Lamotrigine in children and adolescents: the impact of age on its serum concentrations and on the extent of drug interactions

Redefining the age-specific therapeutic ranges of lamotrigine for patients with epilepsy: A step towards optimizing treatment and increasing cost-effectiveness

OBJECTIVE

The pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine exhibits age-related characteristics. Nevertheless, current evidence regarding the therapeutic range of lamotrigine has been derived almost exclusively from studies in adult patients, and the applicability of this therapeutic range to the pediatric population remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to establish the appropriate age-specific therapeutic ranges of lamotrigine corresponding to adequate clinical responses for patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study of therapeutic drug monitoring included 582 Chinese epilepsy patients receiving lamotrigine monotherapy. Patients were divided into three age-related subgroups: (1) toddler and school-age group (2-12 years old, n = 168), (2) adolescent group (12-18 years old, n = 171), and (3) adult group (>18 years old, n = 243). Patients with a reduction in seizure frequency of 50 % or greater than baseline were defined as responders, and the remaining patients were non-responders. The relationship between lamotrigine serum concentrations and clinical response was assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated to determine the representative cut-off values of lamotrigine trough levels, to distinguish responders from non-responders. The upper margin of the therapeutic range of lamotrigine was determined by developing concentration-effect curves for the three age-related subgroups.

RESULTS

The median trough levels of lamotrigine were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders from all three age-related groups (P < 0.0001). Results of logistic regression analysis revealed that higher serum concentrations of lamotrigine predicted a higher probability that seizure frequency would be reduced by more than 50 % compared to baseline (adjusted odds ratio: 1.228, 95 % CI: 1.137-1.327; P < 0.0001), and younger children were less likely to be responders (adjusted odds ratio: 1.027, 95 % CI: 1.012-1.043; P = 0.001). Based on a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity, the optimal cut-off values for lamotrigine trough concentrations corresponding to clinical response were 3.29 mg/L, 2.06 mg/L, and 1.61 mg/L in the toddler and school-age group, adolescent group, and adult group, respectively. By reducing interpatient variability, the results of the concentration-effect curves suggested no additional clinical benefit from a continued increase of doses for lamotrigine concentrations exceeding 9.08 mg/L, 8.43 mg/L, and 10.38 mg/L in the toddler and school-age group, adolescent group, and adult group, respectively. In conclusion, the therapeutic ranges of lamotrigine trough concentrations corresponding to adequate clinical response were 3.29-9.08 mg/L in the toddler and school-age group, 2.06-8.43 mg/L in the adolescent group, and 1.61-10.38 mg/L in the adult group.

CONCLUSIONS

The study determined age-specific therapeutic ranges corresponding to optimal clinical efficacy for lamotrigine. Our findings lay the foundation for catalyzing novel opportunities to optimize treatment and reduce therapeutic costs. Based on the age-specific therapeutic ranges identified in this study, individualized and cost-effective algorithms for lamotrigine treatment of epilepsy patients may be developed and validated in larger cohort studies of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Population Pharmacokinetics Modeling of Lamotrigine in Jordanian Epileptic Patients Using Dried Blood Spot Sampling

AIMS

To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine in Jordanian epileptic patients and to identify factors affecting therapeutic parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A population pharmacokinetics model for lamotrigine was established based on a prospectively collected data of 52 steady-state concentrations from 38 adult and pediatric patients with epilepsy. Lamotrigine concentrations were determined by a dried blood spot liquid chromatography method. Data were analyzed according to a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination using the nonlinear mixed effect modeling program. The covariates effect of total body weight, gender, age, and co-medication with topiramate, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and valproic acid on lamotrigine clearance were investigated using a stepwise forward addition followed by a stepwise backward elimination.

