Analysis of daily teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis in men

Health-related quality of life of men with primary osteoporosis and its changes after bisphosphonates treatment

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis leads to more serious consequences in men than in women, but less is known about its impacts on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of men, and whether the anti-osteoporosis treatment can improve HRQoL of men with osteopenia/osteoprosis.

METHODS

We enrolled men with primary osteoporosis and age-matched healthy controls. We collected medical history, serum levels of carboxyl-terminal type I collagen telopeptide, procollagen type I propeptides, and bone mineral density of patients. All patients and controls completed the short-form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires. Changes in HRQoL of osteopenia/osteoporosis men were prospectively evaluated after alendronate or zoledronic acid treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 100 men with primary osteoporosis or osteopenia and 100 healthy men were included. The patients were divided into three subgroups: osteopenia (n = 35), osteoporosis (n = 39) and severe osteoporosis (n = 26). Men with osteoporosis or severe osteoporosis had impaired HRQoL in domains of physical health compared to healthy controls. HRQoL scores in physical health related domains of patients with severe osteoporosis were significantly lower compared to healthy controls, and were the poorest among the three subgroups of patients. Fragility fracture history was correlated with lower SF-36 scores about physical health. In 34 men with newly diagnosed osteoporosis receiving bisphosphonates treatment, HRQoL scores were significantly improved in domains of physical health after treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

The HRQoL is significantly impaired in men with osteoporosis, and the more severe the osteoporosis, the poorer the HRQoL. Fragility fracture is an important influencing factor of deteriorated HRQoL. Bisphosphonates treatment is beneficial to improve HRQoL of osteopenia/osteoporosis men.

Evaluation of Vitamin D isolated or Associated with Teriparatide in Peri-Implant Bone Repair in Tibia of Orchiectomized Rats

(1) Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the morphometry of peri-implant bone tissue in orchiectomized rats, treated with vitamin D isolated or associated with teriparatide. (2) Methods: 24 rats were divided into 4 groups: ORQ-orchiectomy, without drug treatment, ORQ+D-orchiectomy, treated with vitamin D, ORQTERI-orchiectomy, treated with teriparatide and ORQTERI+D-orchiectomy, treated with teriparatide + vitamin D. Each animal received an implant in the tibial metaphysis. Euthanasia occurred 60 days after implant surgery. Computed microtomography (micro-CT) was performed to evaluate the parameters of volume and percentage of bone volume (BV, BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), number and separation of trabeculae (Tb.N, Tb.Sp) and percentage of total porosity (Po-tot). Data were subjected to 1-way ANOVA and Tukey post-test, with a significance level of 5%. (3) Results: For the parameters BV, BV/TV, Tb.Th, the ORQTERI+D group showed the highest values in relation to the other groups and for Po-tot, the lowest values were for ORQTERI+D. For Tb.Sp and Tb.N, there was no statistically significant difference when comparing intragroup results (p > 0.05). (4) Conclusions: It was possible to conclude that treatment with vitamin D associated with teriparatide increases bone volume and improves bone quality.

Teriparatide improves microarchitectural characteristics of peri-implant bone in orchiectomized rats

This study evaluated the peri-implant bone repair in orchiectomized rats receiving intermittently PTH 1-34. The treatment returned the bone quality and quantity of the animals to normal in the computerized microtomography, laser confocal microscopy, and histological analysis. The PTH 1-34 promoted marked bone formation with increased volume, improved quality, and greater bone turnover.

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis can be a problem in implant osseointegration. So this study aimed to evaluate the quantity and quality of peri-implant bone repair in orchiectomized Wistar rats receiving intermittently administered PTH 1-34.

METHODS

Animals (n = 24) were divided into 3 groups: healthy control (SHAM), orchiectomized (ORQ), and orchiectomized and treated with 0.5 μg/kg/day PTH 1-34 (TERI), and each received an implant in the right and left tibial metaphysis, which was allowed to repair for 60 days. The resultant bone formation was evaluated through computerized microtomography (micro-CT) to compare the percent bone volume (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular number and separation (Tb.N, Tb.Sp), and bone implant contact (BIC) through the intersection surface (i.S) between groups. Laser confocal microscopy was used to evaluate fluorochrome areas for mineral apposition rate (MAR) and neoformed bone area (NBA). In addition, histological evaluation of calcified tissues with Stevenel blue and alizarin red staining was performed.

RESULTS

Treatment with PTH 1-34 returned the bone quality and quantity of the osteoporotic animal to normal, as the TERI group presented statistically significant higher values for BV/TV, Tb.Th, and BIC parameters compared with ORQ (p < 0.05), but when compared with SHAM (p > 0.05), no statistical difference was noted. In addition, in the bone turnover analysis (MAR, NBA) for TERI, the highest results are presented, followed by SHAM, and then ORQ (TERI × ORQ: p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intermittent treatment with PTH 1-34 on orchiectomized animals promoted marked bone formation with increased volume, improved quality, and greater bone turnover in the peri-implant space, returning the bone quality and quantity to the present standard in healthy animals.

