Planning short pointing sequences

The influence of foreperiod duration on the preparation and control of sequential aiming movements

Reaction time (RT) and movement times (MTs) to the first target are typically longer for two-target sequential movements compared to one-target movements. While this one-target advantage has been shown to be dependent on the availability of advance information about the numbers of targets, there has been no systematic investigation of how foreperiod duration (i.e., interval between presentation of the target(s) and stimulus) influences the planning and execution of sequential movements. Two experiments were performed to examine how the one-target advantage is influenced by the availability and timing of advance target information. In Experiment 1, participants performed one- and two-target movements in two separate blocks. In Experiment 2, target conditions were randomised from trial to trial. The interval between target(s) appearing and stimulus tone (i.e., foreperiod) was varied randomly (0, 500, 1,000, 1,500, and 2,000 ms). The results of Experiment 1 revealed that while the one-target advantage in RT was not influenced by foreperiod duration, the one-target advantage in MT increased as foreperiod duration increased. The variability of endpoints at the first target was greater in the two- compared to one-target condition. In Experiment 2, the one-target advantage in both RT and MT increased as the length of the foreperiod increased. However, there was no difference in limb trajectory variability between target conditions. The implication of these findings for theories of motor planning and execution of multiple segment movements is discussed.

Delay of gaze fixation during reaching movement with the non-dominant hand to a distant target

The present study examined the effects of hand and task difficulty on eye-hand coordination related to gaze fixation behavior (i.e., fixating a gaze to the target until reach completion) in single reaching movements. Twenty right-handed young adults made reaches on a digitizer, while looking at a visual target and feedback of hand movements on a computer monitor. Task difficulty was altered by having three target distances. In a small portion of trials, visual feedback was randomly removed at the target presentation. The effect of a moderate amount of practice was also examined using a randomized trial schedule across target-distance and visual-feedback conditions in each hand. The results showed that the gaze distances covered during the early reaching phase were reduced, and the gaze fixation to the target was delayed when reaches were performed with the left hand and when the target distance increased. These results suggest that when the use of the non-dominant hand or an increased task difficulty reduces the predictability of hand movements and its sensory consequences, eye-hand coordination is modified to enhance visual monitoring of the reach progress prior to gaze fixation. The randomized practice facilitated this process. Nevertheless, variability of reach trajectory was more increased without visual feedback for right-hand reaches, indicating that control of the dominant arm integrates more visual feedback information during reaches. These results together suggest that the earlier gaze fixation and greater integration of visual feedback during right-hand reaches contribute to the faster and more accurate performance in the final reaching phase.

Searching Through Alternating Sequences: Working Memory and Inhibitory Tagging Mechanisms Revealed Using the MILO Task

We used the Multi-Item Localisation (MILO) task to examine search through two sequences. In Sequential blocks of trials, six letters and six digits were touched in order. In Mixed blocks, participants alternated between letters and digits. These conditions mimic the A and B variants of the Trail Making Test (TMT). In both block types, targets either vanished or remained visible after being touched. There were two key findings. First, in Mixed blocks, reaction times exhibited a saw-tooth pattern, suggesting search for successive pairs of targets. Second, reaction time patterns for vanish and remain conditions were identical in Sequential blocks-indicating that participants could ignore past targets-but diverged in Mixed blocks. This suggests a breakdown of inhibitory tagging. These findings may help explain the elevated completion times observed in TMT-B, relative to TMT-A.

