Patterns of direct oral anticoagulant drug prescription in France in 2010–2013: a study in the Midi-Pyrénées area

A drug utilization study of oral anticoagulants in five representative cities of China between 2015 and 2019

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Oral anticoagulants (OACs), including warfarin and newer direct-acting OACs (DOACs), have been used for decades to prevent thromboembolic diseases. A drug utilization study was performed to determine the prescribing patterns of OACs.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Cooperation Project of Hospital Prescription Analysis in China. A total of 455,490 prescription records from 43 tertiary hospitals in five cities of China (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Hangzhou and Chengdu) were selected for inclusion. Quarterly trends of defined daily doses (DDDs) and defined daily dose cost (DDDC) from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019 were calculated.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Warfarin was the most widely used OAC with DDDs between 189,982 and 176,323 from the first quarter (Q1) of 2015 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2019, whereas the use of DOACs increased rapidly during this period. DDDs of rivaroxaban increased from 5409 in Q1 of 2015 to 125,800 in Q4 of 2019, whereas the DDDC declined from 160.5 to 45.7. From Q1 of 2018, rivaroxaban became the most prescribed OAC, surpassing warfarin, in patients diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis. In addition, the DDDs of rivaroxaban exceeded those of warfarin in patients diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation since the second quarter (Q2) of 2019. DDDs in outpatients and inpatients increased by 80.6% and 71.4%, respectively, and the DDDC for outpatients in Q4 of 2019 was 6.7-fold higher than that in Q1 of 2015. Among patients of all ages, the DDDs in elderly patients increased from 36.8% in Q1 of 2015 to 59.4% in Q4 of 2019. Moreover, the departments of cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery prescribed the majority of the OACs.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

In this study, we describe OAC prescription patterns in China. DOACs, especially rivaroxaban, contribute to the continuous increase in the use of OACs. In the investigated population of China, outpatients and elderly patients were observed to be administered the highest proportion of DOACs.

Inappropriate Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) require dose adjustment based on specific patient characteristics, making them prone to incorrect dosing. The current study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of inappropriate DOAC dosing, its predictors, and corresponding outcomes in a single-center cohort of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. We reviewed all patients with AF treated at Mayo Clinic with a DOAC (Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, or Dabigatran) between 2010 and 2017. Outcomes examined were ischemic stroke /transient ischemic attack (TIA)/embolism and bleeding. 8,576 patients (mean age 69.5 ± 11.9 years, 35.1 % female, CHA₂DS₂-VASc 3.0±1.8) received a DOAC (38.6% apixaban, 35.8% rivaroxaban, 25.6% dabigatran). DOAC dosing was inappropriate in 1,273 (14.8%) with 1071 (12.4%) receiving an inappropriately low dose, and 202(2.4%) an inappropriately high dose. Patients prescribed inappropriate doses were older (72.4 ± 11.7 vs 69.0 ± 11.8, p <0.0001), more likely to be female (43.1% vs 33.7%, p <0.0001), had a higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (3.4 ± 1.8 vs 2.9 ± 1.8, p <0.0001) and a greater Charlson co-morbidity index (3.5 ± 3.3 vs 2.9 ± 3.2, p<0.0001). Over 1.2 ±1.6 years (median 0.5 years) follow up; there was no significant difference in the incidence of stroke and/or TIA and/or embolism and bleeding between patients who were inappropriately dosed versus appropriately dosed. In conclusion, DOAC dosing was not in compliance with current recommendations in 15% of AF patients. Patients at higher risk of stroke and/or TIA based on older age, female gender, and higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc score were more likely to be underdosed, but there was no significant difference in outcomes including stroke/TIA/embolism and bleeding.

Bleeding Risk of Warfarin and Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Younger Population: A Historical Cohort Study Using a Japanese Claims Database

A historical cohort analysis of the Japan medical data center (JMDC) claims databases was performed to compare the incidence rates of bleeding events with warfarin (WF) versus direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study is to clarify the risk factors for bleeding events in younger patients newly treated with WF or DOAC in clinical practice setting. Patients who newly initiated WF or DOAC treatment from April 2012 to March 2015 were selected from the JMDC claims database. A 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was used for new users of WF or DOAC. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to depict the time to bleeding event (total bleeding events, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and intracranial hemorrhage) during the follow-up period. Cox proportional regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios for total bleeding events caused by oral anticoagulants. Overall, 2,046 patients (503 WF and 1,543 DOAC) were included. After applying propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier analysis of the WF and DOAC groups displayed comparable incidences of total bleeding events, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and intracranial hemorrhage. Cox proportional hazards modeling showed that the use of WF was not associated with total bleeding events compared with DOAC (hazard ratio: 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 0.93-1.54, p = 0.15). This historical cohort study using a claims database indicates that the bleeding risk of DOAC was comparable to that of WF in Japanese younger population.