Motor evoked potential latency and duration from tibialis anterior in individuals with chronic stroke

Understanding corticomotor mechanisms for activation of non-target muscles during unilateral isometric contractions of leg muscles after stroke

PURPOSE

Muscle activation often occurs in muscles ipsilateral to a voluntarily activated muscle and to a greater extent after stroke. In this study, we measured muscle activation in non-target, ipsilateral leg muscles and used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to provide insight into whether corticomotor pathways contribute to involuntary activation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Individuals with stroke performed unilateral isometric ankle dorsiflexion, ankle plantarflexion, knee extension, and knee flexion. To quantify involuntary muscle activation in non-target muscles, muscle activation was measured during contractions from the ipsilateral tibialis anterior (TA), medial gastrocnemius (MG), rectus femoris (RF), and biceps femoris (BF) and normalized to resting muscle activity. To provide insight into mechanisms of involuntary non-target muscle activation, TMS was applied to the contralateral hemisphere, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded.

RESULTS

We found significant muscle activation in nearly every non-target muscle during isometric unilateral contractions. MEPs were frequently observed in non-target muscles, but greater non-target MEP amplitude was not associated with greater non-target muscle activation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that non-target muscle activation occurs frequently in individuals with chronic stroke. The lack of association between non-target TMS responses and non-target muscle activation suggests that non-target muscle activation may have a subcortical or spinal origin. Non-target muscle activation has important clinical implications because it may impair torque production, out-of-synergy movement, and muscle activation timing.

Corticospinal Responses Following Gait-Specific Training in Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review

Corticospinal excitability is subject to alterations after stroke. While the reversal of these alterations has been proposed as an underlying mechanism for improved walking capacity after gait-specific training, this has not yet been clearly demonstrated. Therefore, the objective of this review is to evaluate the effect of gait-specific training on corticospinal excitability in stroke survivors. We conducted an electronic database search in four databases (i.e., Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science) in June 2022. Two authors screened in an independent way all the studies and selected those that investigated the effect of gait-specific training on variables such as motor-evoked potential amplitude, motor threshold, map size, latency, and corticospinal silent period in stroke survivors. Nineteen studies investigating the effect of gait-specific training on corticospinal excitability were included. Some studies showed an increased MEP amplitude (7/16 studies), a decreased latency (5/7studies), a decreased motor threshold (4/8 studies), an increased map size (2/3 studies) and a decreased cortical silent period (1/2 study) after gait-specific training. No change has been reported in terms of short interval intracortical inhibition after training. Five studies did not report any significant effect after gait-specific training on corticospinal excitability. The results of this systematic review suggest that gait-specific training modalities can drive neuroplastic adaptation among stroke survivors. However, given the methodological disparity of the included studies, additional clinical trials of better methodological quality are needed to establish conclusions. The results of this review can therefore be used to develop future studies to better understand the effects of gait-specific training on the central nervous system.

Role of the Contra-Lesional Corticoreticular Tract in Motor Recovery of the Paretic Leg in Stroke: A Mini-Narrative Review

This review discusses the role of the contra-lesional corticoreticular tract (CRT) in motor recovery of the paretic leg in stroke patients by reviewing related diffusion tensor tractography studies. These studies suggest that the contra-lesional CRT can contribute to the motor recovery of the paretic leg in stroke patients, particularly in patients with complete injuries of the ipsilesional corticospinal tract and CRT. Furthermore, a review study reported that the motor recovery of the paretic ankle dorsiflexor, which is mandatory for achieving a good gait pattern without braces in hemiparetic stroke patients, was closely related to the contra-lesional CRT. These results could be clinically important in neuro-rehabilitation. For example, the contra-lesional CRT could be a target for neuromodulation therapies in patients with complete injuries of the ipsilesional corticospinal tract and CRT. On the other hand, only three studies were reviewed in this review and one was a case report. Although the CRT has been suggested to be one of the ipsilateral motor pathways from the contra-lesional cerebral cortex to the paretic limbs in stroke, the role of the CRT has not been elucidated clearly. Therefore, further prospective follow-up studies combining functional neuroimaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation for the paretic leg with diffusion tensor tractography will be useful for elucidating the role of the contra-lesional CRT in stroke patients.