Judgements of hand location and hand spacing show minimal proprioceptive drift

How we perceive the width of grasped objects: Insights into the central processes that govern proprioceptive judgements

Low-level proprioceptive judgements involve a single frame of reference, whereas high-level proprioceptive judgements are made across different frames of reference. The present study systematically compared low-level (grasp → $\rightarrow$ grasp) and high-level (vision → $\rightarrow$ grasp, grasp → $\rightarrow$ vision) proprioceptive tasks, and quantified the consistency of grasp → $\rightarrow$ vision and possible reciprocal nature of related high-level proprioceptive tasks. Experiment 1 (n = 30) compared performance across vision → $\rightarrow$ grasp, a grasp → $\rightarrow$ vision and a grasp → $\rightarrow$ grasp tasks. Experiment 2 (n = 30) compared performance on the grasp → $\rightarrow$ vision task between hands and over time. Participants were accurate (mean absolute error 0.27 cm [0.20 to 0.34]; mean [95% CI]) and precise (R 2 $R^2$ = 0.95 [0.93 to 0.96]) for grasp → $\rightarrow$ grasp judgements, with a strong correlation between outcomes (r = -0.85 [-0.93 to -0.70]). Accuracy and precision decreased in the two high-level tasks (R 2 $R^2$ = 0.86 and 0.89; mean absolute error = 1.34 and 1.41 cm), with most participants overestimating perceived width for the vision → $\rightarrow$ grasp task and underestimating it for grasp → $\rightarrow$ vision task. There was minimal correlation between accuracy and precision for these two tasks. Converging evidence indicated performance was largely reciprocal (inverse) between the vision → $\rightarrow$ grasp and grasp → $\rightarrow$ vision tasks. Performance on the grasp → $\rightarrow$ vision task was consistent between dominant and non-dominant hands, and across repeated sessions a day or week apart. Overall, there are fundamental differences between low- and high-level proprioceptive judgements that reflect fundamental differences in the cortical processes that underpin these perceptions. Moreover, the central transformations that govern high-level proprioceptive judgements of grasp are personalised, stable and reciprocal for reciprocal tasks. KEY POINTS: Low-level proprioceptive judgements involve a single frame of reference (e.g. indicating the width of a grasped object by selecting from a series of objects of different width), whereas high-level proprioceptive judgements are made across different frames of reference (e.g. indicating the width of a grasped object by selecting from a series of visible lines of different length). We highlight fundamental differences in the precision and accuracy of low- and high-level proprioceptive judgements. We provide converging evidence that the neural transformations between frames of reference that govern high-level proprioceptive judgements of grasp are personalised, stable and reciprocal for reciprocal tasks. This stability is likely key to precise judgements and accurate predictions in high-level proprioception.

Virtual occlusion effects on the perception of self-initiated visual stimuli

Virtual reality (VR) has established itself as a useful tool in the study of human perception in the laboratory. A recent study introduced a new approach to examine visual sensory attenuation (SA) effects in VR. Hand movements triggered the appearance of Gabor stimuli, which were either presented behind the participant's hand - not rendered in VR ("virtual occlusion") - or elsewhere on the display. Virtual occlusion led to a rightward shift of the psychometric curve, suggesting that self-generated hand movements reduced the perceived contrast of the stimulus. Since such attenuation effects might provide a window into the predictive processing of the sensory and cognitive apparatus, we sought to better understand the nature of the virtual occlusion effects. In our study, the presentation of test stimuli was either self-initiated, self-initiated with a variable delay, or triggered externally; the test stimuli were occluded or not. In conflict with our hypothesis, we found moderate to strong evidence for an absence of any horizontal shifts between the psychometric curves. However, virtual occlusion was associated with a decrease in the slope of the psychometric function. Our results suggest that virtual occlusion attenuated the relative perceptual sensitivity, so that participants had more difficulty discriminating contrast differences when the test stimulus was presented behind the hand. We tentatively conclude that, in the visual domain, the discriminability of stimulus intensity is modified by internal predictive cues (i.e., proprioception), possibly linked to shifts in covert spatial attention.

Typical Development of Finger Position Sense From Late Childhood to Adolescence

Finger position sense is a proprioceptive modality highly important for fine motor control. Its developmental time course is largely unknown. This cross-sectional study examined its typical development in 138 children (8-17 years) and a group of 14 healthy young adults using a fast and novel psychophysical test that yielded objective measures of position sense acuity. Participants placed their hands underneath a computer tablet and judged the perceived position of their unseen index finger relative to two visible areas displayed on a tablet following a two-forced-choice paradigm. Responses were fitted to a psychometric acuity function from which the difference between the point-of-subjective-equality and the veridical finger position (ΔPSE) was derived as a measure of position sense bias, and the uncertainty area (UA) as a measure of precision. The main results are: First, children under 12 exhibited a significantly greater UA than adults while adolescent children (13-17 years) exhibited no significant differences when compared to adults. Second, no significant age-related differences in ΔPSE were found across the age range of 8-17 years. This implies that the typical development of finger position sense from late childhood to adulthood is characterized as an age-dependent increase in proprioceptive precision and not as a decrease in bias.

Two senses of human limb position: methods of measurement and roles in proprioception

The sense of position of the body and its limbs is a proprioceptive sense. Proprioceptors are concerned with monitoring the body's own actions. Position sense is important because it is believed to contribute to our self-awareness. This review discusses recent developments in the debate about the sources of peripheral afferent signals contributing to position sense and describes different methods of measurement of position sense under conditions where vision does not participate. These include pointing to or verbal reporting of the perceived position of a hidden body part, alignment of one body part with the perceived position of another, or using memory-based repositioning tasks. The evidence suggests that there are at least two different mechanisms involved in the generation of position sense, mechanisms using different central processing pathways. The principal sensory receptor responsible for position sense is believed to be the muscle spindle. One criterion for identifying mechanism is whether position sense can be manipulated by controlled changes in spindle discharge rates. Position sense measured in two-limb matching is altered in a predictable way by such changes, while values for pointing and verbal reporting remain unresponsive. It is proposed that in two-limb matching the sensation generated is limb position in postural space. In pointing or verbal reporting, information is provided about limb position in extrapersonal space. Here vision is believed to play a role. The evidence suggests that we are aware, at the same time, of sensations of limb position in postural space as well as in extrapersonal space.