Efficacy of Switching From Teriparatide to Bisphosphonate or Denosumab: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Trial

There is no consensus on an optimal treatment after daily teriparatide (TPTD). We performed a prospective, randomized, open-label, 12-month trial to investigate the efficacy of follow-up treatment after daily TPTD treatment for Japanese patients. Three-hundred patients were enrolled in this study. Patients received oral bisphosphonate (BP) including alendronate (ALN; 35 mg/week) and minodoronate (MINO; 50 mg/month), or subcutaneous denosumab (60 mg/6 month). The primary efficacy measure was bone mineral density (BMD) responses in the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN). Lumbar spine BMD increased by 1.3 ± 5.1% in the ALN subgroups, 0.5 ± 4.6% in the MINO subgroups, and 4.3 ± 3.5% in the denosumab subgroups. Femoral neck BMD increased by 0.7 ± 4.6% in the ALN subgroups, 0.2 ± 4.6% in the MINO subgroups, and 1.4 ± 3.4% in the denosumab subgroups. Lumbar spine BMD increases were significantly greater in the denosumab subgroup than the BP subgroups. There were no significant differences in FN BMD increases among the three subgroups. Lumbar spine BMD increases were significantly greater in the denosumab subgroup than the BP subgroups, whereas FN BMD increases were not significant. Denosumab treatment was more effective in increasing BMD and therefore has the potential benefit of fracture prevention. Further research is warranted to determine the optimal treatment after daily TPTD. © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Influence of Dosing Interval and Administration on the Bone Metabolism, Skeletal Effects, and Clinical Efficacy of Parathyroid Hormone in Treating Osteoporosis: A Narrative Review

Recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH) is the key anabolic agent used for preventing fracture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. In bone metabolism, PTH signaling is mediated through a G protein–coupled receptor that affects various post‐receptor signaling pathways. Results of preclinical and clinical studies have shown that PTH improves both the structure and strength of bone tissue. Once daily subcutaneous injection of the PTH fragment, teriparatide (PTH [1‐34]), is the most commonly recommended formulation and dosing strategy in clinical practice. However, other dosing intervals, formulations, and routes have been investigated in preclinical and clinical studies. In particular, once‐weekly and cyclical administration have been investigated mainly as a means of reducing the high direct costs of treatment. In preclinical studies, bone formation/resorption markers, bone mineral density measurements, and histomorphometric parameters improved with both once‐daily and once‐weekly administration. However, the magnitude and duration of such improvements were generally greater with once‐daily PTH administration. In clinical studies, reductions in fracture incidence were also noted with both once‐daily and once‐weekly PTH administration, although improvements in nonvertebral fractures are less evident with once‐weekly administration. This narrative review details the differences between PTH formulation and dosing strategies in relation to preclinical and clinical efficacy/safety parameters, although it should be stressed that no head‐to‐head studies allow direct comparisons. This review also seeks to outline practical considerations involved with PTH prescribing and new directions in research regarding routes of administration. © 2017 The Authors. JBMR Plus is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Male Hypogonadism and Osteoporosis: The Effects, Clinical Consequences, and Treatment of Testosterone Deficiency in Bone Health

It is well recognized that bone loss accelerates in hypogonadal states, with female menopause being the classic example of sex hormones affecting the regulation of bone metabolism. Underrepresented is our knowledge of the clinical and metabolic consequences of overt male hypogonadism, as well as the more subtle age-related decline in testosterone on bone quality. While menopause and estrogen deficiency are well-known risk factors for osteoporosis in women, the effects of age-related testosterone decline in men on bone health are less well known. Much of our knowledge comes from observational studies and retrospective analysis on small groups of men with variable causes of primary or secondary hypogonadism and mild to overt testosterone deficiencies. This review aims to present the current knowledge of the consequences of adult male hypogonadism on bone metabolism. The direct and indirect effects of testosterone on bone cells will be explored as well as the important differences in male osteoporosis and assessment as compared to that in females. The clinical consequence of both primary and secondary hypogonadism, as well as testosterone decline in older males, on bone density and fracture risk in men will be summarized. Finally, the therapeutic options and their efficacy in male osteoporosis and hypogonadism will be discussed.

A retrospective analysis of nonresponse to daily teriparatide treatment

Some patients with osteoporosis do not respond to teriparatide treatment. Prior bisphosphonate use, lower bone turnover marker (BTMs) concentrations, and lower early increases in BTMs were significantly associated with a blunted lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) response to daily treatment with teriparatide, although the impact was limited.

INTRODUCTION

Some osteoporosis patients do not respond to teriparatide treatment. To better understand the factors underlying treatment nonresponses, we compared nonresponders' and responders' characteristics.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 354 male and female patients with osteoporosis who were administered teriparatide (20 μg/day) for 24 months. The patients were categorized as responders (≥3 % lumber spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) increase) or nonresponders (<3 % LS BMD increase), and the groups were compared.

