1
|
Kobayashi T, Morimoto T, Ito K, Mawatari M, Shimazaki T. Denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of comparative safety in randomized controlled trials. Osteoporos Int 2024:10.1007/s00198-024-07118-0. [PMID: 38733394 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07118-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
Denosumab and bisphosphonates for primary osteoporosis are generally well-tolerated, but their comparative safety remains unclear. We aimed to explore the comparative safety of denosumab and bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis. Databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for relevant peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials published in English (as of December 2023). Trials comparing adverse events (AE) between denosumab and bisphosphonates in patients with primary osteoporosis were investigated. Data were pooled using a fixed- or random-effects model to determine the risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for various AEs in patients treated with denosumab in comparison to patients treated with bisphosphonates. Eleven trials (5,545 patients; follow-up period: 12-24 months) were included in this meta-analysis. All trials had a risk of bias (e.g., reporting bias linked to secondary endpoints and selection bias linked to random allocation). In comparison to bisphosphonates, denosumab was significantly associated with less withdrawal due to AEs (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34-0.71), more five-point major adverse cardiovascular events (RR = 2.05; 95% CI 1.03-4.09), more cardiovascular AEs (RR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.07-2.41), more infections (RR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.02-1.27), more upper respiratory tract infections (RR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.08-2.25), less vertebral fractures (RR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.93), and less abdominal pain (RR = 0.44;95% CI 0.22-0.87). We explored the comparative safety of denosumab and bisphosphonates for primary osteoporosis, some of which could be attributed to their beneficial effects. However, all trials had a risk of bias. Further investigations are required to confirm our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaomi Kobayashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Taku City Hospital, Saga, Japan.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
- Department of Clinical Research, Amagi Chuo Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
| | - Tadatsugu Morimoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Koji Ito
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Taku City Hospital, Saga, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Masaaki Mawatari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Takafumi Shimazaki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Taku City Hospital, Saga, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Adverse nocebo responses can cause harm to patients and interfere with treatment adherence and effects in both clinic practice and clinical trials. Nocebo responses refer to negative outcomes to active medical treatments in clinical trials or practice that cannot be explained by the treatment's pharmacologic effects. Negative expectancies and nocebo effects are less known than placebo responses. Nocebo effects can be triggered by verbal suggestions, prior negative experiences, observation of others experiencing negative outcomes, and other contextual and environmental factors. As research advances over the years, mechanistic knowledge is accumulating on the neurobiological mechanisms of nocebo effects. This review summarizes studies on different facets of nocebo effects and responses and discusses clinical implications, ethical considerations, and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luana Colloca
- Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science and Placebo Beyond Opinions Center, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yavropoulou MP, Kasdagli MI, Makras P, Diomatari KM, Anastasilakis AD, Mitsikostas DD, Kassi E, Sfikakis PP, Kravvariti E. Nocebo-associated treatment discontinuation with subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs. A systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-arm dropouts in randomized-controlled trials. Maturitas 2024; 179:107874. [PMID: 37976923 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.107874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Nocebo is a concept of therapeutics referring to unpleasant symptoms attributed by a patient to a drug, due to negative anticipation. Patients receiving oral anti-osteoporotic drugs in randomized controlled trials (RCT) can experience adverse events leading to dropout, implying that nocebo contributes to treatment discontinuation for these drugs. In this study we aim to investigate the nocebo effect of subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs with a higher compliance rate than orally administered drugs. STUDY DESIGN We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases for double-blind trials investigating subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs for osteoporosis (namely, denosumab, teriparatide, abaloparatide and romosozumab) published up to May 2023. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Dropouts due to reported adverse events in the placebo arms ("nocebo dropouts"). RESULTS Data from 17 trials were extracted. Among 10,529 placebo-treated patients the pooled nocebo-dropout percentage was 3 % for denosumab (average: 0.03; 95 % CI: 0.01-0.05), 1 % for romosozumab (average: 0.01; 95 % CI: 0.00-0.03) and 6 % for teriparatide and abaloparatide (average: 0.06; 95 % CI: 0.05-0.07). Nocebo-dropouts were significantly higher in men than women (6 % vs. 3 %, respectively, p = 0.012), in older (mean age >68 years) than in younger patients (5 % vs. 1 %, respectively, p = 0.017) and in those with more severe osteoporosis (based on the percentage of participants with prior fragility-related fractures in the study cohort) compared with patients with no prior fracture history (4 % vs. 1 %, respectively, p = 0.046). CONCLUSION Nocebo responses may contribute to treatment discontinuation with subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs in clinical practice. Higher nocebo-related dropout rates in the higher-risk RCT population (older patients, males, those with prior fractures) show that nocebo mechanisms have the potential to hinder therapeutic efforts to specific populations who would benefit most. Prospero registration number CRD42020212843.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria P Yavropoulou
- Endocrinology Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon University Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
| | - Maria-Iosifina Kasdagli
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Polyzois Makras
- Department of Medical Research, 251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantina-Maria Diomatari
- Postgraduate Medical Studies in the Physiology of Aging and Geriatric Syndromes, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Dimos D Mitsikostas
- 1st Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Eva Kassi
- Endocrinology Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon University Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Endocrinology Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon University Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon University Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Evrydiki Kravvariti
- Endocrinology Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon University Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon University Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|