Subregional DXA-derived vertebral bone mineral measures are stronger predictors of failure load in specimens with lower areal bone mineral density, compared to those with higher areal bone mineral density

Differentiation Between Osteoporotic And Neoplastic Vertebral Fractures: State Of The Art And Future Perspectives

Vertebral fractures are a common condition, occurring in the context of osteoporosis and malignancy. These entities affect a group of patients in the same age range; clinical features may be indistinct and symptoms non-existing, and thus present challenges to diagnosis. In this article, we review the use and accuracy of different imaging modalities available to characterize vertebral fracture etiology, from well-established classical techniques, to the role of new and advanced imaging techniques, and the prospective use of artificial intelligence. We also address the role of imaging on treatment. In the context of osteoporosis, the importance of opportunistic diagnosis is highlighted. In the near future, the use of automated computer-aided diagnostic algorithms applied to different imaging techniques may be really useful to aid on diagnosis.

Subregional areal bone mineral density (aBMD) is a better predictor of heterogeneity in trabecular microstructure of vertebrae in young and aged women than subregional trabecular bone score (TBS)

BACKGROUND

Currently, bone densitometry fails to identify nearly half of those elderly patients at immediate fracture risk. To improve clinical assessment of vertebral fracture risk, we aimed to determine how the DXA-based 2D parameter Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) relates to subregional variability in 3D trabecular microstructure in young and elderly women compared to aBMD.

METHODS

T12 vertebrae from 29 women (11 young: 32 ± 6 years, 18 aged: 71 ± 5 years) were DXA-scanned ex vivo in anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral projection providing vertebral aBMD and TBS. Additionally, aBMD and TBS were measured for three horizontal (superior, mid-horizontal, inferior) and three vertical subregions (anterior, mid-vertical, posterior) and related to 3D microstructure indices, i.e. bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV), trabecular number and thickness (Tb.N, Tb.Th), based on HRpQCT.

RESULTS

Subregional high-resolution tomography showed significant differences in trabecular parameters for both age groups: In horizontal subregions, BV/TV was lowest superiorly, Tb.Th was highest mid-horizontally, and Tb.N was lowest mid-horizontally and highest inferiorly. Correspondingly, aBMD varied between horizontal subregions, with differences depending on projection direction. TBS varied only in lateral projections of the aged group, with lower values for the mid-horizontal subregion. In vertical subregions, BV/TV, Tb.N, and aBMD were highest posteriorly for both groups. TBS did not differ between vertical subregions. Regression analysis showed aBMD as a predictor explained more of the variance in subregional 3D microstructure compared to TBS. Stepwise multi-regression analysis revealed only three combinations of subregion, projection, and group where aBMD and TBS were both significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Subregional aBMD reflects variations in trabecular bone microstructure better than subregional TBS for trisected regions. Specifically, lateral aBMD identifies microstructural heterogeneities independent of age and may improve prediction of vertebral strength and susceptibility to specific fracture types.

Intra- and interobserver reliability of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score system for instability in spine metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mechanical instability is one of the two main indications for surgical intervention in patients with metastatic spine disease. Since its publication in 2010, the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) has been the most commonly used means of assessing mechanical instability. To prove clinically valuable though, diagnostic tests must demonstrate consistency across measures and across observers. Here we report a systematic review and meta-analysis of all prior reports of intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the SINS score. To identify articles, we queried the PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for all full-text English articles reporting interobserver or intraobserver reliability for the SINS score, category, or a domain of the SINS score. Articles reporting confidence intervals for these metrics were then subjected to meta-analysis to identify pooled estimates of reliability. Of 167 unique studies identified, seven met inclusion criteria and were subjected to qualitative review and meta-analysis. Intraobserver reliability for SINS score was found to be near perfect [estimate =0.815; 90% CI (0.661-0.969)] and interobserver reliability was substantial [0.673; (0.227-1.12)]. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability among spine surgeons was significantly better than reliability across all observers (both P<0.0001). Qualitative analysis suggested that increased surgeon experience may be associated with greater intraobserver and interobserver reliability among spine surgeons. On the whole, meta-analysis of the available literature suggests SINS to have good intraobserver and interobserver reliability, giving it the potential to be a valuable guide to the management of patients with spinal metastases. Further research is required to demonstrate that SINS score correlates with the clinical decision to stabilize.

The positive correlation between upper adjacent vertebral fracture and the kyphosis angle of injured vertebral body after percutaneous kyphoplasty: An in vitro study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation between the kyphosis angle of injured vertebral body and the risk of upper adjacent vertebral fracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) using an osteoporotic vertebral compressed fracture model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

24 functional spinal units (FSUs, T9 to L4) were selected from 6 elderly formalin preserved vertebral specimens to build the vertebral compressed fracture model. According to the kyphosis angle between the upper plate of upper vertebral body and the horizontal plane, group A (0°) and group B (20°) were defined, with each group comprised with 12 FSUs. The stiffness and fracture load were measured in both groups.

RESULTS

After PKP, the stiffness was (571.513 ± 83.373)N/mm and the fracture load was (1751.659 ± 112.291)N in group A, with both significantly higher than those of group B (stiffness, (307.706 ± 46.723)N/mm; fracture load, (1128.011 ± 125.417)N).

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce the risk of upper adjacent vertebral fracture, it is better to restore the height of injured vertebral body and decrease the angle of kyphosis to increase the capability of upper adjacent vertebral body against fracture.