1
|
Vimal VP, DiZio P, Lackner JR. The role of spatial acuity in a dynamic balancing task without gravitational cues. Exp Brain Res 2021; 240:123-133. [PMID: 34652493 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06239-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
In earlier studies, blindfolded participants used a joystick to orient themselves to the direction of balance in the horizontal roll plane while in a device programmed to behave like an inverted pendulum. In this spaceflight analog situation, position relevant gravitational cues are absent. Most participants show minimal learning, positional drifting, and failure of path integration. However, individual differences are substantial, some participants show learning and others become progressively worse. In Experiment 1, our goal was to determine whether spatial acuity could explain these individual differences in active balancing. We exposed blindfolded participants to passive movement profiles, with different frequency components, in the vertical and horizontal roll planes. They pressed a joystick trigger to indicate every time they passed the start point. We found greater spatial acuity for higher frequencies but no relation between passive spatial accuracy and active balance control in the horizontal roll plane, suggesting that spatial acuity in the horizontal roll plane does not predict performance in a disorienting spaceflight condition. In Experiment 2, we found significant correlations between passive spatial acuity in the vertical roll plane, where participants have task relevant gravitational cues, and early active balancing in the horizontal roll plane. These correlations appeared after participants underwent brief provocative vestibular stimulation by making a pitch head movement during vertical yaw rotation. Our findings suggest that vestibular stimulation may be a valuable part of assessments of individual differences in performance during initial exposure to disorienting spaceflight conditions where there are no reliable gravity dependent positional cues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivekanand Pandey Vimal
- Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, MS 033, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02245-9110, USA. .,Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02245-9110, USA.
| | - Paul DiZio
- Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, MS 033, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02245-9110, USA.,Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02245-9110, USA.,Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02245-9110, USA
| | - James R Lackner
- Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, MS 033, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02245-9110, USA.,Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02245-9110, USA.,Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02245-9110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lackner JR. The Importance of Being in Touch. Front Neurol 2021; 12:646640. [PMID: 34054694 PMCID: PMC8160084 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.646640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper describes a series of studies resulting from the finding that when free floating in weightless conditions with eyes closed, all sense of one's spatial orientation with respect to the aircraft can be lost. But, a touch of the hand to the enclosure restores the sense of spatial anchoring within the environment. This observation led to the exploration of how light touch of the hand can stabilize postural control on Earth even in individuals lacking vestibular function, and can override the effect of otherwise destabilizing tonic vibration reflexes in leg muscles. Such haptic stabilization appears to represent a long loop cortical reflex with contact cues at the hand phase leading EMG activity in leg muscles, which change the center of pressure at the feet to counteract body sway. Experiments on dynamic control of balance in a device programmed to exhibit inverted pendulum behavior about different axes and planes of rotation revealed that the direction of gravity not the direction of balance influences the perceived upright. Active control does not improve the accuracy of indicating the upright vs. passive exposure. In the absence of position dependent gravity shear forces on the otolith organs and body surface, drifting and loss of control soon result and subjects are unaware of their ongoing spatial position. There is a failure of dynamic path integration of the semicircular canal signals, such as occurs in weightless conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Lackner
- Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
White O, Gaveau J, Bringoux L, Crevecoeur F. The gravitational imprint on sensorimotor planning and control. J Neurophysiol 2020; 124:4-19. [PMID: 32348686 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00381.2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Humans excel at learning complex tasks, and elite performers such as musicians or athletes develop motor skills that defy biomechanical constraints. All actions require the movement of massive bodies. Of particular interest in the process of sensorimotor learning and control is the impact of gravitational forces on the body. Indeed, efficient control and accurate internal representations of the body configuration in space depend on our ability to feel and anticipate the action of gravity. Here we review studies on perception and sensorimotor control in both normal and altered gravity. Behavioral and modeling studies together suggested that the nervous system develops efficient strategies to take advantage of gravitational forces across a wide variety of tasks. However, when the body was exposed to altered gravity, the rate and amount of adaptation exhibited substantial variation from one experiment to another and sometimes led to partial adjustment only. Overall, these results support the hypothesis that the brain uses a multimodal and flexible representation of the effect of gravity on our body and movements. Future work is necessary to better characterize the nature of this internal representation and the extent to which it can adapt to novel contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O White