Predictable real-time constraints reveal anticipatory strategies of coupled planning in a sequential pick and place task

Planning a sequence of two motor elements is much more than concatenating two independent movements. However, very little is known about the cognitive strategies that are used to perform fluent sequences for intentional object manipulation. In this series of studies, the participants’ task was to reach for and pick to place a wooden cylinder to set it on a place pad of three different diameters, which served to modify terminal accuracy constraints. Participants were required to perform the sequences (1) at their preferred speed or (2) as fast as possible. Action kinematics were recorded with the Qualisys motion-capture system in order to implement a real-time protocol to get participants to engage in a true interactive relation. Results revealed that with low internal constraints (at preferred speed), low coupling between the two elements of the motor sequence was observed, suggesting a step-by-step planning strategy. Under high constraints (at fastest speed), an important terminal accuracy effect back propagated to modify early kinematic parameters of the first element, suggesting strong coupling of the parameters in an encapsulated planning strategy. In Studies 2 and 3, we further manipulated instructions and timing constraints to confirm the importance of time and predictability of external information for coupled planning. These findings overall sustain the hypothesis that coupled planning can take place in a pick and place task when anticipatory strategies are possible. This mode of action planning may be the key reason why motor intention can be read through the observation of micro variations in body kinematics.

Effects of auditory feedback on movements with two-segment sequence and eye-hand coordination: Using a short auditory contact cue

During sequential reaches to multiple targets, eye and hand movements are highly coordinated, and the gaze is anchored to each target until the reaching hand makes contact to each of them. Such contact events are monitored by multimodal (visual, proprioceptive) sensory systems, and one function of the gaze anchoring to each target is verification of successful target contact (reach completion). The present study focused on this verification function and examined how planning and control of eye and hand movements during two-segment eye-hand movements are affected by augmented auditory feedback of reach completion. Young adults made a reach to the first target with a saccade, and then made another saccade to the second target in blocked trials. An auditory target-contact cue condition delivered four short sounds during the initial reach, and the last sound was synchronized with target contact, whereas a control condition lacked the last target-contact sound. The results showed that saccadic reaction time increased with the target-contact cue, especially when the reaching accuracy demand was high. The reach also became slower with lower peak velocity and longer time to peak velocity with that cue, suggesting that the limb-motor system lower the preplanned speed of the reach in a top-down fashion for a better preparation toward reach completion. However, no auditory effects were found for the timing of gaze shift to the second target. These results were different from those seen in previous studies, indicating that the effects of the additional auditory contact feedback differ depending on behavioral tasks and cue characteristics.

Effects of auditory feedback on movements with two-segment sequence and eye-hand coordination

The present study investigated the effect of auditory feedback on planning and control of two-segment reaching movements and eye-hand coordination. In particular, it was examined whether additional auditory information indicating the progression of the initial reach (i.e., passing the midway and contacting the target) affects the performance of that reach and gaze shift to the second target at the transition between two segments. Young adults performed a rapid two-segment reaching task, in which both the first and second segments had two target sizes. One out of three auditory feedback conditions included the reach-progression information: a continuous tone was delivered at a consistent timing during the initial reach from the midway to the target contact. Conversely, the other two were control conditions: a continuous tone was delivered at a random timing in one condition or not delivered in the other. The results showed that the initial reach became more accurate with the auditory reach-progression cue compared to without any auditory cue. When that cue was available, movement time of the initial reach was decreased, which was accompanied by an increased peak velocity and a decreased time to peak velocity. These findings suggest that the auditory reach-progression feedback enhanced the preplanned control of the initial reach. Deceleration time of that reach was also decreased with auditory feedback, but it was observed regardless of whether the sound contained the reach-progression information. At the transition between the two segments, the onset latencies of both the gaze shift and reach to the second target became shorter with the auditory reach-progression cue, the effect of which was pronounced when the initial reach had a higher terminal accuracy constraint. This suggests that the reach-progression cue enhanced verification of the termination of initial reach, thereby facilitating the initiation of eye and hand movements to the second target. Taken together, the additional auditory information of reach-progression enhances the planning and control of multi-segment reaches and eye-hand coordination at the segment transition.