RESULTS

The final population pharmacokinetics model for lamotrigine clearance was as follows: CL/F_pop=θ₁*exp ^(θ3*age)*exp ^{(θ5*carbamazepine)}*exp ^{(θ6*valproic acid)} , where θ₁ is the relative clearance (L/hr) estimated, and θ₃, θ₅, and θ₆ are the fixed parameters relating to age and co-medication with carbamazepine and valproic acid, respectively.The population mean value of lamotrigine total clearance generated in the final model (with covariates) was 2.12 L/hr. Inter-individual variability and residual unexplained variability expressed as the coefficient of variation was 37.1 and 26.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Lamotrigine total clearance in the Jordanian patients is comparable to that reported by others for Caucasian patients. Age and concomitant therapy with carbamazepine and valproic acid significantly affected lamotrigine clearance, and accounted for 48% of its inter-individual variability.

Effect of Age-Related Factors on the Pharmacokinetics of Lamotrigine and Potential Implications for Maintenance Dose Optimisation in Future Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In this study, we evaluate the performance of allometric concepts to predict the implications of age and size on the pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine, and assess the dose rationale across different age groups from 0.2 to 91 years.

METHODS

An allometrically scaled pharmacokinetic model was developed using adolescent and adult data, taking into account the effect of comedications. Model parameters were then used to extrapolate lamotrigine pharmacokinetics to older adults (> 65 years), children (4-12 years) and infants and toddlers (0.2-2.0 years). In addition, simulations were performed to identify the implication of different doses and dosing regimens for each population, so as to ensure steady-state concentrations within a predefined reference range.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine was best described using a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Carbamazepine, phenytoin, and valproic acid changed systemic clearance (CL) by + 76.5, + 129, and - 47.4%, respectively. Allometric principles allowed accurate extrapolation of disposition parameters to older adults and children older than 4 years of age. A maturation function was required to describe changes in exposure in younger patients. Compared with adults, a child aged 1.7 years has a 31.5% higher CL, after correcting for body weight. Patients > 65 years of age showed a decrease in CL of approximately 15%.

CONCLUSION

Population pharmacokinetic models are usually limited to a subgroup of patients, which may mask the identification of factors contributing to interindividual variability. The availability of an integrated model including the whole patient population provides insight into the role of age-related changes in the disposition of lamotrigine, and potential implications for maintenance dose optimisation in any future trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

According to GlaxoSmithKline's Clinical Trial Register, data from the GlaxoSmithKline studies LAM100034 and LEP103944, corresponding to ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT00113165 and NCT00264615, used in this work, have been used in previous publications (doi: https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000277698.33743.8b , https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01274.x ).

The need for contraception in patients taking prescription drugs: a review of FDA warning labels, duration of effects, and mechanisms of action

Introduction: This review provides a guide for the rational use of prescription drugs in patients of reproductive age. Areas covered: A comprehensive retrieval of the labels of FDA-approved drugs was performed to identify drugs where the label recommends contraceptive use during and/or after treatment. The acquired data were analyzed and organized into a table. Contraception was recommended or mandated for 268 single-ingredient drugs. These could be divided into four main categories, with many having effects across several categories: 177 drugs required contraception because they were associated with pregnancy loss or stillbirth, 177 drugs were associated with teratogenesis, 136 were associated with non-teratogenic adverse peri- or postnatal effects on the fetus (e.g. low birth weight), and 44 were associated with decreased efficacy of contraception or a change in ovulatory cycle. We also discuss the period of time contraception is required, as well as the known or hypothesized reasons for the reproductive toxicity of these agents. Expert opinion: We have provided a comprehensive overview of the FDA-approved drugs where the warning labels currently stipulate that contraception should be used. Although other references are available for clinicians, this review provides a useful source of information regarding the single-ingredient prescription drugs that may affect the outcome of pregnancy. This information is particularly relevant for researchers, as it provides an overview of the different drugs with reproductive toxicity, and because it highlights the specific needs for future research. In particular, more work (especially epidemiological studies) is needed to clarify the clinical relevance of these findings, most of which were obtained through animal studies.

