1
|
Bou Malham C, El Khatib S, Cestac P, Andrieu S, Rouch L, Salameh P. Management of potentially inappropriate medication use among older adult's patients in primary care settings: description of an interventional prospective non-randomized study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:213. [PMID: 38872125 PMCID: PMC11170768 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02334-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of inappropriate medication use in older patients suffering from multimorbidity and polymedication is a major healthcare challenge. In a primary care setting, a medication review is an effective tool through which a pharmacist can collaborate with a practitioner to detect inappropriate drug use. AIM This project described the implementation of a systematic process for the management of potentially inappropriate medication use among Lebanese older adults. Its aim was to involve pharmacists in geriatric care and to suggest treatment optimization through the analysis of prescriptions using explicit and implicit criteria. METHOD This study evaluated the medications of patients over 65 years taking a minimum of five chronic medications a day in different regions of Lebanon. Descriptive statistics for all the included variables using mean and standard deviation (Mean (SD)) for continuous variables and frequency and percentage (n, (%)) for multinomial variables were then performed. RESULTS A total of 850 patients (50.7% women, 28.6% frail, 75.7 (8.01) mean age (SD)) were included in this study. The mean number of drugs per prescription was 7.10 (2.45). Roughly 88% of patients (n = 748) had at least one potentially inappropriate drug prescription: 66.4% and 64.4% of the patients had at least 1 drug with an unfavorable benefit-to-risk ratio according to Beers and EU(7)-PIM respectively. Nearly 50.4% of patients took at least one medication with no indication. The pharmacists recommended discontinuing medication for 76.5% of the cases of drug related problems. 26.6% of the overall proposed interventions were implemented. DISCUSSION The rate of potentially inappropriate drug prescribing (PIDP) (88%) was higher than the rates previously reported in Europe, US, and Canada. It was also higher than studies conducted in Lebanon where it varied from 22.4 to 80% depending on the explicit criteria used, the settings, and the medical conditions of the patients. We used both implicit and explicit criteria with five different lists to improve the detection of all types of inappropriate medication use since Lebanon obtains drugs from many different sources. Another potential source for variation is the lack of a standardized process for the assessment of outpatient medication use in the elderly. CONCLUSION The prevalence PIDP detected in the sample was higher than the percentages reported in previous literature. Systematic review of prescriptions has the capacity to identify and resolve pharmaceutical care issues thus improving geriatric care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmela Bou Malham
- Aging Research Team, Center for Epidemiology and Research in POPulation health (CERPOP), Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Inserm, Toulouse, 31000, France.
- University Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, 31062, France.
| | - Sarah El Khatib
- Aging Research Team, Center for Epidemiology and Research in POPulation health (CERPOP), Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Inserm, Toulouse, 31000, France
- University Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, 31062, France
| | - Philippe Cestac
- Aging Research Team, Center for Epidemiology and Research in POPulation health (CERPOP), Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Inserm, Toulouse, 31000, France
- University Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, 31062, France
- Department of Pharmacy, Toulouse University Hospitals, Purpan Hospital, Toulouse, 31059, France
| | - Sandrine Andrieu
- Aging Research Team, Center for Epidemiology and Research in POPulation health (CERPOP), Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Inserm, Toulouse, 31000, France
- University Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, 31062, France
- Department of Pharmacy, Toulouse University Hospitals, Purpan Hospital, Toulouse, 31059, France
| | - Laure Rouch
- Aging Research Team, Center for Epidemiology and Research in POPulation health (CERPOP), Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Inserm, Toulouse, 31000, France
- University Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, 31062, France
- Department of Pharmacy, Toulouse University Hospitals, Purpan Hospital, Toulouse, 31059, France
| | - Pascale Salameh
- School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, 1401, Lebanon
- University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, 1065, Cyprus
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Lebanese University, Hadath, 1100, Lebanon
- Institut National de Santé Publique, Epidémiologie Clinique et Toxicologie INSPECT-LB), Beirut, 1100, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alsalemi N, Lafrance JP, Sadowski CA. Older age, kidney concordant diseases and the dilemma of adherence to guidelines: A narrative review. Res Social Adm Pharm 2023; 19:1018-1024. [PMID: 37055315 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.04.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
