Effects of repetitive passive movement on ankle joint on spinal reciprocal inhibition

Reciprocal inhibition of the thigh muscles in humans: A study using transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Evaluating reciprocal inhibition of the thigh muscles is important to investigate the neural circuits of locomotor behaviors. However, measurements of reciprocal inhibition of thigh muscles using spinal reflex, such as H-reflex, have never been systematically established owing to methodological limitations. The present study aimed to clarify the existence of reciprocal inhibition in the thigh muscles using transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS). Twenty able-bodied male individuals were enrolled. We evoked spinal reflex from the biceps femoris muscle (BF) by tSCS on the lumber posterior root. We examined whether the tSCS-evoked BF reflex was reciprocally inhibited by the following conditionings: (1) single-pulse electrical stimulation on the femoral nerve innervating the rectus femoris muscle (RF) at various inter-stimulus intervals in the resting condition; (2) voluntary contraction of the RF; and (3) vibration stimulus on the RF. The BF reflex was significantly inhibited when the conditioning electrical stimulation was delivered at 10 and 20 ms prior to tSCS, during voluntary contraction of the RF, and during vibration on the RF. These data suggested a piece of evidence of the existence of reciprocal inhibition from the RF to the BF muscle in humans and highlighted the utility of methods for evaluating reciprocal inhibition of the thigh muscles using tSCS.

Participant attention on the intervention target during repetitive passive movement improved spinal reciprocal inhibition enhancement and joint movement function

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the participant's attention target during repetitive passive movement (RPM) intervention on reciprocal inhibition (RI) and joint movement function. Twenty healthy adults participated in two experiments involving four attention conditions [control (forward attention with no RPM), forward attention (during RPM), monitor attention (monitor counting task during RPM), ankle joint attention (ankle movement counting task during RPM)] during 10-min RPM interventions on the ankle joint. Counting tasks were included to ensure the participant's attention remained on the target during the intervention. In Experiment 1, RI was measured before, immediately after, and 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min after the RPM intervention. In Experiment 2, we evaluated ankle joint movement function at the same time points before and after RPM intervention. The maximum ankle dorsiflexion movement (from 30° plantar flexion to 10° dorsiflexion) was measured, reflecting RI. In Experiment 1, the RI function reciprocal Ia inhibition was enhanced for 10 min after RPM under all attention conditions (excluding the control condition. D1 inhibition was enhanced for 20 min after RPM in the forward and monitor attention conditions and 30 min after RPM in the ankle joint attention condition. In Experiment 2, the joint movement function decreased under the forward and monitor attention conditions but improved under the ankle joint attention condition. This study is the first to demonstrate that the participant's attention target affected the intervention effect of the RI enhancement method, which has implications for improving the intervention effect of rehabilitation.

Effects of Clenching Strength on Exercise Performance: Verification Using Spinal Function Assessments

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the relationship between exercise performance and spinal function based on clenching strength.

HYPOTHESIS

Low-intensity clenching contributes to joint movement, whereas high-intensity clenching contributes to joint fixation.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized crossover trial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

METHODS

Two experiments were conducted using 2 groups of 20 healthy adults. The 4 clenching conditions in experiment 1 were 0%, 12.5%, 25%, and 50% of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of the masseter muscle. Experiment 2 consisted of 3 conditions: no-bite condition, moderate effort, and maximum effort (max condition). In experiment 1, spinal function and ankle dorsiflexion tasks were measured for each clenching condition, and the ankle dorsiflexion task was measured in experiment 2. Regarding spinal function, we measured spinal reciprocal inhibition (RI) and excitability of spinal anterior horn cells. For the ankle dorsiflexion task, ankle dorsiflexion MVC was performed for 3 seconds under each clenching condition. The items analyzed were reaction time, peak ankle dorsiflexion torque, and soleus (Sol)/tibialis anterior (TA) electromyography (EMG) ratio.

RESULTS

The results of experiment 1 illustrated that RI was significantly attenuated or eliminated with increasing clenching strength (>25% MVC). Spinal anterior horn cell excitability increased significantly with increasing clenching strength. The peak torque was significantly higher at 50% MVC than that at 0% MVC. In experiment 2, the peak torque was significantly higher under moderate and max conditions than no-bite condition, and the Sol/TA EMG ratio was significantly higher under max condition than that under moderate condition.

CONCLUSION/CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results illustrated that during high-strength clenching (≥50% MVC), antagonist muscles are activated simultaneously to increase muscle strength. High-strength clenching improved kinetic performance (joint fixation), whereas low-strength clenching (<50% MVC) enhanced exercise performance (joint movement).

Activation of the Supplementary Motor Areas Enhances Spinal Reciprocal Inhibition in Healthy Individuals

The supplementary motor area (SMA) may modulate spinal reciprocal inhibition (RI) because the descending input from the SMA is coupled to interneurons in the spinal cord via the reticulospinal tract. Our study aimed to verify whether the anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (anodal-tDCS) of the SMA enhances RI. Two tDCS conditions were used: the anodal stimulation (anodal-tDCS) and sham stimulation (sham-tDCS) conditions. To measure RI, there were two conditions: one with the test stimulus (alone) and the other with the conditioning-test stimulation intervals (CTIs), including 2 ms and 20 ms. RI was calculated at multiple time points: before the tDCS intervention (Pre); at 5 (Int 5) and 10 min; and immediately after (Post 0); and at 5, 10 (Post 10), 15, and 20 min after the intervention. In anodal-tDCS, the amplitude values of H-reflex were significantly reduced for a CTI of 2 ms at Int 5 to Post 0, and a CTI of 20 ms at Int 5 to Pot 10 compared with Pre. Stimulation of the SMA with anodal-tDCS for 15 min activated inhibitory interneurons in RIs by descending input from the reticulospinal tract via cortico–reticulospinal projections. The results showed that 15 min of anodal-tDCS in the SMA enhanced and sustained RI in healthy individuals.