Comparative effectiveness and cardiovascular safety of abaloparatide and teriparatide in postmenopausal women new to anabolic therapy: A US administrative claims database study

Bone aging and extracellular vesicles

Bone aging, a major global health concern, is the natural decline in bone mass and strength. Concurrently, extracellular vesicles (EVs), tiny membrane-bound particles produced by cells, have gained recognition for their roles in various physiological processes and age-related diseases. The interaction between EVs and bone aging is of growing interest, particularly their effects on bone metabolism, which become increasingly critical with advancing age. In this review, we explored the biology, types, and functions of EVs and emphasized their regulatory roles in bone aging. We examined the effects of EVs on bone metabolism and highlighted their potential as biomarkers for monitoring bone aging progression. Furthermore, we discussed the therapeutic applications of EVs, including targeted drug delivery and bone regeneration, and addressed the challenges associated with EV-based therapies, including the technical complexities and regulatory issues. We summarized the current research and clinical trials investigating the role of EVs in bone aging and suggested future research directions. These include the potential for personalized medicine using EVs and the integration of EV research with advanced technologies to enhance the management of age-related bone health. This analysis emphasized the transformative potential of EVs in understanding and managing bone aging, thereby marking a significant advancement in skeletal health research.

Comparative effectiveness and cardiovascular safety of romosozumab versus teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis: a population-based cohort study

This study compared the effectiveness and cardiovascular safety of romosozumab and teriparatide. The main finding was that there were no significant differences between the two drugs in fracture prevention and risk of major adverse cardiac events. This suggests that romosozumab and teriparatide are comparable options for treating osteoporosis.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the preventive effects of romosozumab versus teriparatide on fractures and the risk of cardiovascular events in patients initiating these drugs.

METHODS

We conducted an active comparator, a new user cohort design, with confounding controlled by inverse probability of treatment weighting using a Japanese administrative claims database (March 2019 to October 2022). This cohort study included 49,104 patients aged 50 years or older who initiated romosozumab (n = 16,125) or teriparatide (n = 32,979) for osteoporosis. The study exposure was the initiation of romosozumab or teriparatide. Effectiveness outcomes were nonvertebral fracture and hip fracture. The safety outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Follow-up period was 365 days.

RESULTS

The weighted incidence rate difference (IRD) for nonvertebral fracture between romosozumab versus teriparatide was -0.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.34 to 0.17) events per 100 person-years (weighted hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.12]); weighted IRD for hip fracture was 0.00 (95% CI, -0.16 to 0.16) events per 100 person-years (weighted HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.29]); and weighted IRD for MACE was -0.06 (95% CI, -0.20 to 0.09) events per 100 person-years (weighted HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.19]).

CONCLUSION

In patients with osteoporosis, there was no significant difference in the prevention of nonvertebral fracture and hip fracture between romosozumab and teriparatide. In addition, the risk of MACE was comparable between the two drugs.

Comparative Effectiveness of Abaloparatide and Teriparatide in Women 50 Years of Age and Older: Update of a Real-World Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Abaloparatide and teriparatide are osteoanabolic treatments indicated for postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture. In the Abaloparatide Comparator Trial In Vertebral Endpoints study, bone mineral density improvements were significantly greater with abaloparatide compared to teriparatide at the total hip and femoral neck. We conducted a retrospective claims study to examine the incidences of hip and nonvertebral fractures and cardiovascular events in women aged ≥50 years initiating abaloparatide or teriparatide therapy, expanding on a previous retrospective claims study.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study used anonymized claims data from ICON's Symphony Health, PatientSource for women aged ≥ 50 years with ≥ 1 prescription fill for abaloparatide or teriparatide. The index date was the date of the initial prescription dispensed. Times to first hip fracture, nonvertebral fracture, and serious cardiovascular event were compared between logistic regression-based propensity score-matched cohorts and in predefined subgroups by age, prior antiresorptive use, and prior fracture using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Patients (21 676 per cohort) were well matched on 73 baseline parameters. Forty-five percent of patients in the abaloparatide arm and 47% in the teriparatide arm were exposed to treatment for longer than 12 months. Over 18 months (+ 30 days follow-up), 245 (1.1%) and 296 (1.4%) women in the abaloparatide and teriparatide cohorts, respectively, had a hip fracture (HR [95% CI] 0.83 [0.70, 0.98]; P = .027); 947 (4.4%) and 1078 (5.0%) had a nonvertebral fracture (0.88 [0.80, 0.96]; P = .003). There were no significant treatment-subgroup interactions (P ≥ .2). Cardiovascular events were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significantly lower rates of hip and nonvertebral fractures with abaloparatide compared to teriparatide, which were consistent across subgroups. No differences in cardiovascular safety were noted between cohorts.