Evidence-based medicine is pivotal to contemporary clinical practice, and the excellence of a healthcare institution is measured by the adherence of its clinical staff to the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) among other standards and policies. Following the recommendations of CPGs in older adults poses different challenges to prescribers. In this narrative review we explore research studies that assessed clinicians' adherence to CPGs when prescribing to older adults with chronic kidney disease and its concordant disorders, and to discuss the potential barriers and facilitators to better adherence to CPGs. Our review of the literature found that the adherence level to CPGs differed according to country, disease condition and healthcare setting. Clinicians' attitudes toward older adults and the CPGs, the unfamiliarity with the CPGs, and the lack of time, were commonly cited barriers. Interventions suggested to improve adherence to CPGs include direct mentoring, educational activities, and the integration of CPGs recommendations within hospital protocols and policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noor Alsalemi
- Département de pharmacologie et physiologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Centre de Recherche de l'Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-Philippe Lafrance
- Département de pharmacologie et physiologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Centre de Recherche de l'Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, QC, Canada; Service de néphrologie, CIUSSS de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Cheryl A Sadowski
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yadesa TM, Kitutu FE, Tamukong R, Alele PE. Predictors of hospital-acquired adverse drug reactions: a cohort of Ugandan older adults. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:359. [PMID: 35461224 PMCID: PMC9033930 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03003-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Globally, it is estimated that the number of older adults will become 2 billion by 2050. The identification of the predictors of adverse drug reaction (ADR) in hospitalized older patients is crucial to the development of prediction tools and preventive strategies to mitigate the burden of ADRs. This study aimed to determine the predictors of hospital-acquired ADR occurrence among hospitalized older adults in a low-income country. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort of older adults admitted to medical, oncology, and surgery wards at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH) for a consecutive 6 months where each patient was followed up daily from admission to discharge. We used Edwards and Aronson’s definition of ADR and the Naranjo ADR Causality Scale. We employed Beer’s criteria and Lexicomp to determine potentially inappropriate medications, and drug interactions, respectively. We conducted univariate and multivariable logistic regression using Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) Version 23.0. Results Out of 523 participants with median (Inter Quartile Range) age of 67 (62–76) years, 256 (48.9%) experienced at least one ADR. Independent predictors of occurrence of hospital acquired ADRs included age of 60–75 (Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.97, 95% C.I: 1.14–3.41; p value = 0.015) compared to > 75 years, previous ADR in 1 year (AOR = 2.43, 95% C.I: 1.42–4.17; p value = 0.001), potentially inappropriate medication (AOR = 4.56, 95% C.I: 2.70–7.70; p value< 0.001), polypharmacy (AOR = 3.29, 95% C.I: 1.98–5.46; p value< 0.001)), having a Charlison Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 6 (AOR = 8.47, 95% C.I: 4.85–14.99; p value< 0.001), having heart failure (AOR = 2.83, 95% C.I: 1.34–6.02; p value = 0.007) or kidney disease (AOR = 1.95, 95% C.I: 1.05–3.61; p value = 0.034) and a hospital stay > 10 days (AOR = 3.53, 95% C.I: 1.89–6.61; p value< 0.001) compared to < 5 days. Conclusion The current prevalence of ADR is higher than previously reported in high-income countries. Disease-related factors followed by medication-related factors were shown to be the most important predictors of hospital-acquired ADRs. CCI and PIM showed the strongest association with ADR. The predictors of ADRs identified in our study were generally comparable with those reported by previous studies. Plain language title Conditions that predispose older patients to experience harmful effects from their medications while in hospital. Plain language summary Identifying the conditions that predispose older adults to incur harmful effects of their medications helps to plan on how best to predict, take precautions and closely follow up on them and thus, to prevent these undesirable outcomes. This study aimed to identify these conditions which determine which older adults are higher risk to incur these harmful undesirable effects of medicines. Everydayduring their hospital stay, we closely followed older patients who were 60 years and above from their entry to the hospital wards until they left the hospital. We interviewed the participants, reviewed their medication files and we also examined them physically to identify any unwanted and harmful outcome from their current medications. Out of 523 participants, almost half of them experienced at least one harmful or undesired effect related to their medicine. Conditions which predisposed them to experience a harmful effect from their medicines included being in age bracket of 60–75 years, having a history of experiencing harmful outcomes from medicines in the previous 1 year, taking a medication which was listed as potentially inappropriate for older adults, taking 5 or more medications concurrently, having a lower 10 years survival chance, having heart or kidney disease and a hospital stay > 10 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadele Mekuriya Yadesa
