Low frequency rTMS over posterior parietal cortex impairs smooth pursuit eye tracking

Effect of TMS on oculomotor behavior but not perceptual stability during smooth pursuit eye movements

During smooth pursuit eye movements, we do not mistake the shift of the retinal image induced by the visual background for motion of the world around us but instead perceive a stable world. The goal of this study was to search for the neuronal substrates providing perceptual stability. To this end, pursuit eye movements across a background stimulus and perceptual stability were measured in the absence and presence, respectively, of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied to 6 different brain regions, that is, primary visual cortex (V1), area MT+/V5, left and right temporoparietal junctions (TPJs), medial parieto-occipital cortex (POC), and the lateral cerebellum (LC). Stimulation of MT+/V5 and the cerebellum induced significant decreases in pursuit gain independent of background presentation, whereas stimulation of TPJ impaired the suppression of the optokinetic reflex induced by background stimulation. In contrast to changes in pursuit, only nonsignificant modifications in perceptual stability were observed. We conclude that MT+/V5, TPJ, and the LC contribute to pursuit eye movements and that TPJ supports the suppression of optokinesis. The lack of significant influences of TMS on perception suggests that motion perception invariance is not based on a localized but rather a highly distributed network featuring parallel processing.

Is this hand for real? Attenuation of the rubber hand illusion by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the inferior parietal lobule

In the rubber hand illusion (RHI), participants incorporate a rubber hand into a mental representation of one's body. This deceptive feeling of ownership is accompanied by recalibration of the perceived position of the participant's real hand toward the rubber hand. Neuroimaging data suggest involvement of the posterior parietal lobule during induction of the RHI, when recalibration of the real hand toward the rubber hand takes place. Here, we used off-line low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in a double-blind, sham-controlled within-subjects design to investigate the role of the inferior posterior parietal lobule (IPL) in establishing the RHI directly. Results showed that rTMS over the IPL attenuated the strength of the RHI for immediate perceptual body judgments only. In contrast, delayed perceptual responses were unaffected. Furthermore, ballistic action responses as well as subjective self-reports of feeling of ownership over the rubber hand remained unaffected by rTMS over the IPL. These findings are in line with previous research showing that the RHI can be broken down into dissociable bodily sensations. The illusion does not merely affect the embodiment of the rubber hand but also influences the experience and localization of one's own hand in an independent manner. Finally, the present findings concur with a multicomponent model of somatosensory body representations, wherein the IPL plays a pivotal role in subserving perceptual body judgments, but not actions or higher-order affective bodily judgments.

Role of the primary motor and sensory cortex in precision grasping: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study

Human precision grip requires precise scaling of the grip force to match the weight and frictional conditions of the object. The ability to produce an accurately scaled grip force prior to lifting an object is thought to be the result of an internal feedforward model. However, relatively little is known about the roles of various brain regions in the control of such precision grip-lift synergies. Here we investigate the role of the primary motor (M1) and sensory (S1) cortices during a grip-lift task using inhibitory transcranial magnetic theta-burst stimulation (TBS). Fifteen healthy individuals received 40 s of either (i) M1 TBS, (ii) S1 TBS or (iii) sham stimulation. Following a 5-min rest, subjects lifted a manipulandum five times using a precision grip or completed a simple reaction time task. Following S1 stimulation, the duration of the pre-load phase was significantly longer than following sham stimulation. Following M1 stimulation, the temporal relationship between changes in grip and load force was altered, with changes in grip force coming to lag behind changes in load force. This result contrasts with that seen in the sham condition where changes in grip force preceded changes in load force. No significant difference was observed in the simple reaction task following either M1 or S1 stimulation. These results further quantify the contribution of the M1 to anticipatory grip-force scaling. In addition, they provide the first evidence for the contribution of S1 to object manipulation, suggesting that sensory information is not necessary for optimal functioning of anticipatory control.