Discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical antipsychotic amisulpride: comparison to its isomers and to other benzamide derivatives, antipsychotic, antidepressant, and antianxiety drugs in C57BL/6 mice

Examination of the mechanisms underlying the discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical antipsychotic amisulpride

Amisulpride is an atypical benzamide antipsychotic/antidepressant, whose mechanism of action is thought to depend mainly on dopamine D2/3 receptor activity, but also with some serotonin 5-HT2B/7 effects. The present study examined the role of D2/3 receptors and 5-HT2B/7 receptors in amisulpride's discriminative stimulus. Selective agonists and antagonists of the above receptors were tested in adult, male C57BL/6 mice trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg amisulpride from vehicle in a two-lever drug discrimination assay. After acquisition of the two-lever discrimination, the amisulpride generalization curve yielded an ED50 = 0.56 mg/kg (95% CI = 0.42-0.76 mg/kg). Substitution tests found that the D2/3 antagonist raclopride (62.7% Drug Lever Responding), D2/3 agonist quinpirole (56.6% DLR), 5-HT7 agonist LP-44 (50.1% DLR) and 5-HT7 antagonist SB-269970 (36.7% DLR) produced various degrees of partial substitution for the amisulpride stimulus, whereas the 5-HT2B agonist BW 723C86 (17.9% DLR) and 5-HT2B antagonist SB-204741 (21.1% DLR) yielded negligible amisulpride-like effects. In combination tests with amisulpride, quinpirole decreased percent responding from 98.3% to 57.0% DLR, LP-44 decreased percent responding from 97.6% to 76.7% DLR, and BW 723C86 reduced percent responding from 95.66% to 74.11% DLR. Taken together, the results from stimulus generalization and antagonism studies suggest that amisulpride has a complex discriminative cue that involves mainly mixed D2/3 receptor antagonist/agonist effects and, to a lesser degree, mixed 5-HT7 receptor agonist/antagonist and perhaps 5-HT2B receptor antagonist effects.

Antidepressant-like effect of a selenopropargylic benzamide in mice: involvement of the serotonergic system

RATIONALE

Major depressive disorder is a psychiatric disorder that requires considerable attention, since it dramatically impairs the quality of life of the sufferers. The available treatments do not have the efficacy needed, often presenting several side effects. Organoselenium compounds and benzamides have presented some pharmacological properties, among them an antidepressant-like effect.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

This study evaluated the antidepressant-like effect of N-(3-(phenylselanyl)prop-2-yn-1-yl)benzamide (SePB), an organoselenium compound containing a benzamide moiety, on the forced swimming test (FST) and the tail suspension test (TST) in mice, as well as the involvement of the serotonergic system in its effect.

RESULTS

SePB, tested after different times (15-120 min) and doses (1-50 mg/kg, intragastrically (i.g.)), reduced immobility of male mice during FST and TST, without changing locomotor activity in the open-field test (OFT), demonstrating its antidepressant-like effect. SePB (10 mg/kg) also produced an antidepressant-like effect in female mice in the TST. The preadministration of the serotonin (5-HT) depletor p-chlorophenylalanine (pCPA; 100 mg/kg, intraperitoneal route (i.p.) once daily for 4 days) prevented the anti-immobility effect of SePB, indicating that the serotonergic system is involved in the SePB antidepressant-like effect. The preadministration of the selective serotonergic receptor antagonists WAY100635 (0.1 mg/kg, subcutaneous route (s.c.), a selective 5-HT_1A receptor antagonist), ketanserin (1 mg/kg, i.p., a 5-HT_2A/2C receptor antagonist), and ondansetron (1 mg/kg, i.p., a selective 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist) also prevented the anti-immobility effect of SePB, demonstrating that these receptors are involved in the antidepressant-like effect of SePB.

CONCLUSION

The search for new antidepressants drugs is a noteworthy goal. This study has described a new compound with an antidepressant-like effect, whose mechanism of action is related to modulation of the serotonergic system.

Discriminative stimulus properties of the typical antipsychotic haloperidol compared to other antipsychotic drugs in C57BL/6 mice

Haloperidol (HAL) was developed in 1958 for the treatment of schizophrenia and is classified as a typical antipsychotic drug (APD). Effective in treating positive symptoms of schizophrenia, it does not treat negative symptoms and produces extrapyramidal motor side-effects. Atypical APDs like clozapine treat both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, have reduced extrapyramidal motor side-effects and possess other clinical advantages. This study used a drug discrimination assay to allow a direct comparison between the subjective effects of HAL and other APDs. Eleven C57BL/6 mice were trained to discriminate 0.05 mg/kg HAL from the vehicle in a two-lever drug discrimination task. The HAL generalization curve (0.001563-0.2 mg/kg) yielded an ED50=0.0024 mg/kg (95% confidence interval: 0.0012-0.0048 mg/kg). The typical APD chlorpromazine produced full substitution at 4.0 mg/kg with 82.7% drug-lever responding (%DLR) with significant rate suppression and partial substitution (73.9% DLR) at 1.0 mg/kg with no rate suppression. The atypical APD clozapine produced partial substitution at 2.5 mg/kg (64.8% DLR) with significant rate suppression. The atypical APD amisulpride failed to substitute for HAL with a maximum %DLR of 57.9% at 40 mg/kg with no rate suppression. The atypical APD aripiprazole partially substituted with a maximum of 75.9% DLR at 1.25 mg/kg with significant rate suppression. These results demonstrate that HAL can be trained as a discriminative stimulus in C57BL/6 mice, and its discriminative cue appears to be unique and distinct from that of atypical APDs.

Drug Discrimination: Historical Origins, Important Concepts, and Principles

Research on the stimulus properties of drugs began with studies on state dependent learning during the first half of the twentieth century. From that research, an entirely new approach evolved called drug discrimination. Animals (including humans) could discriminate the presence or absence of a drug; once learned, the drug could serve as a discriminative stimulus, signaling the availability or nonavailability of reinforcement. Early drug discrimination research involved the use of a T-maze task, which evolved in the 1970s into a two-lever operant drug discrimination task that is still used today. A number of important concepts and principles of drug discrimination are discussed. (1) The discriminative stimulus properties of drugs are believed in large part to reflect the subjective effects of drugs. While it has been impossible to directly measure subjective effects in nonhuman animals, drug discrimination studies in human subjects have generally supported the belief that discriminative stimulus properties of drugs in nonhuman animals correlate highly with subjective effects of drugs in humans. In addition to the ability of the drug discrimination procedure to measure the subjective effects of drugs, it has a number of other strengths that help make it a valuable preclinical assay. (2) Drug discrimination can be used for classification of drugs based on shared discriminative stimulus properties. (3) The phenomena of tolerance and cross-tolerance can be studied with drug discrimination. (4) Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs typically have been found to be stereospecific, if a drug is comprised of enantiomers. (5) Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs reflect specific CNS activity at neurotransmitter receptors. (6) Both human and nonhuman subjects display individual differences in their sensitivity to discriminative stimuli and drugs. (7) The drug discrimination procedure has been used extensively as a preclinical assay in drug development. This chapter is the first in the volume The Behavioural Neuroscience of Drug Discrimination, which includes chapters concerning the discriminative stimulus properties of various classes of psychoactive drugs as well as sections on the applications and approaches for using this procedure.