/vitamin D prescription were also associated with better bisphosphonate persistence, while having osteoporosis diagnosed was associated with better denosumab persistence. CONCLUSION Persistence for osteoporosis medications is suboptimal. Of concern, few patients are switched to other bone-health treatments when denosumab is stopped which could increase fracture risk. Free access to GP services and medications may have resulted in better medication persistence in this cohort. Future research should explore prescribing choices in primary care osteoporosis management and evaluate cost-effectiveness of interventions for improving persistence.
Collapse
|
4
|
Fatoye F, Smith P, Gebrye T, Yeowell G. Real-world persistence and adherence with oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e027049. [PMID: 30987990 PMCID: PMC6500256 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study examined patient adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis in real-world settings. METHODS A systematic review was completed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database NHS EED) databases were searched for studies published in English language up to April 2018. Prospective and retrospective observational studies that used prescription claim databases or hospital medical records to examine patient adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonate treatment among adults with osteoporosis were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of included studies. RESULTS The search yielded 540 published studies, of which 89 were deemed relevant and were included in this review. The mean age of patients included within the studies ranged between 53 to 80.8 years, and the follow-up varied from 3 months to 14 years. The mean persistence of oral bisphosphonates for 6 months, 1 year and 2 years ranged from 34.8% to 71.3%, 17.7% to 74.8% and 12.9% to 72.0%, respectively. The mean medication possession ratio ranged from 28.2% to 84.5%, 23% to 50%, 27.2% to 46% over 1 year, 2 years and 3 years, respectively. All studies included scored between 6 to 8 out of 9 on the NOS. The determinants of adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates included geographic residence, marital status, tobacco use, educational status, income, hospitalisation, medication type and dosing frequency. CONCLUSIONS While a number of studies reported high levels of persistence and adherence, the findings of this review suggest that patient persistence and adherence with oral bisphosphonates medications was poor and reduced notably over time. Overall, adherence was suboptimal. To maximise adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates, it is important to consider possible determinants, including characteristics of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Fatoye
- Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - P Smith
- Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - T Gebrye
- Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - G Yeowell
- Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reynolds AW, Liu G, Kocis PT, Skowronski JN, Leslie DL, Fox EJ. Comparison of Osteoporosis Pharmacotherapy Fracture Rates: Analysis of a MarketScan ® Claims Database Cohort. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2018; 16:e12104. [PMID: 30464768 PMCID: PMC6216103 DOI: 10.5812/ijem.12104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Revised: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several different classes of medications have been shown to be efficacious at preventing fractures in patients with osteoporosis. No study has compared real world efficacy at preventing fractures between all currently approved medications. OBJECTIVES To directly compare the efficacy of all currently available osteoporosis medications by using a large population claims database. METHODS The Truven Health Analytics MarketScan® database from 2008 - 2012 was used to identify all patients who started a new osteoporosis medication. Patients who experienced a fracture after at least 12 months of treatment were identified and risk factors for fracture for all patients were recorded. Logistic regression was used to account for and quantify the contribution of risk factors, and to make direct comparisons between different osteoporosis medications. RESULTS A total of 51649 patients were included in the cohort, with an average age of 56 years. The overall incidence rate of fracture was 1.55 per 100 person - years of treatment. Orally administered medications had the lowest fracture rates, led by raloxifene and alendronate (1.24 and 1.54 respectively), while parenterally administered medications including teriparatide and zolerdonic acid had the highest rates (3.90 and 1.98 respectively). No statistically significant differences found between oral or parenterally administered bisphosphonate medications. CONCLUSIONS While patients taking orally administered drugs including bisphosphonates had less frequent incident fracture no statistically significant differences were found between most drugs in head - to - head comparisons, even considering the route of administration of bisphosphonates. These findings support previous evidence that minimal differences in efficacy exist between different osteoporosis medications. This is the first study using a large database to compare all currently available osteoporosis treatments and will hopefully be augmented by further study to provide more evidence to make clinical decisions on osteoporosis medication use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan W Reynolds
- Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, U.S.A
| | - Guodong Liu
- Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, U.S.A
| | - Paul T Kocis
- Pharmacy Disease Management, Pennsylvania State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, U.S.A
| | - Jenna N Skowronski
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, U.S.A
| | - Douglas L Leslie
- Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, U.S.A
| | - Edward J Fox
- Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, U.S.A
- Corresponding author: Edward J Fox, Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, 30 Hope Drive, P. O. Box: 859, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA. Tel: +1-7175315638, Fax: +1-7175310498, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chodick G, Moser SS, Goldshtein I. Non-adherence with bisphosphonates among patients with osteoporosis: impact on fracture risk and healthcare cost. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2016; 16:359-70. [PMID: 27015247 DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2016.1171145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Osteoporosis-related fractures at the spine and hip have a substantial impact on mortality, morbidity, and quality of life in older adults worldwide. Adherence to bisphosphonates is essential for effective treatment and fracture prevention. Nevertheless, numerous studies from various populations and study designs clearly indicated that adherence and persistence are poor with more than 50% of patients discontinuing therapy within one year. This is primarily explained by mild adverse effects, dosing regimens, and costs. Studies have also shown that good adherence is associated with reduced osteoporosis-related and non-related healthcare costs as soon as 2 years from therapy initiation. Nonetheless, we found only little improvement in adherence rates over the years. In light of the importance of medication adherence and the limited success of previous programs, other than reducing dosing frequency, new directions should be explored to engage patients and care givers in order to improve adherence and prevent fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Chodick
- a Medical division , Maccabi Healthcare Services , Tel Aviv , Israel.,b Sackler Faculty of Medicine , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv , Israel
| | | | - Inbal Goldshtein
- a Medical division , Maccabi Healthcare Services , Tel Aviv , Israel.,b Sackler Faculty of Medicine , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv , Israel
| |
Collapse
|