Influence of galvanic vestibular stimulation on postural recovery during sudden falls

Vestibular input modulates stepping balance reactions early in the pre-step phase through to post-recovery

Compensatory stepping reactions to recover balance are frequently performed, however, the role of sensory feedback in regulating these responses is not fully understood. Specifically, it is unknown whether vestibular input influences compensatory stepping. Here, we aimed to assess whether step responses utilize vestibular input by combining medio-lateral galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) with step-inducing balance perturbations via unpredictable anterior-posterior platform translations. Step responses were assessed for any lateral differences due to the illusory sense of left (LGVS) or rightward (RGVS) postural motion in terms of pre-step weight-shifts, center of mass (COM) motion and step-placement as well as lateral stability when recovering balance. GVS evoked clear differences from the pre-step phase onwards, in an asymmetrical pattern depending on the GVS direction relative to the right step-leg side. RGVS induced a leftwards postural shift to create a larger stability margin to the right (p < 0.0007), opposing the illusory motion and reducing the fall towards the unsupported side during the step; however, RGVS caused no change in step-width. Conversely, LGVS evoked a leftward step placement (p < 0.0001) in the direction of the mis-sensed motion, but without any rightward shift in postural motion. This asymmetry is consistent with vestibular input predictively modulating pre-step lateral weight-shifts and foot-placement in accordance with step mechanics, specifically in controlling frontal plane stability when lifting the foot to step.

Multiple roles of active stiffness in upright balance and multidirectional sway

Both passive and active mechanisms are necessary to explain small amplitude forward-backward (FB) voluntary swaying. Parallel and symmetric leg inverted pendulum models with stiffness control are a simple way to replicate FB swaying during quiet stance. However, it has been more difficult to model lateral left-right (LR) voluntary swaying involving the dual mechanisms of hip loading-unloading and ankle pressure distribution. To assess these factors, we had subjects perform small amplitude FB and LR sways and circular rotation. We experimentally identified three parameters that characterized their two-dimensional stiffnesses: AP stiffness (K_S^AP), and lateral stiffness (K_S^ML), at the ankles and a parameter we refer to as the engagement-disengagement rate (K_ED) of the legs. We performed simulations with our engaged leg model (Bakshi A, DiZio P, Lackner JR. J Neurophysiol 121: 2042-2060, 2019; Bakshi A, DiZio P, Lackner JR. J Neurophysiol 121: 2028-2041, 2019) to test its predictions about the limits of balance stability during sway in the three test conditions. Comparing the model's predictions with the experimental data, we found that K_S^AP has a task-dependent dual role in upright balance and is crucial to prevent falling; K_S^ML helps overcome viscous drags but is not instrumental to stability; K_ED has a key role in stability and is dependent on the biomechanical geometry of the body, which is invariant across balance tasks. These findings provide new insights into balance control that have important clinical implications for falling, especially for patients who are unable to use a hip strategy during balance control.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our previously published Engaged Leg Model here shows how stiffness plays complex multicausal roles in balance. In one role, it is crucial to stability, with task contingent influences over balance. In another, it overcomes viscous drag. Task-dependent stiffness alone does not explain stable balance; geometrical, invariant aspects of body biomechanics also matter. Our model is fully applicable to clinical balance pathologies involving asymmetries in movement and balance control.

Adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of postural sway requires an asymmetric two-leg model