The Effectiveness of Lamotrigine and Its Blood Levels for Pediatric Epilepsy

This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of lamotrigine (LTG) over 2 years and the usefulness of measuring its blood levels during the follow-up of patients with epilepsy. We measured peak blood LTG levels of 32 patients with epilepsy (9.16 ± 3.34 years old; mean ± SD). The blood levels were measured at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after reaching the LTG maintenance dosage. The effectiveness of LTG was evaluated to determine the seizure reduction rate. The patients were classified as effective cases (mean of own seizure reduction rates >50%) and ineffective cases (≤50%). The results were that the dosage and blood level showed positive correlations in the case of combination use with sodium valproate (VPA) (r = 0.690), carbamazepine and/or phenobarbital (r = 0.940), and others (r = 0.548). In several groups, the blood levels and efficacies did not show any positive correlations. In the cases of combination use with VPA, the blood levels of effective cases and ineffective cases were significantly different (P = 0.001). The optimal range was 8-11.5 μg/mL based on the average and SD values in the effective cases. No patients had any side effects. In conclusion, no precise definition of the therapeutic range was possible because of the incomplete correlation between the blood level and seizure frequency. We recommend the optimal range of LTG as a therapeutic target without any side effects, and it was established that the range in the combination with VPA was 8-11.5 μg/mL.

Oxcarbazepine oral suspension in pediatric patients with partial seizures and/or generalized tonic-clonic seizures: a multi-center, single arm, observational study in China

BACKGROUND

To assess efficacy and safety of oxcarbazepine (OXC) oral suspension in pediatric patients aged 2-16 years with partial seizures (PS) and/or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) in real-world clinical practice in China.

METHODS

This 26-week, single arm, multicenter and observational study recruited patients aged 2-16 years with PS or GTCS suitable for OXC oral suspension treatment. Enrolled patients received OXC oral suspension treatment for 26 weeks. Primary endpoints included mean seizure frequency at the end of the treatment and mean seizure frequency reduction at the end of the treatment vs. baseline. Secondary efficacy-related endpoints and safety parameters were also assessed.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and eighty-seven pediatric patients were enrolled and 912 (92.4%) completed the study. The mean seizure frequencies at baseline and the end of week 26 were 13.40±64.92 and 1.62±19.47 times/ month, respectively. The mean seizure frequency reduction was 10.03±63.67 times/month and the mean seizure frequency reduction percentage was 90.02%±5127.0% (P<0.0001). After 26 weeks of treatment, 82.36%, 7.24% and 3.86% of the patients became controlled, significantly improved and improved, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 74 (7.65%) patients. Rash was the most common AE. The efficacy of OXC was not affected by seizure types, age or gender.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the efficacy and good safety profile of OXC oral suspension in Chinese pediatric patients aged 2-16 years with PS and/or GTCS.

The Impact of Pharmacokinetic Interactions With Eslicarbazepine Acetate Versus Oxcarbazepine and Carbamazepine in Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new anti-epileptic drug (AED) chemically related to oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) and is increasingly used in clinical practice. The purpose of the study was to investigate 2-way pharmacokinetic interactions between ESL and other AEDs as compared to OXC and CBZ.

METHODS

Anonymous data regarding age, gender, use of AEDs, daily doses and serum concentration measurements of ESL, OXC, CBZ and lamotrigine (LTG) and other AEDs were retrieved from 2 therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) databases in Norway. Drugs were categorized according to their known potential for interactions. Concentration/dose (C/D) ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

Data from 1100 patients were available. The C/D ratios of ESL and OXC were unchanged in combination with enzyme-inducing AEDs or valproate (VPA). The C/D ratio of CBZ decreased by 40% and 22% in combination with other enzyme-inducing AEDs or VPA, respectively, pointing to an increased clearance. ESL demonstrated no significant enzyme-inducing effect on LTG metabolism although there was a 20% and 34% decrease in the C/D ratio of LTG in combination with OXC and CBZ, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Possible pharmacokinetic interactions have been studied for ESL as compared to OXC and CBZ. The pharmacokinetics of ESL is not affected by enzyme-inducing AEDs or VPA and does not affect the metabolism of LTG in contrast to OXC and CBZ. The study demonstrates the value of using TDM databases to explore the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions of new AEDs.