- INSERM UMR1093-CAPS, UFR des Sciences du Sport, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - J Gaveau
- INSERM UMR1093-CAPS, UFR des Sciences du Sport, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - L Bringoux
- Institut des Sciences du Mouvement, CNRS, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - F Crevecoeur
- Institute of Communication and Information Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics (ICTEAM), UCLouvain, Belgium.,Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), UCLouvain, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Our research described in this article was motivated by the puzzling finding of the Skylab M131 experiments: head movements made while rotating that are nauseogenic and disorienting on Earth are innocuous in a weightless, 0-g environment. We describe a series of parabolic flight experiments that directly addressed this puzzle and discovered the gravity-dependent responses to semicircular canal stimulation, consistent with the principles of velocity storage. We describe a line of research that started in a different direction, investigating dynamic balancing, but ended up pointing to the gravity dependence of angular velocity-to-position integration of semicircular canal signals. Together, these lines of research and the theoretical framework of velocity storage provide an answer to at least part of the M131 puzzle. We also describe recently discovered neural circuits by which active, dynamic vestibular, multisensory, and motor signals are interpreted as either appropriate for action and orientation or as conflicts evoking motion sickness and disorientation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Lackner
- Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
| | - Paul DiZio
- Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vimal VP, Lackner JR, DiZio P. Learning dynamic control of body yaw orientation. Exp Brain Res 2018; 236:1321-1330. [PMID: 29508040 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5216-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
To investigate the role of gravitational cues in the learning of a dynamic balancing task, we placed blindfolded subjects in a device programmed with inverted pendulum dynamics about the yaw axis. Subjects used a joystick to try and maintain a stable orientation at the direction of balance during 20 100 s-long trials. They pressed a trigger button on the joystick to indicate whenever they felt at the direction of balance. Three groups of ten subjects each participated. One group balanced with their body and the yaw axis vertical, and thus did not have gravitational cues to help them to determine their angular position. They showed minimal learning, inaccurate indications of the direction of balance, and a characteristic pattern of positional drifting away from the balance point. A second group balanced with the yaw axis pitched 45° from the gravitational vertical and had gravity relevant position cues. The third group balanced with their yaw axis horizontal where they had gravity-dependent cues about body position in yaw. Groups 2 and 3 showed better initial balancing performance and more learning across trials than Group 1. These results indicate that in the absence of vision, the integration of transient semicircular canal and somatosensory signals about angular acceleration is insufficient for determining angular position during dynamic balancing; direct position-dependent gravity cues are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivekanand Pandey Vimal
- Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, MS 033, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02245-9110, USA. .,Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, USA.
| | - James R Lackner
- Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, MS 033, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02245-9110, USA.,Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, USA.,Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, USA
| | - Paul DiZio
- Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, MS 033, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02245-9110, USA.,Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, USA.,Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Learning dynamic balancing in the roll plane with and without gravitational cues. Exp Brain Res 2017; 235:3495-3503. [PMID: 28849394 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5068-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Accepted: 08/17/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
We determined the relative contributions of gravity-dependent positional cues and motion cues to the learning of roll balance control. We hypothesized that gravity-dependent otolith and somatosensory shear forces related to body orientation would yield better initial performance, more rapid learning, and better retention. Blindfolded subjects rode in a device programmed to roll with inverted pendulum dynamics in a vertical (UPRIGHT) or horizontal plane (SUPINE), and used a joystick to align themselves with the direction of balance. Each subject completed five blocks of four 100 s long trials on two consecutive days in one of four groups (n = 10 per group): Group 1, UPRIGHT balancing both days; Group 2, SUPINE both days; Group 3, UPRIGHT then SUPINE; and Group 4, SUPINE then UPRIGHT. On Day 1, UPRIGHT subjects showed better initial performance and greater improvement in performance than SUPINE subjects, who showed improvements only in having fewer deviations exceeding ±60 deg from the direction of balance. Subjects tested UPRIGHT on both days showed full retention of learning across days and additional Day 2 learning, but subjects tested SUPINE on both days showed partial retention of their marginal learning from Day 1 and little improvement on Day 2. Subjects tested SUPINE on Day 2 after being tested UPRIGHT on Day 1 showed no better performance than subjects tested SUPINE on Day 1. By contrast, there was transfer from SUPINE on Day 1 to UPRIGHT on Day 2. We conclude that absence of gravitationally dependent otolith and somatosensory cues degrades balance performance.
