Severe 5-fluorouracil toxicity associated with a marked alteration of pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its catabolite 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil: a case report

Current status and future outlooks on therapeutic drug monitoring of fluorouracil

INTRODUCTION

: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the anticancer drug fluorouracil (5FU) as a method to support dose adjustments has been researched and discussed extensively. Despite manifold evidence of the advantages of 5FU-TDM, traditional body surface area (BSA)-guided dosing is still widely applied.

AREAS COVERED

: This review covers the latest evidence on 5FU-TDM based on a literature search in PubMed between June and September 2021. It particularly highlights new approaches of implementing 5FU-TDM into precision medicine by combining TDM with pharmacogenetic testing and/or pharmacometric models. This review further discusses remaining obstacles in order to incorporate 5FU-TDM into clinical routine.

EXPERT OPINION

: New data on 5FU-TDM further strengthen the advantages compared to BSA-guided dosing as it is able to reduce pharmacokinetic variability and thereby improve treatment efficacy and safety. Interprofessional collaboration has the potential to overcome the remaining barriers for its implementation. Pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing followed by 5FU-TDM can further improve 5FU exposure in a substantial proportion of patients. Developing a model framework integrating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 5FU will be crucial to fully advance into the precision medicine era. Model applications can potentially support clinicians in dose finding before starting chemotherapy. Additionally, TDM provides further assistance in continuously improving model predictions.

Systemic exposure to 5-fluorouracil and its metabolite, 5,6-dihydrofluorouracil, and development of a limited sampling strategy for therapeutic drug management of 5-fluorouracil in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy

AIMS

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is widely used in combination chemotherapy, and literature suggests pharmacokinetic-guided dosing to improve clinical efficacy and reduce toxicity. This study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic exposure of both 5-FU and its metabolite, 5,6-dihydrofluorouracil (DHFU), in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy and to establish a simplified strategy to assist in therapeutic drug management for dose optimization.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study, performed in 27 patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal malignancy who were prescribed 5-FU. Multiple samples were collected per patient over the slow bolus (15-20 min) and continuous infusion period (over 44 h) in doses 1 and 3, and the concentrations of 5-FU and DHFU were measured.

RESULTS

A higher proportion of patients had exposures within the therapeutic range in dose 3 (50%) as compared to dose 1 (37.5%) with 5-FU. There was an association between delayed time to maximum concentration of DHFU and a high maximum concentration of 5-FU. A limited sampling strategy was developed with 4 samples, 2 during the bolus period and 2 during the continuous period (at 18 h and the end of infusion), which accurately predicted the total area under the curve of 5-FU.

CONCLUSION

Using body surface area-based dosing with 5-FU, 50-60% of patients were outside of the therapeutic range. In the absence of genotype testing, measurement of the metabolite DHFU could be a phenotypical measure of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme activity. A limited sampling strategy was developed in patients who were prescribed a combination regimen of slow bolus, followed by a 44-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU to assist in the therapeutic drug management of patients.

[5-fluorouracil therapeutic drug monitoring: Update and recommendations of the STP-PT group of the SFPT and the GPCO-Unicancer]

Despite being 60-years old now, 5-FU remains the backbone of numerous regimen to treat a variety of solid tumors such as breast, head-and-neck and digestive cancers either in neo-adjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic settings. Standard 5-FU usually claims 15-40% of severe toxicities and up to 1% of toxic-death. Numerous studies show a stiff relationship between 5-FU exposure and toxicity or efficacy. In addition, 5-FU pharmacokinetics is highly variable between patients. Indeed, 80% of the 5-FU dose is catabolized in the liver by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) into inactive compounds. It is now well established that DPD deficiency could lead to severe toxicities and, thus, require dose reduction in deficient patients. However, despite dosage adaptation based on DPD status, some patients may still experience under- or over-exposure, leading to inefficacy or major toxicity. The "Suivi thérapeutique pharmacologique et personnalisation des traitements" (STP-PT) group of the "Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique" (SFPT) and the "Groupe de pharmacologie clinique oncologique" (GPCO)-Unicancer, based on the latest and most up-to-date literature data, recommend the implementation of 5-FU Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in order to ensure an adequate 5-FU exposure.