Receptor activity-modifying protein modulation of parathyroid hormone-1 receptor function and signaling

Introduction

Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) are known to modulate the pharmacology and function of several G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including the parathyroid hormone 1 receptor (PTH1R). However, the precise effects of different RAMPs on PTH1R signalling and trafficking remain poorly understood. This study investigated the impact of RAMP2 and RAMP3 on PTH1R function using a range of PTH and PTH-related protein (PTHrP)-derived ligands.

Methods

We employed FRET imaging to assess PTH1R interactions with RAMPs. Cell surface expression of PTH1R was evaluated in the presence of RAMPs. PTH1R-mediated cAMP accumulation, β-arrestin recruitment, and calcium signalling were measured in response to various ligands. Antibody-capture scintillation proximity assays were used to examine G-protein activation patterns.

Results

PTH1R preferentially interacted with RAMP2 and, to a lesser extent, RAMP3, but not with RAMP1. RAMP3 co-expression reduced cell surface expression of PTH1R. RAMP2 significantly enhanced PTH1R-mediated signalling responses to PTH (1-34), PTHrP (1-34), PTH (1-84), and PTH (1-17) analogue ZP2307, while RAMP3 co-expression attenuated or abolished these responses. Full-length PTHrP analogues exhibited lower potency and efficacy than PTHrP (1-34) in activating PTH1R. RAMP2 increased the potency and/or efficacy of these analogues, whereas RAMP3 reduced these responses. RAMP2 differentially modulated G-protein activation by PTH1R in a ligand-dependent manner, with PTH (1-34) and PTHrP (1-34) inducing distinct patterns of G-protein subtype activation.

Discussion

These findings highlight the complex role of RAMPs in regulating PTH1R signalling and trafficking, revealing differential effects of RAMP2 and RAMP3 on receptor function. The data suggest that targeting the PTH1R/RAMP2 complex may be a promising strategy for developing novel bone anabolic therapies by leveraging biased agonism and functional selectivity. Further research using physiologically relevant models is needed to elucidate the therapeutic potential of this approach.

Recommendations for the optimal use of bone forming agents in osteoporosis

Bone forming agents, also known as anabolic therapies, are essential in managing osteoporosis, particularly for patients at very high-risk of fractures. Identifying candidates who will benefit the most from these treatments is crucial. For example, this group might include individuals with severe osteoporosis, multiple vertebral fractures, a recent fragility fracture or those unresponsive to antiresorptive treatments. Definitions of patients with a very high fracture risk vary across nations, are often based on fracture history, bone mineral density (BMD), and/or fracture risk calculated by FRAX® or other algorithms. However, for very high-risk patients, anabolic agents such as teriparatide, abaloparatide, or romosozumab are commonly recommended as first-line therapies due to their ability to stimulate new bone formation and improve bone microarchitecture, offering significant benefits in rapid fracture reduction over antiresorptive therapies. The cost-effectiveness of these agents is a critical consideration for decision-makers. Despite their higher costs, their effectiveness in significantly reducing fracture risk and improving quality of life can justify the investment, especially when long-term savings from reduced fracture rates and associated healthcare costs are considered. Additionally, after completing a course of anabolic therapy, transitioning to antiresorptive agents like bisphosphonates or denosumab is crucial to maintain the gains in bone density and minimize subsequent fracture risks. This sequential treatment approach ensures sustained protection and optimal resource utilization. In summary, the effective use of bone forming agents in osteoporosis requires a comprehensive strategy that includes accurate patient identification, consideration of cost-effectiveness, and implementation of appropriate sequential treatments, ultimately maximizing patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.

