1
|
Wang Y, Shi J, Dai D, Cai J, Wang S, Hong Y, Zhou S, Zhao F, Zhou Q, Geng P, Zhou Y, Xu X, Luo Q. Evaluation of commonly used cardiovascular drugs in inhibiting vonoprazan metabolism in vitro and in vivo. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:909168. [PMID: 36052128 PMCID: PMC9424819 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.909168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
As a novel acid-suppressing drug, vonoprazan shows the potential to replace traditional proton-pump inhibitors. With its widespread use, some adverse effects that require further study have emerged due to drug–drug interactions. Our study is the first experiment that evaluated the drug–drug interactions of eleven common cardiovascular drugs that inhibit vonoprazan metabolism in vitro and in vivo. Rat liver microsome incubation and molecular simulation docking were applied to explore the inhibition mechanism. Amlodipine and nifedipine showed inhibitory effects on vonoprazan metabolism in both rat and human liver microsomes in the first evaluation part in vitro. The inhibition mechanism analysis results demonstrated that amlodipine and nifedipine might inhibit the metabolism of vonoprazan by a mixed type of competitive and non-competitive inhibition. However, the pharmacokinetic data of the vonoprazan prototype revealed that amlodipine affected vonoprazan in vivo while nifedipine did not. Thus, more attention should be paid when amlodipine is prescribed with vonoprazan. Furthermore, the changes in its carboxylic acid metabolites MI hinted at a complex situation. Molecular simulation suggested the CYP2B6 enzyme may contribute more to this than CYP3A4, and further inhibitory experiments preliminarily verified this speculation. In conclusion, the use of vonoprazan with cardiovascular drugs, especially amlodipine, should receive particular attention in clinical prescriptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiran Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Peking University Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jihua Shi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Dapeng Dai
- The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology of National Health Commission, Beijing, China
| | - Jianping Cai
- The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology of National Health Commission, Beijing, China
| | - Shuanghu Wang
- Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People’s Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, China
| | - Yun Hong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Shan Zhou
- The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology of National Health Commission, Beijing, China
| | - Fangling Zhao
- Peking University Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
- The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology of National Health Commission, Beijing, China
| | - Quan Zhou
- Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People’s Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, China
| | - Peiwu Geng
- Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People’s Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, China
| | - Yunfang Zhou
- Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People’s Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, China
| | - Xue Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Qingfeng Luo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Qingfeng Luo,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shin CM. Acid Suppressive Drugs. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF HELICOBACTER AND UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL RESEARCH 2022. [DOI: 10.7704/kjhugr.2022.0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Histamine H<sub>2</sub> receptor antagonists (H<sub>2</sub>RAs) suppress gastric acid production by blocking H<sub>2</sub> receptors in parietal cells. Studies have shown that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are superior to H<sub>2</sub>RAs as a treatment for acid-related disorders, such as peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). PPIs reduce gastric acid production by irreversibly inhibiting the H<sup>+</sup>/K<sup>+</sup> ATPase pump, and they also increase gastric emptying. Although PPIs have differing pharmacokinetic properties, each PPI is effective in managing GERD and PUDs. However, PPIs have some limitations, including short plasma half-lives, breakthrough symptoms (especially at night), meal-associated dosing, and concerns associated with long-term PPI use. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) provide more rapid and profound suppression of intragastric acidity than PPIs. P-CABs are non-inferior to lansoprazole in healing erosive esophagitis and peptic ulcers, and may also be effective in improving symptoms in patients with non-erosive reflux disease. Acid suppressive drugs are the most commonly used drugs in clinical practice, and it is necessary to understand the pharmacological properties and adverse effects of each drug.
Collapse
|
3
|
Influence of daily versus alternate-day dosing of vonoprazan on intragastric pH, serum gastrin, and the antiplatelet function of clopidogrel : Influence of alternate-day dosing of vonoprazan. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 78:955-963. [PMID: 35445847 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03313-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, inhibits gastric acid secretion and attenuates the antiplatelet function of clopidogrel more potently than esomeprazole. We investigated whether alternate-day dosing of vonoprazan might avoid this interaction with clopidogrel while providing sufficient gastric acid inhibition. METHODS Following 24 h of pH monitoring (control regimen), 12 healthy volunteers received three regimens (clopidogrel-only regimen: clopidogrel 75 mg daily [q.d.]; vonoprazan alternate-day regimen: vonoprazan 10 mg every other day [q.o.d.] + clopidogrel 75 mg q.d.; vonoprazan daily regimen: vonoprazan 10 mg q.d. + clopidogrel 75 mg q.d.) for 14 days in a randomized open-label crossover manner. Intragastric pH monitoring was performed for 24 h on day 13 in the clopidogrel-only and vonoprazan q.d. regimens and for 48 h on days 13 and 14 in the vonoprazan q.o.d. regimen. Serum gastrin and inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) were measured before the commencement of pH monitoring in each regimen. RESULTS Twelve volunteers completed the study. Equivalent median IPA values in the q.o.d. and q.d. regimens were measured (21.8% and 25%, respectively) and were significantly lower than that with the clopidogrel-only regimen (40.8%). The median pH4 holding time ratio for the vonoprazan q.o.d. regimen (49.7%) was superior to that of the clopidogrel-only regimen (18.4%), but was significantly inferior to that of the vonoprazan q.d. regimen (77.0%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Alternate-day administration of vonoprazan could not prevent the interaction between vonoprazan and clopidogrel, and acid inhibition was inferior to that with vonoprazan daily administration. Alternate-day administration of vonoprazan thus appears to be of questionable clinical utility.
Collapse
|