Spinal reciprocal inhibition in the co-contraction of the lower leg depends on muscle activity ratio

Induced effects of electrical muscle stimulation and visual stimulation on visual sensory reweighting dynamics during standing on a balance board

Providing instruction cues on body motions using stimulations has the potential to induce sensory reweighting dynamics. However, there are currently very few quantitative investigations on the difference in the induced effects on the sensory reweighting dynamics between stimulation methods. We therefore investigated the difference in the induced effects of electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) and visual sensory augmentation (visual SA) on sensory reweighting dynamics during standing on a balance board. Twenty healthy participants controlled their posture to maintain the board horizontally in the balance-board task, which included a pre-test without stimulation, a stimulation test, and a post-test without stimulation. The EMS group (n = 10) received EMS to the tibialis anterior or soleus muscle based on the board tilt. The visual SA group (n = 10) received visual stimuli via a front monitor based on the board tilt. We measured the height of the board marker and calculated the board sway. Before and after the balance-board task, the participants performed static standing with their eyes open and closed. We measured postural sway and calculated the visual reweighting. The visual reweighting showed a strong negative correlation with the balance board sway ratio between the pre- and stimulation tests in the EMS group and a strong positive correlation with that in the visual SA group. Moreover, for those who reduced the balance board sway in the stimulation test, the visual reweighting was significantly different between the stimulation methods, demonstrating that the induced effect on sensory reweighting dynamics is quantitatively different depending on which method is used. Our findings suggest that there is an appropriate stimulation method to change to the targeted sensory weights. Future investigations on the relationship between sensory reweighting dynamics and stimulation methods could contribute to the proposal and implementation of new training methods for learning to control the target weights.

Effects of Clenching Strength on Exercise Performance: Verification Using Spinal Function Assessments

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the relationship between exercise performance and spinal function based on clenching strength.

HYPOTHESIS

Low-intensity clenching contributes to joint movement, whereas high-intensity clenching contributes to joint fixation.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized crossover trial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

METHODS

Two experiments were conducted using 2 groups of 20 healthy adults. The 4 clenching conditions in experiment 1 were 0%, 12.5%, 25%, and 50% of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of the masseter muscle. Experiment 2 consisted of 3 conditions: no-bite condition, moderate effort, and maximum effort (max condition). In experiment 1, spinal function and ankle dorsiflexion tasks were measured for each clenching condition, and the ankle dorsiflexion task was measured in experiment 2. Regarding spinal function, we measured spinal reciprocal inhibition (RI) and excitability of spinal anterior horn cells. For the ankle dorsiflexion task, ankle dorsiflexion MVC was performed for 3 seconds under each clenching condition. The items analyzed were reaction time, peak ankle dorsiflexion torque, and soleus (Sol)/tibialis anterior (TA) electromyography (EMG) ratio.

RESULTS

The results of experiment 1 illustrated that RI was significantly attenuated or eliminated with increasing clenching strength (>25% MVC). Spinal anterior horn cell excitability increased significantly with increasing clenching strength. The peak torque was significantly higher at 50% MVC than that at 0% MVC. In experiment 2, the peak torque was significantly higher under moderate and max conditions than no-bite condition, and the Sol/TA EMG ratio was significantly higher under max condition than that under moderate condition.

CONCLUSION/CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results illustrated that during high-strength clenching (≥50% MVC), antagonist muscles are activated simultaneously to increase muscle strength. High-strength clenching improved kinetic performance (joint fixation), whereas low-strength clenching (<50% MVC) enhanced exercise performance (joint movement).

Activation of the Supplementary Motor Areas Enhances Spinal Reciprocal Inhibition in Healthy Individuals

The supplementary motor area (SMA) may modulate spinal reciprocal inhibition (RI) because the descending input from the SMA is coupled to interneurons in the spinal cord via the reticulospinal tract. Our study aimed to verify whether the anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (anodal-tDCS) of the SMA enhances RI. Two tDCS conditions were used: the anodal stimulation (anodal-tDCS) and sham stimulation (sham-tDCS) conditions. To measure RI, there were two conditions: one with the test stimulus (alone) and the other with the conditioning-test stimulation intervals (CTIs), including 2 ms and 20 ms. RI was calculated at multiple time points: before the tDCS intervention (Pre); at 5 (Int 5) and 10 min; and immediately after (Post 0); and at 5, 10 (Post 10), 15, and 20 min after the intervention. In anodal-tDCS, the amplitude values of H-reflex were significantly reduced for a CTI of 2 ms at Int 5 to Post 0, and a CTI of 20 ms at Int 5 to Pot 10 compared with Pre. Stimulation of the SMA with anodal-tDCS for 15 min activated inhibitory interneurons in RIs by descending input from the reticulospinal tract via cortico–reticulospinal projections. The results showed that 15 min of anodal-tDCS in the SMA enhanced and sustained RI in healthy individuals.