- Department of Pharmacy, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, P.O.Box 1410, Uganda. .,Department of Pharmacy, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia. .,Pharm-Biotechnology and Traditional Medicine Center, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
| | - Freddy Eric Kitutu
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Schiences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.,Sustainable Pharmaceutical Systems (SPS) unit, School of Health Schiences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Robert Tamukong
- Department of Pharmacy, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, P.O.Box 1410, Uganda.,Pharm-Biotechnology and Traditional Medicine Center, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
| | - Paul E Alele
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The Effect of the NorGeP–NH on Quality of Life and Drug Prescriptions in Norwegian Nursing Homes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PHARMACY 2022; 10:pharmacy10010032. [PMID: 35202081 PMCID: PMC8880047 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy10010032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The effect of the Norwegian General Practice–Nursing Home (NorGeP–NH) criteria has never been tested on clinical outcomes in nursing home (NH) residents. We performed a cluster-randomized trial in Norwegian NHs and tested the effect of NorGeP–NH on QoL (primary outcome), medication prescriptions, and physical and mental health (secondary outcomes) for the enrolled residents; Methods: Fourteen NHs were randomized into intervention NHs (iNHs) and control NHs (cNHs). After baseline data collection, physicians performed NorGeP–NH on the enrolled residents. We assessed the difference between cNHs and iNHs in the change in primary outcome from baseline to 12 weeks and secondary outcomes from baseline to eight and 12 weeks by linear mixed models; Results: One hundred and eight residents (13 lost to follow-up) and 109 residents (nine lost to follow-up) were randomized to iNHs and cNHs, respectively. Difference in change in QoL at 12 weeks between cNHs and iNHs was not statistically significant (mean (95% CI)): −1.51 (−3.30; 0.28), p = 0.101). We found no significant change in drug prescriptions over time. Difference in depression scores between cNHs and iNHs was statistically significant after 12 weeks. Conclusions: Our intervention did not affect QoL or drug prescriptions, but reduced depression scores in the iNHs. NorGeP–NH may be a useful tool, but its effect on clinical outcomes may be scarce in NH residents. Further studies about the effectiveness of NorGeP–NH in other healthcare contexts and settings are recommended.
Collapse
|
5
|
The association between geriatric treatment and 30-day readmission risk among medical inpatients aged ≥75 years with multimorbidity. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0262340. [PMID: 34995327 PMCID: PMC8741041 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Readmission to hospital is frequent among older patients and reported as a post-discharge adverse outcome. The effect of treatment in a geriatric ward for acutely admitted older patients on mortality and function is well established, but less is known about the possible influence of such treatment on the risk of readmission, particularly in the oldest and most vulnerable patients. Our aim was to assess the risk for early readmission for multimorbid patients > 75 years treated in a geriatric ward compared to medical wards and to identify risk factors for 30-day readmissions. Methods Prospective cohort study of patients acutely admitted to a medical department at a Norwegian regional hospital. Eligible patients were community-dwelling, multimorbid, receiving home care services, and aged 75+. Patients were consecutively included in the period from 1 April to 31 October 2012. Clinical data were retrieved from the referral letter and medical records. Results We included 227 patients with a mean (SD) age of 86.0 (5.7) years, 134 (59%) were female and 59 (26%) were readmitted within 30 days after discharge. We found no statistically significant difference in readmission rate between patients treated in a geriatric ward versus other medical wards. In adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, lower age (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.95 (0.91–0.99) per year), female gender (2.17 (1.15–4.00)) and higher MMSE score (1.03 (1.00–1.06) per point) were significant risk factors for readmission. Conclusions Lower age, female gender and higher cognitive function were the main risk factors for 30-day readmission to hospital among old patients with multimorbidity. We found no impact of geriatric care on the readmission rate.
