Population pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin in pediatric patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolaemia: Experience of a tertiary paediatric lipid clinic

AIM

To review the experience of a dedicated paediatric multidisciplinary lipid clinic in the management of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) by studying the demographics, clinical presentations as well as statin therapy and outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective database review of all patients under 18 years old seen in the lipid clinic at an Australian tertiary paediatric hospital between April 1999 and August 2017. Outcome measures collected included patient demographics, family history, lipid profile, age at treatment commencement, treatment outcomes and complications.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients (53 males) were seen in the lipid clinic. Eighty-five had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels at or above the 75th percentile for sex prior to treatment. Of these, 75 had a first-degree relative with hypercholesterolaemia and/or early cardiac death. Four patients had clinical manifestations. Thirty-two patients (14 males) were started on statin therapy for likely FH. LDL-C levels reduced by 2.4 mmol/L (1.4 to 2.7) in boys and 1.9 mmol/L (0.8 to 2.8) in girls at 12 month follow-up. Five patients reported side effects requiring adjustment in therapy. Main reasons for not starting statin therapy in eligible patients were parental refusal and/or lost to follow up (77%).

CONCLUSION

A dedicated multidisciplinary lipid clinic is helpful for streamlining and monitoring management of paediatric FH. Clinical manifestations of FH are rare in children and may represent more severe form of FH or other lipid disorder. Statin therapy is efficacious and well tolerated but current recommended targets of treatment are difficult to attain. Greater awareness and coordinated services are required to overcome poor family engagement.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modelling to Describe the Cholesterol Lowering Effect of Rosuvastatin in People Living with HIV

BACKGROUND

Rosuvastatin is a lipid-lowering agent widely prescribed in people living with HIV, which is actively transported into the liver, making it a potential victim of drug-drug interactions with antiretroviral agents.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to characterise the pharmacokinetic profile of rosuvastatin and to describe the relationship between rosuvastatin concentrations and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels in people living with HIV.

METHODS

A population pharmacokinetic model (NONMEM) was developed to quantify the influence of demographics, clinical characteristics and comedications on rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics. This model was combined with an indirect effect model to describe non-HDL-cholesterol measurements.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption best fitted the 154 rosuvastatin concentrations provided by 65 people living with HIV. None of the tested covariates significantly influenced rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics. A total of 403 non-HDL cholesterol values were available for pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling. Baseline non-HDL cholesterol decreased by 14% and increased by 12% with etravirine and antiretroviral drugs with a known impact on the lipid profile (i.e. protease inhibitors, efavirenz, cobicistat), respectively. The baseline value was surprisingly 43% lower in people living with HIV aged 80 years compared with those aged 40 years. Simulations based on the covariate-free model predicted that, under standard rosuvastatin dosages of 5 mg and 20 mg once daily, 31% and 64% of people living with HIV would achieve non-HDL-cholesterol targets, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The high between-subject variability that characterises both rosuvastatin pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles remained unexplained after the inclusion of usual covariates. Considering its limited potential for drug-drug interactions with antiretroviral agents and its potent lipid-lowering effect, rosuvastatin prescription appears safe and effective in people living with HIV with hypercholesterolaemia.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO

NCT03515772.

Atorvastatin inhibits osteoclastogenesis and arrests tooth movement

INTRODUCTION

In addition to their cholesterol-lowering effects, the statin class of drugs appears to enhance osteogenesis and suppress bone resorption, which could be a clinical concern during orthodontic treatment. In this animal study, we aimed to determine whether atorvastatin (ATV) affects orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) through osteoclast inhibition. Furthermore, we analyzed the potential adverse effects of ATV on long-bone turnover and endochondral ossification.

METHODS

Rats were administered ATV (15 mg/kg) or saline solution via gavage (n = 12 animals/group), starting 2 weeks before initial OTM. Tooth displacement was measured after 7, 14, and 21 days. Histologic sections of the maxilla and femur were obtained after 14 and 21 days of OTM and stained (hematoxylin and eosin; TRAP assay) for histomorphometric analysis.

RESULTS

ATV was associated with significant (P <0.05) reductions in OTM and osteoclast counts. Independently of drug administration, OTM increased the number of osteoclasts and reduced the bone-volume ratio compared with the control maxillae without OTM. Long-term statin administration did not appear to affect femoral endochondral ossification.

CONCLUSIONS

This experimental study showed that the long-term use of ATV can significantly promote osteoclast inhibition and slow the OTM in the first week in rats. Under physiologic conditions, the drug did not affect bone turnover and endochondral ossification.

Apixaban and Rosuvas--tatin Pharmacokinetics in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

There is little known about the impact of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) on drug metabolism and transport. We examined the pharmacokinetics of oral apixaban (2.5 mg) and rosuvastatin (5 mg) when administered simultaneously in subjects with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed NAFLD (N = 22) and healthy control subjects (N = 12). The area under the concentration-time curve to the last sampling time (AUC_0-12) values for apixaban were not different between control and NAFLD subjects (671 and 545 ng/ml × hour, respectively; P = 0.15). Similarly, the AUC_0-12 values for rosuvastatin did not differ between the control and NAFLD groups (25.4 and 20.1 ng/ml × hour, respectively; P = 0.28). Furthermore, hepatic fibrosis in NAFLD subjects was not associated with differences in apixaban or rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics. Decreased systemic exposures for both apixaban and rosuvastatin were associated with increased body weight (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). In multivariable linear regression analyses, only participant weight but not NAFLD, age, or SLCO1B1/ABCG2/CYP3A5 genotypes, was associated with apixaban and rosuvastatin AUC_0-12 (P < 0.001 and P = 0.06, respectively). NAFLD does not appear to affect the pharmacokinetics of apixaban or rosuvastatin.

Gender-based personalized pharmacotherapy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

In general, male and female are prescribed the same amount of dosage even if most of the cases female required less dosage than male. Physicians are often facing problem on appropriate drug dosing, efficient treatment, and drug safety for a female in general. To identify and synthesize evidence about the effectiveness of gender-based therapy; provide the information to patients, providers, and health system intervention to ensure safety treatment; and minimize adverse effects.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to evaluate the effect of gender difference on pharmacotherapy. Published articles from January 1990 to December 2015 were identified using specific term in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane library according to search strategies that strengthen the reporting of observational and clinical studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this systematic review, yielding a total of 6309 subjects. We observed that female generally has a lower the gastric emptying time, gastric PH, lean body mass, and higher plasma volume, BMI, body fat, as well as reduce hepatic clearance, difference in activity of Cytochrome P450 enzyme, and metabolize drugs at different rate compared with male. Other significant factors such as conjugation, protein binding, absorption, and the renal elimination could not be ignored. However, these differences can lead to adverse effects in female especially for the pregnant, post-menopausal, and elderly women.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides an evidence for the effectiveness of dosage difference to ensure safety and efficient treatment. Future studies on the current topic are, therefore, recommended to reduce the adverse effect of therapy.