Treatment patterns in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis using abaloparatide: a real-world observational study

Review of medical records from 173 women with osteoporosis who received abaloparatide treatment revealed that 96.0% had at least one visit for osteoporosis management and 55.5% had medication support group access. The most common reasons for discontinuing treatment were financial (31.2%) and tolerability (22.8%). Most patients (64.8%) completed treatment as prescribed.

PURPOSE

Abaloparatide is approved for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk for fracture. This study evaluated real-world treatment patterns for patients new to abaloparatide, regardless of osteoporosis treatment history.

METHODS

Data for patients with ≥ 1 prescription for abaloparatide were collected retrospectively from six academic and clinical practice settings across the US.

RESULTS

A total of 173 patients were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 69.8 [7.4] years). At the time of abaloparatide treatment initiation, 78.6% had received other osteoporosis medications. Mean (SD) time from discontinuation of osteoporosis medications prior to initiation of abaloparatide was 1.7 (3.2) years. Twenty-four months of follow-up data from the initiation date of abaloparatide was collected from 94.0% of patients and 6.0% of patients had 12-24 months of follow-up. During the follow-up period, 96.0% of patients had at least one visit for osteoporosis management and 55.5% had access to a medication support program. The median duration of therapy was 18.6 months and 105/162 (64.8%) completed abaloparatide treatment as prescribed. The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were financial (31.2%) and tolerability (22.8%). Following completion of a course of treatment with abaloparatide, 82/162 (50.6%) patients transitioned to another osteoporosis medication. The median time between abaloparatide treatment course completion and the initiation of follow-on medication was 21 days.

CONCLUSION

Most patients completed treatment with abaloparatide as prescribed, and over half continued with an antiresorptive agent. This favorable conduct may be the result of regular follow-up visits and accessibility to both medication and patient support services.

Romosozumab versus parathyroid hormone receptor agonists: which osteoanabolic to choose and when?

Osteoanabolic agents are used as a first line treatment in patients at high fracture risk. The PTH receptor 1 (PTH1R) agonists teriparatide (TPTD) and abaloparatide (ABL) increase bone formation, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone strength by activating PTH receptors on osteoblasts. Romosozumab (ROMO), a humanized monoclonal antibody against sclerostin, dramatically but transiently stimulates bone formation and persistently reduces bone resorption. Osteoanabolic agents increase BMD and bone strength while being more effective than antiresorptives in reducing fracture risk in postmenopausal women. However, direct comparisons of the antifracture benefits of osteoanabolic therapies are limited. In a direct comparison of TPTD and ABL, the latter resulted in greater BMD increases at the hip. While no differences in vertebral or non-vertebral fracture risk were observed between the two drugs, ABL led to a greater reduction of major osteoporotic fractures. Adverse event profiles were similar between the two agents except for hypercalcemia, which occurred more often with TPTD. No direct comparisons of fracture risk reduction between ROMO and the PTH1R agonists exist. Individual studies have shown greater increases in BMD and bone strength with ROMO compared with TPTD in treatment-naive women and in women previously treated with bisphosphonates. Some safety aspects, such as a history of tumor precluding the use of PTH1R agonists, and a history of major cardiovascular events precluding the use of ROMO, should also be considered when choosing between these agents. Finally, convenience of administration, reimbursement by national health systems and length of clinical experience may influence patient choice.