Collapse
|
6
|
Alwhaibi M. Potentially Inappropriate Medications Use among Older Adults with Comorbid Diabetes and Hypertension in an Ambulatory Care Setting. J Diabetes Res 2022; 2022:1591511. [PMID: 35586116 PMCID: PMC9110241 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1591511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to estimate the prevalence of PIMs use and its associated factors among older adults with comorbid diabetes and hypertension. METHODS A cross-sectional retrospective study was used, including 1,853 older adults (age ≥65 years) with diabetes and hypertension who visited an ambulatory care setting. The study objectives were to estimate the prevalence and factors associated with PIMs use based on the 2019 American Geriatric Society (AGS) Beers criteria. RESULTS Almost one out of two individuals had PIMs used, with the average number of medications taken being seven. The most commonly prescribed PIMs were the use of gastrointestinal and endocrine medications. High risk of PIMs use was among those with ischemic heart disease, anxiety, and polypharmacy. CONCLUSIONS Given the higher PIMs use among older adults with diabetes and hypertension comorbidities, tailored strategies and interventions to minimize PIMs use in this population are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monira Alwhaibi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Medication Safety Research Chair, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim DS, Je NK, Park J, Lee S. Effect of nationwide concurrent drug utilization review program on drug-drug interactions and related health outcome. Int J Qual Health Care 2021; 33:6353545. [PMID: 34402911 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A computerized drug utilization review (DUR) program has provided physicians and pharmacists with alerts on drug-drug interactions (DDIs), drug-age precautions and therapeutic duplication in Korea since 2010. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the DUR program on health outcomes associated with DDIs. METHODS An uncontrolled before-after study was performed to investigate the impact of the nationwide DUR program on DDIs and related health outcomes. The study population consisted of people who used two types of DDI pairs before DUR implementation (from January 2009 to December 2010) and post-DUR implementation (from January 2012 to December 2013); (i) benzodiazepines with concurrent use of metabolic enzyme inhibitors and (ii) QTc (heart-rate corrected QT interval) prolongation agents. The main outcome measures were all-cause and cause-specific hospitalization admissions or emergency department (ED) visits. RESULTS This study included 107 874 people who used benzodiazepines with enzyme inhibitors and 8489 who received co-medication of QTc prolongation agents. For patients receiving a combination of benzodiazepines and enzyme inhibitors, both all-cause hospitalization and cause-specific hospitalization decreased after DUR implementation, from 43.2% to 41.7% and from 4.6% to 4.5% (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.93-0.98; OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.84-0.99, respectively). For patients receiving co-medication of QTc prolongation agents, all-cause hospitalization (54.2%) was lower than before (54.9%) (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.79-0.96), but no significant change was found for cause-specific hospitalization and ED visits. CONCLUSION Implementation of a DUR program may reduce the adverse health outcomes posed by DDIs in patients on combination of benzodiazepines and enzyme inhibitors potentially QTc-prolongation agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Sook Kim
- Department of Research, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, HyeoksinRo 60, Wonju 26465, South Korea
| | - Nam Kyung Je
- College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Pusandaehakro 63Gil 2, Busan 14624, South Korea
| | - Juhee Park
- Department of Research, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, HyeoksinRo 60, Wonju 26465, South Korea
| | - Sukhyang Lee
- College of Pharmacy, Ajou University, WorldcupRo 206, Suwon 16499, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yadesa TM, Kitutu FE, Deyno S, Ogwang PE, Tamukong R, Alele PE. Prevalence, characteristics and predicting risk factors of adverse drug reactions among hospitalized older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SAGE Open Med 2021; 9:20503121211039099. [PMID: 34422271 PMCID: PMC8377309 DOI: 10.1177/20503121211039099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Occurrence of adverse drug reactions is a major global health problem mostly affecting older adults. Identifying the magnitude and predictors of adverse drug reactions is crucial to developing strategies to mitigate the burden of adverse drug reactions. This study's objectives were to estimate and compare the prevalences of adverse drug reactions, to characterize them and to identify the predictors among hospitalized older adults. METHODS A comprehensive systematic literature search including both prevalence and risk factors of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized older adults was conducted using PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar, involving all articles published in English. Descriptive statistics and comparison of means was performed using SPSS version 20.0 and metaprop command was performed in STATA version 13.0. Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistic. RESULTS A total of 18 studies, involving 80,695 participants with a median age of 77 years, were included in this study. The pooled prevalence of adverse drug reaction was 22% (95% confidence interval: 17%, 28%; I 2 = 99.23%). Among high-income countries, the prevalence of adverse drug reactions was 29% (95% confidence interval: 16%, 42%) as compared to 19% (95% confidence interval: 14%-25%) in low and middle-income countries (p value = 0.176). Of the 620 adverse drug reactions categorized, most were type A (89%), which are generally predictable and preventable. Two-thirds (795, 67%) of the adverse drug reactions were probable and most (1194, 69%) were mild or moderate. The majority (60%) of the categorized adverse drug reactions were preventable and less than one-third (31%) were severe. The most consistently reported predictors of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized older patients were medication-related factors, including polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications followed by disease-related factors-renal failure, complex comorbidity, heart failure and liver failure. CONCLUSION Almost one-quarter of all hospitalized older adults experienced at least one adverse drug reaction during their hospital stay. The majority of the adverse drug reactions were preventable. Medication-related factors were the most consistently reported predictors of adverse drug reactions followed by disease-related factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadele Mekuriya Yadesa