Accumulation of alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine and fluoro mono acetate in a patient with 5-fluorouracil-associated hyperammonemia

PURPOSE

High-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) containing chemotherapy occasionally causes hyperammonemia and can be lethal. However, the mechanism of 5FU-associated hyperammonemia has not been known. The aim of this study was to reveal the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU-associated hyperammonemia in a recurrent colorectal cancer patient with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

METHODS

We experienced a case of hyperammonemia during mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab therapy for recurrent colorectal cancer. He was a dialyzed patient due to diabetic nephropathy and was registered to prospective blood sampling for pharmacokinetics analysis during chemotherapy. Blood concentrations of 5-FU and its catabolites were determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

The patient developed hyperammonemia encephalopathy 41 h after the initiation of continuous 5-FU infusion (on the third day). Before onset of hyperammonemia encephalopathy, serum alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine (FBAL, 59.2 µg/ml) and fluoro mono acetate (FMA, 905.8 ng/ml) were gradually increased. After hemodialysis for hyperammonemia, FBAL and FMA were collaterally decreased and his symptom was improved. Other intermediate catabolites of 5-FU, dihydrofluorouracil, and alpha-fluoro-beta-ureidopropionic acid were not changed.

CONCLUSION

We found increases of serum FBAL and FMA under the condition of hyperammonemia in the patient with ESRD during mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab therapy. This research supported the hypothesis that impairment of tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle by FMA would cause 5-FU-associated hyperammonemia.

Cellular and molecular mechanisms for the synergistic cytotoxicity elicited by oxaliplatin and pemetrexed in colon cancer cell lines

Purpose

Oxaliplatin effect in the treatment of colorectal cancer is improved upon combination with thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitors. Pemetrexed is polyglutamated by the folylpolyglutamate synthase (FPGS) and blocks folate metabolism and DNA synthesis by inhibiting TS, dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (GARFT). The present study evaluates the pharmacological interaction between oxaliplatin and pemetrexed in colorectal cancer cells.

Methods

Human HT29, WiDr, SW620 and LS174T cells were treated with oxaliplatin and pemetrexed. Drug interaction was studied using the combination index method, while cell cycle was investigated with flow cytometry. The effects of drugs on Akt phosphorylation and apoptosis were studied with ELISA and fluorescence microscopy, respectively. RT-PCR analysis was performed to assess whether drugs modulated the expression of pemetrexed targets and of genes involved in DNA repair (ERCC1 and ERCC2). Finally, platinum–DNA adduct levels were detected by ultra-sensitive multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).

Results

A dose-dependent inhibition of cell growth was observed after drug exposure, while a synergistic interaction was detected preferentially with sequential combinations. Oxaliplatin enhanced cellular population in the S-phase. Drug combinations increased apoptotic indices with respect to single agents, and both drugs inhibited Akt phosphorylation. RT-PCR analysis showed a correlation between the FPGS/(TS × DHFR × GARFT) ratio and pemetrexed sensitivity, as well as a downregulation of ERCC1, ERCC2, TS, DHFR and GARFT after drug exposure. In addition, pretreatment with pemetrexed resulted in an increase of oxaliplatin–DNA adducts.

Conclusion

These data demonstrate that oxaliplatin and pemetrexed synergistically interact against colon cancer cells, through modulation of cell cycle, inhibition of Akt phosphorylation, induction of apoptosis and modulation of gene expression.

5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics predicts disease-free survival in patients administered adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FDHU) pharmacokinetics and disease-free survival (DFS) in colorectal cancer patients given 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy within a nonrandomized, retrospective, pharmacokinetic study.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

One hundred fifteen patients including 72 men (median age, 63 years; range, 36-79 years) and 43 women (median age, 60 years; range, 36-73 years) received 6 cycles of l-leucovorin 100 mg/m(2)/day and 5-FU 370 mg/m(2)/day i.v. boluses (5 days every 4 weeks). Individual plasma concentrations of 5-FU and 5-FDHU were determined on day 1 of the first cycle with a validated high performance liquid chromatography method, and the main pharmacokinetic variables were determined. Follow-up of all patients was extended up to 5 years after the end of adjuvant chemotherapy, and DFS was recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate any correlation among 5-FU pharmacokinetics, clinical and pathologic variables, and DFS.