Clinical challenges and considerations in pharmacotherapy of osteoporosis due to menopause

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is a chronic systemic skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength and an increased risk of fracture, with a high prevalence worldwide. It is associated with a negative quality of life and an increased morbidity and mortality. Postmenopausal women are more prone to develop osteoporosis, and many of them will suffer at least one fragility fracture along their lifetime.

AREAS COVERED

This review starts by summarizing the pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO), with focus on the estrogen deficiency-associated bone loss. It continues with the current PMO diagnostic and fracture risk prediction tools, and it finally addresses management of PMO. All the efficacy and safety profiles of the current and future osteoporosis medications are reviewed. Furthermore, strategies to optimize the long-term disease management are discussed. For this review, only publications in English language were selected. References were extracted from PubMed, Embase, and Medline.

EXPERT OPINION

PMO disease management is far from being ideal. Educational and communication programs with the goal of improving disease knowledge and awareness, as well as reducing the health-care gap, should be implemented. In addition, most effective sequential prevention and treatment strategies should be initiated from the early menopause.

A comprehensive review and advanced biomolecule-based therapies for osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of osteoporosis (OP) on a global scale is significantly elevated that causes life threatening issues. The potential of groundbreaking biomolecular therapeutics in the field of OP is highly encouraging. The administration of biomolecular agents has the potential to mitigate the process of bone demineralization while concurrently augmenting the regenerative capacity of bone tissue, thereby facilitating a personalized therapeutic approach. Biomolecules-based therapies showed promising results in term of bone mass protection and restoration in OP.

AIM OF REVIEW

We summarized the recent biomolecular therapies with notable progress in clinical, demonstrating the potential to transform illness management. These treatments frequently utilize different biomolecule based strategies. Biomolecular therapeutics has a targeted character, which results in heightened specificity and less off-target effects, ultimately leading to increased patient outcomes. These aspects have the capacity to greatly enhance the management of OP, thus resulting in a major enhancement in the quality of life encountered by individuals affected by this condition.

Synthesis of Heterocyclic Ring-Fused Bisnoralcohol Derivatives as Novel Small-Molecule Antiosteoporosis Agents

A series of heterocyclic ring-fused derivatives of bisnoralcohol (BA) were synthesized and evaluated for their inhibitory effects on RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis. Most of these derivatives possessed potent antiosteoporosis activities in a dose-dependent manner. Among these compounds, 31 (SH442, IC50 = 0.052 μM) exhibited the highest potency, displaying 100% inhibition at 1.0 μM and 82.8% inhibition at an even lower concentration of 0.1 μM, which was much more potent than the lead compound BA (IC50 = 2.325 μM). Cytotoxicity tests suggested that the inhibitory effect of these compounds on RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation did not result from their cytotoxicity. Mechanistic studies revealed that SH442 inhibited the expression of osteoclastogenesis-related marker genes and proteins, including TRAP, TRAF6, c-Fos, CTSK, and MMP9. Especially, SH442 could significantly attenuate bone loss of ovariectomy mouse in vivo. Therefore, these BA derivatives could be used as promising leads for the development of a new type of antiosteoporosis agent.

Systematical mutational analysis of teriparatide on anti-osteoporosis activity by alanine scanning

Osteoporosis is a progressive systemic skeletal disease that decreases bone density and bone quality, making them fragile and easy to break. In spite of effective anti-osteoporosis potency, teriparatide, the first anabolic medications approved for the treatment of osteoporosis, was proven to exhibit various side effects. And the relevant structure-activity relationship (SAR) of teriparatide was in need. In this work, we performed a systematical alanine scanning against teriparatide and synthesized 34 teriparatide derivatives. Their biological activities were evaluated and the importance of each residue for anti-osteoporosis activity was also revealed. A remarkable decrease in activity was observed for alanine replacement of the residue Gly12, His14, Ser17, Arg20 and Leu24, showcasing the important role of these residues in teriparatide on anti-osteoporosis activity. On contrary, when Gly13 and Gln30 were mutated to Ala, the peptide derivatives exhibited the significantly increased activities, demonstrating that these two residues could be readily replaced. Our research expanded the peptide library of teriparatide analogues and presented a potential opportunity for designing the more powerful anti-osteoporosis peptide agents.

