Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability

Homeostatic metaplasticity induced by the combination of two inhibitory brain stimulation techniques: Continuous theta burst and transcranial static magnetic stimulation

Aftereffects of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques may be brain state-dependent. Either continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) as transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) reduce cortical excitability. Our objective was to explore the aftereffects of tSMS on a M1 previously stimulated with cTBS. The interaction effect of two inhibitory protocols on cortical excitability was tested on healthy volunteers (n = 20), in two different sessions. A first application cTBS was followed by real-tSMS in one session, or sham-tSMS in the other session. When intracortical inhibition was tested with paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation, LICI (ie., long intracortical inhibition) increased, although the unconditioned motor-evoked potential (MEP) remained stable. These effects were observed in the whole sample of participants regardless of the type of static magnetic field stimulation (real or sham) applied after cTBS. Subsequently, we defined a group of good-responders to cTBS (n = 9) on whom the unconditioned MEP amplitude reduced after cTBS and found that application of real-tSMS (subsequent to cTBS) increased the unconditioned MEP. This MEP increase was not found when sham-tSMS followed cTBS. The interaction of tSMS with cTBS seems not to take place at inhibitory cortical interneurons tested by LICI, since LICI was not differently affected after real and sham tSMS. Our results indicate the existence of a process of homeostatic plasticity when tSMS is applied after cTBS. This work suggests that tSMS aftereffects arise at the synaptic level and supports further investigation into tSMS as a useful tool to restore pathological conditions with altered cortical excitability.

Exploring the role of the left DLPFC in fatigue during unresisted rhythmic movements

Understanding central fatigue during motor activities is important in neuroscience and different medical fields. The central mechanisms of motor fatigue are known in depth for isometric muscle contractions; however, current knowledge about rhythmic movements and central fatigue is rather scarce. In this study, we explored the role of an executive area (left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [DLPFC]) in fatigue development during rhythmic movement execution, finger tapping (FT) at the maximal rate, and fatigue after effects on the stability of rhythmic patterns. Participants (n = 19) performed six sets of unresisted FT (with a 3 min rest in‐between). Each set included four interleaved 30 s repetitions of self‐selected (two repetitions) and maximal rate FT (two repetitions) without rest in‐between. Left DLPFC involvement in the task was perturbed by transcranial static magnetic stimulation (tSMS) in two sessions (one real and one sham). Moreover, half of the self‐selected FT repetitions were performed concurrently with a demanding cognitive task, the Stroop test. Compared with sham stimulation, real tSMS stimulation prevented waning in tapping frequency at the maximal rate without affecting perceived levels of fatigue. Participants' engagement in the Stroop test just prior to maximal FT reduced the movement amplitude during this mode of execution. Movement variability at self‐selected rates increased during Stroop execution, especially under fatigue previously induced by maximal FT. Our results indicate cognitive‐motor interactions and a prominent role of the prefrontal cortex in fatigue and the motor control of simple repetitive movement patterns. We suggest the need to approach motor fatigue including cognitive perspectives.

We show the fundamental role of executive areas in fatigue caused by very simple repetitive movements. Fatigue developed less during the maximal frequency of movement production, while the left DLPFC received magnetic stimulation (in right‐handers). The role of cognitive‐motor interaction in fine motor control was also clear when participants engaged in cognitive tasks. At the clinical level, our work reinforces the need to treat fatigue from a comprehensive perspective.

Isometric agonist and antagonist muscle activation interacts differently with 140-Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation aftereffects at different intensities

During transcranial electric stimulation, increasing intracellular Ca²⁺ levels beyond those needed for inducing long term potentiation (LTP) may collapse aftereffects. State-dependent plastic aftereffects are reduced when applied during muscle activation as compared with rest. Cortical surround inhibition by antagonistic muscle activation inhibits the center-innervated agonist. The objective of this study is to determine the interaction of state dependency of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) aftereffects at rest and under activation of agonist and antagonist muscles during stimulation with different intensities. In 13 healthy participants, we measured motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes before and after applying tACS at 140 Hz over the motor cortex in nine single-blinded sessions using sham, 1 mA, and 2 mA stimulation intensities during rest and activation of agonist and antagonist muscles. During rest, only 1 mA tACS produced a significant MEP increase, whereas the 2 mA stimulation produced no significant MEP size shift. During agonist activation 1 mA did not induce MEP changes; after 2 mA, first a decrease and later an increase of MEPs were observed. Antagonist activation under sham tACS led to an inhibition, which was restored to baseline by 1 and 2 mA tACS. Increasing stimulation intensity beyond 1 mA does not increase excitability, compatible with too strong intracellular Ca²⁺ increase. Antagonist innervation leads to MEP inhibition, supporting the concept of surround inhibition, which can be overcome by tACS at both intensities. During agonist innervation, a tACS dose-dependent relationship exists. Our results integrate concepts of "leaky membranes" under activation, surround inhibition, intracellular Ca²⁺ increase, and their role in the aftereffects of tACS.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Stimulation intensity and activation of center versus surround muscles affect cortical excitability alterations generated by 140-Hz tACS. At rest, excitatory aftereffects were induced by tACS with 1 mA, but not 2 mA stimulation intensity. With agonistic muscle activation, excitability first decreases, and then increases with 2 mA. For antagonist activation, the MEP amplitude reduction observed in the sham condition is counteracted upon by 1 and 2 mA tACS. This reflects the relation of LTP-like aftereffects to Ca²⁺ concentration alterations.

A Checklist to Reduce Response Variability in Studies Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Assessment of Corticospinal Excitability: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Response variability between individuals (interindividual variability) and within individuals (intraindividual variability) is an important issue in the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) literature. This has raised questions of the validity of TMS to assess changes in corticospinal excitability (CSE) in a predictable and reliable manner. Several participant-specific factors contribute to this observed response variability with a current lack of consensus on the degree each factor contributes. This highlights a need for consistency and structure in reporting study designs and methodologies. Currently, there is no summarized review of the participant-specific factors that can be controlled and may contribute to response variability. This systematic review aimed to develop a checklist of methodological measures taken by previously published research to increase the homogeneity of participant selection criteria, preparation of participants before experimental testing, participant scheduling, and the instructions given to participants throughout experimental testing to minimize their effect on response variability. Seven databases were searched in full. Studies were included if CSE was measured via TMS and included methodological measures to increase the homogeneity of the participants. Eighty-four studies were included. Twenty-three included measures to increase participant selection homogeneity, 21 included measures to increase participant preparation homogeneity, while 61 included measures to increase participant scheduling and instructions during experimental testing homogeneity. These methodological measures were summarized into a user-friendly checklist with considerations, suggestions, and rationale/justification for their inclusion. This may provide the framework for further insights into ways to reduce response variability in TMS research.