- PHARMBIOTRAC, World Bank’s ACE-II Project, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia
| | - Freddy Eric Kitutu
- Sustainable Pharmaceutical Systems (SPS) Unit, Pharmacy Department, School of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Serawit Deyno
- PHARMBIOTRAC, World Bank’s ACE-II Project, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
- School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
| | - Patrick Engeu Ogwang
- PHARMBIOTRAC, World Bank’s ACE-II Project, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
| | - Robert Tamukong
- PHARMBIOTRAC, World Bank’s ACE-II Project, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
| | - Paul E Alele
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Roux B, Berthou-Contreras J, Beuscart JB, Charenton-Blavignac M, Doucet J, Fournier JP, de la Gastine B, Gautier S, Gonthier R, Gras V, Grau M, Noize P, Polard E, Rudelle K, Valnet-Rabier MB, Tannou T, Laroche ML. REview of potentially inappropriate MEDIcation pr[e]scribing in Seniors (REMEDI[e]S): French implicit and explicit criteria. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 77:1713-1724. [PMID: 34115158 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-021-03145-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To establish a consensus on both explicit and implicit criteria in order to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in French older people aged 75 years and over or 65 years and over with multimorbidity. METHODS Fifteen experts in geriatrics, general practice, pharmacy, and clinical pharmacology were involved in a two-round Delphi survey to assess preliminary explicit and implicit criteria based on an extensive literature review and up-to-date evidence data. Experts were asked to rate their level of agreement using a 5-level Likert scale for inclusion of criteria and also for rationale and therapeutic alternatives. A consensus was considered as reached if at least 75% of the experts rated criteria as "strongly agreed" or "agreed." RESULTS The new tool included a seven-step algorithm (implicit criteria) encompassing the three main domains that define PIP (i.e. overprescribing, underprescribing, and misprescribing) and 104 explicit criteria. Explicit criteria were divided into 6 tables related to inappropriate drug duplications (n = 7 criteria), omissions of medications and/or medication associations (n = 16), medications with an unfavourable benefit/risk ratio and/or a questionable efficacy (n = 39), medications with an unsuitable dose (n = 4) or duration (n = 6), drug-disease (n = 13), and drug-drug interactions (n = 19). CONCLUSION The REMEDI[e]S tool (REview of potentially inappropriate MEDIcation pr[e]scribing in Seniors) is an original mixed tool, adapted to French medical practices, aimed at preventing PIP both at the individual level in clinical practice and the population level in large-scale studies. Therefore, its use could contribute to an improvement in healthcare professionals' prescribing practices and safer care in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Roux
- Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Pharmacology Toxicology and Centre of Pharmacovigilance, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France. .,INSERM UMR 1248, Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.
| | - Julie Berthou-Contreras
- Department of Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacy Unit, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Beuscart
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000, Lille, France
| | | | - Jean Doucet
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Therapeutics, Saint Julien Hospital, Rouen University Hospital, 76031, Rouen Cedex, France
| | - Jean-Pascal Fournier
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Blandine de la Gastine
- Geriatric Department, Institut du Vieillissement, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Pierre Garraud, Lyon, France
| | - Sophie Gautier
- Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medical Pharmacology, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Régis Gonthier
- Département de Gérontologie Clinique, CHU de Saint Etienne, Hôpital de La Charité, 44 rue Pointe Cadet, 42000, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Valérie Gras
- Centre of Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital of Amiens, Amiens, France
| | - Muriel Grau
- Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Pharmacology Toxicology and Centre of Pharmacovigilance, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Pernelle Noize
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, U1219, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Elisabeth Polard
- Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medical Pharmacology, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Karen Rudelle
- University Department of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Limoges, France
| | - Marie-Blanche Valnet-Rabier
- Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medical Pharmacology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Thomas Tannou
- Geriatric Departement, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Marie-Laure Laroche
- Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Pharmacology Toxicology and Centre of Pharmacovigilance, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France.,INSERM UMR 1248, Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.,Laboratoire Vie-Santé (Vieillissement Fragilité Prévention, E-Santé), IFR GEIST, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