Real-World Evidence to Support the Registration of a New Osteoporosis Medicinal Product in Europe

Real-World Evidence (RWE), which has historically been used to support post-approval safety studies, has recently gained acceptance for new drug applications as supportive evidence or as new clinical evidence for medicinal products with orphan designation and/or in disease areas with high unmet need. Here, we present a case study for the use of RWE in the approval of abaloparatide in the European Union (EU) under the tradename Eladynos. In addition to data from the pivotal Phase 3 study, the marketing authorization application (MAA) included clinical data from additional interventional and observational studies, as well as post-marketing data obtained from the United States (US) market since approval of abaloparatide by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2017. The new interventional studies were not designed to assess fracture efficacy and cardiovascular safety which were topics of concern raised by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) during their review of the initial MAA submitted in 2015. However, these studies taken together with the RWE formed the basis for a new MAA. Prior to the planned resubmission in the EU, national Scientific Advice (SA) was sought on the proposed clinical program, specifically on the relevance of Real-World Data (RWD) derived from an observational study to support and complement the efficacy and safety data already available from prospective randomized clinical trials. This case study demonstrates successful use of RWE to address a previously identified gap raised by the CHMP during the review of an earlier MAA, which led to the approval of Eladynos for the treatment of osteoporosis in the EU.

Cardiovascular Safety of Romosozumab vs. PTH Analogs for Osteoporosis Treatment: a Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study

CONTEXT

Romosozumab, a monoclonal sclerostin antibody, is a recently approved highly potent anti-osteoporotic agent with osteoanabolic properties. Clinical use of Romosozumab is hindered by the fear of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events raised following the pivotal ARCH-trial.

OBJECTIVE

To assess real-world CV safety of romosozumab vs. alternative osteoanabolic therapies used for treatment of severe osteoporosis.

DESIGN

Data was obtained from TriNetX, a global federated health research network including real-time electronic medical records from 113 healthcare organizations with a total of 136,460,930 patients across 16 countries at time of analysis. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 40 years, a diagnosis of osteoporosis and prescription of romosozumab or a PTH analog (teriparatide/abaloparatide) during 8.2019-8.2022. 1:1 propensity score matched cohorts were created using demographic variables, comorbidities, and medications. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the probability of the outcomes.

OUTCOMES

Incident 3-point major adverse CV event or death (3P-MACE) during 1-year of follow-up after the initial prescription.

RESULTS

5,626 and 15,986 patients met the criteria for romosozumab and PTH analog cohorts, respectively, with 5,610 patients per group following propensity score matching. 3P-MACE was significantly less frequent in the romosozumab vs. PTH analog cohort (158 vs 211 patients with an outcome, p=0.003) with reductions in the individual components of the composite outcome: myocardial ischemic events (31 vs 58, p=0.003); cerebrovascular events 56 vs 79, p=0.037; deaths (83 vs 104, p=0.099).

CONCLUSIONS

In a diverse real-world setting, prescription of romosozumab for osteoporosis is associated with less adverse CV events when compared to PTH analog therapy.

Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with abaloparatide in US men and women at very high risk of fractures

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic-related fractures represent an increasing burden to patients, health care systems and society.

AIMS

This study estimated cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with abaloparatide (ABL) followed by alendronate (ALN) compared to relevant alternative strategies in US men and women aged 50 to 80 years at very high fracture risk (bone mineral density T-score ≤  - 2.5 and a recent fracture).

METHODS

A lifetime Markov-based microsimulation model was used to estimate healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Comparators were sequential treatment with unbranded teriparatide (TPTD)/ALN, generic ALN monotherapy, and no treatment. Analyses were conducted based on initial fracture site (hip, vertebral, or any fracture) and treatment efficacy data (derived from clinical trials or a recent network meta-analysis).