In the companion paper (Bakshi A, DiZio P, Lackner JR. J Neurophysiol. In press, 2019), we reported how voluntary forward-backward sway in a rotating room generated medial-lateral Coriolis forces that initially deviated intended body sway paths. Pure fore-aft sway was gradually restored over per-rotation trials, and a negative aftereffect occurred during postrotation sway. Force plate recordings showed that subjects learned to compensate for the Coriolis forces by executing a bimodal torque, the distribution of which was asymmetric across the two legs and of opposite sign for forward vs. backward sway. To explain these results, we have developed an asymmetric, nonparallel-leg, inverted pendulum model to characterize upright balance control in two dimensions. Fore-aft and medial-lateral sway amplitudes can be biomechanically coupled or independent. Biomechanical coupling occurs when Coriolis forces orthogonal to the direction of movement perturb sway about the ankles. The model includes a mechanism for alternating engagement/disengagement of each leg and for asymmetric drive to the ankles to achieve adaptation to Coriolis force-induced two-dimensional sway. The model predicts the adaptive control underlying the adaptation of voluntary postural sway to Coriolis forces. A stability analysis of the model generates parameter values that match those measured experimentally, and the parameterized model simulations reproduce the experimentally observed sway trajectories. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This paper presents a novel nonparallel leg model of postural control that correctly predicts the perturbations of voluntary sway that occur in a rotating environment and the adaptive changes that occur to restore faithful movement trajectories. This engaged leg model (ELM) predicts the asymmetries in force distribution and their patterns between the two legs to restore accurate movement trajectories. ELM has clinical relevance for pathologies that generate postural asymmetries and for altered gravitoinertial force conditions.

An Initial Passive Phase That Limits the Time to Recover and Emphasizes the Role of Proprioceptive Information

In the present experiments, multiple balance perturbations were provided by unpredictable support-surface translations in various directions and velocities. The aim of this study was to distinguish the passive and the active phases during the pre-impact period of a fall. It was hypothesized that it should be feasible if one uses a specific quantitative kinematic analysis to evaluate the dispersion of the body segments trajectories across trials. Moreover, a multi-joint kinematical model was created for each subject, based on a new 3-D minimally invasive stereoradiographic X-ray images to assess subject-specific geometry and inertial parameters. The simulations allowed discriminating between the contributions of the passive (inertia-induced properties) and the active (neuromuscular response) components during falls. Our data show that there is limited time to adjust the way one fall from a standing position. We showed that the pre-impact period is truncated of 200 ms. During the initial part of a fall, the observed trajectory results from the interaction between the destabilizing external force and the body: inertial properties intrinsic to joints, ligaments and musculotendinous system have then a major contribution, as suggested for the regulation of static upright stance. This passive phase is later followed by an active phase, which consists of a corrective response to the postural perturbation. We believe that during a fall from standing height, it takes about 300 ms for postural responses to start correcting the body trajectory, while the impact is expected to occur around 700 ms. It has been argued that this time is sufficient to change the way one falls and that this makes it possible to apply safer ways of falling, for example by using martial arts fall techniques. Also, our results imply visual and vestibular information are not congruent with the beginning of the on-going fall. This consequence is to be noted as subjects prepare to the impact on the basis of sensory information, which would be uniquely mainly of proprioceptive origin at the fall onset. One limitation of the present analysis is that no EMG was included so far but these data are the subject of a future study.

Adaptation to Coriolis perturbations of voluntary body sway transfers to preprogrammed fall-recovery behavior

In a rotating environment, goal-oriented voluntary movements are initially disrupted in trajectory and endpoint, due to movement-contingent Coriolis forces, but accuracy is regained with additional movements. We studied whether adaptation acquired in a voluntary, goal-oriented postural swaying task performed during constant-velocity counterclockwise rotation (10 RPM) carries over to recovery from falling induced using a hold and release (H&R) paradigm. In H&R, standing subjects actively resist a force applied to their chest, which when suddenly released results in a forward fall and activation of an automatic postural correction. We tested H&R postural recovery in subjects (n = 11) before and after they made voluntary fore-aft swaying movements during 20 trials of 25 s each, in a counterclockwise rotating room. Their voluntary sway about their ankles generated Coriolis forces that initially induced clockwise deviations of the intended body sway paths, but fore-aft sway was gradually restored over successive per-rotation trials, and a counterclockwise aftereffect occurred during postrotation attempts to sway fore-aft. In H&R trials, we examined the initial 10- to 150-ms periods of movement after release from the hold force, when voluntary corrections of movement path are not possible. Prerotation subjects fell directly forward, whereas postrotation their forward motion was deviated significantly counterclockwise. The postrotation deviations were in a direction consistent with an aftereffect reflecting persistence of a compensation acquired per-rotation for voluntary swaying movements. These findings show that control and adaptation mechanisms adjusting voluntary postural sway to the demands of a new force environment also influence the automatic recovery of posture.