No impact of a prescription booklet on medication consumption in nursing home residents from 2011 to 2014: a controlled before-after study. Aging Clin Exp Res 2021; 33:1599-1607. [PMID: 32748114 PMCID: PMC8203501 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01670-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Older persons are particularly exposed to adverse events from medication. Among the various strategies to reduce polypharmacy, educational approaches have shown promising results. We aimed to evaluate the impact on medication consumption, of a booklet designed to aid physicians with prescriptions for elderly nursing home residents. Methods Among 519 nursing homes using an electronic pill dispenser, we recorded the daily number of times that a drug was administered for each resident, over a period of 4 years. The intervention group comprised 113 nursing homes belonging to a for-profit geriatric care provider that implemented a booklet delivered to prescribers and pharmacists and specifically designed to aid with prescriptions for elderly nursing home residents. The remaining 406 nursing homes where no such booklet was introduced comprised the control group. Data were derived from electronic pill dispensers. The effect of the intervention on medication consumption was assessed with multilevel regression models, adjusted for nursing home status. The main outcomes were the average daily number of times that a medication was administered and the number of drugs with different presentation identifier codes per resident per month. Results 96,216 residents from 519 nursing homes were included between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2014. The intervention group and the control group both decreased their average daily use of medication (− 0.05 and − 0.06). The booklet did not have a statistically significant effect (exponentiated difference-in-differences coefficient 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.99–1.02, P = .45). Conclusion We observed an overall decrease in medication consumption in both the control and intervention groups. Our analysis did not provide any evidence that this reduction was related to the use of the booklet. Other factors, such as national policy or increased physician awareness, may have contributed to our findings. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40520-020-01670-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
11
|
Sandvik MK, Watne LO, Brugård A, Wang-Hansen MS, Kersten H. Association between psychotropic drug use and handgrip strength in older hospitalized patients. Eur Geriatr Med 2021; 12:1213-1220. [PMID: 34033072 PMCID: PMC8626357 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-021-00511-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Handgrip strength is an indicator of frailty and longevity in older adults. The association between psychotropic drug use and handgrip strength in older hospitalized patients was investigated in this study. METHODS A total of 488 patients were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study, 333 women and 155 men, from two different cohorts of older (mean age 84 years) hospitalized in-patients. We used multiple linear regression models to explore the association between psychotropic drug use and handgrip strength. We adjusted for factors known to affect handgrip strength: Age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and comorbidity (Charlson comorbidity index). RESULTS Both unadjusted and adjusted analyses showed that psychotropic drug use was associated with handgrip strength (β = - 0.183, p < 0.0001). The relationship was of a linear character, with no clear threshold value, but with the greatest reduction in handgrip strength between zero and two psychotropic drugs. CONCLUSION An increasing number of psychotropic drugs were significantly associated with reduced handgrip strength in a linearly pattern. Hence, it is timely to question the guided threshold value of avoidance of three or more psychotropic drugs in older people. Psychotropic drug use should be kept as low as possible in treatment of older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leiv Otto Watne
- Oslo Delirium Research Group, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anniken Brugård
- Oslo Delirium Research Group, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Trust, Drammen, Norway
| | - Marte Sofie Wang-Hansen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Hege Kersten
- Department of Research, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway.,Department of Pharmaceutical Bioscience, School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wojt IR, Cairns R, Clough AJ, Tan ECK. The Prevalence and Characteristics of Psychotropic-Related Hospitalizations in Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2021; 22:1206-1214.e5. [PMID: 33539820 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the prevalence and characteristics of psychotropic medication-related hospitalizations in older people. DESIGN Systematic review with meta-analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Older adults (≥65 years of age) with psychotropic-related hospitalizations. METHODS A search of published literature was performed in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus from 2010 to March 2020. Three authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts of relevant studies for relevance. Two authors independently extracted full text data, including characteristics, measures of causality, prevalence data, and performed quality assessment. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of psychotropic-related hospitalizations using random effects models. Heterogeneity was explored using subgroup analyses. RESULTS Of 815 potentially relevant studies, 11 were included in the final analysis. Five studies were cross-sectional studies, 5 were cohort studies, and 1 was a case control study. The majority of studies were rated as good quality. Psychotropic medications contributed to 2.1% (95% CI 1.2%-3.3%) of total hospitalizations and 11.3% (95% CI 8.2%-14.8%) of adverse drug event-related hospitalizations. The main psychotropic medications attributable to hospitalizations were antidepressants, hypnotics, sedatives, and antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Psychotropic medications are a significant contributor to hospitalizations in older adults. The risk of hospitalization was greatest for those taking antidepressants, antipsychotics, hypnotics, and sedatives. Future studies should aim to address specific medication subgroups and implement uniform adverse drug event-related classification systems to improve comparability across studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilsa R Wojt
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rose Cairns
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; NSW Poisons Information Center, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander J Clough
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Edwin C K Tan
