Effects of altered transport paths and intermediate movement goals on human grasp kinematics

A review of grasping as the movements of digits in space

It is tempting to describe human reach-to-grasp movements in terms of two, more or less independent visuomotor channels, one relating hand transport to the object’s location and the other relating grip aperture to the object’s size. Our review of experimental work questions this framework for reasons that go beyond noting the dependence between the two channels. Both the lack of effect of size illusions on grip aperture and the finding that the variability in grip aperture does not depend on the object’s size indicate that size information is not used to control grip aperture. An alternative is to describe grip formation as emerging from controlling the movements of the digits in space. Each digit’s trajectory when grasping an object is remarkably similar to its trajectory when moving to tap the same position on its own. The similarity is also evident in the fast responses when the object is displaced. This review develops a new description of the speed-accuracy trade-off for multiple effectors that is applied to grasping. The most direct support for the digit-in-space framework is that prism-induced adaptation of each digit’s tapping movements transfers to that digit’s movements when grasping, leading to changes in grip aperture for adaptation in opposite directions for the two digits. We conclude that although grip aperture and hand transport are convenient variables to describe grasping, treating grasping as movements of the digits in space is a more suitable basis for understanding the neural control of grasping.

Learning robotic eye-arm-hand coordination from human demonstration: a coupled dynamical systems approach

We investigate the role of obstacle avoidance in visually guided reaching and grasping movements. We report on a human study in which subjects performed prehensile motion with obstacle avoidance where the position of the obstacle was systematically varied across trials. These experiments suggest that reaching with obstacle avoidance is organized in a sequential manner, where the obstacle acts as an intermediary target. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the notion of workspace travelled by the hand is embedded explicitly in a forward planning scheme, which is actively involved in detecting obstacles on the way when performing reaching. We find that the gaze proactively coordinates the pattern of eye-arm motion during obstacle avoidance. This study provides also a quantitative assessment of the coupling between the eye-arm-hand motion. We show that the coupling follows regular phase dependencies and is unaltered during obstacle avoidance. These observations provide a basis for the design of a computational model. Our controller extends the coupled dynamical systems framework and provides fast and synchronous control of the eyes, the arm and the hand within a single and compact framework, mimicking similar control system found in humans. We validate our model for visuomotor control of a humanoid robot.

Time to disengage: holding an object influences the execution of rapid compensatory reach-to-grasp reactions for recovery from whole-body instability

Rapid reach-to-grasp (RTG) reactions are important for balance recovery. Despite the benefit of having hands free to regain balance, people do not always release a handheld object. We investigated whether reluctance to release is related to central nervous system (CNS) processing delays that occur when the initial reaction is to drop the object rather than RTG. Young adults sat in a custom-designed chair that tilted backwards. Participants regained balance by reaching to a handle with hands free or while holding onto (1) a chair-fixed object or (2) a SMALL or LARGE free-moving object (unbreakable plastic tubes). EMG was collected from the upper limb to determine onset of reaction. Kinematic data from a digitized wrist marker were used to determine movement time. 9 of 10 participants released the object in every trial. Extensor digitorum onset occurred significantly later than anterior deltoid onset in all conditions. LARGE object release induced further delays in extensor onset while both SMALL and LARGE object release increased response and movement time. Object disengagement led to delays in perturbation-evoked, RTG reactions, particularly in the focal muscle (extensor digitorum) and when the objects' properties posed greater risk for a failed RTG response. We propose that time required for cognitive disengagement accounts for the observed delays. This study offers a potential explanation for the tendency to avoid disengaging from a handheld object during balance recovery. Results also provide insight into the challenges imposed upon the CNS during temporally urgent movements.

Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task

Research has demonstrated that people will adopt initially awkward grasps if they afford more comfortable postures at the end of the movement. This end-state comfort effect provides evidence that humans represent future posture states and select appropriate grasps in anticipation of these postures. The purpose of the study was to examine to what extent the final action goal of a task influences motor planning of preceding segments, and whether grasp postures are planned to optimize end-state comfort during a three-segment action sequence in which two objects are manipulated, and participants can select from a continuous range of possible grasp postures. In the current experiment, participants opened a drawer, grasped an object from inside the drawer, and placed it on a table in one of the three target orientations (0°, 90°, or 180° object rotation required). Grasp postures during the initial movement segment (drawer opening) were not influenced by the final action goal (i.e., required target orientation). In contrast, both the intermediate (i.e., object grasping) and the final movement segment (i.e., object placing) were influenced by target orientation. In addition, participants adopted different strategies to achieve the action goal when the object required 180° rotation, with 42 % of participants prioritizing intermediate-state comfort and 58 % prioritizing end-state comfort. The results indicate that individuals optimize task performance by selecting lower level constraints that allow for successful completion of the action goal and that the selection of these constraints is dependent upon contextual, environmental, and internal influences.

Grasping kinematics from the perspective of the individual digits: a modelling study

Grasping is a prototype of human motor coordination. Nevertheless, it is not known what determines the typical movement patterns of grasping. One way to approach this issue is by building models. We developed a model based on the movements of the individual digits. In our model the following objectives were taken into account for each digit: move smoothly to the preselected goal position on the object without hitting other surfaces, arrive at about the same time as the other digit and never move too far from the other digit. These objectives were implemented by regarding the tips of the digits as point masses with a spring between them, each attracted to its goal position and repelled from objects' surfaces. Their movements were damped. Using a single set of parameters, our model can reproduce a wider variety of experimental findings than any previous model of grasping. Apart from reproducing known effects (even the angles under which digits approach trapezoidal objects' surfaces, which no other model can explain), our model predicted that the increase in maximum grip aperture with object size should be greater for blocks than for cylinders. A survey of the literature shows that this is indeed how humans behave. The model can also adequately predict how single digit pointing movements are made. This supports the idea that grasping kinematics follow from the movements of the individual digits.

Hand aperture patterns in prehension

Although variations in the standard prehensile pattern can be found in the literature, these alternative patterns have never been studied systematically. This was the goal of the current paper. Ten participants picked up objects with a pincer grip. Objects (3, 5, or 7cm in diameter) were placed at 30, 60, 90, or 120cm from the hands' starting location. Usually the hand was opened gradually to a maximum immediately followed by hand closing, called the standard hand opening pattern. In the alternative opening patterns the hand opening was bumpy, or the hand aperture stayed at a plateau before closing started. Two participants in particular delayed the start of grasping with respect to start of reaching, with the delay time increasing with object distance. For larger object distances and smaller object sizes, the bumpy and plateau hand opening patterns were used more often. We tentatively concluded that the alternative hand opening patterns extended the hand opening phase, to arrive at the appropriate hand aperture at the appropriate time to close the hand for grasping the object. Variations in hand opening patterns deserve attention because this might lead to new insights into the coordination of reaching and grasping.

Advance Planning in Sequential Pick–and–Place Tasks

It has been suggested that the kinematics of a reach–to–grasp movement, performed within an action sequence, vary depending on the action goal and the properties of subsequent movement segments (action context effect). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the action context also affects action sequences that consist of several grasping movements directed toward different target objects. Twenty participants were asked to perform a sequence in which they grasped a cylinder, placed it into a target area, and subsequently grasped and displaced a target bar of a certain orientation. We specifically tested whether the orientation of the target bar being grasped in the last movement segment influenced the grip orientation adapted to grasp and place the cylinder in the preceding segments. When all movement segments within the sequence were easy to perform, results indeed showed that grip orientation chosen in the early movement segments depended on the forthcoming motor demands, suggesting a holistic planning process. In contrast, high accuracy demands in specifying a movement segment reduced the ability of the motor system to plan and organize the movement sequence into larger chunks, thus causing a shift toward sequential performance. Additionally, making the placing task more difficult resulted in prolonged reaction times and increased the movement times of all other movement segments.