Eye-hand coordination during visuomotor adaptation: effects of hemispace and joint coordination

Random Practice Enhances Retention and Spatial Transfer in Force Field Adaptation

The contextual-interference effect is a frequently examined phenomenon in motor skill learning but has not been extensively investigated in motor adaptation. Here, we first tested experimentally if the contextual-interference effect is detectable in force field adaptation regarding retention and spatial transfer, and then fitted state-space models to the data to relate the findings to the “forgetting-and-reconstruction hypothesis”. Thirty-two participants were divided into two groups with either a random or a blocked practice schedule. They practiced reaching to four targets and were tested 10 min and 24 h afterward for motor retention and spatial transfer on an interpolation and an extrapolation target, and on targets which were shifted 10 cm away. The adaptation progress was participant-specifically fitted with 4-slow-1-fast state-space models accounting for generalization and set breaks. The blocked group adapted faster (p = 0.007) but did not reach a better adaptation at practice end. We found better retention (10 min), interpolation transfer (10 min), and transfer to shifted targets (10 min and 24 h) for the random group (each p < 0.05). However, no differences were found for retention or for the interpolation target after 24 h. Neither group showed transfer to the extrapolation target. The extended state-space model could replicate the behavioral results with some exceptions. The study shows that the contextual-interference effect is partially detectable in practice, short-term retention, and spatial transfer in force field adaptation; and that state-space models provide explanatory descriptions for the contextual-interference effect in force field adaptation.

Delay of gaze fixation during reaching movement with the non-dominant hand to a distant target

The present study examined the effects of hand and task difficulty on eye-hand coordination related to gaze fixation behavior (i.e., fixating a gaze to the target until reach completion) in single reaching movements. Twenty right-handed young adults made reaches on a digitizer, while looking at a visual target and feedback of hand movements on a computer monitor. Task difficulty was altered by having three target distances. In a small portion of trials, visual feedback was randomly removed at the target presentation. The effect of a moderate amount of practice was also examined using a randomized trial schedule across target-distance and visual-feedback conditions in each hand. The results showed that the gaze distances covered during the early reaching phase were reduced, and the gaze fixation to the target was delayed when reaches were performed with the left hand and when the target distance increased. These results suggest that when the use of the non-dominant hand or an increased task difficulty reduces the predictability of hand movements and its sensory consequences, eye-hand coordination is modified to enhance visual monitoring of the reach progress prior to gaze fixation. The randomized practice facilitated this process. Nevertheless, variability of reach trajectory was more increased without visual feedback for right-hand reaches, indicating that control of the dominant arm integrates more visual feedback information during reaches. These results together suggest that the earlier gaze fixation and greater integration of visual feedback during right-hand reaches contribute to the faster and more accurate performance in the final reaching phase.

A condition that produces sensory recalibration and abolishes multisensory integration

We examined the influence of extended exposure to a visuomotor rotation, which induces both motor adaptation and sensory recalibration, on (partial) multisensory integration in a cursor-control task. Participants adapted to a 30° (adaptation condition) or 0° (control condition) visuomotor rotation by making center-out movements to remembered targets. In subsequent test trials of sensory integration, they made center-out movements with variable visuomotor rotations and judged the position of hand or cursor at the end of these movements. Test trials were randomly embedded among twice the number of maintenance trials with 30° or 0° rotation. The biases of perceived hand (or cursor) position toward the cursor (or hand) position were measured. We found motor adaptation together with proprioceptive and visual recalibrations in the adaptation condition. Unexpectedly, multisensory integration was absent in both the adaptation and control condition. The absence stemmed from the extensive experience of constant visuomotor rotations of 30° or 0°, which probably produced highly precise predictions of the visual consequences of hand movements. The frequently confirmed predictions then dominated the estimate of the visual movement consequences, leaving no influence of the actual visuomotor rotations in the minority of test trials. Conversely, multisensory integration was present for sensed hand positions when these were indirectly assessed from movement characteristics, indicating that the relative weighting of discrepant estimates of hand position was different for motor control. The existence of a condition that abolishes multisensory integration while keeping sensory recalibration suggests that mechanisms that reduce sensory discrepancies (partly) differ between integration and recalibration.

Effect of fatigue and the absence of visual feedback on shoulder motor control in an healthy population during a reaching task

INTRODUCTION

The main role of the upper limb is to position the hand in order to carry out varied activities requiring coordinated multi-joint movement, which requires mobility and stability at the glenohumeral joint. This is made possible by the interaction between active and passive structures as well as the integration of information coming from multiple systems. This interaction can be compromised by factors such as muscle fatigue and lack of visual feedback, leading to decreased performance. Several studies have investigated their isolated effect without looking at their combined effect.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the specific and the combined effects of shoulder muscles fatigue and of lack of visual feedback on shoulder motor control during a reaching task with the arm in an elevated position.

METHODS

60 healthy participants were randomly assigned to one of four experimental groups: 1) control with visual feedback; 2) control without visual feedback; 3) fatigue with visual feedback; 4) fatigue without visual feedback. Subjects had to perform 10 trials of a reaching task in the KINARM robotic arm. Kinematic variables of interest were time taken to complete the task, final error, initial angle of deviation and area under curve. Non-parametric ANOVAs were used.

RESULTS

Analyses showed that there were statistically significant differences (p < 0,01) for the time taken to complete the task (1.15 s compared to 0.70 s), the area under the curve (0.015m² compared to 0.009m²) and the final error (0.025 m compared to 0,011 m) between those who had visual feedback and those who did not. No statistically significant fatigue or feedback X fatigue interaction effects were found for all kinematic variables.

CONCLUSION

Findings show that lack of visual feedback had an impact on the reaching task performance while fatigue did not. In addition, fatigue did not increase the effect of the lack of visual feedback.

Effects of Hand and Hemispace on Multisensory Integration of Hand Position and Visual Feedback

The brain generally integrates a multitude of sensory signals to form a unified percept. Even in cursor control tasks, such as reaching while looking at rotated visual feedback on a monitor, visual information on cursor position and proprioceptive information on hand position are partially integrated (sensory coupling), resulting in mutual biases of the perceived positions of cursor and hand. Previous studies showed that the strength of sensory coupling (sum of the mutual biases) depends on the experience of kinematic correlations between hand movements and cursor motions, whereas the asymmetry of sensory coupling (difference between the biases) depends on the relative reliabilities (inverse of variability) of hand-position and cursor-position estimates (reliability rule). Furthermore, the precision of movement control and perception of hand position are known to differ between hands (left, right) and workspaces (ipsilateral, contralateral), and so does the experience of kinematic correlations from daily life activities. Thus, in the present study, we tested whether strength and asymmetry of sensory coupling for the endpoints of reaches in a cursor control task differ between the right and left hand and between ipsilateral and contralateral hemispace. No differences were found in the strength of sensory coupling between hands or between hemispaces. However, asymmetry of sensory coupling was less in ipsilateral than in contralateral hemispace: in ipsilateral hemispace, the bias of the perceived hand position was reduced, which was accompanied by a smaller variability of the estimates. The variability of position estimates of the dominant right hand was also less than for the non-dominant left hand, but this difference was not accompanied by a difference in the asymmetry of sensory coupling – a violation of the reliability rule, probably due a stronger influence of visual information on right-hand movements. According to these results, the long-term effects of the experienced kinematic correlation between hand movements and cursor motions on the strength of sensory coupling are generic and not specific for hemispaces or hands, whereas the effects of relative reliabilities on the asymmetry of sensory coupling are specific for hemispaces but not for hands.