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Center for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Josendal AV, Bergmo TS, Granas AG. Potentially inappropriate prescribing to older patients receiving multidose drug dispensing. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:272. [PMID: 32758129 PMCID: PMC7409456 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01665-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multidose drug dispensing (MDD) is an adherence aid that provides patients with machine-dispensed medicines in disposable unit bags, usually for a 14 day period. Previous studies have suggested that the quality of prescribing, with time, is lower for MDD users, compared to patients receiving prescriptions dispensed as usual. This study aimed to examine the quality of prescribing to Norwegian elderly home care service patients receiving MDD. Methods A cross-sectional study comprising 45,593 MDD patients aged ≥70 years was performed. The proportion of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) was assessed using the Norwegian General Practice Criteria, and drug-drug interactions (DDI) were investigated using the Norwegian Medicines Agency database. Results On average, patients were prescribed 10.6 drugs (SD = 5.0), of which 6.1 were dispensed via MDD. Men used on average fewer drugs than women (10.7 vs 11.1), Twenty-seven percent of patients used at least one PIM. Concomitant use of three or more psychotropic drugs (10.8%), and prescribing of diazepam (6.4%) was the most commonly identified inappropriate prescribing. DDIs affected 59% of the patients, however, only 2.7% had serious interactions. Women were more frequently exposed to both PIMs and DDIs than men, with an odds ratio of 1.50 (95% CI: 1.43–1.58) and 1.43 (95% CI: 1.37–1.50), respectively. Conclusions Polypharmacy is common in elderly Norwegian patients using MDD. About one-fourth of the patients were exposed to PIMs, and over half were exposed to DDI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anette Vik Josendal
- Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. .,Department of Pharmacy, Section for Pharmaceutics and Social Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Trine Strand Bergmo
- Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Anne Gerd Granas
- Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Pharmacy, Section for Pharmaceutics and Social Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Aim: To identify patterns and characteristics of polypharmacy among elderly residents in Danish nursing homes in the Northern region of Denmark. Materials & methods: Twenty-five nursing homes were contacted, where each supplied 20 randomly selected anonymized residents’ information. Residents were 65 years or older, concurrently taking five or more medications. Drug–drug interactions and potential adverse effects were investigated. Results: One hundred residents (68% females; 32% males) were included. The most prevalent co-morbid condition was cardiovascular disease, and the most prevalent medications were for gastrointestinal- and metabolism-related conditions. Age influenced the number of drugs (p = 0.013) and drug–drug interactions per resident (p = 0.039), with a positive correlation. Conclusion: Elderly residents of the studied nursing homes were potentially affected by an inappropriate polypharmacy. Multimorbidity is common among elderly and a leading factor for polypharmacy. We conducted this study on 100 Danish elderly residents (>65 years, on ≥5 medications) in 25 nursing homes, anonymously and randomly chosen in Northern region of Denmark, to find characteristics of potential inappropriate polypharmacy. We found that age influenced the number of drugs (p = 0.013) and number of drug–drug interactions per resident (p = 0.039), but no sex-related difference was evident. Positive correlations were present between the number of drugs and drug–drug interactions. Elderly residents of the studied nursing homes were potentially affected by an inappropriate polypharmacy.
Collapse
|
15
|
Amoros-Reboredo P, Soy D, Hernandez-Hernandez M, Lens S, Mestres C. Anticholinergic Burden and Safety Outcomes in Older Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C: A Retrospective Cohort Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E3776. [PMID: 32466526 PMCID: PMC7311997 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17113776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
AIM Older patients with chronic hepatitis C infection starting direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are frequently prescribed multiple medications that may be categorized as inappropriate. Anticholinergic burden has been shown to be a predictor of adverse health and functional outcomes. Different scales are available to calculate anticholinergic burden. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of anticholinergic medication among older patients treated with DAAs and the risk factors associated using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale, the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS) and the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS) and analyze the resulting safety consequences. METHODS Observational, retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients ≥65 years old receiving DAAs and taking concomitant medication. This study was conducted in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of observational studies in Epidemiology Statement. RESULTS 236 patients were included. The average age was 71.7 years, 73.3% cirrhotic, and 47% patients took ≥5 medicines. According to the ACB, ARS and ADS scales, 35.2% (n = 83), 10.6% (n = 25) and 34.3% (n = 81) of the patients were treated with anticholinergic medication. Two hundred-and-six (86%) patients presented any adverse events (AEs) during therapy. ARS scale showed a significant relationship between presence of anticholinergic medication and AEs. A large number of patients suffered anticholinergic events, with more events per patient in patients taking anticholinergic drugs. CONCLUSIONS Older hepatitis C chronic patients are exposed to potentially inappropriate polypharmacy and anticholinergic risk, according to the ACB, ARS and ADS scales. The three scales showed different results. Only the ARS scale was associated with AEs, but the rate of anticholinergic effects per patient was significantly higher in patients with anticholinergic drugs, regardless of the scale used. Consider quality of pharmacotherapy when starting DAA with a multidisciplinary approach could improve health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dolors Soy
- Pharmacy Service Division of Medicines Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | | | - Sabela Lens
- Liver Unit Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Conxita Mestres