The effects of co-medications on lamotrigine clearance in Japanese children with epilepsy

PURPOSE

Although it has been reported that some antiepileptic drugs have inducing or inhibiting effects on lamotrigine (LTG) clearance, whether they have the same effects in Asian epilepsy patients as in those in other countries has not been clarified, especially in children. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of co-medications on LTG clearance in Japanese children with epilepsy.

METHODS

A total of 342 routine serum concentration measurements of LTG in 102 Japanese epilepsy patients under 20years of age were reviewed. The dose-corrected concentration (DCC) of LTG was calculated as [concentration]/[dose/(body weight)], and the DCC of LTG was compared by co-medication. The difference in the DCC of LTG was compared between patients with and without valproic acid (VPA) and between those with and without drugs inducing glucuronic acid conjugation (phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), and phenobarbital (PB)).

RESULTS

The DCC of LTG was significantly higher in patients on VPA and significantly lower in patients on drugs inducing glucuronic acid conjugation than in patients on LTG monotherapy. The DCC of LTG was significantly higher in patients on CBZ than in patients on PHT or PB. There was no correlation between the DCC of LTG and the concentration of VPA or metabolic inducers within the therapeutic range. Other antiepileptic drugs including clobazam, clonazepam, zonisamide, and levetiracetam had little effect on LTG concentration.

CONCLUSION

LTG concentration changes dramatically with concomitant antiepileptic drugs in Japanese children, as previously reported from other countries, and special attention is required. Although the dose of LTG should be adjusted when starting or discontinuing VPA or metabolic inducers, no adjustment is needed when changing the dose of VPA or metabolic inducers in the therapeutic range.

Pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine and its metabolite N-2-glucuronide: Influence of polymorphism of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and drug transporters

AIMS

This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for quantitative evaluation of the influence of genetic variants in metabolic enzymes and transporters on lamotrigine pharmacokinetics while taking into account the influence of various clinical, biochemical and demographic factors.

METHODS

We included 100 patients with epilepsy on stable dosing with lamotrigine as mono or adjunctive therapy. Lamotrigine and lamotrigine N-2-glucuronide concentrations were determined in up to two plasma samples per patient. Patients were genotyped for UGT1A4, UGT2B7, ABCB1 and SLC22A1. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by non-linear mixed effects modelling. Prior knowledge from previous pharmacokinetic studies was incorporated to stabilize the modelling process. A parent-metabolite model was developed to get a more detailed view on the covariate effects on lamotrigine metabolism.

RESULTS

With a base model absorption rate (interindividual variability) was estimated at 1.96 h(-1) (72.8%), oral clearance at 2.32 l h(-1) (41.4%) and distribution volume at 77.6 l (30.2%). Lamotrigine clearance was associated with genetic factors, patient's weight, renal function, smoking and co-treatment with enzyme inducing or inhibiting drugs. In patients with UGT2B7-161TT genotype clearance was lower compared with GT and GG genotypes. Clearance was particularly high in patients with UGT2B7 372 GG genotype (compared with AA genotype it was 117%; 95% CI 44.8, 247% higher).

CONCLUSIONS

Variability in lamotrigine pharmacokinetics is large and quantification of its sources may lead to more precise individual treatment. Genotyping for UGT2B7 may be useful in various clinical settings.

Development and validation of a HPLC-UV method for the quantification of antiepileptic drugs in dried plasma spots

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiepileptic drugs is widely used in clinical practice to optimise therapy, but it is limited by technical problems and cost considerations. The aim of the present study was: 1) to validate a chromatographic method for the concomitant determination of levetiracetam, lamotrigine, ethosuximide, felbamate, rufinamide, zonisamide and monohydroxycarbamazepine; 2) to develop it for dried plasma spot (DPS) assessing its reliability against the classical determination from plasma; and 3) test its clinical application.