RESULTS

From all analyses completed, sequential ABL/ALN demonstrated more QALYs for lower healthcare costs versus unbranded TPTD/ALN. No treatment was dominated (higher costs for less QALYs) versus ALN monotherapy. Sequential ABL/ALN resulted in favorable cost-effectiveness (at US threshold of $150,000/QALY) versus generic ALN monotherapy in men aged ≥ 50 years with any fracture type, women aged ≥ 65 years with any fracture type, and women aged ≥ 55 years having a hip or vertebral fracture.

DISCUSSION

Similar cost-effectiveness of sequential ABL/ALN versus unbranded TPTD/ALN, ALN monotherapy, and no treatment was observed in both US men and women at very high fracture risk, with a moderate improvement in cost-effectiveness in men versus women and in patients with a hip or vertebral fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential therapy with ABL/ALN was cost-effective in US men and women at very high risk of fractures.

Abaloparatide dose-dependently increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a phase 2 study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to determine the efficacy of abaloparatide in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) and its safety in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study of abaloparatide in postmenopausal Japanese women at high fracture risk. The primary endpoint was the change in lumbar spine (LS) BMD from baseline at the last visit after daily subcutaneous injections of placebo or 40 or 80 µg abaloparatide. Other endpoints included time-course changes in LS BMD at 12, 24, and 48 weeks, in total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN) BMDs, and in bone turnover markers.

RESULTS

Increases in LS BMD with 40 and 80 µg abaloparatide were significantly higher than that with placebo (6.6% and 11.5%, respectively), with significant between-group differences for the abaloparatide groups (4.9%). TH BMD increased by 0.4%, 1.6%, and 2.9% and FN BMD increased by 0.6%, 1.5%, and 2.4% in the placebo and 40 and 80 µg abaloparatide groups, respectively. Serum PINP rapidly increased by 67.3% and 140.7% and serum CTX slowly increased by 16.4% and 34.5% in the 40 and 80 µg abaloparatide groups, respectively. Although more adverse events were observed in the abaloparatide groups, they were mild to moderate and not dose dependent.

CONCLUSION

In postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis at high fracture risk, abaloparatide for 48 weeks dose-dependently increased LS, TH, and FN BMDs, supporting further investigation with 80 μg abaloparatide for the treatment of osteoporosis in this population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

JapicCTI-132381.

Real-world evidence: new opportunities for osteoporosis research. Recommendations from a Working Group from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO)

This narrative review summarises the recommendations of a Working Group of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) for the conduct and reporting of real-world evidence studies with a focus on osteoporosis research.

PURPOSE

Vast amounts of data are routinely generated at every healthcare contact and activity, and there is increasing recognition that these real-world data can be analysed to generate scientific evidence. Real-world evidence (RWE) is increasingly used to delineate the natural history of disease, assess real-life drug effectiveness, understand adverse events and in health economic analysis. The aim of this work was to understand the benefits and limitations of this type of data and outline approaches to ensure that transparent and high-quality evidence is generated.

METHODS

A ESCEO Working Group was convened in December 2022 to discuss the applicability of RWE to osteoporosis research and approaches to best practice.

RESULTS

This narrative review summarises the agreed recommendations for the conduct and reporting of RWE studies with a focus on osteoporosis research.

CONCLUSIONS

It is imperative that research using real-world data is conducted to the highest standards with close attention to limitations and biases of these data, and with transparency at all stages of study design, data acquisition and curation, analysis and reporting to increase the trustworthiness of RWE study findings.

