The influence of body posture on the kinematics of prehension in humans and gorillas (Gorilla gorilla)

Non-human primate models and systems for gait and neurophysiological analysis

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have garnered extensive interest and become a groundbreaking technology to restore movement, tactile sense, and communication in patients. Prior to their use in human subjects, clinical BCIs require rigorous validation and verification (V&V). Non-human primates (NHPs) are often considered the ultimate and widely used animal model for neuroscience studies, including BCIs V&V, due to their proximity to humans. This literature review summarizes 94 NHP gait analysis studies until 1 June, 2022, including seven BCI-oriented studies. Due to technological limitations, most of these studies used wired neural recordings to access electrophysiological data. However, wireless neural recording systems for NHPs enabled neuroscience research in humans, and many on NHP locomotion, while posing numerous technical challenges, such as signal quality, data throughout, working distance, size, and power constraint, that have yet to be overcome. Besides neurological data, motion capture (MoCap) systems are usually required in BCI and gait studies to capture locomotion kinematics. However, current studies have exclusively relied on image processing-based MoCap systems, which have insufficient accuracy (error: ≥4° and 9 mm). While the role of the motor cortex during locomotion is still unclear and worth further exploration, future BCI and gait studies require simultaneous, high-speed, accurate neurophysiological, and movement measures. Therefore, the infrared MoCap system which has high accuracy and speed, together with a high spatiotemporal resolution neural recording system, may expand the scope and improve the quality of the motor and neurophysiological analysis in NHPs.

The Biomechanical Basis of the Claw Finger Deformity: A Computational Simulation Study

PURPOSE

Claw finger deformity occurs during attempted finger extension in patients whose intrinsic finger muscles are weakened or paralyzed by neural impairments. The deformity is generally not acutely present after intrinsic muscle palsy. The delayed onset, with severity progressing over time, suggests soft tissue changes that affect the passive biomechanics of the hand exacerbate and advance the deformity. Clinical interventions may be more effective if such secondary biomechanical changes are effectively addressed. Using a computational model, we simulated these altered soft tissue biomechanical properties to quantify their effects on coordinated finger extension.

METHODS

To evaluate the effects of maladaptive changes in soft tissue biomechanical properties on the development and progression of the claw finger deformity after intrinsic muscle palsy, we completed 45 biomechanical simulations of cyclic index finger flexion and extension, varying the muscle excitation level, clinically relevant biomechanical factors, and wrist position. We evaluated to what extent (1) increased joint laxity, (2) decreased mechanical advantage of the extensors about the proximal interphalangeal joint, and (3) shortening of the flexor muscles contributed to the development of claw finger deformity in an intrinsic-minus hand model.

RESULTS

Of the mechanisms studied, shortening (or contracture) of the extrinsic finger flexors was the factor most associated with the development of claw finger deformity in simulation.

CONCLUSIONS

These simulations suggest that adaptive shortening of the extrinsic finger flexors is required for the development of claw finger deformity. Increased joint laxity and decreased extensor mechanical advantage only contributed to the severity of the deformity in simulations when shortening of the flexor muscles was present.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In both the acute and chronic stages of intrinsic finger paralysis, maintaining extrinsic finger flexor length should be an area of focus in rehabilitation to prevent formation of the claw finger deformity and achieve optimal outcomes after surgical interventions.

The impact of hand proportions on tool grip abilities in humans, great apes and fossil hominins: A biomechanical analysis using musculoskeletal simulation

Differences in grip techniques used across primates are usually attributed to variation in thumb-finger proportions and muscular anatomy of the hand. However, this cause-effect relationship is not fully understood because little is known about the biomechanical functioning and mechanical loads (e.g., muscle or joint forces) of the non-human primate hand compared to that of humans during object manipulation. This study aims to understand the importance of hand proportions on the use of different grip strategies used by humans, extant great apes (bonobos, gorillas and orangutans) and, potentially, fossil hominins (Homo naledi and Australopithecus sediba) using a musculoskeletal model of the hand. Results show that certain grips are more challenging for some species, particularly orangutans, than others, such that they require stronger muscle forces for a given range of motion. Assuming a human-like range of motion at each hand joint, simulation results show that H. naledi and A. sediba had the biomechanical potential to use the grip techniques considered important for stone tool-related behaviors in humans. These musculoskeletal simulation results shed light on the functional consequences of the different hand proportions among extant and extinct hominids and the different manipulative abilities found in humans and great apes.

Behavioral and functional strategies during tool use tasks in bonobos

Different primate species have developed extensive capacities for grasping and manipulating objects. However, the manual abilities of primates remain poorly known from a dynamic point of view. The aim of the present study was to quantify the functional and behavioral strategies used by captive bonobos (Pan paniscus) during tool use tasks. The study was conducted on eight captive bonobos which we observed during two tool use tasks: food extraction from a large piece of wood and food recovery from a maze. We focused on grasping postures, in-hand movements, the sequences of grasp postures used that have not been studied in bonobos, and the kind of tools selected. Bonobos used a great variety of grasping postures during both tool use tasks. They were capable of in-hand movement, demonstrated complex sequences of contacts, and showed more dynamic manipulation during the maze task than during the extraction task. They arrived on the location of the task with the tool already modified and used different kinds of tools according to the task. We also observed individual manual strategies. Bonobos were thus able to develop in-hand movements similar to humans and chimpanzees, demonstrated dynamic manipulation, and they responded to task constraints by selecting and modifying tools appropriately, usually before they started the tasks. These results show the necessity to quantify object manipulation in different species to better understand their real manual specificities, which is essential to reconstruct the evolution of primate manual abilities.