Collapse
|
7
|
Panic H, Panic AS, DiZio P, Lackner JR. Direction of balance and perception of the upright are perceptually dissociable. J Neurophysiol 2015; 113:3600-9. [PMID: 25761954 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00737.2014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2014] [Accepted: 03/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
We examined whether the direction of balance rather than an otolith reference determines the perceived upright. Participants seated in a device that rotated around the roll axis used a joystick to control its motion. The direction of balance of the device, the location where it would not be accelerated to either side, could be offset from the gravitational vertical, a technique introduced by Riccio, Martin, and Stoffregen (J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18: 624-644, 1992). Participants used the joystick to align themselves in different trials with the gravitational vertical, the direction of balance, the upright, or the direction that minimized oscillations. They pressed the joystick trigger whenever they thought they were at the instructed orientation. Achieved angles for the "align with gravity" and "align with the upright" conditions were not different from each other and were significantly displaced past the gravitational vertical opposite from the direction of balance. Mean indicated angles for align with gravity and align with the upright coincided with the gravitational vertical. Both mean achieved and indicated angles for the "minimize oscillations" and "align with the direction of balance" conditions were significantly deviated toward the gravitational vertical. Three control experiments requiring self-settings to instructed orientations only, perceptual judgments only, and perceptual judgments during passive exposure to dynamic roll profiles confirmed that perception of the upright is determined by gravity, not by the direction of balance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Panic
- Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts; Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts; and
| | - Alexander Sacha Panic
- Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
| | - Paul DiZio
- Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts; Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts; and Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
| | - James R Lackner
- Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts; Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts; and Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Motion sickness is a complex syndrome that includes many features besides nausea and vomiting. This review describes some of these factors and points out that under normal circumstances, many cases of motion sickness go unrecognized. Motion sickness can occur during exposure to physical motion, visual motion, and virtual motion, and only those without a functioning vestibular system are fully immune. The range of vulnerability in the normal population varies about 10,000 to 1. Sleep deprivation can also enhance susceptibility. Systematic studies conducted in parabolic flight have identified velocity storage of semicircular canal signals-velocity integration-as being a key factor in both space motion sickness and terrestrial motion sickness. Adaptation procedures that have been developed to increase resistance to motion sickness reduce this time constant. A fully adequate theory of motion sickness is not presently available. Limitations of two popular theories, the evolutionary and the ecological, are described. A sensory conflict theory can explain many but not all aspects of motion sickness elicitation. However, extending the theory to include conflicts related to visceral afferent feedback elicited by voluntary and passive body motion greatly expands its explanatory range. Future goals should include determining why some conflicts are provocative and others are not but instead lead to perceptual reinterpretations of ongoing body motion. The contribution of visceral afferents in relation to vestibular and cerebellar signals in evoking sickness also deserves further exploration. Substantial progress is being made in identifying the physiological mechanisms underlying the evocation of nausea, vomiting, and anxiety, and a comprehensive understanding of motion sickness may soon be attainable. Adequate anti-motion sickness drugs without adverse side effects are not yet available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Lackner
- Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Crevecoeur F, McIntyre J, Thonnard JL, Lefèvre P. Movement Stability Under Uncertain Internal Models of Dynamics. J Neurophysiol 2010; 104:1301-13. [DOI: 10.1152/jn.00315.2010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Sensory noise and feedback delay are potential sources of instability and variability for the on-line control of movement. It is commonly assumed that predictions based on internal models allow the CNS to anticipate the consequences of motor actions and protect the movements from uncertainty and instability. However, during motor learning and exposure to unknown dynamics, these predictions can be inaccurate. Therefore a distinct strategy is necessary to preserve movement stability. This study tests the hypothesis that in such situations, subjects adapt the speed and accuracy constraints on the movement, yielding a control policy that is less prone to undesirable variability in the outcome. This hypothesis was tested by asking subjects to hold a manipulandum in precision grip and to perform single-joint, discrete arm rotations during short-term exposure to weightlessness (0 g), where the internal models of the limb dynamics must be updated. Measurements of grip force adjustments indicated that the internal predictions were altered during early exposure to the 0 g condition. Indeed, the grip force/load force coupling reflected that the grip force was less finely tuned to the load-force variations at the beginning of the exposure to the novel gravitational condition. During this learning period, movements were slower with asymmetric velocity profiles and target undershooting. This effect was compared with theoretical results obtained in the context of optimal feedback control, where changing the movement objective can be directly tested by adjusting the cost parameters. The effect on the simulated movements quantitatively supported the hypothesis of a change in cost function during early exposure to a novel environment. The modified optimization criterion reduces the trial-to-trial variability in spite of the fact that noise affects the internal prediction. These observations support the idea that the CNS adjusts the movement objective to stabilize the movement when internal models are uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. Crevecoeur
- Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; and
| | - J. McIntyre
- Centre d'Etudes de la Sensorimotricité, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique–Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - J.-L. Thonnard
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; and
| | - P. Lefèvre
- Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; and
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Motion sickness induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR). Exp Brain Res 2010; 204:207-22. [PMID: 20535456 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2305-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2010] [Accepted: 05/15/2010] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that motion sickness is produced by an integration of the disparity between eye velocity and the yaw-axis orientation vector of velocity storage. Disparity was defined as the magnitude of the cross product between these two vectors. OVAR, which is known to produce motion sickness, generates horizontal eye velocity with a bias level related to velocity storage, as well as cyclic modulations due to re-orientation of the head re gravity. On average, the orientation vector is close to the spatial vertical. Thus, disparity can be related to the bias and tilt angle. Motion sickness sensitivity was defined as a ratio of maximum motion sickness score to the number of revolutions, allowing disparity and motion sickness sensitivity to be correlated. Nine subjects were rotated around axes tilted 10 degrees-30 degrees from the spatial vertical at 30 degrees/s-120 degrees/s. Motion sickness sensitivity increased monotonically with increases in the disparity due to changes in rotational velocity and tilt angle. Maximal motion sickness sensitivity and bias (6.8 degrees/s) occurred when rotating at 60 degrees/s about an axis tilted 30 degrees. Modulations in eye velocity during OVAR were unrelated to motion sickness sensitivity. The data were predicted by a model incorporating an estimate of head velocity from otolith activation, which activated velocity storage, followed by an orientation disparity comparator that activated a motion sickness integrator. These results suggest that the sensory-motor conflict that produces motion sickness involves coding of the spatial vertical by the otolith organs and body tilt receptors and processing of eye velocity through velocity storage.
Collapse
|