Programming of left hand exploits task set but that of right hand depends on recent history

Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot

While reaching and grasping are highly prevalent manual actions, neuroimaging studies provide evidence that their neural representations may be shared between different body parts, i.e., effectors. If these actions are guided by effector-independent mechanisms, similar kinematics should be observed when the action is performed by the hand or by a cortically remote and less experienced effector, such as the foot. We tested this hypothesis with two characteristic components of action: the initial ballistic stage of reaching, and the preshaping of the digits during grasping based on object size. We examined if these kinematic features reflect effector-independent mechanisms by asking participants to reach toward and to grasp objects of different widths with their hand and foot. First, during both reaching and grasping, the velocity profile up to peak velocity matched between the hand and the foot, indicating a shared ballistic acceleration phase. Second, maximum grip aperture and time of maximum grip aperture of grasping increased with object size for both effectors, indicating encoding of object size during transport. Differences between the hand and foot were found in the deceleration phase and time of maximum grip aperture, likely due to biomechanical differences and the participants’ inexperience with foot actions. These findings provide evidence for effector-independent visuomotor mechanisms of reaching and grasping that generalize across body parts.

How long is the interval over which trial-to-trial effects on Fitts' Law task can operate?

Fitts' Law is a well-studied principle in psychology which holds that movement time (MT) varies with the size and distance of a target across a wide range of tasks. In a recent study, the authors demonstrated that performance on a current trial in a Fitts' Law paradigm is affected by what happens during the previous trial (Tang et al. in Psychon Bull Rev 25(5):1833-1839, 2018). The aim of the present study was to explore how long this trial-to-trial transfer might last and whether or not the transfer would occur between the left and right hands. A series of experiments was carried out using discrete trials, a paradigm in which the current authors and others have previously established that Fitts' Law operates (Fitts and Peterson in J Exp Psychol 67(2):103-112, 1964; Tang et al. 2018). Three inter-trial intervals (3 s, 4 s, and 5 s) were used in separate testing sessions, the order of which was counterbalanced across participants. In addition, trial-to-trial transfer was tested within a single hand and between hands. The results demonstrate that transfer from one trial to the next could bridge 4 s when either the right or the left hand was used and would disappear by 5 s. Moreover, the effect transferred between the two hands. The endpoint accuracy of the current trial was not affected by the previous trial. These findings suggest that the trial-to-trial effect reduces over time and that the transfer of sensorimotor memory or the task set is independent of the particular hand used.

The left hand disrupts subsequent right hand grasping when their actions overlap

Adaptive motor control is premised on the principle of movement minimization, which in turn is premised on a form of sensorimotor memory. But what is the nature of this memory and under what conditions does it operate? Here, we test the limits of sensorimotor memory in an intermanual context by testing the effect that the action performed by the left hand has on subsequent right hand grasps. Target feature-overlap predicts that sensorimotor memory is engaged when task-relevant sensory features of the target are similar across actions; partial effector-overlap predicts that sensorimotor memory is engaged when there is similarity in the task-relevant effectors used to perform an action; and the action-goal conjunction hypotheses predicts that sensorimotor memories are engaged when the action goal and the action type overlap. In three experiments, participants used their left hand to reach out and pick up an object, manually estimate its size, pinch it, look at it, or merely rest the left hand before reaching out to pick up a second object with their right hand. The in-flight anticipatory grip aperture of right-hand grasps was only influenced when it was preceded by grasps performed by the left-hand. Overlap in the sizes of the objects, partial overlap in the effectors used, and in the availability of haptic feedback bore no influence on this metric. These results support the hypothesis that intermanual transfer of sensorimotor memory on grasp execution is dependent on a conjunction of action type and goal.