Duplicate prescriptions-proposal of a clinically oriented categorisation

Development and validation of a clinical decision support system to prevent anticoagulant duplications

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Unintended duplicate prescriptions of anticoagulants increase the risk of serious adverse events. Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) can help prevent such medication errors; however, sophisticated algorithms are needed to avoid alert fatigue. This article describes the steps taken in our hospital to develop a CDSS to prevent anticoagulant duplication (AD).

METHODS

The project was composed of three phases. In phase I, the status quo was established. In phase II, a clinical pharmacist developed an algorithm to detect ADs using daily data exports. In phase III, the algorithm was integrated into the hospital's electronic health record system. Alerts were reviewed by clinical pharmacists before being sent to the prescribing physician. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all three phases to assess the impact of the interventions on the occurrence and duration of ADs. Phase III was analyzed in more detail regarding the acceptance rate, sensitivity, and specificity of the alerts.

RESULTS

We identified 91 ADs in 1581 patients receiving two or more anticoagulants during phase I, 70 ADs in 1692 patients in phase II, and 57 ADs in 1575 patients in phase III. Mean durations of ADs were 1.8, 1.4, and 1.1 calendar days during phases I, II, and III, respectively. In comparison to the baseline in phase I, the relative risk reduction of AD in patients treated with at least two different anticoagulants during phase III was 42% (RR: 0.58, CI: 0.42-0.81). A total of 429 alerts were generated during phase III, many of which were self-limiting, and 186 alerts were sent to the respective prescribing physician. The acceptance rate was high at 97%. We calculated a sensitivity of 87.4% and a specificity of 87.9%.

CONCLUSION

The stepwise development of a CDSS for the detection of AD markedly reduced the frequency and duration of medication errors in our hospital, thereby improving patient safety.

Characteristics of clinical-pharmacological recommendations in psychiatry in Germany

OBJECTIVE

Psychiatric patients in general, and elderly psychiatric patients in particular, are at risk of adverse drug reactions due to comorbidities and inappropriate polypharmacy. Interdisciplinary and clinical-pharmacologist-led medication reviews may contribute to medication safety in the field of psychiatry. In this study, we reported the frequency and characteristics of clinical-pharmacological recommendations in psychiatry, with a particular focus on geriatric psychiatry.

METHOD

A clinical pharmacologist, in collaboration with the attending psychiatrists and a consulting neurologist, conducted interdisciplinary medication reviews in a general psychiatric ward with a geropsychiatric focus at a university hospital over a 25-week period. All clinical and pharmacological recommendations were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 316 recommendations were made during 374 medication reviews. Indications/contraindications of drugs were the most frequently discussed topics (59/316; 18.7 %), followed by dose reductions (37/316; 11.7 %), and temporary or permanent discontinuation of medications (36/316; 11.4 %). The most frequent recommendations for dose reduction involvedbenzodiazepines (9/37; 24.3 %). An unclear or absent indication was the most common reason for recommending temporary or permanent discontinuation of the medication (6/36; 16.7 %).

CONCLUSION

Interdisciplinary clinical pharmacologist-led medication reviews represented a valuable contribution to medication management in psychiatric patients, particularly the elderly ones.

Sedatives and analgesics are major contributors to potentially inappropriate duplicate prescriptions in geriatric psychiatry

BACKGROUND

This study sought to investigate the frequency and characteristics of duplicate prescriptions (DPs) in elderly psychiatric inpatients using a novel categorisation of DPs that differentiates between appropriate duplicate prescriptions (ADPs) and potentially inappropriate duplicate prescriptions (PIDPs).

METHODS

The study was conducted as a monocentric retrospective cross-sectional pilot study on the gerontopsychiatric ward of the Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy of Hannover Medical School, a large university hospital in northern Germany. The outcome measures were the nature and frequency of PIDPs compared with the frequency of ADPs.

RESULTS

For 92 individual patients a total of 339 medication chart reviews were conducted between April 2021 and February 2022. The median age of the study population was 73 years (interquartile range (IQR) 68-82 years); 64.6% were female. Patients' medications comprised a median of eight drugs (IQR 6-11 drugs) and 43.1% of the study population were exposed to at least one PIDP (at least one grade-1 PIDP: 39.5%; at least one grade-2 PIDP: 5.0%; at least one grade-3 PIDP: 1.5%). Sedatives were most frequently responsible for grade-1 and grade-2 PIDPs, while grade-3 PIDPs were elicited exclusively by analgesics. Nearly half of the study population (49.0%) displayed at least one ADP.

CONCLUSION

Even though the clinical implications of PIDPs are not fully established to date, we recommend that physicians who treat elderly psychiatric patients pay special attention to PIDPs, especially PIDPs elicited by sedatives. Termination of PIDPs may prevent adverse drug reactions and save healthcare expenditures.

Duplicate prescriptions in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To determine the nature and frequency of duplicate prescriptions (DPs) in the emergency department (ED) by utilization of a novel categorization of DPs which differentiates between appropriate DPs (ADPs) and potentially inappropriate DPs (PIDPs).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients who presented to the ED for internal medicine of a large university hospital in northern Germany in 2018 and 2019 were screened for the presence of DPs. Descriptive statistical methods were used to characterize the nature and frequency of PIDPs compared to the frequency of ADPs.

RESULTS

A total of 4208 patients were enrolled into the study. The median age of the study population was 63 years (interquartile range (IQR) 48-77), 53.9% were female. The patients took a median of 5 drugs (IQR 3-9). 10.9% of the study population were affected by at least one PIDP (at least one grade-1 PIDP: 6.1%; at least one grade-2 PIDP: 4.5%; at least one grade-3 PIDP: 1.1%). Non-opioid analgesics accounted for the majority of grade-1 PIDPs, while inhalatives were most frequently responsible for grade-2 and grade-3 PIDPs. Nearly half of the study population (48.6%) displayed at least one ADP.

CONCLUSION

PIDPs pose a frequent pharmacological challenge in the ED. The medication review should comprise a systematic screening for PIDPs with a particular focus on non-opioid analgesics and inhalatives. ADPs were detected more frequently than PIDPs, questioning the predominant notion in the medical literature that DPs are exclusively deleterious.