Evidence synthesis based on non-randomised studies-a critical review of studies leading to conclusions on fall risk properties of loop diuretics/beta-blockers

Methodological issues in research on drug-related admissions: A meta-epidemiological review with focus on causality assessments

AIM

To investigate methodological aspects potentially related to the diverging scientific literature on the prevalence of drug-related hospitalisations, focusing on causality assessments.

METHODS

Original studies contributing data to a recent meta-analysis were reviewed. Methodological aspects, in particular those related to causality assessments, were extracted and compiled.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies provided data on the prevalence of drug-related admissions. Seven studies focused on adverse drug reactions (prevalences 1.3-10%), and six studies used the broader concept of drug-related problems (prevalences 4.5-41%). In 10 out of 13 studies, causality between the drug and the specified problem was assessed. One study required a probable causal relationship; the remaining studies merely required a possible causal relationship. Five studies assessed the association between the problem assumed to be related to drug therapy and the admission, at one end requiring the former to be demonstrated as the underlying cause and, at the other, merely requiring a temporal relationship between drug intake and admission. Three out of eight studies involving multiple assessors for all/some cases reported the inter-rater agreement, ranging from none to almost perfect. Physicians were involved in the assessments in five studies, reporting prevalences of 3.2% to 4.5%, while studies without such medical input reported prevalences of 8.8% to 41%.

CONCLUSIONS

This review illustrates that methodological issues contribute to the diverse literature on drug-related admissions. We provide suggestions for harmonisation of research, including explicitly assessing the drug-problem-admission relationships from a medical perspective, focusing on problems where the drug treatment is the probable culprit.

Anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and immunomodulatory treatment in children with symptoms corresponding to the research condition PANS (Pediatric Acute-onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome): A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To assess effects of treatment against a hypothesized neuroinflammation in children with symptoms corresponding to the research condition Pediatric Acute-onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome (PANS) which is not included in current diagnostic systems.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches were performed (1998 to June 2020) in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and HTA databases. Inclusion criteria: patients (P) were children (<18 years) with PANS; intervention (I)/comparison (C) was use of, versus no use of, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial or immunomodulating treatments; outcomes (O) were health-related quality of life (HRQL), level of functioning, symptom change, and complications.

RESULTS

Four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and three non-RCTs, including 23 to 98 patients, fulfilled the PICO. HRQL was not investigated in any study. Regarding level of functioning, two RCTs investigated antibiotics (penicillin V, azithromycin) and one RCT investigated immunomodulating treatments (intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), plasma exchange). Regarding symptoms, two non-RCTs investigated anti-inflammatory treatment (cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors, corticosteroids), two RCTs and one non-RCT investigated antibiotics (penicillin V, azithromycin), and two RCTs investigated immunomodulating treatments (IVIG, plasma exchange). Complications, reported in five studies, were consistent with those listed in the summary of products characteristics (SPC). All studies were assessed to have some or major problems regarding directness, the absence of an established diagnosis contributing to clinical diversity in the studied populations. All studies were assessed to have major risk of bias, including selection and detection biases. Due to clinical and methodological diversity, meta-analyses were not performed.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review reveals very low certainty of evidence of beneficial effects, and moderate certainty of evidence of adverse effects, of anti-inflammatory, antibacterial or immunomodulating treatments in patients with symptoms corresponding to the research condition PANS. Available evidence neither supports nor excludes potential beneficial effects, but supports that such treatment can result in adverse effects.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42020155714).

Personalised medicine and the decision to withhold chemotherapy in early breast cancer with intermediate risk of recurrence - a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the evidence for decision making, at the health care and the patient levels, regarding the use of gene expression assays to inform chemotherapy decisions in breast cancer patients with intermediate clinical risk of recurrence.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches were performed (January 2002-April 2020) in Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and HTA databases.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

patients (P) were individuals with post-surgical breast cancer at intermediate clinical risk of recurrence; intervention (I)/comparison (C) was (i) use of, versus no use of, a gene expression assay and (ii) withholding versus providing chemotherapy; outcomes (O) were overall survival (OS), health-related quality of life (HRQL), and recurrence. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed where possible.

RESULTS

Three inconclusive non-RCTs, respectively, compared OS and recurrence with and without a gene expression assay. No studies investigated HRQL. Regarding the comparison withholding versus providing chemotherapy based on a gene expression assay, one RCT and four non-RCTs evaluated OS. In the RCT, 93.9% (I) versus 93.8% (C) were alive at 9 years. Three RCTs and seven non-RCTs evaluated recurrence. Three RCTs could be pooled regarding distant recurrence; 4.29% versus 3.88% had such an event (risk ratio: 1.12 (95% confidence interval: 0.90 to 1.39).

CONCLUSION

Regarding the use of gene expression assays in breast cancer, evidence on patient effects, informing patient-level chemotherapy decision making, is available. However, evidence for prioritisation at the overall health care level, i.e. use of, versus no use of, such assays, is largely lacking.