METHODS

Extraction of plasma samples and DPS was done by simple precipitation. Chromatographic analysis was performed using high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. After validation, both methods were applied for the quantification of plasma samples from patients on antiepileptic therapy.

RESULTS

Mean inter- and intra-day accuracy and precision were <15% for all compounds both in plasma and in DPS samples. DPS samples were considered stable under tested conditions. Measurements between plasma and DPS samples appeared related (p<0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed accordance in lamotrigine values with mean overestimation of concentration for DPS sample of 2.8%. Also for monohydroxycarbamazepine data the agreement was acceptable (mean overestimation of 9.2%). For levetiracetam mean difference was 7.6%, while for ethosuximide mean percentage difference was 20.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed methods simplify TDM of antiepileptic drugs. This is particularly relevant for the method on dried spot sample devices because it facilitates further sample handling, stability and shipments making the management of therapies in epileptic patients easier also in hospitals devoid of a dedicated laboratory.

Influence of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase inducers and inhibitors on the plasma lamotrigine concentration in pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy

This study evaluated the influence of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the plasma concentration of lamotrigine (LTG) in pediatric patients with epilepsy. We retrospectively reviewed 1653 plasma samples from 709 patients (aged 6 months to 16 years) and compared the concentration-to-dose ratio (CD ratio) of LTG among different AED regimens. The median CD ratio of patients receiving LTG monotherapy was 1.25 μg/mL/mg/kg. In patients receiving LTG plus VPA, the CD ratio was increased by about 140%. The CD ratio was elevated from a low VPA concentration (<40 μg/mL) and the increase was VPA concentration-dependent. In contrast, the median CD ratio of patients treated with LTG plus the inducers phenytoin, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine was 0.42, 0.63, and 0.66, respectively, and phenytoin significantly reduced the CD ratio in comparison with phenobarbital or carbamazepine (p < 0.001). Pediatric patients of all ages beyond infancy showed similar susceptibility to VPA or inducers, but infants had higher CD ratios compared with the other age groups. Among other AEDs, topiramate, ethosuximide, and rufinamide reduced the CD ratio. These findings should be useful for estimating interactions between LTG and concomitant AEDs.

The effects of antiepileptic inducers in neuropsychopharmacology, a neglected issue. Part I: A summary of the current state for clinicians

The literature on inducers in epilepsy and bipolar disorder is seriously contaminated by false negative findings. This is part i of a comprehensive review on antiepileptic drug (AED) inducers using both mechanistic pharmacological and evidence-based medicine to provide practical recommendations to neurologists and psychiatrists concerning how to control for them. Carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin, are clinically relevant AED inducers; correction factors were calculated for studied induced drugs. These correction factors are rough simplifications for orienting clinicians, since there is great variability in the population regarding inductive effects. As new information is published, the correction factors may need to be modified. Some of the correction factors are so high that the drugs (e.g., bupropion, quetiapine or lurasidone) should not co-prescribed with potent inducers. Clobazam, eslicarbazepine, felbamate, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, rufinamide, topiramate, vigabatrin and valproic acid are grouped as mild inducers which may (i)be inducers only in high doses; (ii)frequently combine with inhibitory properties; and (iii)take months to reach maximum effects or de-induction, definitively longer than the potent inducers. Potent inducers, definitively, and mild inducers, possibly, have relevant effects in the endogenous metabolism of (i)sexual hormones, (ii) vitamin D, (iii)thyroid hormones, (iv)lipid metabolism, and (v)folic acid.

Effects of UGT1A4 genetic polymorphisms on serum lamotrigine concentrations in Chinese children with epilepsy

Lamotrigine (LTG) is widely used in the treatment of children with epilepsy. Genetic polymorphisms in genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes may be an important source of interindividual variability in LTG metabolism. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of genetic polymorphisms of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A4 (UGT1A4) gene on LTG serum concentrations in children with epilepsy. The UGT1A4 142T > G in the coding regions and -219C > T/-163G > A in the 5'-upstream regions were genotyped using polymerase chain reaction amplification followed by direct automated DNA sequencing in 148 patients treated with polytherapy with LTG and valproic acid (VPA). Our data showed that patients carrying the variant UGT1A4 -219C > T/-163G > A genotypes or alleles had significantly higher adjusted LTG concentrations than those carrying the wild-type genotypes or alleles. However, the significant association was abrogated after adjusted by age, body weight, and adjusted VPA concentration. No associations were detected between the UGT1A4 142T > G genotypes or alleles and adjusted LTG concentrations. Taken together, these results suggest that the -219C > T/-163G > A mutations in the 5'-upstream regions of the UGT1A4 gene affect LTG pharmacokinetics, with which is potentially interfered by age, body weight, and concomitant VPA administration.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of new-generation antiepileptic drugs at the extremes of age: an update

Epilepsies occur across the entire age range, and their incidence peaks in the first years of life and in the elderly. Therefore, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are commonly used at the extremes of age. Rational prescribing in these age groups requires not only an understanding of the drugs' pharmacodynamic properties, but also careful consideration of potential age-related changes in their pharmacokinetic profile. The present article, which updates a review published in 2006 in this journal, focuses on recent findings on the pharmacokinetics of new-generation AEDs in neonates, infants, children, and the elderly. Significant new information on the pharmacokinetics of new AEDs in the perinatal period has been acquired, particularly for lamotrigine and levetiracetam. As a result of slow maturation of the enzymes involved in glucuronide conjugation, lamotrigine elimination occurs at a particularly slow rate in neonates, and becomes gradually more efficient during the first months of life. In the case of levetiracetam, elimination occurs primarily by renal excretion and is also slow at birth, but drug clearance increases rapidly thereafter and can even double within 1 week. In general, infants older than 2-3 months and children show higher drug clearance (normalized for body weight) than adults. This pattern was confirmed in recent studies that investigated the pediatric pharmacokinetics of several new AEDs, including levetiracetam, rufinamide, stiripentol, and eslicarbazepine acetate. At the other extreme of age, in the elderly, drug clearance is generally reduced compared with younger adults because of less efficient drug-metabolizing activity, decreased renal function, or both. This general pattern, described previously for several AEDs, was confirmed in recent studies on the effect of old age on the clearance of felbamate, levetiracetam, pregabalin, lacosamide, and retigabine. For those drugs which are predominantly eliminated by renal excretion, aging-related pharmacokinetic changes could be predicted by measuring creatinine clearance (CLCR). Overall, most recent findings confirm that age is a major factor influencing the pharmacokinetic profile of AEDs. However, pharmacokinetic variability at any age can be considerable, and the importance of other factors should not be disregarded. These include genetic factors, co-morbidities, and drug interactions, particularly those caused by concomitantly administered AEDs which induce or inhibit drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine in paediatric and young adult epileptic patients--nonlinear mixed effects modelling approach

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to examine and describe adjunctive lamotrigine (LTG) pharmacokinetics in paediatric and young adult patients using a nonlinear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM) approach.

METHODS

The study included 53 patients (age range 3-35 years) who were concomitantly treated with carbamazepine (CBZ) and/or valproic acid (VPA). A total of 70 blood samples corresponding to trough levels were available for analysis. Data were modelled, and the final model was evaluated using NONMEM and auxiliary software tools.

RESULTS

The final LTG population model included the effects of concomitant drugs and patient's weight (WT) which stratified the population into three groups: ≤25 kg, >25 to <60 kg and ≥60 kg. Based on the final model, the estimated LTG oral clearance (CL/F) for a typical patient weighing ≤25 kg, >25 to <60 kg or ≥60 kg who was concomitantly treated with CBZ was estimated to be 3.28, 4.23, or 7.15 l/h, respectively. If a patient was concomitantly treated with CBZ + VPA, the CL/F decreased on average by 69.5 % relative to LTG + CBZ co-therapy. VPA was found to decrease the LTG CL/F by 87.6 % compared to co-therapy with only CBZ.

CONCLUSION

The LTG population pharmacokinetic model developed in this study may be a reliable method for individualising the LTG dosing regimen in paediatric and young adult patients on combination therapy during therapeutic drug monitoring.

Pharmacokinetic variability of four newer antiepileptic drugs, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate: a comparison of the impact of age and comedication

BACKGROUND

Newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are widely used in patients with epilepsy. There is still insufficient documentation regarding pharmacokinetic variability of these AEDs in different patient groups.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare age and comedication as factors contributing to pharmacokinetic variability between 4 newer AEDs (lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate) among patients with refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

Data regarding age, gender, use of AEDs, daily doses, and serum concentration measurements were retrieved from a therapeutic drug monitoring database, from patients admitted to the National Center for Epilepsy, Norway, 2007-2008.

RESULTS

In total, 1050 patients were included, 111 younger children (2-9 years), 137 older children (10-17 years), 720 adults (18-64 years), 82 elderly (65-93 years). Fifty percent of the patients were prescribed polytherapy, in 88 different combinations. The interindividual pharmacokinetic variability was extensive, as illustrated by a 10-fold variability in serum concentration compared with dose. Age affected the apparent clearance of levetiracetam to the largest extent, as shown by a 60% increase in younger children and a 40% reduction in the elderly, respectively, compared with adults. Comedication altered the clearance of lamotrigine to the greatest extent ±70% because it is affected by both enzyme inducers and inhibitors. Hepatic enzyme inducers increased the clearance of levetiracetam and topiramate by 25% and oxcarbazepine by 75%. Valproic acid reduced the clearance of topiramate by 25%.

CONCLUSION

Age and comedication are important contributors to pharmacokinetic variability. Age had the greatest impact on levetiracetam, and comedication affected the clearance of each of the 4 AEDs investigated in this study. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions must be carefully considered when multidrug therapies are prescribed. Therapeutic drug monitoring is a valuable tool for individualizing AED therapy.

Impact of age, weight and concomitant treatment on lamotrigine pharmacokinetics

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Lamotrigine metabolism may be substantially altered with concomitant administration of valproic acid and/or carbamazepine. Such alterations may require the adjustment of lamotrigine dose to ensure optimal treatment efficacy and safety.

METHODS

The extent of lamotrigine interactions was investigated dependent on age, gender, weight and dose of concomitant carbamazepine and/or valproic acid in 65 patients with epilepsy. Lamotrigine plasma steady-state oral clearance (CLss/F) and area under the curve (AUCss) were calculated from the dose of drug, average steady-state concentration (Css) and interval of administration. Multiple regression analysis was used for the identification and quantification of factors that influenced lamotrigine pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Age and dose of carbamazepine and valproic acid had significant influence on lamotrigine CLss/F and AUCss. Carbamazepine was associated with a dose-dependent increase and valproic acid with a dose-dependent decrease of lamotrigine metabolism rate. The effect of carbamazepine was more pronounced. Younger patients were expected to metabolize lamotrigine more rapidly whereas overweight patients may be less susceptible to interactions. Gender had no influence on lamotrigine pharmacokinetics.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of lamotrigine may be altered by concomitant administration of carbamazepine and valproic acid. The models developed may be useful for estimating doses of lamotrigine for individual patients to minimize clinically significant interactions. Therapeutic monitoring is advisable when those drugs are used concomitantly.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between clobazam and drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate potential drug-drug interactions between clobazam and cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme substrates, inhibitors, and inducers.

DESIGN

Two, prospective, open-label, single-center, drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies and a population pharmacokinetics analysis of seven multicenter phase II-III trials.

