Two-dimensional static manipulation tasks: does force coordination depend on change of the tangential force direction?

Visual Feedback of Object Motion Direction Influences the Timing of Grip Force Modulation During Object Manipulation

During manipulation, object slipping is prevented by modulating the grip force (GF) in synchrony with motion-related inertial forces, i.e., load force (LF). However, due to conduction delays of the sensory system, GF must be modulated in advance based on predictions of LF changes. It has been proposed that such predictive force control relies on internal representations, i.e., internal models, of the relation between the dynamic of the environment and movement kinematics. Somatosensory and visual feedback plays a primary role in building these internal representations. For instance, it has been shown that manipulation-dependent somatosensory signals contribute to building internal representations of gravity in normal and altered gravitational contexts. Furthermore, delaying the timing of visual feedback of object displacement has been shown to affect GF. Here, we explored whether and the extent to which spatial features of visual feedback movement, such as motion direction, may contribute to GF control. If this were the case, a spatial mismatch between actual (somatosensory) and visual feedback of object motion would elicit changes in GF modulation. We tested this hypothesis by asking participants to generate vertical object movements while visual feedback of object position was congruent (0° rotation) or incongruent (180° or 90°) with the actual object displacement. The role of vision on GF control was quantified by the temporal shift of GF modulation as a function of visual feedback orientation and actual object motion direction. GF control was affected by visual feedback when this was incongruent in the vertical (180°), but not horizontal dimension. Importantly, 180° visual feedback rotation delayed and anticipated GF modulation during upward and downward actual movements, respectively. Our findings suggest that during manipulation, spatial features of visual feedback motion are used to predict upcoming LF changes. Furthermore, the present study provides evidence that an internal model of gravity contributes to GF control by influencing sensory reweighting processes during object manipulation.

Flexible organization of grip force control during movement frequency scaling

The grip force applied to maintain grasp of a handheld object has been typically reported as tightly coupled to the load force exerted by the object as it is actively manipulated, occurring proportionally and consistently in phase with changes in load force. However, continuous grip force-load force coupling breaks down when overall load force levels and oscillation amplitudes are lower (Grover F, Lamb M, Bonnette S, Silva PL, Lorenz T, Riley MA. Exp Brain Res 236: 2531–2544, 2018) or more predictable (Grover FM, Nalepka P, Silva PL, Lorenz T, Riley MA. Exp Brain Res 237: 687–703, 2019). Under these circumstances, grip force is instead only intermittently coupled to load force; continuous coupling is prompted only when load force levels or variations become sufficiently high or unpredictable. The current study investigated the nature of the transition between continuous and intermittent modes of grip force control by scaling the load force level and the oscillation amplitude continuously in time by means of scaling the required frequency of movement oscillations. Participants grasped a cylindrical object between the thumb and forefinger and oscillated their arm about the shoulder in the sagittal plane. Oscillation frequencies were paced with a metronome that scaled through an ascending or descending frequency progression. Due to greater accelerations, faster frequencies produced greater overall load force levels and more pronounced load oscillations. We observed smooth but nonlinear transitions between clear regimes of intermittent and continuous grip force-load force coordination, for both scaling directions, indicating that grip force control can flexibly reorganize as parameters affecting grasp (e.g., variations in load force) change over time.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY Grip force (GF) is synchronously coupled to changing load forces (LF) during object manipulation when LF levels are high or unpredictable, but only intermittently coupled to LF during less challenging grasp conditions. This study characterized the nature of transitions between synchronous and intermittent GF-LF coupling, revealing a smooth but nonlinear change in intermittent GF modulation in response to continuous scaling of LF amplitude. Intermittent, “drift-and-act” control may provide an alternative framework for understanding GF-LF coupling.

Simultaneous assessment of hand function and neuromuscular quickness through a static object manipulation task in healthy adults

Both hand function [as seen through the coordination between grip force (GF) and load force (LF)] and the ability to produce a submaximal force quickly (i.e., neuromuscular quickness) are two important qualities of motor function that could be seriously affected by the presence of neurological diseases. Therefore, their quantitative assessment is very important in clinical settings. Within this study, we aimed to develop, standardize, and measure the within-session reliability of a clinically meaningful test that assesses both hand function and neuromuscular quickness simultaneously. Thirteen healthy young adults produced around 90 rapid isometric LF pulses to varying submaximal magnitudes by either pulling down or pulling up on an externally fixed GF- and LF-measuring device. Results revealed high indices of force coordination (i.e., GF scaling as assessed by GF/LF and GF coupling as assessed by maximum cross-correlation between GF and LF) in both force directions, while GF coupling was higher in downward than in upward direction (p < 0.001). Regarding the indices of neuromuscular quickness (i.e., the regression parameters obtained from the relationship between peak force and it's rate of development and half-relaxation time), results, in general, revealed a higher slope (named as rate of force development scaling factor; p < 0.01), similar R ² (p > 0.05), and shorter half-relaxation time (p < 0.05) for LF than for GF. Furthermore, all of the selected variables showed moderate to excellent within-session reliability with only 45 pulses. Findings suggest that brief force production tasks should be further evaluated as clinical tests of hand function and neuromuscular quickness in various populations.

Selective effects of arm proximal and distal muscles fatigue on force coordination in manipulation tasks

Effects of muscle fatigue on force coordination and task performance of various manipulation tasks are explored. Grip force (GF; normal force component acting at the digits-object contact area) and load force (LF; tangential component that lifts and holds objects) were recorded prior to and after fatiguing the distal (DAM; i.e., GF producing) and proximal arm muscles (PAM; LF producing). Results reveal a deterioration of GF scaling (i.e., averaged GF-LF ratio), GF-LF coupling (their correlation), and task performance (ability to exert a prescribed LF pattern) associated with DAM, but not PAM fatigue. Deteriorated force coordination clearly increases the likelihood of dropping an object; however, the observed selective effects of DAM and PAM fatigue represent a novel finding deserving of further research.

Effects of muscle fatigue on grip and load force coordination and performance of manipulation tasks

Muscle fatigue is known to be associated with a deteriorated muscle coordination and impaired movement performance in variety of voluntary movements. The aim of this study was to investigate the generally underexplored effect of muscle fatigue on both the coordination between grip force (GF; the force component perpendicular to the hand-object contact area that provides friction) and load force (LF; the parallel force component that can move the object or support the body) as well as movement performance in manipulation tasks. Fifteen participants performed a variety of static and dynamic manipulations both with and without a preceding procedure designed to fatigue the arm and hand muscles. The tasks involved exertion of ramp-and-hold and oscillation patterns of LF against an externally fixed instrumented device, and a simple lift of a freely moving device. The results revealed a fatigue-associated decrease in GF scaling (i.e., the magnitude of GF relative to LF) and GF-LF coupling (correlation between GF and LF), while the task performance regarding the accuracy of exertion of the prescribed LF profiles remained unaffected. We conclude that muscle fatigue both partly decouples GF from LF and reduces the overall GF magnitude, which could potentially explain why hand-held objects are more likely to drop when manipulated with fatigued muscles. However, the unaffected task performance could be explained either by the relatively low level of muscle forces required by the tested tasks, the moderate level of the fatigue imposed, or both.