Better together: Contrasting the hypotheses explaining the one-target advantage

Movement times are significantly shorter when moving from a start position to a single target, compared to when one has to continue onto a second target (i.e., the one-target advantage [OTA]). To explain this movement time difference, both the movement integration and the movement constraint hypotheses have been proposed. Although both hypotheses have been found to have explanatory power as to why the OTA exists, the support for each has been somewhat equivocal. The current review evaluated the relative support in the literature for these two hypotheses. Ultimately, preferential support for each theoretical explanation was found to be related to the higher indices of difficulty (IDs: Fitts, 1954) employed. That is, studies that included higher IDs (i.e., 6-8 bits) were more likely to provide more support for the movement constraint hypothesis, whereas studies employing lower IDs (i.e., 1-4 bits) were more likely to provide more support for the movement integration hypothesis. When the IDs employed were relatively intermediate (i.e., 5 bits), both hypotheses were mostly supported. Thus, task difficulty is crucial when determining which hypothesis better explains the planning and control of sequential goal-directed movements. Critically, the OTA most likely always involves integration but may also involve constraining if the accuracy demands are sufficiently high.

The coding of repetitions and alternations in action sequences: spatial or relational?

We used variants of the Simon task to investigate whether repetitions and alternations in short keypress sequences are represented by spatial or relational codes. With spatial coding, either absolute or relative location would be used for coding the second response in a sequence. With relational coding, the second response would be coded in terms of a non-spatial relation to the first one (e.g., left response-same response, for a repetition). In three experiments with different imperative stimuli, we compared Simon effects across three experimental conditions, a single-response condition, a response-repetition condition (each stimulus required two keypresses on the same side, e.g., left-left), and a response-alternation condition (each stimulus required a keypress on each side, e.g., left-right). When compared to the single-response condition, spatial coding of the second response should modulate the Simon effect (i.e., response conflict) in selecting the first response because spatial coding of the second response produces additional dimensional overlap of stimulus and the second-response code. We observed Simon effects in the response times of first responses in each condition, and they increased in the response-alternation condition, but not in the response-repetition condition. The findings suggest relational coding of response repetitions, and spatial coding of response alternations.

Stimulation of subthalamic nuclei restores a near normal planning strategy in Parkinson's patients

A fundamental function of the motor system is to gather key information from the environment in order to implement behavioral strategies appropriate to the context. Although several lines of evidence indicate that Parkinson's disease affects the ability to modify behavior according to task requirements, it is currently unknown whether deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) affects context-related planning. To explore this issue, we asked 12 Parkinson's patients with bilateral STN DBS and 13 healthy subjects to execute similar arm reaching movements in two different paradigms: go-only and countermanding tasks. In the former task patients had to perform speeded reaching movements to a peripheral target. In contrast, in the countermanding task participants had to perform the same reaches unless an infrequent and unpredictable stop-signal was shown during the reaction time (RT) indicating that they should withhold the ongoing action. We compared the performance of Parkinson's patients in different DBS conditions. We found that patients with both DBS-ON behaved similarly to healthy subjects, in that RTs of no-stop trial increased while movement times (MTs) decreased with respect to those of go-only-trials. However, when both DBS were off, both RTs and MTs were longer in no-stop trials than in go-only trials. These findings indicate that bilateral DBS of STN can partially restore the appropriate motor strategy according to the given cognitive contexts.

Suppression of proprioceptive feedback control in movement sequences through intermediate targets

Simple movements can be seen as building blocks for complex action sequences, and neural control of an action sequence can be expected to preserve some control features of its constituent blocks. It was previously found that during single-joint elbow movements to a single target, the proprioceptive feedback control is initially suppressed, and we tested this feedback suppression in a two-segment sequence during which subjects momentarily slowed down at an intermediate target at a 30° distance (first segment) and then immediately moved another 30° to the final target (second segment). Either the first or second segment was unexpectedly perturbed; the latency of the earliest response to the perturbation in the muscle surface electromyogram was analyzed. The perturbations were delivered either at the onset of each segment or about 0.1 s later. We found that in both segments, the response latency to the late perturbation was shorter than the latency to the early perturbation, which suggests that the proprioceptive feedback control is suppressed in the beginning of each segment. Next, we determined the latency of the response to unexpected perturbations in 30° movements to a single target. We found that the response latency was not significantly different in the movement to a single target and in each segment in the sequence. This result suggests that the initial suppression of the proprioceptive feedback control in movements to single targets is preserved in movements through intermediate targets and supports the idea of modular organization of neural control of movement sequences.

Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: evidence from startle

In this review we provide a summary of the observations made regarding advance preparation of the motor system when presenting a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) during various movement tasks. The predominant finding from these studies is that if the participant is prepared to make a particular movement a SAS can act to directly and quickly trigger the prepared action. A similar effect has recently been shown in patients with Parkinson's disease. This "StartReact" effect has been shown to be a robust indicator of advance motor programming as it can involuntarily release whatever movement has been prepared. We review the historical origins of the StartReact effect and the experimental results detailing circumstances where advance preparation occurs, when it occurs, and how these processes change with practice for both healthy and clinical populations. Data from some of these startle experiments has called into question some of the previously held hypotheses and assumptions with respect to the nature of response preparation and initiation, and how the SAS results in early response expression. As such, a secondary focus is to review previous hypotheses and introduce an updated model of how the SAS may interact with response preparation and initiation channels from a neurophysiological perspective.

Anticipatory planning of sequential hand and finger movements

Hand movements may be anticipatorily planned to reach an immediate target and at the same time facilitate movements to subsequent targets. Researchers have proposed that in anticipatory planning, information about subsequent targets needs to be processed to engage in the planning of the next movement. To test this hypothesis, the authors varied the information 48 participants had about to-be-executed two-step hand and finger movement sequences prior to a choice reaction signal. Movements were initialized faster if participants had advance information about the second target of the sequence than if participants had no advance information at all. The results imply that movement segments to late targets in a movement sequence may be at least partially planned, even if information about earlier targets is not yet available.

Context influences on the preparation and execution of reaching movements

The ability of rapidly adapting our motor behaviour in order to face the unpredictable changes in the surrounding environment is fundamental for survival. To achieve such a high level of efficiency our motor system has to assess continuously the context in which it acts, gathering all available information that can be relevant for planning goal-oriented movements. One still-debated aspect of movement organization is the nature and timing of motor planning. While motor plans are often taken to be concerned with the setting of kinematic parameters as a function of perceptual and motor factors, it has been suggested that higher level, cognitive factors may also affect planning. To explore this issue further, we asked 18 right-handed human participants to perform speeded hand-reaching movement toward a visual target in two different experimental settings, a reaction time (RT) paradigm (go-only task) and a countermanding paradigm. In both tasks participants executed the same movements, but in the countermanding task no-stop trials were randomly intermixed with stop trials. In stop trials participants were required to withhold the ongoing movement whenever a stop signal was shown. It is known that the presence of stop trials induces a consistent increase of the RTs of no-stop trials with respect to the RTs of go-only trials. However, nothing is known about a similar effect for movement times (MTs). We found that RTs and MTs exhibit opposing tendencies, so that a decrease in the RT correspond to an increase in the MT and vice versa. This tendency was present in all our participants and significant in 90% of them. Furthermore we found a moderate, but again very consistent, anticorrelation between RTs and MTs on a trial-by-trial base. These findings are consistent with strategic changes in movement programmes for the very same movements under different cognitive contexts, requiring different degrees of feedback-driven control during movement.

Review of models for the generation of multi-joint movements in 3-D

Most studies in motor control have focused on movements in two dimensions and only very few studies have systematically investigated movements in three dimensions. As a consequence, the large majority of modeling studies for motor control have tested the predictions of these models using movement data in 2D. As we will explain, movements in 3D cannot be understood from movements in 2D by adding just another dimension. The third dimension adds new and unexpected complexities. In this chapter we will explore the frames of reference, which are used in mapping sensory information about movement targets into motor commands and muscle activation patterns. Moreover, we will make a quantitative comparison between the predictions of various models in the literature with the outcome of 3D movement experiments. Quite surprisingly, none of the existing models is able to explain the data in different movement paradigms.

