Relationship between bone strength index of the hemiparetic tibial diaphysis and muscle strength in people with chronic stroke: influence of muscle contraction type and speed

Effect of high-intensity laser therapy versus shockwave therapy on selected outcome measures in osteoporotic long-term hemiparetic patients: a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the effects of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in treating consequences of osteoporosis in hemiparetic patients.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted on hemiplegic patients with osteoporosis. They were randomly classified into three equal groups (n = 40 in each group). The control group received medication and traditional physiotherapy programs for stroke patients. The high-intensity laser (HIL) group received the same intervention as the control group in addition to high-intensity laser therapy. The shock wave (SW) group received the same intervention as the control group in addition to shock wave therapy. The three groups received an intervention that lasted 3 sessions/week for 12 weeks). All groups were assessed before and after therapy for the degree of pain, fall risk, and quality of life.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was found concerning VAS, which had a significant difference in favor of HILT and ESWT groups compared to the control group; however, no significant difference was determined between HIL and SW groups. Regarding the overall stability index, SFBBS, and QUALEFFO-41, there was a significant difference in favor of HIL and SW groups compared to the control group, and a significant difference was found in HIL when compared to SW.

CONCLUSION

The current study indicates that the combined traditional physical therapy and HILT and ESWT have clinical significance in improving osteoporotic long-term hemiparetic patients with more favor to HILT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered as a clinical trial at ClinicalTrial.gov ID (NCT05616611).

Bone parameters in hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorder: A comparative cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To compare bone parameters between individuals with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) and generalized joint hypermobility spectrum disorder (G-HSD), both diagnosed according to the most recent diagnostic criteria, and with controls.

METHODS

Twenty female adults with hEDS (mean age 43.8 years), 20 with G-HSD (mean age 41.8 years), and 37 healthy controls (mean age 40.8 years) participated. Body composition and bone parameters at whole body and lumbar spine were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography at the lower leg evaluated body composition (66 % site), and trabecular (4 % site) and cortical (66 % site) bone parameters at the tibia.

RESULTS

No significantly different body composition and bone parameters were observed between hEDS and G-HSD. Compared to controls, individuals with hEDS and G-HSD had lower muscle mass (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively) and cross-sectional area (p = 0.025 and p < 0.001, respectively), cortical bone mineral content (BMC; p = 0.024 and p = 0.027, respectively) and area (p = 0.019 and p = 0.010, respectively). Additionally, individuals with hEDS had lower muscle density (p = 0.009), trabecular BMC (p = 0.027) and bone mineral density (p = 0.022), and individuals with G-HSD lower stress-strain index (p = 0.019), and periosteal and endosteal circumference (p = 0.002 and 0.025, respectively), compared to controls.

CONCLUSION

Results indicated lower cortical bone mineral content and smaller cortices in hEDS and G-HSD compared to controls. Individuals with hEDS and G-HSD had no different bone parameters, suggesting that these impairments might not be reflected by the different diagnostic classification. Therefore, we recommend regular physical activity, and training to reduce the risk of falling in both hEDS or G-HSD.

Bone Mass, Density, Geometry, and Stress-Strain Index in Adults With Osteogenesis Imperfecta Type I and Their Associations With Physical Activity and Muscle Function Parameters

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous heritable connective tissue disorder mainly characterized by bone fragility and increased fracture risk. This study investigated bone parameters in adults with OI type I and their relationship with physical activity and muscle function parameters in comparison with controls. A total of 27 (15 women, 12 men) adults with OI type I and 27 healthy age- and sex-matched controls, with mean age 45 years (range 18-72 years), were included. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography was performed at the lower leg and forearm to assess muscle density, muscle and fat cross-sectional area (CSA) (66% site), and trabecular (4% site) and cortical bone parameters (66% site) at radius and tibia. Physical activity (step count and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA]) was assessed by accelerometry, muscle function parameters by Leonardo mechanography (single two-legged jump - peak power), and hand grip dynamometry (maximal hand grip strength). Overall, the OI type I group had significantly lower muscle CSA at the lower leg and forearm, lower trabecular and cortical bone mineral content, lower polar stress-strain index (SSIp), and smaller cortices but higher cortical bone mineral density and lower step count and MVPA in comparison with controls. Maximal hand grip strength was positively associated with SSIp at radius (p = 0.012) in the control group but not in the OI type I group (p = 0.338) (difference in associations: p = 0.012). No other significantly different associations between bone and muscle function parameters or physical activity (step count or MVPA) were found in the OI type I versus control group. We conclude that adults with OI type I have smaller bones, lower trabecular bone mass, lower estimates of bone strength, and higher cortical density in comparison with controls and that there are some indications of a disturbed biomechanical muscle-bone relationship in adults with OI type I. © 2022 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

The effects of biophysical stimulation on osteogenic differentiation and the mechanisms from ncRNAs

Ample proof showed that non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) play a crucial role in proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts and bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). Varied forms of biophysical stimuli like mechanical strain, fluid shear stress (FSS), microgravity and vibration are verified to regulate ncRNAs expression in osteogenic differentiation and influence the expression of target genes associated with osteogenic differentiation and ultimately regulate bone formation. The consequences of biophysical stimulation on osteogenic differentiation validate the prospect of exercise for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. In this review, we tend to summarize the studies on regulation of osteogenic differentiation by ncRNAs beneath biophysical stimulation and facilitate to reveal the regulatory mechanism of biophysical stimulation on ncRNAs, and provide an update for the prevention of bone metabolism diseases by exercise.