RESULTS

The univariate analyses determined that prior bisphosphonate use, a lower baseline procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) concentration and a lower urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen (uNTX) concentration at baseline were significantly associated with teriparatide nonresponses, but these factors were not significant following multivariate analysis. Diminished early increases in the bone turnover markers (BTMs) were also related to nonresponses after teriparatide treatment began. In the nonresponders, the mean (standard deviation (SD)) absolute LS and femoral neck (FN) BMD changes were -0.002 g/cm(2) (0.032) and -0.010 g/cm(2) (0.045), respectively. In the responders, the mean (SD) absolute LS and FN BMD changes were 0.118 g/cm(2) (0.056) and 0.021 g/cm(2) (0.046), respectively. The serum PINP and uNTX levels increased rapidly in both groups, but the responders showed higher early absolute serum PINP and uNTX increases.

CONCLUSIONS

The factors associated with nonresponses were prior bisphosphonate use, lower baseline BTM levels, and lower early increases in the BTMs after starting teriparatide treatment, but the impact of these factors on achieving a ≥3 % LS BMD increase at 24 months was limited.

The Relationship of BMD Increases Between the First 12 Months and the Latter 12 Months by Daily Teriparatide Treatment

The degree of correlation between the first 12 months and the latter 12 months of increased bone mineral density (BMD) with teriparatide treatment is unknown. We retrospectively investigated the correlation between the first 12 months and the latter 12 months of increased BMD owing to teriparatide treatment. We retrospectively analyzed 357 patients (mean age, 78 years) with osteoporosis treated with teriparatide 20 μg/day for 24 months. The primary efficacy measure was the correlation between lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD increases from baseline to 12 months and from 12 to 24 months. The correlation between the first 12 months and the latter 12 months of increased BMD was evaluated. We investigated the correlation between the increases in BMD and the baseline procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) concentration. LS BMD significantly increased by 9.7 ± 8.3 % in the first 12 months and 3.5 ± 4.8 % in the latter 12 months. FN BMD increased by 2.2 ± 8.4 % in the first 12 months and 1.3 ± 4.9 % in the latter 12 months. Increased LS and FN BMD were not significantly correlated between the first 12 months and the latter 12 months. The serum baseline PINP concentration was correlated with the LS BMD in the first 12 months, and similarly, the PINP concentration at 12 months was correlated with the latter 12 months of increased LS BMD. Increased BMD by teriparatide treatment in the first 12 months and the latter 12 months was not significantly correlated.

Usefulness of daily teriparatide treatment in elderly patients over 80 years of age

The percent and absolute lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral densities and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and urinary N-telopeptide level increases noted after teriparatide 20 μg/day treatment for 24 months were similar in the older (age ≥ 80 years) and younger (age < 80 years) subgroups.

INTRODUCTION

Many individuals are living into their eighth and ninth decades, but little is known about the efficacy of osteoporosis medication for this population. We retrospectively compared usefulness of daily teriparatide therapy in osteoporosis patients ≥80 and <80 years to detect possible age-related differences.

METHODS

We analyzed 628 osteoporosis patients treated with teriparatide 20 μg/day for 24 months. The primary efficacy measures were changes in lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD) over 24 months. Changes in serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide levels and urinary N-telopeptide (uNTX) excretion were also measured. Patients were divided into age subgroups (older, ≥80 years; younger, <80 years) for BMD and bone turnover marker comparison.

RESULTS

In the older subgroup, the percent LS BMD significantly increased by 14.6 ± 10.4 % (mean ± SD) and FN BMD significantly increased by 4.5 ± 10.7 % at 24 months. In the younger subgroup, the percent LS BMD significantly increased by 12.2 ± 8.5 % and FN BMD significantly increased by 2.9 ± 8.3 % at 24 months. In the older subgroup, the mean absolute LS BMD change was 0.111 ± 0.071 g/cm(2) and FN BMD change was 0.019 ± 0.043 g/cm(2). In the younger subgroup, the mean absolute LS BMD change was 0.098 ± 0.065 g/cm(2) and FN BMD change was 0.016 ± 0.045 g/cm(2). The percent and absolute BMD increases in LS and FN and changes in PINP and uNTX were similar between the subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The usefulness of daily teriparatide treatment is not age dependent.

Sclerostin, an emerging therapeutic target for treating osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture: A general review

Osteoporosis and its associated fracture risk has become one of the major health burdens in our aging population. Currently, bisphosphonate, one of the most popular antiresorptive drugs, is used widely to treat osteoporosis but so far still no consensus has been reached for its application in treatment of osteoporotic fractures. However, in old patients, boosting new bone formation and its remodelling is essential for bone healing in age-related osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Sclerostin, an inhibitor of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway that regulates bone growth, has become an attractive therapeutic target for treating osteoporosis. In this review, we summarize the recent findings of sclerostin and its potential as an effective drug target for treating both osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures.