Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Efficacy of Gefitinib and Methorexate in Patients With Advanced Stage and Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Gefitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-blocking drug that is effective in the treatment of lung cancer with EGFR mutations; however, its benefits for head and neck cancers are uncertain. Therefore, this study aims to determine the efficacy of gefitinib and methotrexate in patients with advanced-stage or recurrent head and neck cancer.

METHODOLOGY

Two hundred patients of age >18 years with advanced clinical stage either IVA or IVB and recurrent cases were included in this study. Patients were randomly allocated to the gefitinib (n=100) or methotrexate (n=100) group. Each patient was evaluated for demographic variables, addictions, comorbidities and history of cancer followed by clinical and radiological evaluation. Treatment response was evaluated with standard Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The primary end point of the study was overall response rate (ORR). SPSS version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to analyze data.

RESULTS

Overall response of therapy was partial 11% vs 8%, stable disease 52% vs 40%, and progressive disease 33% vs 40% in gefitinib and methotrexate groups respectively. Three patients were lost to follow up in the gefitinib group and one patient in the methotrexate group. Only one death was reported in the gefitinib group and four in the methotrexate group. In recurrent cases, six patients treated with gefitinib showed partial response whereas no case of partial response was reported in the methotrexate group (27.3% vs 0%). Similarly, in the methotrexate group significantly higher numbers of progressive and stable diseases were reported for recurrent cases than in the gefitinib group (p=0.045).

DISCUSSION

Gefitinib had marginally better results in terms of overall response and safety as compared to methotrexate, specifically in recurrent cases of head and neck cancer. This benefit for recurrent cases and ease of administration, leading to fewer hospital visits in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era, makes gefitinib superior to methotrexate.

Efficacy and Safety of Gefitinib in Patients with Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Trials on assessing the benefits of EGFR inhibitors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients have gradually been published. Nevertheless, the benefits of gefitinib in advanced HNSCC are still unknown.

Methods

The Cochrane library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases were systematically searched from the inception dates to 17 July 2017, 18 July 2017, and 19 July 2017, respectively. The keywords "head and neck" and gefitinib were used to retrieve in articles and abstracts. An additional search for recently published randomized trials was performed from July 17, 2017, to April 18, 2018. Then we assessed the risk of bias of the included studies based on the Cochrane "Risk of Bias" tool. Quantitative analysis was carried out to evaluate the overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3-4 adverse effects by Review Manager 5.0.2 and the quality-of-life was analyzed in the included studies.

Results

Seven randomized controlled trials and a total number of 1287 patients were involved. There were no significant differences in OS, PFS, or ORR between gefitinib and no gefitinib group (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.22, and P=0.35; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.04, and P=0.11; RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.20, and P =0.60, respectively). However, gefitinib alone was equivalent to chemotherapeutics (i.e., methotrexate; methotrexate + fluorouracil) in ORR in patients with recurrent HNSCC, and a trend of improvement in QOL in gefitinib group was showed. Toxicities revealed no differences except for diarrhea and skin toxicity (p=0.0003; p=0.03, respectively).

Conclusion

For patients with advanced HNSCC, gefitinib cannot prolong the OS and PFS or improve ORR, and odds of skin toxicity and diarrhea increased. However, gefitinib alone is equivalent to methotrexate or methotrexate + fluorouracil and tends to improve QOL for recurrent patients.

Meta-analysis of the effects of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor on recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy and non-anti-EGFR therapy in recurrent/metastatic (RM) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

The Cochrane library, WanFang Data, PubMed, Medline, VIP, CBM, and EBSCO databases were searched for relevant studies. The objective response rate (ORR, defined as complete response or partial response according to RECTST version 1.1) and grade 3 to 4 adverse effects were used.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 2260 patients were included. Primary meta-analysis showed that anti-EGFR therapy improved the ORR [odds ratio (OR): 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.44-2.21, P <.00001]. Subgroup analyses revealed that the ORR of patients with RM HNSCC could be improved by monoclonal antibodies (OR: 1.89, 1.46-2.45, P <.00001) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (OR: 1.57, 1.07-2.31, P = .02). Analysis of grade 3 to 4 adverse effects demonstrated that diarrhea (3.15, [1.90, 5.20]), rash/desquamation (13.66, [6.86, 27.20]), hypomagnesemia (1.83, [1.28, 2.62]), vomiting (1.99, [1.00, 3.95]), anorexia (3.34, [1.45, 7.73]), dehydration (2.22, [1.19, 4.12]), and hypokalemia (1.63, [1.09, 2.42]) were significantly associated with anti-EGFR therapy.

CONCLUSION

Anti-EGFR therapy is recommended for patients with RM HNSCC. Adverse effects, such as diarrhea, anorexia, hypomagnesemia, and hypokalemia, should be carefully monitored during anti-EGFR therapy.

Systemic therapy in the curative treatment of head and neck squamous cell cancer: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To review the available evidence and make recommendations regarding use of systemically administered drugs in combination or in sequence with radiation (RT) and/or surgery for cure and/or organ preservation in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic (Stage III to IVB) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LASCCHN).

METHOD

Recognizing the Meta-analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer (MACH-NC) group reports have de facto guided practice since 2000, we searched for systematic reviews in the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published from January 2000 to February 2015 in reference to 4 research questions. A search was also conducted for randomized trials (RCTs) up to February 2015 not included in the meta-analyses.

RESULT

The MACH-NC reports, 5 additional meta-analyses, and 30 RCTs not included by MACH-NC were identified. For chemotherapy, MACH-NC findings showing improved overall survival with concomitant chemoRT did not require modification. High-dose cisplatin was most commonly studied. We confirmed this benefit with cisplatin monotherapy in patients treated with with postoperative concurrent chemoRT. Other than cetuximab, no targeted agents and radiosensitizers studied in RCTs were shown effective. TPF induction chemotherapy was superior to PF for tumor response and larynx preservation but not survival. Larynx preservation was reported with both CRT and induction chemotherapy approaches.

CONCLUSION

ChemoRT with cisplatin at least 40 mg/m2 per week given as radical or postoperative adjuvant remains a standard treatment approach for LASCCHN that improves overall survival but increases toxicity. 5-FU plus platinum is supported by less data but may be a reasonable alternative for patients unsuitable for cisplatin. Of note, stratification of outcomes by HPV-status was not available but outcomes for oropharynx cancer appeared similar to other subsites in chemoRT RCTs. No RCTs have yet demonstrated superiority or non-inferiority of cetuximab-RT to CRT. In view of this, cetuximab-RT is suggested only for patients not candidates for CRT. Taxane-based triplet induction chemotherapy is superior to doublets for rapid tumour downsizing and for larynx preservation, but does not improve overall survival and should be used with primary G-CSF prophylaxis. Further investigation of induction approaches for larynx preservation may be warranted.

Antitumor Efficacy of SLPI Promoter-Controlled Expression of Artificial microRNA Targeting EGFR in a Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Line

The purpose of this study was to develop a recombinant adenovirus with secretory leukoprotease inhibitor (SLPI) promoter-controlled expression for gene therapy of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). An artificial microRNA targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was designed, and used to construct a replication-defective recombinant adenovirus with SLPI promoter-controlled expression. The silencing efficiency of this vector (Ad-SLPI-EGFRamiR) was detected in Hep-2 cells. Western blotting showed that the expression of 170 kD EGFR was significantly reduced in Hep-2 cells 72 h after infection with Ad-SLPI-EGFRamiR. At a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 200 pfu/cell, proliferation of Hep-2 cells was highly inhibited by Ad-SLPI-EGFRamiR (inhibition rate: ~70%). The apoptosis rate of Hep-2 cells at 72 h after infection with Ad-SLPI-EGFRamiR at a MOI 35 pfu/cell was 32.8%. The adenovirus constructed was able to specifically inhibit the growth of SCC cells in vitro.