SETTING

Clinical research unit.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-four healthy adult volunteers were enrolled in the two drug-drug interaction studies; 53 completed the studies. The population pharmacokinetics analysis evaluated data from 171 participants from five studies with healthy volunteers and two studies with patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Participants in these studies received clobazam and stable dosages of the following antiepileptic drugs: phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine, valproic acid, lamotrigine, felbamate, or oxcarbazepine.

INTERVENTION

In the first drug-drug interaction study, 36 participants received a single oral dose of clobazam 10 mg on day 1, followed by either ketoconazole 400 mg once/day or omeprazole 40 mg once/day on days 17-22, with a single dose of clobazam 10 mg coadministered on day 22, to study the effects of CYP3A4 or CYP2C19 inhibition, respectively, on clobazam and its active metabolite N-desmethylclobazam (N-CLB). In the second study, 18 participants received a drug cocktail consisting of caffeine 200 mg, tolbutamide 500 mg, dextromethorphan 30 mg, and midazolam 4 mg on days 1 and 19, and clobazam 40 mg/day on days 4-19, to study clobazam's effects on CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In the first DDI study, coadministration of ketoconazole (a CYP3A4 inhibitor) and clobazam increased clobazam's area under the concentration time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-∞) ) 54% and decreased clobazam's maximum plasma concentration (C(max) ) by 15% versus administration of clobazam alone, but the combination affected these pharmacokinetic parameters for N-CLB to a lesser degree. The CYP2C19 inhibitor omeprazole increased AUC(0-∞) and C(max) of N-CLB by 36% and 15%, respectively, but did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of clobazam. At steady state, N-CLB has 3-4 times greater exposure than clobazam. In the second DDI study, no clinically significant drug-drug interactions were observed between clobazam 40 mg and the CYP probe substrates caffeine or tolbutamide. Exposure to midazolam and its 1-hydroxymidazolam metabolite, however, decreased by 27% and increased 4-fold, respectively. Clobazam increased dextromethorphan (CYP2D6) AUC(0-∞) by 95% and C(max) by 59%. In the population pharmacokinetics analysis, stable dosages of common antiepileptic drugs that induce CYP3A4 or CYP2C19, or inhibit CYP2C19, had negligible effects on clobazam or N-CLB. Clobazam did not affect valproic acid or lamotrigine exposures.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest no clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions between clobazam and drugs metabolized by CYP3A4, CYP2C19, CYP1A2, or CYP2C9. Concomitant use of drugs metabolized by CYP2D6 may require dosage adjustment. Clobazam may be administered safely as adjunctive therapy in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, without meaningful changes in clobazam pharmacokinetics that would require dosage adjustment.

Value of therapeutic drug monitoring in epilepsy

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has made it possible to study the individual variations in drug utilization, to reveal noncompliance in patients and for quality assurance aspects. Even if there is a shortage of data from randomized controlled studies concerning the effectiveness of using TDM as an aid to dosage adjustment, experience from nonrandomized investigations and long-lasting clinical experience have shown that TDM of both older and newer AEDs may be of clinical benefit if used appropriately. The main situations for TDM include: after starting treatment to provide a baseline steady-state concentration for further evaluation of an individual therapeutic concentration; after change in drug dosage, in particular when nonlinear kinetics apply; at therapeutic failure to sort out a pharmacokinetic explanation for uncontrolled seizures or side effects; in case of drug interactions; and when pharmacokinetic changes due to physiological or pathological changes are foreseen (e.g., age-dependent conditions [children, elderly], pregnancy, hepatic disease, renal disease or gastrointestinal conditions potentially affecting drug absorption) and change in drug formulation (brand name/generic). Recently, new terminology and definitions have been suggested by the International League Against Epilepsy. The reference range is a range of drug concentrations quoted by laboratories and is not a therapeutic range. Emphasis should be placed on the concept of an individual therapeutic concentration.