RESULTS

The area under the time/concentration curve (AUC) of 5-FU was significantly lower in 58 subjects who recurred (7.5 +/- 2.9 h x mg/L) with respect to other patients (9.3 +/- 4.1 h x mg/L). Furthermore, AUC values lower than 8.4 h x mg/L together with lymph node involvement and the interruption of treatment or reduction of doses were identified as risk factors at univariate analysis. The completion of 6 cycles of adjuvant treatment without dosage modifications was the only independent risk factor at multivariate analysis, despite a trend toward significance for 5-FU AUC values (cutoff value, 8.4 hxmg/L) was observed (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetics of 5-FU should be regarded as an important factor for predicting disease recurrence in colorectal cancers.

Improved chemical syntheses of 5,6-dihydro-5-fluorouracil

5,6-dihydro-5-fluorouracil (5-DHFU) is a metabolite of the chemotherapy drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) of importance for biological studies. 5-DHFU has been prepared by enzymatic reduction of 5-FU and in very low yield by hydrogenation of 5-FU; however, a practical chemical synthesis is not available. Facile racemic syntheses of 5-DHFU from 5-FU or uracil, using p-methoxybenzyl protecting groups followed by L-Selectride reduction, are reported.

Profiling dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency in patients with cancer undergoing 5-fluorouracil/capecitabine therapy

Fluoropyrimidine drugs such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine are a mainstay in the treatment of numerous solid tumors, including colorectal cancers, alone or as part of combination therapies. Cytotoxic drugs such as 5-FU and oral capecitabine display narrow therapeutic indexes combined with high interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. As a result, severe toxicities often limit or delay the administration of successive, optimal chemotherapeutic courses, leading to unfavorable clinical outcome in patients with cancer. Catabolism and deactivation of fluoropyrimidine drugs depend on a single and exclusive enzymatic step driven by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase is prone to marked circadian rhythms, drug-drug interactions, and genetic polymorphisms; influence of its erratic activity on 5-FU pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile has been extensively investigated, and it is now well known that DPD deficiency leads to severe toxicities with 5-FU or possibly capecitabine exposure. With the ever-increasing number of patients with cancer likely to be treated with fluoropyrimidines, predicting and preventing the occurrence of such toxicities is now a major issue in clinical oncology. Early determination of DPD status in patients with cancer would allow identification of those at risk and help in subsequent dose adjustment or selection of other treatment modalities. Numerous methods, either genotypic or phenotypic, have been proposed to achieve this goal. This review covers a wide range of techniques available to establish DPD status in patients with cancer.

Improved Analysis of 5-Fluorouracil and 5,6-Dihydro-5-Fluorouracil by HPLC With Diode Array Detection for Determination of Cellular Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Activity and Pharmacokinetic Profiling

Administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may be associated with severe toxicities in patients who are deficient of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity. For this reason, a sensitive HPLC method for the analysis of 5-FU and 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FDHU) was developed in the present study for the determination of DPD activity in nucleated cells of peripheral blood and pharmacokinetic analysis of 5-FU and 5-FDHU in humans. 5-FU and 5-FDHU were extracted from biologic matrices by adding sodium acetate, sodium sulfate, and diethyl ether/propanol. Dried samples were reconstituted in a mobile phase (KH2PO4 35 mmol/L, pH 4.0), isocratically eluted with a Hypersil C18 stationary phase (25 cm x 4.6 mm, 10 microm), and detected by a diode array detector (measurement and reference wavelengths, 215 and 360 nm, respectively). 5-Fluorocytosine (internal standard), 5-FDHU, and 5-FU were eluted within 13 minutes of the injection without interferences. Recoveries ranged between 81% to 85% for all compounds, and the method proved to be linear, with a coefficient of linearity of 0.999. The limits of detection and quantification were 3.2 and 16 ng/mL, respectively, and the within-day and between-day CV were less than 10% for both 5-FU and 5-FDHU. The present assay proved to be sufficiently sensitive and specific to evaluate cellular DPD activity and measure 5-FU and 5-FDHU plasma concentrations in cancer patients, thus allowing therapeutic 5-FU monitoring in patients and identification of DPD-deficient subjects at major risk of severe toxicities.