Role of EGFR as a prognostic factor for survival in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis

The prognostic role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains controversial. The goal of this study was to summarize existing evidence regarding whether EGFR overexpression is a prognostic factor in HNSCC. Relevant studies were identified using Pubmed, Ovid, and Web of Science databases. A meta-analysis was conducted on the prognostic value of EGFR expression for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Thirty-seven studies were included. Primary analysis indicated that EGFR overexpression was associated with reduced OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.694, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.432–2.004). DFS, on the other hand, was not associated with EGFR expression after adjusting for publication bias (HR: 1.084, 95% CI: 0.910–1.290). Subgroup analysis gave a statistically significant pooled HR for OS in laryngeal carcinoma (HR: 2.519, 95% CI: 1.615–3.928) and in oropharyngeal carcinoma (HR: 2.078, 95% CI: 1.605–2.690). The pooled HR was statistically significant for DFS with respect to oropharyngeal carcinoma (HR: 1.055, 95% CI: 1.020–1.092), but not laryngeal carcinoma (HR: 1.750, 95% CI: 0.911–3.360). When dividing studies based on the immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring system, only the group that evaluated EGFR expression according to the intensity and extent of staining showed no between-study heterogeneity for both OS and DFS. Overall, EGFR overexpression was associated with shortened OS, but not DFS. Future studies are needed that stratify patients by specific tumor sites. Furthermore, when estimating protein level by the IHC method, it is advisable to consider both intensity and extent of staining.

A novel extracellular drug conjugate significantly inhibits head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Despite advances in treatment modalities, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains a challenge to treat with poor survival and high morbidity, necessitating a therapy with greater efficacy. EDC22 is an extracellular drug conjugate of the monoclonal antibody targeting CD147 (glycoprotein highly expressed on HNSCC cells) linked with a small drug molecule inhibitor of Na, K-ATPase. In this study, EDC22's potential as a treatment modality for HNSCC was performed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HNSCC cell lines (FADU, OSC-19, Cal27, SCC-1) were cultured in vitro and proliferation and cell viability were assessed following treatment with a range of concentrations of EDC22 (0.25-5.00μg/mL). Mice bearing HNSCC xenografts (OSC-19, SCC-1) were treated with either EDC22 (3-10mg/kg), anti-CD147 monoclonal antibody, cisplatin (1mg/kg) or radiation therapy (2Gy/week) monotherapy or in combination.

RESULTS

In vitro, treatment with minimal concentration of EDC22 (0.25μg/mL) significantly decreased cellular proliferation and cell viability (p<0.0001). In vivo, systemic treatment with EDC22 significantly decreased primary tumor growth rate in both an orthotopic mouse model (OSC-19) and a flank tumor mouse model (SCC-1) (p<0.05). In addition, EDC22 therapy resulted in a greater reduction in tumor growth in vivo compared to radiation monotherapy (p<0.05) and a similar reduction in tumor growth compared to cisplatin monotherapy. Combination therapy provided no significant further reduction in tumor growth relative to EDC22 monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

EDC22 is a potent inhibitor of HNSCC cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, warranting further investigations of its clinical potential in the treatment of HNSCC.

Advances in the management of skin cancer

Skin cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in the world today in both humans and our pet population. Advances in molecular techniques are now affording us an opportunity to develop therapeutics targeted at specific cancer-related cellular pathways. However, despite progress in conventional treatments, such as chemotherapy and radiation, and the new targeted therapies, some cancers, such as melanoma and cutaneous lymphoma, continue to cause significant mortality and morbidity. This short synopsis is not complete but is aimed at providing an insight into current advanced treatments and horizon therapies for cutaneous malignancies in dogs and cats with comparative aspects.

At the crossroads: EGFR and PTHrP signaling in cancer-mediated diseases of bone

The epidermal growth factor receptor is a well-established cancer therapeutic target due to its stimulation of proliferation, motility, and resistance to apoptosis. Recently, additional roles for the receptor have been identified in growth of metastases. Similar to development, metastatic spread requires signaling interactions between epithelial-derived tumor cells and mesenchymal derivatives of the microenvironment. This necessitates reactivation of developmental signaling molecules, including the hypercalcemia factor parathyroid hormone-related protein. This review covers the variations of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in cancers that produce bone metastases, regulation of parathyroid hormone-related protein, and evidence that the two molecules drive cancer-mediated diseases of bone.