New insights into the role of long non-coding RNAs in osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a common disease in elderly individuals, and osteoporosis can easily lead to bone and hip fractures that seriously endanger the health of elderly individuals. At present, the treatment of osteoporosis is mainly anti-osteoporosis drugs, but there are side effects associated with anti-osteoporosis drugs. Therefore, it is very important to develop early diagnostic indicators and new therapeutic drugs for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), noncoding RNAs longer than 200 nucleotides, can be used as diagnostic markers for osteoporosis, and lncRNAs play an important role in the progression of osteoporosis. Many studies have shown that lncRNAs can be the target of osteoporosis. Therefore, herein, the role of lncRNAs in osteoporosis is summarized, aiming to provide some information for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Cost-Effectiveness of Sequential Abaloparatide/Alendronate in Men at High Risk of Fractures in the United States

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Abaloparatide (ABL) significantly increases bone mineral density in men with osteoporosis similar to what was reported in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The cost effectiveness of sequential treatment with ABL followed by alendronate (ALN) in men at high fracture risk was compared to relevant alternative treatments.

METHODS

A Markov-based microsimulation model based on a lifetime US healthcare decision maker perspective was developed to evaluate the cost (expressed in US$2021) per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained of sequential ABL/ALN. Comparators were sequential treatment unbranded teriparatide (TPTD)/ALN, generic ALN monotherapy, and no treatment. Discount rates of 3% were used. Consistent with practice guidelines, patients received 18 months of ABL or TPTD followed by ALN for 5 years, or 5 years of ALN monotherapy. Analyses were conducted in high-risk men aged over 50 years defined as having a bone mineral density T-score ≤-2.5 and a recent fracture. Time-specific risk of subsequent fracture after a recent fracture, incremental costs up to 5 years following fractures, real-world medication adherence, and mostly US men-specific data were included in the model. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of results.

RESULTS

Over the full age range, sequential ABL/ALN led to more QALYs for lower costs than sequential unbranded TPTD/ALN, while no treatment was dominated (more QALYs, lower costs) by ALN monotherapy. The costs per QALY gained of sequential ABL/ALN were lower than the US threshold of US$150,000 versus generic ALN monotherapy. The probabilities that sequential ABL/ALN was cost effective compared to ALN monotherapy were estimated at 51% in men aged 50 years and between 88 and 90% in those aged ≥ 60 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential therapy using ABL/ALN may be cost effective compared with generic ALN monotherapy in US men aged ≥ 50 years at high fracture risk, especially in those aged ≥ 60 years. Unbranded TPTD/ALN and no treatment were dominated interventions (less QALY, more costs) compared with ABL/ALN or ALN monotherapy.

An Evaluation of Treatment Patterns for Osteoporosis and Outcomes After a Fragility Fracture in a Real-World Setting

OBJECTIVES

Treatment initiation and persistence after a fragility fracture are critical to reduce the risk of subsequent fractures. The authors evaluated osteoporosis management and outcomes after index fracture.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used real-world data for patients (≥50 years), including pharmacy claims linked to commercial and Medicare medical claims from Symphony Health Patient Source. Osteoporosis management was evaluated for at least 12 months after the first case-qualifying fracture during the identification period and continued until a second fracture or March 31, 2020 (depending on data availability). Secondary fracture incidence was evaluated overall and for subgroups at very high risk.

RESULTS

Of 755,312 eligible patients, the proportion with a claim for bone mineral density testing at 12 months after index fracture was low [64,932 (8.6%)], and 75.3% of those tested were ≥65 years of age. Most patients (88.6%) remained untreated at any time after fracture. Among those treated, most (64.9%) were initially treated with bisphosphonates (oral, 93.7%; IV, 6.3%). Treatment duration and persistence were low for all treatments ranging from 6.5 months with 19.6% persistent for abaloparatide to 11.3 months with 45.0% persistent for denosumab. During follow-up, 13.6% of patients had a secondary fracture at any site, with higher incidence in subgroups considered to be at high risk for fracture than in the overall population.

CONCLUSIONS

Low rates of osteoporosis testing and treatment initiation and high secondary fracture rates (particularly among patients at very high risk) highlight the need for better management of patients after a fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.