Xiao Y, Long WQ, Guan KP, Long M, Lu GH, Huang ZB. Role of angiotensin II type 2 receptor during electrophysiological remodeling of left ventricular hypertrophic myocardium in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017;
12:58-65. [PMID:
29100861 DOI:
10.1016/j.jash.2017.09.014]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2017] [Revised: 08/29/2017] [Accepted: 09/26/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The objective was to investigate the role of angiotensin II type 2 receptor during electrophysiological remodeling of left ventricular hypertrophic myocardium in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). A total of 36, aged 10 weeks, male SHRs were divided into three groups: control, valsartan, and valsartan + PD123319 groups (n = 12 in each). The systolic blood pressure, left ventricular mass index, ventricular effective refractory period, and ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) were also measured after 8 weeks. At the same time, INa, ICaL, Ito, and membrane capacitance were measured in left ventricular myocytes by whole-cell patch-clamp. The VFT of valsartan was higher than that of control (valsartan vs.
CONTROL
17.4 ± 0.6 mA vs. 15.8 ± 0.5 mA, P < .05). The VFT of valsartan was higher than that of valsartan + PD123319 (valsartan vs. valsartan + PD123319: 17.4 ± 0.6 mA vs. 16.6 ± 0.9 mA, P < .05). The density of Ito of valsartan was higher than that of control (valsartan vs.
CONTROL
14.7 ± 0.42 pA/pF vs. 11.2 ± 0.15 pA/pF, P < .05). The density of Ito of valsartan was higher than that of valsartan + PD123319 (valsartan vs. valsartan + PD123319: 14.7 ± 0.42 pA/pF vs. 13.6 ± 0.30 pA/pF, P < .05). The density of ICaL of valsartan was lower than that of control (valsartan vs.
CONTROL
-4.6 ± 0.2 pA/pF vs. -6.9 ± 0.1 pA/pF, P < .05). The density of ICaL of valsartan was lower than that of valsartan + PD123319 (valsartan vs. valsartan + PD123319: -4.6 ± 0.2 pA/pF vs. -5.4 ± 0.1 pA/pF, P < .05). These results demonstrated that the stimulation of angiotensin II type 2 receptor improved electrophysiological remodeling of left ventricular hypertrophic myocardium in SHR.
Collapse