Role of intracellular Ca(2+) signaling in the antinociceptive and discriminative stimulus effects of the imidazoline I(2) receptor agonist 2-BFI in rats

Modulation of NMDA receptor activity by CR4056, an imidazoline-2 receptor ligand with analgesic properties

CR4056 is an imidazoline-2 receptor ligand having potent analgesic activity and synergistic effect with opioids. Very recently it has been found that CR4056 can revert the cognitive impairment in animal models of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Since several lines of evidence highlight the importance of NMDAR modulators in nociceptive signaling and in AD progression, we considered as important to investigate the effects of CR4056 on NMDAR activity. In primary culture of cortical neurons, application of NMDA and glycine elicits a current that is decreased in a dose-dependent fashion by CR4056 (IC50 5.3 ± 0.1 µM). CR4056 antagonism is reversible, not competitive and voltage-independent and it is not blocked by pertussis toxin. CR4056 interacts with the co-agonist glycine site in a competitive way, indeed high glycine concentrations diminish its effect. Fibroblasts expressing different recombinant NMDA receptors are differently modulated by CR4056: the potency and the efficacy of the compound are higher in GluN1- GluN2B than in GluN1-GluN2A containing receptors. In lamina II neurons of spinal cord slices, single stimulation of afferent fibers evokes an NMDA-mediated current that is inhibited by 10 µM CR4056. Repetitive stimulation of the dorsal root at high frequency and high intensity produces a firing activity that is significatively depressed by CR4056. Taken together, our results broad the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of CR4056 analgesic activity, involving the modulation of NMDAR activity. Therefore, we propose that the analgesic action of CR4056 and the neuroprotective effects in AD models may be mediated also by NMDAR inhibition.

Imidazoline Receptor System: The Past, the Present, and the Future

Imidazoline receptors historically referred to a family of nonadrenergic binding sites that recognize compounds with an imidazoline moiety, although this has proven to be an oversimplification. For example, none of the proposed endogenous ligands for imidazoline receptors contain an imidazoline moiety but they are diverse in their chemical structure. Three receptor subtypes (I₁, I₂, and I₃) have been proposed and the understanding of each has seen differing progress over the decades. I₁ receptors partially mediate the central hypotensive effects of clonidine-like drugs. Moxonidine and rilmenidine have better therapeutic profiles (fewer side effects) than clonidine as antihypertensive drugs, thought to be due to their higher I₁/α ₂-adrenoceptor selectivity. Newer I₁ receptor agonists such as LNP599 [3-chloro-2-methyl-phenyl)-(4-methyl-4,5-dihydro-3H-pyrrol-2-yl)-amine hydrochloride] have little to no activity on α ₂-adrenoceptors and demonstrate promising therapeutic potential for hypertension and metabolic syndrome. I₂ receptors associate with several distinct proteins, but the identities of these proteins remain elusive. I₂ receptor agonists have demonstrated various centrally mediated effects including antinociception and neuroprotection. A new I₂ receptor agonist, CR4056 [2-phenyl-6-(1H-imidazol-1yl) quinazoline], demonstrated clear analgesic activity in a recently completed phase II clinical trial and holds great promise as a novel I₂ receptor-based first-in-class nonopioid analgesic. The understanding of I₃ receptors is relatively limited. Existing data suggest that I₃ receptors may represent a binding site at the Kir6.2-subtype ATP-sensitive potassium channels in pancreatic β-cells and may be involved in insulin secretion. Despite the elusive nature of their molecular identities, recent progress on drug discovery targeting imidazoline receptors (I₁ and I₂) demonstrates the exciting potential of these compounds to elicit neuroprotection and to treat various disorders such as hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and chronic pain.

Mechanisms of imidazoline I2 receptor agonist-induced antinociception in rats: involvement of monoaminergic neurotransmission

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although the antinociceptive efficacies of imidazoline I₂ receptor agonists have been established, the exact post-receptor mechanisms remain unknown. This study tested the hypothesis that monoaminergic transmission is critical for I₂ receptor agonist-induced antinociception.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

von Frey filaments were used to assess antinociceptive effects of two I₂ receptor agonists, 2-BFI and CR4056 on chronic constriction injury (CCI)-induced neuropathic pain or complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced inflammatory pain in rats. Rectal temperature was measured to assess hypothermic effects of 2-BFI. A two-lever drug discrimination paradigm in which rats were trained to discriminate 5.6 mg·kg^-1 2-BFI (i.p.) from its vehicle was used to examine the discriminative stimulus effects of 2-BFI. In each experiment, pharmacological mechanisms were investigated by combining 2-BFI or CR4056 with various pharmacological manipulations of the monoaminergic system including selective reuptake inhibition, monoamine depletion and monoamine receptor antagonism.

KEY RESULTS

In the CCI model, selective reuptake inhibitors of 5-HT (fluoxetine) or noradrenaline (desipramine), but not dopamine (GBR12909), enhanced 2-BFI-induced antinociception. Selective depletion of 5-HT or noradrenaline almost abolished 2-BFI-induced antinociception. 5-HT_1A , 5-HT_2A and α₁ -adrenoceptor antagonists, but not other monoaminergic antagonists, attenuated 2-BFI and CR4056-induced antinociception in CCI and/or CFA models. However, none of these monoamine receptor antagonists significantly altered 2-BFI-induced hypothermia or discriminative stimulus effects.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Antinociception induced by I₂ receptor agonists was mediated by serotonergic and noradrenergic mechanisms with 5-HT_1A , 5-HT_2A and α₁ -adrenoceptor being particularly important. In contrast, the hypothermic and discriminative stimulus effects of I₂ receptor agonists were mediated by distinct, independent mechanisms.