The preparation and control of reversal movements as a single unit of action

Previous research has demonstrated that movement time and kinematic properties of limb trajectories to the first target of a two-target reversal movement differ to that of single-target responses. In the present study we investigated whether two-target reversal movements are organized as a single unit of action or two separate components by perturbing the number of targets prior to and during movement execution. In one experiment, participants performed single-target movements and on one-third of the trials a second target was presented either at target presentation, movement onset or peak velocity. On those trials in which a second target was presented, participants were required to complete their movement to the first target and then move to the second target. In a second experiment, the reverse was the case with participants performing two-target movements that changed to single-target movement on one-third of the trials. A two-target movement time advantage was observed only when the required response was specified prior to movement initiation. Also, participants failed to prevent movement towards the second target when the requirements of the task changed from a two-target to single-target response at movement onset or later. These results indicate that two-target reversal movements were organized as a single unit of action prior to response initiation.

Performance of Unimanual and Bimanual Multiphased Prehensile Movements

By manipulating task action demands in 2 experiments, the author investigated whether the context-dependent effects seen in unimanual multiphase movements are also present in bimanual movements. Participants (N = 14) in Experiment 1 either placed or tossed objects into targets. The results indicated that the intention to perform a subsequent action with an object could influence the performance of an earlier movement in a sequence in both unimanual and bimanual tasks. Furthermore, assimilation effects were found when the subsequent tasks being performed by the 2 hands were incongruent. In Experiment 2, the author investigated in 12 participants whether planning in a multiphase movement includes some representation of the accuracy demands of the subsequent task. The accuracy demands of a subsequent task did not appear to influence initial movement planning. Instead, the present results support the notion that it is the action requirements of the subsequent movement that lead to context-dependent effects.

Integration of target and effector information in the human brain during reach planning

To plan a reaching movement, the brain must integrate information about the location of the target with information about the limb selected for the reach. Here, we applied rapid event-related 3-T fMRI to investigate this process in human subjects (n = 16) preparing a reach following two successive visual instruction cues. One cue instructed which arm to use; the other cue instructed the location of the reach target. We hypothesized that regions involved in the integration of target and effector information should not only respond to each of the two instruction cues, but should respond more strongly to the second cue due to the added integrative processing to establish the reach plan. We found bilateral regions in the posterior parietal cortex, the premotor cortex, the medial frontal cortex, and the insular cortex to be involved in target-arm integration, as well as the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and an area in the right lateral occipital sulcus to respond in this manner. We further determined the functional properties of these regions in terms of spatial and effector specificity. This showed that the posterior parietal cortex and the dorsal premotor cortex specify both the spatial location of a target and the effector selected for the response. We therefore conclude that these regions are selectively engaged in the neural computations for reach planning, consistent with the results from physiological studies in nonhuman primates.

Learning of Similar Complex Movement Sequences: Proactive and Retroactive Effects on Learning

The authors used an interference paradigm to determine the extent to which the learning of 2 similar movement sequences influences the learning of each other. Participants (N=30) produced the sequences by moving a lever with their right arm and hand to sequentially presented target locations. They practiced 2 similar 16-element movement sequences (S1 and S2), 1 sequence on each of 2 consecutive days of practice. Control groups received only 1 day of practice on 1 of the sequences. Early in S2 practice, the experimental group demonstrated a relatively strong level of proactive facilitation arising from previous practice with S1. The advantage was not evident at the end of S2 practice or on the S2 retention test. No advantage of practicing the 1st sequence on the learning of the 2nd sequence (proactive effect) was found in the analysis of element duration in the retention and transfer tests, even though 14 of the 16 elements were common to both sequences. A strong retroactive interference on the switched elements was detected, however. Thus, the memories underpinning S1 seemed to be "overwritten" or adapted in response to the learning of S2.