1
|
Scott M, Chiu C. Temporal binding and agency under startle. Exp Brain Res 2020; 239:289-300. [PMID: 33165671 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05972-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Forward models are a component of the motor system that predicts the sensory consequences of our actions. These models play several key roles in motor control and are hypothesized to underlie (among other things) the two phenomena under investigation in this experiment: The feeling of agency that we have over self-initiated actions (as opposed to reflexes), and "temporal binding", in which self-caused sensations are judged to have occurred earlier in time than they actually did. This experiment probes the connection between forward models and both of these phenomena using the "Startle" paradigm. In the Startle paradigm, a startlingly loud sound causes people to initiate a prepared action at a very short latency. It is hypothesized that the latency of a startle-initiated action is so short that normal cortical operations (including forward models) are circumvented. This experiment replicates the temporal-binding effect and simultaneously measures participants' sense of agency over their actions. The results show that both the temporal-binding effect and the sense of agency we have over our own actions is disrupted under the startle paradigm in line with the theory that these phenomena both rely on forward models. Furthermore, this experiment provides evidence in support of the claim that a startle-induced action is qualitatively different from other actions.
Collapse
|
2
|
Rahimi M, Honeycutt CF. StartReact increases the probability of muscle activity and distance in severe/moderate stroke survivors during two-dimensional reaching task. Exp Brain Res 2020; 238:1219-1227. [DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05797-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
3
|
Ossanna MR, Zong X, Ravichandran VJ, Honeycutt CF. Startle evokes nearly identical movements in multi-jointed, two-dimensional reaching tasks. Exp Brain Res 2019; 237:71-80. [PMID: 30306245 PMCID: PMC6359978 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5399-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
StartReact is the ability of the startle reflex to involuntarily release a planned movement in the presence of a loud acoustic stimulus resulting in muscle activity patterns and kinematics that are tightly regulated and scaled with the intended action. Previous studies demonstrated startReact's robustness during simple single-joint reaching tasks and found no difference between startReact and voluntary movements for movement kinematics and muscle activation patterns. However, startReact has not been evaluated during multi-joint reaching movements with multiple degrees of freedom. It is unclear if startReact would evoke accurate and precise multi-joint reaching movements in an unrestricted workspace. Furthermore, if tested more rigorously, multi-joint startReact movement kinematics and muscle activation patterns might not be truly equivalent despite showing no difference through traditional ANOVAs. A previous study found multi-joint startReact was possible during unrestricted elbow and shoulder movement when reaching to a forward target. Therefore, we hypothesized that startReact would evoke similar multi-joint reaching movements for movement accuracy and muscle activation patterns when compared to voluntary movements in a multi-directional workspace. Expanding upon the previous study, our study uses a larger workspace and fully evaluates movement kinematics and muscle activations patterns. Results confirmed our hypothesis and found startReact movements were readily evoked in all directions. StartReact responses presented stereotypically earlier muscle activation, but the relative timing of agonist/antagonist firing pairs between startReact and voluntary movements remained similar. Results demonstrate that startReact is robustly present and equivalent in multi-joint reaching tasks and has potential clinical use for evaluating healthy and impaired movement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meilin R Ossanna
- School of Biological and Health Science Engineering, Arizona State University, 501 E Tyler Mall, PO Box 879709, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| | - Xi Zong
- School of Biological and Health Science Engineering, Arizona State University, 501 E Tyler Mall, PO Box 879709, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| | - Vengateswaran J Ravichandran
- School of Biological and Health Science Engineering, Arizona State University, 501 E Tyler Mall, PO Box 879709, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| | - Claire F Honeycutt
- School of Biological and Health Science Engineering, Arizona State University, 501 E Tyler Mall, PO Box 879709, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gu C, Pruszynski JA, Gribble PL, Corneil BD. A rapid visuomotor response on the human upper limb is selectively influenced by implicit motor learning. J Neurophysiol 2018; 121:85-95. [PMID: 30427764 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00720.2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
How do humans learn to adapt their motor actions to achieve task success? Recent behavioral and patient studies have challenged the classic notion that motor learning arises solely from the errors produced during a task, suggesting instead that explicit cognitive strategies can act in concert with the implicit, error-based, motor learning component. In this study, we show that the earliest wave of directionally tuned neuromuscular activity that begins within ~100 ms of peripheral visual stimulus onset is selectively influenced by the implicit component of motor learning. In contrast, the voluntary neuromuscular activity associated with reach initiation, which evolves ~100-200 ms later, is influenced by both the implicit and explicit components of motor learning. The selective influence of the implicit, but not explicit, component of motor learning on the directional tuning of the earliest cascade of neuromuscular activity supports the notion that these components of motor learning can differentially influence descending motor pathways. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Motor learning can be driven both by an implicit error-based component and an explicit strategic component, but the influence of these components on the descending pathways that contribute to motor control is unknown. In this study, we show that the implicit component selectively influences a reflexive circuit that rapidly generates a visuomotor response on the human upper limb. Our results show that the substrates mediating implicit and explicit motor learning exert distinct influences on descending motor pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Gu
- Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario; London , Ontario , Canada.,The Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario; London , Ontario , Canada
| | - J Andrew Pruszynski
- Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario; London , Ontario , Canada.,The Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario; London , Ontario , Canada.,Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario; London , Ontario , Canada.,Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario , London, Ontario , Canada
| | - Paul L Gribble
- Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario; London , Ontario , Canada.,The Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario; London , Ontario , Canada.,Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario; London , Ontario , Canada
| | - Brian D Corneil
- Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario; London , Ontario , Canada.,The Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario; London , Ontario , Canada.,Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario; London , Ontario , Canada.,Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario , London, Ontario , Canada
| |
Collapse
|