MRI-based Vertebral Bone Quality Score for Osteoporosis Screening Based on Different Osteoporotic Diagnostic Criteria Using DXA and QCT

Value of different preoperative bone evaluation methods in predicting intraoperative screw insertion torque-a prospective clinical comparative trial

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Establishing good screw-bone structural stability is conducive to reducing the risk of postoperative screw loosening. Screw insertion torque is an objective index for evaluating screw-bone structural stability. Therefore, accurate prediction of screw insertion torque can improve the preoperative evaluation of patients, optimize the surgical plan, and improve the surgical effect. At present, the correlation between different bone assessment methods and screw insertion torque is unclear.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between different bone assessment methods and screw insertion torque and to optimize the predictive performance of screw insertion torque through mathematical modeling combined with different radiology methods.

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional study.

PATIENT SAMPLES

77 patients with preoperatively available DXA, CT and MRI data who underwent spinal fixation surgeries between October 2022 and September 2023 and 357 sets of screw data were included in this analysis.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Spinal, vertebrae-specific and screw trajectory's BMD were measured preoperatively by different imaging modalities. Intraoperative screw insertion torque was measured using an electronic torque wrench.

METHODS

Pearson linear correlation, scatter plots and univariate linear regression were used to evaluate the correlation between different bone evaluation methods and screw insertion torque. Different bone evaluation methods were fitted into the prediction model of screw torque and the related equations were obtained.

RESULTS

Screw insertion torque had the strongest positive correlation with the volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of the screw trajectory (Pedicle screw insertion torque (PSIT): R = 0.618, p<.001; Terminal screw insertion torque (TSIT): R = 0.735, p<.001). A weak negative correlation was found between the screw insertion torque and level specific vertebral bone quality (VBQ) (PSIT: R = -0.178, p=.001; TSIT: R = -0.147, p=.006). We also found that the PSIT was strongly correlated with the TSIT (R = 0.812, p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to other bone quality assessment methods, screw trajectory vBMD may be better predict the magnitude of screw insertion torque. In addition, we further optimized preoperative assessments by constructing a mathematical model to better predict screw insertion torque. In conclusion, clinicians should select appropriate preoperative bone quality assessment methods, identify potential low-torque patients, optimize surgical plans, and ultimately improve screw insertion accuracy and reduce postoperative screw loosening rate.

Which Indicator Among Lumbar Vertebral Hounsfield Unit, Vertebral Bone Quality, or Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry-Measured Bone Mineral Density Is More Efficacious in Predicting Thoracolumbar Fragility Fractures?

OBJECTIVE

Hounsfield units (HU), vertebral bone quality (VBQ), and bone mineral density (BMD) can all serve as predictive indicators for thoracolumbar fragility fractures. This study aims to explore which indicator provides better risk prediction for thoracolumbar fragility fractures.

METHODS

Patients who have received medical attention from The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University for thoracolumbar fragility fractures were selected. A total of 78 patients with thoracolumbar fragility fractures were included in the study. To establish a control group, 78 patients with degenerative spinal diseases were matched to the fracture group on the basis of gender, age, and body mass index. The lumbar vertebral HU, the VBQ, and the BMD were obtained for all the 156 patients through computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The correlations among these parameters were analyzed. The area under curve (AUC) analysis was employed to assess the predictive efficacy and thresholds of lumbar vertebral HU, VBQ, and BMD in relation to the risk of thoracolumbar fragility fractures.

RESULTS

Among the cohort of 156 patients, lumbar vertebral HU exhibited a positive correlation with BMD (p < 0.01). Conversely, VBQ showed a negative correlation with HU, BMD (p < 0.05). HU and BMD displayed a favorable predictive efficacy for thoracolumbar fragility fractures (p < 0.01), with HU (AUC = 0.863) showcasing the highest predictive efficacy, followed by the DEXA-measured BMD (AUC = 0.813). VBQ (AUC = 0.602) ranked lowest among the 3 indicators. The thresholds for predicting thoracolumbar fragility fractures were as follows: HU (88),VBQ (3.37), and BMD (0.81).

CONCLUSION

All 3 of these indicators, HU, VBQ, and BMD, can predict thoracolumbar fragility fractures. Notably, lumbar vertebral HU exhibits the highest predictive efficacy, followed by the BMD obtained through DEXA scanning, with VBQ demonstrating the lowest predictive efficacy.