Prostaglandin E2 does not attenuate adrenergic-induced cardiac contractile response

Left ventricular assist device bioinformatics identify possible hubgenes and regulatory networks involved in the myocardium of patients with left ventricular assist device

Objective

The aim of this study was to clarify the changes of myocardial gene expression profile after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and the related molecular biological significance.

Methods

A thorough bioinformatic analysis to evaluate the changes in gene expression profile in patients pre-LVAD and post-LVAD was conducted. Four relevant gene expression datasets—GSE430, GSE974, GSE21610, and GSE52601 from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database were downloaded. Analysis of GEO2R, Gene Ontology (GO), protein-protein interaction (PPI) were used to determine differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and their function, respectively.

Results

A total of 37 DEGs were identified, including 26 down-regulated and 11 up-regulated genes. The molecular function of DEGs were enriched in “cytokine activity,” “neurotransmitter binding,” “receptor ligand activity.” The gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed an overall marked increase of neutrophil degranulation signaling, closely correlated with the G protein coupled receptor (GPCR)—ligand binding process after LVAD assistance. 16 hubgenes in these DEGs were further selected and the biological process involved is mainly related to positive regulation of leukocyte chemotaxis mediated by chemokines.

Conclusion

Inflammatory signaling pathway is crucial for the pathophysiology after LVAD implantation. Chemokines mediate cardiac inflammatory response and tissue remodeling after LVAD implantation through GPCR—ligand binding.

Prostaglandin E2 Reduces Cardiac Contractility via EP3 Receptor

BACKGROUND

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) EP receptors EP3 and EP4 signal via decreased and increased cAMP production, respectively. Previously, we reported that cardiomyocyte-specific EP4 knockout mice develop dilated cardiomyopathy with reduced ejection fraction. Thus, we hypothesized that PGE2 increases contractility via EP4 but decreases contractility via EP3.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The effects of PGE2 and the EP1/EP3 agonist sulprostone on contractility were examined in the mouse Langendorff preparation and in adult mouse cardiomyocytes. Isolated hearts of adult male C57Bl/6 mice were perfused with PGE2 (10(-6) M) or sulprostone (10(-6) M) and compared with vehicle. Both PGE2 and sulprostone decreased +dp/dt (P<0.01) and left ventricular developed pressure (P<0.001) with reversal by an EP3 antagonist. In contrast, the EP4 agonist had the opposite effect. Adult mouse cardiomyocytes contractility was also reduced after treatment with either PGE2 or sulprostone for 10 minutes. We then examined the acute effects of PGE2, sulprostone, and the EP4 agonist on expression of phosphorylated phospholamban and sarcoendoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase 2a in adult mouse cardiomyocytes using Western blot. Treatment with either PGE2 or sulprostone decreased expression of phosphorylated phospholamban corrected to total phospholamban, whereas treatment with the EP4 agonist had the opposite effect. Sarcoendoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase 2a expression was unaffected. Finally, we examined the effect of these compounds in vivo using pressure-volume loops. Both PGE2 and sulprostone decreased +dp/dt, whereas the EP4 agonist increased +dp/dt.

CONCLUSIONS

Contractility is reduced via the EP3 receptor but increased via EP4. These effects may be mediated through changes in phospholamban phosphorylation and has relevance to detrimental effects of inflammation.