A comparison of virtual locomotion methods in movement experts and non-experts: testing the contributions of body-based and visual translation for spatial updating

The practice of speleology: What is its relationship with spatial abilities?

Given the evidence of motor and exploring activities being related to spatial abilities on different scales, the present study considers the case of speleology, a peculiar underground exploratory activity. The relation of this practice with spatial abilities was examined. The study compares a group of expert speleologists (18), a group with a reduced amount of experience in speleology (19 novice speleologists), and a group with a similar amount of practice but in the outdoors (19 experts mountaineers). Group differences will be investigated in terms of (i) small-scale spatial task performance (rotation-based and spatial working memory); (ii) large-scale environment learning (reproduced using verbal descriptions) asking participants to learn a path through a cave or up a mountain (in a counterbalanced order) and then to test their recall with true/false spatial questions and graphical representation tasks; and (iii) self-reports of wayfinding attitudes. The results of linear models showed that, after controlling for age, gender, years of education, and vocabulary scores, expert speleologists had greater mental rotation and perspective-taking abilities and less spatial anxiety than expert mountaineers, and the former performed the true/false questions better than the latter. It should be noted that participants who reported having guiding/path-finding experiences had greater accuracy in graphical representation performance and higher scores in attitude towards orientation. Overall, expertise in speleology is related to spatial abilities on different scales and might have a distinctive role in comparison with other motor practices, pointing to the potential value of examining speleology in the spatial cognition framework.

Using virtual reality to assess dynamic self-motion and landmark cues for spatial updating in children and adults

The relative contribution of different sources of information for spatial updating - keeping track of one's position in an environment - has been highly debated. Further, children and adults may differ in their reliance on visual versus body-based information for spatial updating. In two experiments, we tested children (age 10-12 years) and young adult participants on a virtual point-to-origin task that varied the types of self-motion information available for translation: full-dynamic (walking), visual-dynamic (controller induced), and no-dynamic (teleporting). In Experiment 1, participants completed the three conditions in an indoor virtual environment with visual landmark cues. Adults were more accurate in the full- and visual-dynamic conditions (which did not differ from each other) compared to the no-dynamic condition. In contrast, children were most accurate in the visual-dynamic condition and also least accurate in the no-dynamic condition. Adults outperformed children in all conditions. In Experiment 2, we removed the potential for relying on visual landmarks by running the same paradigm in an outdoor virtual environment with no geometrical room cues. As expected, adults' errors increased in all conditions, but performance was still relatively worse in teleporting. Surprisingly, children showed overall similar accuracy and patterns across locomotion conditions to adults. Together, the results support the importance of dynamic translation information (either visual or body-based) for spatial updating across both age groups, but suggest children may be more reliant on visual information than adults.