Effects of gait rehabilitation on motor coordination in stroke survivors: an UCM-based approach

Spatiotemporal variability after stroke reflects more than just slow walking velocity

BACKGROUND

Increased spatiotemporal gait variability is considered a clinical biomarker of ageing and pathology, and a predictor of future falls. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether the increased spatiotemporal variability observed in persons with stroke is directly related to the pathology or simply reflects their choice of walking velocity.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does increased spatiotemporal gait variability directly relate to motor coordination deficits after stroke?

METHODS

Forty persons with stroke participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants performed the lower-extremity motor coordination test (LEMOCOT) on an electronic mat equipped with force sensors. Then, participants walked for 120 s on a computerized treadmill at their comfortable walking velocity. For the LEMOCOT we used the traditional score of in-target touch count and computed the absolute and variable error around the targets. For gait variability, we extracted the standard deviation of step time, step length, step velocity, and step width. Using linear modeling, we tested the correlations of gait variability with the outcome measures from the LEMOCOT, after controlling for walking velocity.

RESULTS

The variability in step time, step length and step width correlated with walking velocity, while the variability in step velocity did not. After controlling for walking velocity, we observed that the LEMOCOT score correlated with the variance in step time, and the variable error in the LEMOCOT correlated with the variance in step length, in step width, and in step velocity. No significant correlation with any of the velocity-controlled step parameters was found for the absolute error in the LEMOCOT.

SIGNIFICANCE

Decreased performance in the LEMOCOT was associated with increased spatiotemporal variability in persons with stroke, regardless of their walking velocity. Our results demonstrate the connection between lower-extremity coordination impairments and deficits in gait function.

Motor flexibility to stabilize the toe position during obstacle crossing in older adults: an investigation using an uncontrolled manifold analysis

Introduction

An age-related decrease in the ability to exploit the abundant degrees of freedom of the body, referred to as motor flexibility, leads to a heightened fall risk. The present study investigated motor flexibility to stabilize the toe position during obstacle crossing in older adults and its correlation with the magnitude of foot elevation.

Methods

Twenty-six older adults (70.9 ± 7.4 years old) and 21 younger adults (25.4 ± 5.0 years old) walked and crossed an obstacle, during which the dominant limb was always the leading limb. An uncontrolled manifold (UCM) analysis was used to quantify the flexibility during obstacle crossing as the synergy index, with the vertical toe position being regarded as the performance variable and the segment angles of the lower limbs as the elemental variables.

Results and discussion

The results showed that older participants had a significantly lower synergy index for the trailing limb before the moment of obstacle crossing than younger participants, suggesting reduced flexibility in part. The results also showed that, regardless of age, foot elevation was negatively correlated with the synergy index, suggesting that a so-called "conservative strategy" (i.e., a tendency to show extraordinarily high foot elevation to ensure collision avoidance) may be related to their reduced motor flexibility.

Do Bernstein's Stages of Learning Apply after Stroke? A Scoping Review on the Development of Whole-Body Coordination after Cerebrovascular Accidents

Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability around the world, presenting unique challenges in motor development during the rehabilitation process. Based on studies in movement and sports science, thorough knowledge has accumulated on the development of movement skills. Through the works of Nikolai Bernstein, it has been established that when learning new skills, people tend to first simplify coordination by 'freezing' their degrees of freedom, after which they start building efficiency by 'releasing' specific degrees of freedom. If a similar pattern of development can be established post-stroke, it would imply that lessons learned in sports skill acquisition can also be implemented to optimize stroke rehabilitation. The current scoping review aims to assess whether the Bernsteinian freezing-to-releasing stages of learning also apply to developing whole-body movement skills after stroke. To this end, we systematically screened the existing literature for studies involving a longitudinal measure of whole-body coordination after a stroke. Only five articles met the criteria for inclusion, indicating a gap in research on this topic. Based on the observations within these articles, we could neither confirm nor reject whether the freezing-to-releasing process can apply after a stroke. We could, however, hypothesize a detailed description of the freezing-to-releasing process, which can be assessed in future works.

Experience influences kinematic motor synergies: an Uncontrolled manifold approach to simulated Nordic skiing

Motor synergies are defined as central nervous system mechanisms which adjust participating degrees of freedom to ensure dynamic stability (control) of certain performance variables and have been identified during many motor tasks. The potential for synergistic control of individual segments during full-body tasks is often overlooked. Thus, this study compared individual differences in the potential stabilization of multiple performance variables on the basis of experience during a full-body sport activity. Normalized time series of synergy indices from Uncontrolled Manifold analyses on experienced (n = 9) and inexperienced (n = 19) participants were analysed using statistical parametric mapping during simulated Nordic skiing. Regardless of experience, hand, upper arm, and whole-body centre of mass (COM) kinematics were found to be stabilized by kinematic motor synergies. Only experienced Nordic skiers stabilized trunk COM position at all, while trunk COM velocity was stabilized for a longer duration than inexperienced participants. However, inexperienced participants stabilized hand velocity for a greater duration overall and to a greater magnitude during early pull phase than the experienced skiers. That motor synergies for hand and trunk COM velocity differed between experience groups suggests potential utility for these performance variables as indicators of motor skill development for full-body tasks such as Nordic skiing.

Time profile of kinematic synergies of stroke gait

BACKGROUND

In stroke subjects, the motor skills differ between sides and among subjects with different levels of motor recovery, impacting inter-joint coordination. How these factors can affect the kinematic synergies over time during gait has not been investigated yet. This work aimed to determine the time profile of kinematic synergies of stroke patients throughout the single support phase of gait.

METHODS

Kinematic data from 17 stroke and 11 healthy individuals was recorded using a Vicon System. The Uncontrolled Manifold approach was employed to determine the distribution of components of variability and the synergy index. To analyze the time profile of kinematic synergies, we applied the statistical parametric mapping method. Comparisons were made within the stroke group (paretic and non-paretic limbs) and between groups (stroke and healthy). The stroke group was also subdivided into subgroups with worse and better motor recovery.

FINDINGS

There are significant differences in synergy index at the end of the single support phase between stroke and healthy subjects; paretic and non-paretic limbs; and paretic limb according to the motor recovery. Comparisons of mean values showed significantly larger values of synergy index for the paretic limb compared to the non-paretic and healthy.

INTERPRETATION

Despite the sensory-motor deficits and the atypical kinematic behavior, stroke patients can produce joint covariations to control the center of mass trajectory in the forward progression plane, but the modulation of the synergy is impaired, reflecting altered adjustments, especially in the paretic limb of subjects with worse levels of motor recovery.