- School of Health Sciences Blanquerna, University Ramon Llull, 08025 Barcelona, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Romskaug R, Skovlund E, Straand J, Molden E, Kersten H, Pitkala KH, Lundqvist C, Wyller TB. Effect of Clinical Geriatric Assessments and Collaborative Medication Reviews by Geriatrician and Family Physician for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life in Home-Dwelling Older Patients Receiving Polypharmacy: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2020; 180:181-189. [PMID: 31617562 PMCID: PMC6802420 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Polypharmacy and inappropriate drug regimens are major health concerns among older adults. Various interventions focused on medication optimization strategies have been carried out, but the effect on patient-relevant outcomes remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of clinical geriatric assessments and collaborative medication reviews by geriatrician and family physician (FP) on health-related quality of life and other patient-relevant outcomes in home-dwelling older patients receiving polypharmacy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cluster randomized, single-blind, clinical trial. Norwegian FPs were recruited from March 17, 2015, to March 16, 2017, to participate in the trial with their eligible patients. Participants were home-dwelling patients 70 years or older, using at least 7 medications regularly, and having their medications administered by the home nursing service. Patients in the control group received usual care. Randomization occurred at the FP level. A modified intent-to-treat analysis was used. INTERVENTION The intervention consisted of 3 main parts: (1) clinical geriatric assessment of the patients combined with a thorough review of their medications; (2) a meeting between the geriatrician and the FP; and (3) clinical follow-up. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was health-related quality of life as assessed by the 15D instrument (score range, 0-1; higher scores indicate better quality of life, with a minimum clinically important change of ±0.015) at week 16. Secondary outcomes included changes in medication appropriateness, physical and cognitive functioning, use of health services, and mortality. RESULTS Among 174 patients (mean [SD] age, 83.3 [7.3] years; 67.8% women; 87 randomized to the intervention group and 87 randomized to the control [usual care] group) in 70 FP clusters (36 intervention and 34 control), 158 (90.8%) completed the trial. The mean (SD) 15D instrument score at baseline was 0.708 (0.121) in the intervention group and 0.714 (0.113) in the control group. At week 16, the mean (SD) 15D instrument score was 0.698 (0.164) in the intervention group and 0.655 (0.184) in the control group, with an estimated between-group difference of 0.045 (95% CI, 0.004-0.086; P = .03). Several secondary outcomes were also in favor of the intervention. There were more drug withdrawals, reduced dosages, and new drug regimens started in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study's findings indicate that, among older patients exposed to polypharmacy, clinical geriatric assessments and collaborative medication reviews carried out by a geriatrician in cooperation with the patient's FP can result in positive effects on health-related quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02379455.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Romskaug
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eva Skovlund
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.,Division of Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jørund Straand
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Espen Molden
- School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Center for Psychopharmacology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege Kersten
- School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway.,Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Kaisu H Pitkala
- Department of General Practice, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Unit of Primary Health Care, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Christofer Lundqvist
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Health Service Research Unit, Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Torgeir B Wyller
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Laatikainen O, Sneck S, Turpeinen M. The Risks and Outcomes Resulting From Medication Errors Reported in the Finnish Tertiary Care Units:: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Register Study. Front Pharmacol 2020; 10:1571. [PMID: 32009966 PMCID: PMC6978730 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Hospital-acquired medication errors (MEs) are common in health care. Although voluntary reporting is criticized for not producing reliable estimates on ME frequency, it provides valuable knowledge on errors occurring in the medication process. Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze and determine the risks and outcomes resulting from MEs related to the TOP15 medicines in the Finnish tertiary care units from July 2016 to July 2017. Methods: The data consisting of 1,447 ME reports was organized according to ATC classification, after which TOP15 medicines involved in the reports were selected. Inductive content analysis was performed to the reports. After this, the reports were categorized by ME outcome into five categories and further analyzed accordingly. Results: The most common ME outcome in the reports was "omitted medicine" (33.9%). More than a quarter (27.1%) of ME reports were estimated to cause moderate or severe risk to the patient. When compared with each other, none of the outcome groups were more susceptible to high-risk events (p = 0.71). Of the TOP15 medicines, only Norepinephrine had significantly higher risk of being involved in high-risk events (OR 2.43, 95%CI 1.35-4.61). Conclusion: Voluntary reporting has an important role in the development of medication safety and the overall medication process within organizations. Although majority of the TOP15 medicines were involved in MEs resulting in seemingly high-risk outcomes, they were estimated to be insignificant or minor within the reporting unit. In the future, more emphasis will be needed for the assessment and analysis of the reports for more efficient, real-time detection and response to signals from health care units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Outi Laatikainen
- Research Unit of Biomedicine, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, and Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Sami Sneck
- Administration Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Miia Turpeinen
- Research Unit of Biomedicine, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, and Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Administration Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|